<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="bbPress/1.1" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>Nikon Rumors Forum &#187; Topic: Lightweight Glass</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=13325</link>
		<description>where there’s smoke there’s forum fire</description>
		<language>en-US</language>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 16:50:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<generator>http://bbpress.org/?v=1.1</generator>
		<textInput>
			<title><![CDATA[Search]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[Search all topics from these forums.]]></description>
			<name>q</name>
			<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/search.php</link>
		</textInput>
		<atom:link href="http://nikonrumors.com/forum/rss.php?topic=13325" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />

		<item>
			<title>TaoTeJared on "Lightweight Glass"</title>
			<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=13325#post-125101</link>
			<pubDate>Sun, 11 Nov 2012 13:23:09 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>TaoTeJared</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">125101@http://nikonrumors.com/forum/</guid>
			<description><blockquote><p><cite>ericbowles <a href="http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=13325#post-124949">said</a>:</cite><br />
My light kit would be something like the 16-35, 50 f/1.4, and 70-300 VR.
</p></blockquote>
<p>+1 this.  That is almost the lightest you can get.  I would even consider the nikon 24-85vr and skip the 50mm (that would be painfully).  You could also consider the 28-300mm as well.  That is the lightest you can get.  If you are doing this to photograph, go with more and better, if not, then go with less.</p>
<p>This is assuming you are hauling it yourself everywhere. If you are working from a vehicle most of the time, I would go to the 2.8s (24-70 &#38; 70-200) and a 1.7TC and still consider the 16-35vr.  Hell if I could, I probably would try to figure out a way to carry my 300mm 2.8 and a 2x TC as well.  But that is me and I would only be there to photograph stuff.  </p>
<p>1 thing that should be considered is how much you think it will get banged around.  If you anticipate a lot, the 2.8 will handle it for sure.  If you will not have access to a place to get new equipment I would personally pick up the best so I'm not left out.
</p></description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Wataru on "Lightweight Glass"</title>
			<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=13325#post-125097</link>
			<pubDate>Sun, 11 Nov 2012 12:40:40 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Wataru</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">125097@http://nikonrumors.com/forum/</guid>
			<description><blockquote><p><cite>msmoto <a href="http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=13325#post-125070">said</a>:</cite><br />
Or shoot film....45 days will definitely require recharging batteries.  There are hand cranked battery chargers and they weigh about a pound.  I would suspect this is a good thing to take....
</p></blockquote>
<p>The  best pack packing camera I've used was a Leica M4P with a 35 f/2.  And lots of kodachrome. No batteries! No longer an option, I suppose...</p>
<p>If you are really backcountry backpacking, you want as little glass as possible.  Food, shelter, and warm,dry clothing are vastly more important than your 24-70.
</p></description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>adamz on "Lightweight Glass"</title>
			<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=13325#post-125081</link>
			<pubDate>Sun, 11 Nov 2012 08:56:30 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>adamz</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">125081@http://nikonrumors.com/forum/</guid>
			<description><p>I will not recommend You, which one You should take. instead will share with You what I pack during hiking/trekking - including my last Kalla Pathar trek in Himalayas. My basic setup for this year is (for up to 14days of trek):<br />
- d800 - no extra grip, just one spare battery + kirk arca-swiss mount<br />
- N24-70/2.8 - I'm spoiled with the quality I get from this lens, though on d600 - N24-120/4 may do good<br />
- N70-200/2.8vrII - as above, I'm spoiled with the quality<br />
- TC1.4 - for that extra reach<br />
- heavily chopped manfrotto 190CXPRO4 carbon fiber tripod - I've replaced the column mount, so I can mount my ballhead directly on the tripod - w/o any extensions, more like gitzo systematic style - +/- 1kg<br />
- manfrotto 486 ballhead - modified with kirk arca-swiss plate<br />
- waterproof lightweight bag - sth similar to Sea To Summit Ultra-Sil Nano Dry Sack<br />
- lowe alpine attack 45:55 backpack - 1.2kg - good up to 15kg of load<br />
- tailor made 3-season down sleeping bag by Cumulus - good up to 4000m - 600g<br />
- thinktank backpack attachment strap<br />
- thinktank camera strap<br />
- B+W mrc polarizer filter<br />
as You can see, I don't carry a dedicated photo bag, for me it's just to heavy. </p>
<p>@msmoto - I would suggest a solar charger, You can get some good quality chargers from Brunton, which can be easily attached to backpack. </p>
<p>@SCS - as for taking 50/1.4g prime along with zoom... well, for me it's just a loose of weight.
</p></description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>msmoto on "Lightweight Glass"</title>
			<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=13325#post-125070</link>
			<pubDate>Sun, 11 Nov 2012 06:42:47 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>msmoto</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">125070@http://nikonrumors.com/forum/</guid>
			<description><p>Or shoot film....45 days will definitely require recharging batteries.  There are hand cranked battery chargers and they weigh about a pound.  I would suspect this is a good thing to take....
</p></description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>NSXType-R on "Lightweight Glass"</title>
			<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=13325#post-125040</link>
			<pubDate>Sun, 11 Nov 2012 00:23:47 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>NSXType-R</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">125040@http://nikonrumors.com/forum/</guid>
			<description><blockquote><p><cite>Wataru <a href="http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=13325#post-124992">said</a>:</cite><br />
Take lots of batteries.</p>
<p>For 45 days, I'd go with either the 24-120 or one or two primes.  For backpacking I'd suggest the 60 mm micro-nikkor and the 28 f1.8.  The money saved on not buying the heavy glass should all go to batteries...
