<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="bbPress/1.1" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>Nikon Rumors Forum &#187; Topic: Are 570 megapixels enough?</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=1332</link>
		<description>where there’s smoke there’s forum fire</description>
		<language>en-US</language>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 11:22:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<generator>http://bbpress.org/?v=1.1</generator>
		<textInput>
			<title><![CDATA[Search]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[Search all topics from these forums.]]></description>
			<name>q</name>
			<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/search.php</link>
		</textInput>
		<atom:link href="http://nikonrumors.com/forum/rss.php?topic=1332" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />

		<item>
			<title>kyoshinikon on "Are 570 megapixels enough?"</title>
			<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=1332#post-22988</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 04:54:20 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>kyoshinikon</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">22988@http://nikonrumors.com/forum/</guid>
			<description><p>Do they make wide angle lenses for this? "smirks"
</p></description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>astrophotographer on "Are 570 megapixels enough?"</title>
			<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=1332#post-22954</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 20:37:12 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>astrophotographer</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">22954@http://nikonrumors.com/forum/</guid>
			<description><blockquote><p><cite>NikoDoby <a href="http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=1332#post-22948">said</a>:</cite></p>
<p>Nerds are always such pervs I swear!
</p></blockquote>
<p>You think those backyard astronomers are just looking at stars?
</p></description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>NikoDoby on "Are 570 megapixels enough?"</title>
			<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=1332#post-22948</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 20:21:11 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>NikoDoby</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">22948@http://nikonrumors.com/forum/</guid>
			<description><p>I think the real reason they made this intergalactic camera was because they found some hot alien girls tanning on a beach somewhere in another galaxy :^)<br />
Nerds are always such pervs I swear!
</p></description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>astrophotographer on "Are 570 megapixels enough?"</title>
			<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=1332#post-22945</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 20:12:01 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>astrophotographer</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">22945@http://nikonrumors.com/forum/</guid>
			<description><blockquote><p><cite>alphanikonrex <a href="http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=1332#post-22941">said</a>:</cite><br />
LOL, you and your jigapixels Jonny ;^)
</p></blockquote>
<p>Just like my 4 jigabyte CF card.
</p></description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>astrophotographer on "Are 570 megapixels enough?"</title>
			<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=1332#post-22944</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 20:09:45 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>astrophotographer</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">22944@http://nikonrumors.com/forum/</guid>
			<description><p>Did a calculation. the LSST would have a 35mm equivalent focal length of ~700 mm. Just 3.2 gigapixels.
</p></description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>alphanikonrex on "Are 570 megapixels enough?"</title>
			<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=1332#post-22941</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 20:08:15 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>alphanikonrex</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">22941@http://nikonrumors.com/forum/</guid>
			<description><p>LOL, you and your jigapixels Jonny ;^)
</p></description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>astrophotographer on "Are 570 megapixels enough?"</title>
			<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=1332#post-22940</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 20:07:49 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>astrophotographer</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">22940@http://nikonrumors.com/forum/</guid>
			<description><blockquote><p><cite>jonnyapple <a href="http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=1332#post-22932">said</a>:</cite><br />
How would you pronounce gigapixels, astro? Just curious.
</p></blockquote>
<p>Umm...  the usual way ;-)</p>
<p>The LSST will be an amazing telescope when completed. It's expected to produce 20TB of data every night. The plan is to make the data publicly available. One reason Google is a partner.
</p></description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>jonnyapple on "Are 570 megapixels enough?"</title>
			<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=1332#post-22932</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 20:00:14 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>jonnyapple</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">22932@http://nikonrumors.com/forum/</guid>
			<description><p>How would you pronounce gigapixels, astro? Just curious.
</p></description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>astrophotographer on "Are 570 megapixels enough?"</title>
			<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=1332#post-22925</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 19:53:12 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>astrophotographer</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">22925@http://nikonrumors.com/forum/</guid>
			<description><p>No, wait for the 3.2 gigapixel camera:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.lsst.org/lsst/science/concept_camera" rel="nofollow">http://www.lsst.org/lsst/science/concept_camera</a>.</p>
<p>And it comes with a 9900 mm f1.25 telephoto lens!
</p></description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>jonnyapple on "Are 570 megapixels enough?"</title>
			<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=1332#post-22890</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 18:00:07 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>jonnyapple</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">22890@http://nikonrumors.com/forum/</guid>
			<description><p>Willis, did I detect some physics in your last post? Hypocrite. Admit it, physics and photography go well together.
