<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="bbPress/1.1" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>Nikon Rumors Forum &#187; Topic: D800/900 Challenger?</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=1473</link>
		<description>where there’s smoke there’s forum fire</description>
		<language>en-US</language>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 09:44:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<generator>http://bbpress.org/?v=1.1</generator>
		<textInput>
			<title><![CDATA[Search]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[Search all topics from these forums.]]></description>
			<name>q</name>
			<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/search.php</link>
		</textInput>
		<atom:link href="http://nikonrumors.com/forum/rss.php?topic=1473" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />

		<item>
			<title>PB PM on "D800/900 Challenger?"</title>
			<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=1473#post-25796</link>
			<pubDate>Sun, 07 Feb 2010 22:03:17 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>PB PM</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">25796@http://nikonrumors.com/forum/</guid>
			<description><p>No kidding. Of course there are some Canon photographers who feel the issue is more do with quality control, than actually having a bad system. I've read a few blogs from photographers who shoot with 5D MkIIs and they think the AF is just fine.
</p></description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>NikoDoby on "D800/900 Challenger?"</title>
			<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=1473#post-25794</link>
			<pubDate>Sun, 07 Feb 2010 21:29:05 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>NikoDoby</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">25794@http://nikonrumors.com/forum/</guid>
			<description><p>What I meant is that the 5D had crappy AF and they STILL didn't fix it with the 5D2 after 3 years. 3 years is a long time in technology.
</p></description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>PB PM on "D800/900 Challenger?"</title>
			<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=1473#post-25792</link>
			<pubDate>Sun, 07 Feb 2010 21:22:09 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>PB PM</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">25792@http://nikonrumors.com/forum/</guid>
			<description><blockquote><p><cite>NikoDoby <a href="http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=1473#post-25787">said</a>:</cite><br />
But the 5Dmk1 had that same reputation! In fact they both still have the same AF going on 5years!!!
</p></blockquote>
<p>Which is why I said... "due to the poor reputation that the 5D series has in terms of auto focus." ;)
</p></description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>NikoDoby on "D800/900 Challenger?"</title>
			<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=1473#post-25787</link>
			<pubDate>Sun, 07 Feb 2010 20:23:53 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>NikoDoby</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">25787@http://nikonrumors.com/forum/</guid>
			<description><p>But the 5Dmk1 had that same reputation! In fact they both still have the same AF going on 5years!!!
</p></description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>PB PM on "D800/900 Challenger?"</title>
			<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=1473#post-25784</link>
			<pubDate>Sun, 07 Feb 2010 20:11:18 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>PB PM</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">25784@http://nikonrumors.com/forum/</guid>
			<description><p>I think the reason for updating the 5D MKII would due to the poor reputation that the 5D series has in terms of auto focus.
</p></description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>adamz on "D800/900 Challenger?"</title>
			<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=1473#post-25781</link>
			<pubDate>Sun, 07 Feb 2010 20:04:14 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>adamz</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">25781@http://nikonrumors.com/forum/</guid>
			<description><p>if they start to replace the cameras too often than it will only make their customers pissed more, I think that there is a line which shouldn't be crossed - and canon apparently is closer to it than ever before , but that is just my personal opinion
</p></description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>NikoDoby on "D800/900 Challenger?"</title>
			<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=1473#post-25776</link>
			<pubDate>Sun, 07 Feb 2010 19:12:49 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>NikoDoby</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">25776@http://nikonrumors.com/forum/</guid>
			<description><p>Well it took them a long time (3 years) to replace the 5D so if they replace the 5Dm2 after less than 2 years I would think it's because of competition from their own 7D and future Nikon models.
</p></description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>PB PM on "D800/900 Challenger?"</title>
			<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=1473#post-25770</link>
			<pubDate>Sun, 07 Feb 2010 18:47:15 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>PB PM</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">25770@http://nikonrumors.com/forum/</guid>
			<description><p>I doubt Canon is worried too much about Nikon, and what they release. It took them 3 years to make a camera (7D) that could match the performance of the D300, and it didn't hurt their sales very much. I think they go by their own timeline.
</p></description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>mb on "D800/900 Challenger?"</title>
			<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=1473#post-25760</link>
			<pubDate>Sun, 07 Feb 2010 16:23:44 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>mb</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">25760@http://nikonrumors.com/forum/</guid>
			<description><p>I think Canon is doing it because they can.
</p></description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>NSXType-R on "D800/900 Challenger?"</title>
			<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=1473#post-25753</link>
			<pubDate>Sun, 07 Feb 2010 15:04:05 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>NSXType-R</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">25753@http://nikonrumors.com/forum/</guid>
			<description><p>I thought improvements only happened every other generation...?</p>
<p>Like the D70 was a game changer, the D80 was ho hum, and the D90 was amazing. </p>
<p>Same thing- the D100 was amazing, the D200 was okay, and the D300 was amazing.  The D300s isn't much of a big difference from the D300.
</p></description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>NikoDoby on "D800/900 Challenger?"</title>
			<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=1473#post-25748</link>
			<pubDate>Sun, 07 Feb 2010 14:08:50 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>NikoDoby</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">25748@http://nikonrumors.com/forum/</guid>
			<description><p>There is already a rumor that canon has moved up the 5DmkII replacement. The 5Dmk3 is said to have a much improved version of the 7D auto focus and even better video capabilities. It is now expected later this year or early 2011.</p>
<p>Could Nikon's D700 replacement be such a game changer that canon is being forced to move up the 5Dmk2 replacement?
</p></description>
		</item>

	</channel>
</rss>