</p></blockquote>
<p>Or get a solar charging backpack?
</p></description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Wataru on "Lightweight Glass"</title>
			<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=13325#post-124992</link>
			<pubDate>Sat, 10 Nov 2012 13:26:12 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Wataru</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">124992@http://nikonrumors.com/forum/</guid>
			<description><p>Take lots of batteries.</p>
<p>For 45 days, I'd go with either the 24-120 or one or two primes.  For backpacking I'd suggest the 60 mm micro-nikkor and the 28 f1.8.  The money saved on not buying the heavy glass should all go to batteries...
</p></description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>ericbowles on "Lightweight Glass"</title>
			<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=13325#post-124949</link>
			<pubDate>Sat, 10 Nov 2012 08:26:08 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>ericbowles</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">124949@http://nikonrumors.com/forum/</guid>
			<description><p>My light kit would be something like the 16-35, 50 f/1.4, and 70-300 VR.  These three lenses come in around 5 pounds.  You might add extension tubes to this mix.  I agree - the f/2.8 lenses are simply too heavy for a light kit.  With the body, battery charger, filters, and other accessories you would be at 7 pounds.</p>
<p>All of these lenses are FX lenses.  All are reasonably high in quality.  Both the zooms have VR for lower light handholding.</p>
<p>If you are willing to shoot DX and FX, the 16-85 and the 70-300 make a good kit.  The 16-85 would be in crop mode, and they share 67mm filters.  </p>
<p>I'm a little concerned about weather sealing for an Alaska trip.  I like the idea of a P&#38;S for wet weather, but my guess is the novelty of photography in the rain will wear off pretty quickly.  I would have a good backup plan for dealing with failed gear.  You can get replacements shipped, or even arrange to have a backup camera held for you in the area.  Most retailers are reluctant to ship to hotels and other travel locations, so you need a good plan.
</p></description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>msmoto on "Lightweight Glass"</title>
			<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=13325#post-124939</link>
			<pubDate>Sat, 10 Nov 2012 06:55:26 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>msmoto</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">124939@http://nikonrumors.com/forum/</guid>
			<description><p>@ sevencrossing</p>
<p>+1</p>
<p>Other thoughts....you have mentioned the 24-70mm f/2.8 which is a $1900 lens.   So, it would appear that money is not a critical issue. </p>
<p>AF-S NIKKOR 24mm f/1.4G ED, AF-S NIKKOR 70-200mm f/4G ED VR, AF-S NIKKOR 85mm f/1.8G, D800 is $7100 and weighs about 6 pounds.  If this is too much money, substitute the AF Nikkor 20mm f/2.8D for the 24mm f/1.4 and have about $5525.</p>
<p>If your budget is $4000…  D800 and 20mm f/2.8, 85mm f/1.8 or D800 plus the 24-120mm f/4 VR.
</p></description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>sevencrossing on "Lightweight Glass"</title>
			<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=13325#post-124914</link>
			<pubDate>Sat, 10 Nov 2012 04:32:02 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>sevencrossing</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">124914@http://nikonrumors.com/forum/</guid>
			<description><p>When I want to travel light with my  D800 I use the 24 -120 f4, Nikons best "do nearly everthing lens "
</p></description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>heartyfisher on "Lightweight Glass"</title>
			<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=13325#post-124910</link>
			<pubDate>Sat, 10 Nov 2012 04:09:28 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>heartyfisher</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">124910@http://nikonrumors.com/forum/</guid>
			<description><p>Welcome! Let us know what you think of the D600 when you get it :-)</p>
<p>I agree with spraynpray. but if weight is a real issue then the 28-300 looks like a good choice. I would also take a tough waterproof P&#38;S like the AW-100. for when its wet!  or when you cant be bothered to lug the big gear and tripod.</p>
<p>Me ? I would take the new 70-200 F4 but that's me .. :-)
</p></description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>spraynpray on "Lightweight Glass"</title>
			<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=13325#post-124904</link>
			<pubDate>Sat, 10 Nov 2012 03:56:46 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>spraynpray</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">124904@http://nikonrumors.com/forum/</guid>
			<description><p>I'd say simply keep away from the f2.8's and go for the f4's.  Maybe analyse your photos and see what FL you use then leave the rest at home.</p>
<p>If I were going I would take the lightest rigid tripod, the 16-35 and 24-120 for full frame but ymmv.</p>
<p>Welcome to NR!
</p></description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>SCS on "Lightweight Glass"</title>
			<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=13325#post-124891</link>
			<pubDate>Sat, 10 Nov 2012 02:38:01 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>SCS</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">124891@http://nikonrumors.com/forum/</guid>
			<description><p>I am about to purchase a Nikon D600 and need some advice about glass. Next summer I will be backpacking in Alaska for 45 days, what lenses do you think I should take? I've been looking at the 24-70, 24-120 and, of course, the 50 f/1.4G. What do you recommend? Feel free to suggest other lenses not listed here, but keep in mind that I have to keep weight as low as possible (hopefully below 7-8 lbs net weight). Thanks for your help.
</p></description>
		</item>

	</channel>
</rss>