</p></description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Willis on "Are 570 megapixels enough?"</title>
			<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=1332#post-22887</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 17:54:21 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Willis</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">22887@http://nikonrumors.com/forum/</guid>
			<description><p>Of course if you are shooting something 30 light years away, you wouldn't be able to take advantage of said flash until 60 year's after it fires... What would that make the maximum sync speed be?
</p></description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>ShadeofBlue on "Are 570 megapixels enough?"</title>
			<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=1332#post-22881</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 17:39:28 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>ShadeofBlue</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">22881@http://nikonrumors.com/forum/</guid>
			<description><blockquote><p><cite>jonnyapple <a href="http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=1332#post-22858">said</a>:</cite><br />
<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_ignition_facility" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_ignition_facility</a></p>
<p>500 Terawatts. They pump the lasers with 7,680 xenon flash lamps. Even with all their fancy cooling equipment, they get fewer than 1000 shots per year. What's the guide number for this flash? It had better be in light-years if we're going to get our alien snapshots (we'll have to live without bounce flash, I'm afraid).
</p></blockquote>
<p>That's fine, scattering and reddening from the intergalactic medium will give the flash a nice, warm, not-harsh look by the time it gets to them anyway.
</p></description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>adamz on "Are 570 megapixels enough?"</title>
			<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=1332#post-22872</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 17:27:45 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>adamz</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">22872@http://nikonrumors.com/forum/</guid>
			<description><p>with 570Mpx I could photograph african wildlife from Europe :) and still get a nice Full HD picture size :)
</p></description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>jonnyapple on "Are 570 megapixels enough?"</title>
			<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=1332#post-22858</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 16:53:33 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>jonnyapple</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">22858@http://nikonrumors.com/forum/</guid>
			<description><p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_ignition_facility" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_ignition_facility</a></p>
<p>500 Terawatts. They pump the lasers with 7,680 xenon flash lamps. Even with all their fancy cooling equipment, they get fewer than 1000 shots per year. What's the guide number for this flash? It had better be in light-years if we're going to get our alien snapshots (we'll have to live without bounce flash, I'm afraid).
</p></description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>bmxdad on "Are 570 megapixels enough?"</title>
			<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=1332#post-22856</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 16:46:33 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>bmxdad</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">22856@http://nikonrumors.com/forum/</guid>
			<description><p>Wow what would the flash look like for this one, I am sure Niko it will be loaded with Rechargeable batteries, cooling fans and maybe even weather proofing to make you happy</p>
<p>Pete
</p></description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>NikoDoby on "Are 570 megapixels enough?"</title>
			<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=1332#post-22836</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 16:04:37 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>NikoDoby</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">22836@http://nikonrumors.com/forum/</guid>
			<description><p>I heard since its a CCD sensor it has some crazy banding issues
</p></description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>jonnyapple on "Are 570 megapixels enough?"</title>
			<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=1332#post-22835</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 16:03:19 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>jonnyapple</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">22835@http://nikonrumors.com/forum/</guid>
			<description><p>I'd just get one on ebay when the LHC forces fermilab to shut down. Which lenses that have a mini cooper-sized image circle are you looking to attach to it when you get it?</p>
<p>Also, I'd make sure 1080p video is listed in the spec sheet.
</p></description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>NikoDoby on "Are 570 megapixels enough?"</title>
			<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=1332#post-22834</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 16:02:55 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>NikoDoby</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">22834@http://nikonrumors.com/forum/</guid>
			<description><p>Ha ha yeah I saw this on gizmodo too. I thought we had already mentioned this here before so I didn't share it but I'm glad your mentioning it anyway New Fanboy.</p>
<p>It has 74 CCD sensors. I thought you guys said CMOS sensors were the only way to go for low light photography, lol.</p>
<p>And to answer your question New Fanboy, no it's not enough. I want the D700 replacement to have more!
</p></description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>New Fanboy on "Are 570 megapixels enough?"</title>
			<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=1332#post-22832</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 15:55:19 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>New Fanboy</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">22832@http://nikonrumors.com/forum/</guid>
			<description><p>I want to post some snaps of my alien friends on Facebook. (Or maybe "Spacebook?")</p>
<p>Will this camera get the job done?</p>
<p><a href="http://www.wired.com/magazine/2009/12/st_darkenergy_camera/">Big Picture: 570-Megapixel, Intergalactic Camera</a></p>
<p>It's only $35 million, though I'm thinking Adorama would probably sell it for $33 million.</p>
<p>Then again, if I wait until next year, I can probably get 600 megapixels and <a href="http://www.hulu.com/alf">ALFFD (Alien Life Form Face Detection)</a> for only $30 million. </p>
<p>Then I could use that $3 million for a really nice case and some extra memory cards.
</p></description>
		</item>

	</channel>
</rss>
