<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="bbPress/1.1" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>Nikon Rumors Forum &#187; Topic: Leica M9 Ranks 23 On DxO Mark. Right below D300S</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=1789</link>
		<description>where there’s smoke there’s forum fire</description>
		<language>en-US</language>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 16:48:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<generator>http://bbpress.org/?v=1.1</generator>
		<textInput>
			<title><![CDATA[Search]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[Search all topics from these forums.]]></description>
			<name>q</name>
			<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/search.php</link>
		</textInput>
		<atom:link href="http://nikonrumors.com/forum/rss.php?topic=1789" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />

		<item>
			<title>kanuck on "Leica M9 Ranks 23 On DxO Mark. Right below D300S"</title>
			<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=1789#post-30371</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 23 Mar 2010 20:16:49 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>kanuck</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">30371@http://nikonrumors.com/forum/</guid>
			<description><p>I'm not surprised but I would be a little upset for my 7 grand. Leicas can't compete with an all around do everything camera. The M9 basically gets destroyed by its low light ability otherwise it would have scored well or at least in the top 10. Leica shooters generally don't care and will buy the body anyways. Look at all the flaws the M8 had and people went out and bought it no questions asked. Even when problems were widely reported about the UV on the sensor...
</p></description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>kyoshinikon on "Leica M9 Ranks 23 On DxO Mark. Right below D300S"</title>
			<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=1789#post-30369</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 23 Mar 2010 20:06:25 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>kyoshinikon</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">30369@http://nikonrumors.com/forum/</guid>
			<description><blockquote><p><cite>NikoDoby <a href="http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=1789#post-30241">said</a>:</cite><br />
Both you and KR :^)<br />
</blockquote>
  ROFL!!!!</p>
<p>The almost perfect for it's class D90 ranks #17 as opposed to it's direct rivals which are numbers 24 (Samsung Gx 20), 34 (Pentax K20d), 39(Sony a550),and the 49(Canon 50D).  </p>
<p>It's indirect rivals are also below it too #18 D5000, #22 D300s, #26 D300, #27 Sony A700, #32 7D, #33 550D, and etc...
</p></description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>bmxdad on "Leica M9 Ranks 23 On DxO Mark. Right below D300S"</title>
			<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=1789#post-30278</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 23 Mar 2010 00:50:17 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>bmxdad</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">30278@http://nikonrumors.com/forum/</guid>
			<description><blockquote><p><cite>NikoDoby <a href="http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=1789#post-30216">said</a>:</cite><br />
No sorry, the D300 "only" ranks in at #26 on the list :^(<br />
But hey you can still laugh in the face of canon 7D(#32) and 1Dmk2(N)(#28 &#38; 29), users! That's almost as good :^)
</p></blockquote>
<p>No better actually and laugh I will</p>
<p>Pete
</p></description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>NSXType-R on "Leica M9 Ranks 23 On DxO Mark. Right below D300S"</title>
			<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=1789#post-30272</link>
			<pubDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 23:40:23 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>NSXType-R</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">30272@http://nikonrumors.com/forum/</guid>
			<description><blockquote><p><cite>NikoDoby <a href="http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=1789#post-30241">said</a>:</cite><br />
Both you and KR :^)
</p></blockquote>
<p>Think about it, I'm getting great bang for the buck.  The D40 was announced what, 4 years ago?  That's ancient!
</p></description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>poster on "Leica M9 Ranks 23 On DxO Mark. Right below D300S"</title>
			<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=1789#post-30254</link>
			<pubDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 21:07:47 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>poster</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">30254@http://nikonrumors.com/forum/</guid>
			<description><blockquote><p><cite>PB PM <a href="http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=1789#post-30252">said</a>:</cite><br />
You do realize that the M9 is a 35mm camera right, not 4/3?
</p></blockquote>
<p>Yup, I don't care really. I want a small portable camera. Be it 4/3 35mm or whatever.
