<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="bbPress/1.1" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>Nikon Rumors Forum &#187; Topic: This Samsung Camera would have been a great P6000 replacement</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=1607</link>
		<description>where there’s smoke there’s forum fire</description>
		<language>en-US</language>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 May 2013 03:04:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<generator>http://bbpress.org/?v=1.1</generator>
		<textInput>
			<title><![CDATA[Search]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[Search all topics from these forums.]]></description>
			<name>q</name>
			<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/search.php</link>
		</textInput>
		<atom:link href="http://nikonrumors.com/forum/rss.php?topic=1607" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />

		<item>
			<title>NSXType-R on "This Samsung Camera would have been a great P6000 replacement"</title>
			<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=1607#post-27789</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 19:11:24 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>NSXType-R</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">27789@http://nikonrumors.com/forum/</guid>
			<description><p>The Canon SD90 is around $400, although it can be had for less.  But yeah, this is a bit too expensive.
</p></description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>adamz on "This Samsung Camera would have been a great P6000 replacement"</title>
			<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=1607#post-27765</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 16:54:14 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>adamz</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">27765@http://nikonrumors.com/forum/</guid>
			<description><p>the price is ridiculously high - way to expensive
</p></description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>NikoDoby on "This Samsung Camera would have been a great P6000 replacement"</title>
			<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=1607#post-27727</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 13:31:47 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>NikoDoby</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">27727@http://nikonrumors.com/forum/</guid>
			<description><p>It's going in the right direction but I think it's waay too expensive for what it is. Especially since it doesn't even have HD video. Image quality has to be spectacular in order to do well against new cameras from Sony, Panasonic and canon.
</p></description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>bmxdad on "This Samsung Camera would have been a great P6000 replacement"</title>
			<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=1607#post-27721</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 10:41:54 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>bmxdad</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">27721@http://nikonrumors.com/forum/</guid>
			<description><p>The new announced Samsung TL500/EX1 is actually a great looking camera with a larger 10MP sensor and fast high quality zoom.  If Nikon made a similar Camera they would have a great P6000 replacement</p>
<p><a href="http://www.dpreview.com/news/1002/10022005samsungex1.asp" rel="nofollow">http://www.dpreview.com/news/1002/10022005samsungex1.asp</a></p>
<p>What do you think</p>
<p>Pete
</p></description>
		</item>

	</channel>
</rss>
