<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="bbPress/1.1" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>Nikon Rumors Forum &#187; Topic: D300s replacement now a priority!</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=12034</link>
		<description>where there’s smoke there’s forum fire</description>
		<language>en-US</language>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 08:35:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<generator>http://bbpress.org/?v=1.1</generator>
		<textInput>
			<title><![CDATA[Search]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[Search all topics from these forums.]]></description>
			<name>q</name>
			<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/search.php</link>
		</textInput>
		<atom:link href="http://nikonrumors.com/forum/rss.php?topic=12034" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />

		<item>
			<title>msmoto on "D300s replacement now a priority!"</title>
			<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=12034#post-120386</link>
			<pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2012 05:33:39 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>msmoto</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">120386@http://nikonrumors.com/forum/</guid>
			<description><p>Goes here</p>
<p><a href="http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=5160&#038;page=27" rel="nofollow">http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=5160&#038;page=27</a></p>
<p>Welcome, a lot of us agree....
</p></description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Flying Tiger on "D300s replacement now a priority!"</title>
			<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=12034#post-120332</link>
			<pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2012 04:26:34 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Flying Tiger</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">120332@http://nikonrumors.com/forum/</guid>
			<description><p>Nikon are really missing a trick here - huge numbers of photographers would be willing to immediately buy a 24 MP D300s replacement and the 80-400mm lens replacement is so overdue it is laughable.  Canon almost built their company on the back of the success of their 100-400mm f5.6 lens and a Nikon lens of a similar quality would be a real cash cow for them.  As a profit making business, surely Nikon should drop everything in favour of the much requested D400 and 80-400mm replacement!<br />
Best wishes<br />
Frustrated Nikon fan from Lancashire
</p></description>
		</item>

	</channel>
</rss>