</p></description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>NikoDoby on "Leica M9 Ranks 23 On DxO Mark. Right below D300S"</title>
			<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=1789#post-30253</link>
			<pubDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 21:06:02 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>NikoDoby</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">30253@http://nikonrumors.com/forum/</guid>
			<description><p><a href="http://www.dxomark.com/index.php/eng/DxOMark-Sensor" rel="nofollow">http://www.dxomark.com/index.php/eng/DxOMark-Sensor</a></p>
<p>Just remember that this ranking only factors in the sensor and ignores all other qualities of individual cameras. But we won't complain about that until canon gets a camera into the top 5 ;^)
</p></description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>PB PM on "Leica M9 Ranks 23 On DxO Mark. Right below D300S"</title>
			<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=1789#post-30252</link>
			<pubDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 21:00:02 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>PB PM</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">30252@http://nikonrumors.com/forum/</guid>
			<description><blockquote><p><cite>poster <a href="http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=1789#post-30249">said</a>:</cite><br />
yeah but I still prefer Leica for it's size. Come on nikon micro 4/3 system would be a nice spring present for me!
</p></blockquote>
<p>You do realize that the M9 is a 35mm camera right, not 4/3?
</p></description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>smarterchild on "Leica M9 Ranks 23 On DxO Mark. Right below D300S"</title>
			<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=1789#post-30251</link>
			<pubDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 20:48:38 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>smarterchild</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">30251@http://nikonrumors.com/forum/</guid>
			<description><p>Im not surprised at the D40.</p>
<p>where can i find the report?
</p></description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>poster on "Leica M9 Ranks 23 On DxO Mark. Right below D300S"</title>
			<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=1789#post-30249</link>
			<pubDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 20:34:22 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>poster</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">30249@http://nikonrumors.com/forum/</guid>
			<description><p>yeah but I still prefer Leica for it's size. Come on nikon micro 4/3 system would be a nice spring present for me!
</p></description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>NikoDoby on "Leica M9 Ranks 23 On DxO Mark. Right below D300S"</title>
			<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=1789#post-30241</link>
			<pubDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 19:07:16 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>NikoDoby</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">30241@http://nikonrumors.com/forum/</guid>
			<description><blockquote><p><cite>NSXType-R <a href="http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=1789#post-30237">said</a>:</cite><br />
I'm surprised the D40 is 71st on the list.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Both you and KR :^)
</p></description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>NSXType-R on "Leica M9 Ranks 23 On DxO Mark. Right below D300S"</title>
			<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=1789#post-30237</link>
			<pubDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 18:59:59 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>NSXType-R</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">30237@http://nikonrumors.com/forum/</guid>
			<description><p>I'm surprised the D40 is 71st on the list.
</p></description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>stm93 on "Leica M9 Ranks 23 On DxO Mark. Right below D300S"</title>
			<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=1789#post-30217</link>
			<pubDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 17:23:18 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>stm93</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">30217@http://nikonrumors.com/forum/</guid>
			<description><p>Yeah, in your face Canon 7D! Ha-ha! :D
</p></description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>NikoDoby on "Leica M9 Ranks 23 On DxO Mark. Right below D300S"</title>
			<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=1789#post-30216</link>
			<pubDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 17:05:16 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>NikoDoby</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">30216@http://nikonrumors.com/forum/</guid>
			<description><p>No sorry, the D300 "only" ranks in at #26 on the list :^(<br />
But hey you can still laugh in the face of canon 7D(#32) and 1Dmk2(N)(#28 &#38; 29), users! That's almost as good :^)
</p></description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>stm93 on "Leica M9 Ranks 23 On DxO Mark. Right below D300S"</title>
			<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=1789#post-30213</link>
			<pubDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 16:53:02 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>stm93</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">30213@http://nikonrumors.com/forum/</guid>
			<description><p>i own D300. can i still laugh? :)
</p></description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>NikoDoby on "Leica M9 Ranks 23 On DxO Mark. Right below D300S"</title>
			<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=1789#post-30211</link>
			<pubDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 16:44:35 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>NikoDoby</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">30211@http://nikonrumors.com/forum/</guid>
			<description><p>This might surprise some but I'm really not that surprised. So all of you D300S owners can now laugh in the face of Leica M9 owners everywhere :^)
</p></description>
		</item>

	</channel>
</rss>
