<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="bbPress/1.1" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>Nikon Rumors Forum &#187; Topic: Coolpix    P...</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=2145</link>
		<description>where there’s smoke there’s forum fire</description>
		<language>en-US</language>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 20:57:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<generator>http://bbpress.org/?v=1.1</generator>
		<textInput>
			<title><![CDATA[Search]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[Search all topics from these forums.]]></description>
			<name>q</name>
			<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/search.php</link>
		</textInput>
		<atom:link href="http://nikonrumors.com/forum/rss.php?topic=2145" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />

		<item>
			<title>ShadeofBlue on "Coolpix    P..."</title>
			<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=2145#post-43551</link>
			<pubDate>Mon, 20 Sep 2010 16:53:30 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>ShadeofBlue</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">43551@http://nikonrumors.com/forum/</guid>
			<description><blockquote><p><cite>bernard <a href="http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=2145#post-42494">said</a>:</cite><br />
I never knew that P&#38;S only went up to f8…
</p></blockquote>
<p>If you are looking to increase your depth of field, you don't really need to worry about f-stop on a compact. On the wide end the P7000 is 5mm I think? Even on the long end you are probably always shooting at hyperfocal distance by f/8. Also, you are way into diffraction being relevant by f/8 on a compact, so f/11 would probably just blur the whole image more.
</p></description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Gareth on "Coolpix    P..."</title>
			<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=2145#post-43523</link>
			<pubDate>Mon, 20 Sep 2010 08:43:12 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Gareth</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">43523@http://nikonrumors.com/forum/</guid>
			<description><p>tried one of these yesterday.</p>
<p>needless to say, my wife and i much prefer my old canon sx10is.</p>
<p>the p7000 has a horrible plastic body. the scroll is very small and hard to use. in manual i could use the scroller wheel for the aperture, but how the hell do i adjust shutter speed?</p>
<p>clunky toy feel.</p>
<p>but it does have a lot of buttons, and may take reasoable shot.</p>
<p>if i liked point and shoot my money would go to canon.</p>
<p>ironic that i love the heavy metal feel of the nikon slrs but their top of the line "G11 killer" feels like a toy compared to a canon. </p>
<p>the 5d feels like a toy compared to my d700 though.
</p></description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>bernard on "Coolpix    P..."</title>
			<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=2145#post-42494</link>
			<pubDate>Sat, 11 Sep 2010 18:33:54 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>bernard</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">42494@http://nikonrumors.com/forum/</guid>
			<description><blockquote><p><cite>Gareth <a href="http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=2145#post-42477">said</a>:</cite><br />
lol there is no way the p7000 p+s is going to rival a 4/3 camera. esp. the nex5 the sensor is tiny!</p>
<p>look at this</p>
<p><a href="http://www.imaging-resource.com/PRODS/P7000/P7000A.HTM" rel="nofollow">http://www.imaging-resource.com/PRODS/P7000/P7000A.HTM</a></p>
<p>compared to this</p>
<p><a href="http://www.imaging-resource.com/PRODS/NEX5/NEX5A.HTM" rel="nofollow">http://www.imaging-resource.com/PRODS/NEX5/NEX5A.HTM</a></p>
<p>the nex5 has better iso1600 than a d5000!</p>
<p>it will be really interesting to see nikons EVIL camera. then we might have a challenger.
</p></blockquote>
<p>Thanks to both of you ! Very interesting reading :o)<br />
I never knew that P&#38;S only went up to f8…<br />
I know why I love my D300 and lenses so much ! :oD
</p></description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Super Shooter on "Coolpix    P..."</title>
			<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=2145#post-42493</link>
			<pubDate>Sat, 11 Sep 2010 17:39:58 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Super Shooter</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">42493@http://nikonrumors.com/forum/</guid>
			<description><p>I don't need to wait for a review because as gareth mentions there is no way the P7000's small sensor is going to match must less exceed a bigger sensor from a NEX like camera. As for your previous question about DOF Bernard, you can't get DSLR-like Depth-of-Field from such a small sensor. It's pretty common for point &#38; shoots to only be able to go up to f8.
</p></description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Gareth on "Coolpix    P..."</title>
			<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=2145#post-42477</link>
			<pubDate>Sat, 11 Sep 2010 09:32:05 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Gareth</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">42477@http://nikonrumors.com/forum/</guid>
			<description><p>lol there is no way the p7000 p+s is going to rival a 4/3 camera. esp. the nex5 the sensor is tiny!</p>
<p>look at this</p>
<p><a href="http://www.imaging-resource.com/PRODS/P7000/P7000A.HTM" rel="nofollow">http://www.imaging-resource.com/PRODS/P7000/P7000A.HTM</a></p>
<p>compared to this</p>
<p><a href="http://www.imaging-resource.com/PRODS/NEX5/NEX5A.HTM" rel="nofollow">http://www.imaging-resource.com/PRODS/NEX5/NEX5A.HTM</a></p>
<p>the nex5 has better iso1600 than a d5000!</p>
<p>it will be really interesting to see nikons EVIL camera. then we might have a challenger.
