<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="bbPress/1.1" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>Nikon Rumors Forum &#187; Topic: Thoughts on Sigma 100-300 F/4</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=2113</link>
		<description>where there’s smoke there’s forum fire</description>
		<language>en-US</language>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 01:04:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<generator>http://bbpress.org/?v=1.1</generator>
		<textInput>
			<title><![CDATA[Search]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[Search all topics from these forums.]]></description>
			<name>q</name>
			<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/search.php</link>
		</textInput>
		<atom:link href="http://nikonrumors.com/forum/rss.php?topic=2113" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />

		<item>
			<title>adamz on "Thoughts on Sigma 100-300 F/4"</title>
			<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=2113#post-35463</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 20 May 2010 09:17:36 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>adamz</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">35463@http://nikonrumors.com/forum/</guid>
			<description><p>Newfle - after You tweak Your TC a little bit it should - need to get rid of one piece of metal on the mount
</p></description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>ebfoxbat on "Thoughts on Sigma 100-300 F/4"</title>
			<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=2113#post-35458</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 20 May 2010 08:44:15 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>ebfoxbat</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">35458@http://nikonrumors.com/forum/</guid>
			<description><p>The Sigma 1.4x TC allows for autofocus. The Sigma 2.0x (and all non-Sigma)TC allow for only manual focus.</p>
<p>The limited reviews I could find on the 100-300 seem to suggest that it maintains relatively good IQ with the Sigma 1.4x TC.</p>
<p>This is my first non-plastic cheapo lens other than the new 50mm 1.4 AFS.
</p></description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>PB PM on "Thoughts on Sigma 100-300 F/4"</title>
			<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=2113#post-35343</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 18 May 2010 17:27:13 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>PB PM</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">35343@http://nikonrumors.com/forum/</guid>
			<description><p>I think you have to us Sigma TCs with Sigma lenses.
</p></description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Newfie on "Thoughts on Sigma 100-300 F/4"</title>
			<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=2113#post-35342</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 18 May 2010 17:24:48 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Newfie</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">35342@http://nikonrumors.com/forum/</guid>
			<description><p>Will this lens accept the TC-17?
</p></description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>adamz on "Thoughts on Sigma 100-300 F/4"</title>
			<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=2113#post-35323</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 18 May 2010 12:57:44 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>adamz</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">35323@http://nikonrumors.com/forum/</guid>
			<description><p>one of the best, if not the best sigma lens - great price, nice handling, fast and reasonable priced (before the price went up), anyway a good choice - the only con - Sigma
</p></description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>AHIKERAHIKER on "Thoughts on Sigma 100-300 F/4"</title>
			<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=2113#post-35315</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 18 May 2010 11:45:30 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>AHIKERAHIKER</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">35315@http://nikonrumors.com/forum/</guid>
			<description><p>I have had this lens for almost a year now.  I researched it extensively and thought long and hard and finally bought it for $1230 from 47th street in NYC.  It is a wonderful lens!<br />
I got involved in bird photography last fall and took it to the Everglades in Feb/march of this year.  I found that I could, with relative ease, capture birds in flight while hand holding the lens.  It has been great with either my D300 or my D700.  I couldn't be happier.  I also got some terrific "airborne snowmobiles" last winter due mainly to the fact that the sun on the snow was so bright that I was shooting at 1/1600 second and faster.  Hand holding under those conditions is a breeze!!  I really think most folks would be very happy with this lens.<br />
Gordon
</p></description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>tcole1983 on "Thoughts on Sigma 100-300 F/4"</title>
			<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=2113#post-35314</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 18 May 2010 11:40:38 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>tcole1983</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">35314@http://nikonrumors.com/forum/</guid>
			<description><p>+1 on a review and pics.  I think we can all benefit from personal reviews of many of the lenses.
</p></description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>heartyfisher on "Thoughts on Sigma 100-300 F/4"</title>
			<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=2113#post-35312</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 18 May 2010 11:26:55 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>heartyfisher</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">35312@http://nikonrumors.com/forum/</guid>
			<description><p>I must say I have not heard of this lens.. but the reviews seem glowing ! :-) Congrats .. Hope your copy is great! Put some pictures up and do a mini review?
</p></description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>ebfoxbat on "Thoughts on Sigma 100-300 F/4"</title>
			<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=2113#post-35306</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 18 May 2010 09:21:42 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>ebfoxbat</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">35306@http://nikonrumors.com/forum/</guid>
			<description><p>I just ordered it, used. The longest lens I have now is a 55-200 (which is great at f8) but this should be a different class of glass.</p>
<p>I shoot surfing a lot, which is often at f8-f16, but I think the extra 100mm will be nice. I understand it's a bit soft from 200-300.</p>
<p>Thoughts?
</p></description>
		</item>

	</channel>
</rss>