</p></description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>bernard on "Coolpix    P..."</title>
			<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=2145#post-42474</link>
			<pubDate>Sat, 11 Sep 2010 06:19:55 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>bernard</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">42474@http://nikonrumors.com/forum/</guid>
			<description><blockquote><p><cite>Super Shooter <a href="http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=2145#post-42312">said</a>:</cite><br />
I think the P7000 is too little too late. It doesn't kill the Canon G11 like Nikon said it would. It's just a G11 copy that doesn't really do anything that much better then the G11 or 12. It pretty much just equals them.
</p></blockquote>
<p>Wait till you can actually try one or read some serious field test… :o)
</p></description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>heartyfisher on "Coolpix    P..."</title>
			<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=2145#post-42398</link>
			<pubDate>Fri, 10 Sep 2010 09:37:59 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>heartyfisher</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">42398@http://nikonrumors.com/forum/</guid>
			<description><p>hey johnny.. what do you think? how does the spec and samples compare to your nex?
</p></description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Super Shooter on "Coolpix    P..."</title>
			<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=2145#post-42312</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 20:46:17 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Super Shooter</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">42312@http://nikonrumors.com/forum/</guid>
			<description><p>I think the P7000 is too little too late. It doesn't kill the Canon G11 like Nikon said it would. It's just a G11 copy that doesn't really do anything that much better then the G11 or 12. It pretty much just equals them.
</p></description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>bernard on "Coolpix    P..."</title>
			<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=2145#post-42284</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 11:06:18 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>bernard</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">42284@http://nikonrumors.com/forum/</guid>
			<description><p>Reading everything I can find on the Internet about the P7000, I found that the French Nikon site says the video is 30 fps, not 24. Is that good or bad ? (I've never used a photo camera for video).</p>
<p>Also, I've read somewhere that the minimum f number is 8, and that's why they have included a neutral grey filter. What about the effect on the depth of field ?
</p></description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>bernard on "Coolpix    P..."</title>
			<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=2145#post-42281</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 10:12:07 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>bernard</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">42281@http://nikonrumors.com/forum/</guid>
			<description><p>To me, a viewfinder, even if it's not quite 100% is invaluable, and that rules out the nex5, but it's everyone's choice of course.</p>
<p>Hey ! Xmas is coming soon :o)
</p></description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>heartyfisher on "Coolpix    P..."</title>
			<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=2145#post-42272</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 07:25:51 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>heartyfisher</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">42272@http://nikonrumors.com/forum/</guid>
			<description><p>Samples look great! price may be a bit steep though.. will have to wait a bit for the price to drop..  but really looks like a good package!  however, the nex5 may be a better deal?
</p></description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>bernard on "Coolpix    P..."</title>
			<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=2145#post-42262</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 02:57:18 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>bernard</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">42262@http://nikonrumors.com/forum/</guid>
			<description><p>P7000 at long last !!!</p>
<p>If the tests are as good as its promises, it's mine !!!</p>
<p>OK, it's not a rangefinder, but look at the specs… They fulfil almost everyone's dreams.</p>
<p>What I need to know before falling for it is the viewfinder coverage (Mmmm…), and the delay between the moment I depress the shutter and the moment the picture is taken (I guess that's quite good ?)</p>
<p>Any info on those will be appreciated. Thanks !
</p></description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>NikoDoby on "Coolpix    P..."</title>
			<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=2145#post-36659</link>
			<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jun 2010 03:05:47 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>NikoDoby</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">36659@http://nikonrumors.com/forum/</guid>
			<description><p>??? Not sure what you mean? Most COOLPIXes already share parts with Sony especially the  image sensors. So thats not really something new.
</p></description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Huggs on "Coolpix    P..."</title>
			<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=2145#post-36654</link>
			<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jun 2010 01:26:35 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Huggs</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">36654@http://nikonrumors.com/forum/</guid>
			<description><p>I'm looking forward to the P6k replacement. It may be a Sony influenced product.
</p></description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>NikoDoby on "Coolpix    P..."</title>
			<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=2145#post-35705</link>
			<pubDate>Mon, 24 May 2010 17:38:15 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>NikoDoby</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">35705@http://nikonrumors.com/forum/</guid>
			<description><p>Hello lucasc </p>
<p>The P6000 has been discontinued since Aug. or Oct. of last year. Nikon have said they are working on a "canon G11 killer" but have yet to make any announcements as to when it will be released. It will probably show up in September of this year.
</p></description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>lucasc on "Coolpix    P..."</title>
			<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=2145#post-35700</link>
			<pubDate>Mon, 24 May 2010 15:37:58 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>lucasc</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">35700@http://nikonrumors.com/forum/</guid>
			<description><p>Hi.<br />
In many stores the Coolpix P6000 is reported as "discontinued". A new Coolpix, P serie, is coming soon?
</p></description>
		</item>

	</channel>
</rss>
