Nikon Rumors Forum » Topic: I think Adorama screwed up

monty11 on "I think Adorama screwed up"

monty11 — Mon, 20 Apr 2009 05:34:43 +0000

Well if the person typing in the specifications doesn't know the subject, then it is simple to mess something up. Granted, there should be someone to proofread the texts but mistakes still happen.

ddovala on "I think Adorama screwed up"

ddovala — Mon, 20 Apr 2009 03:36:00 +0000

I remember once adorama showed the 600mm as an f/2.8!

AcquaCow on "I think Adorama screwed up"

AcquaCow — Fri, 17 Apr 2009 23:42:41 +0000

Oh, come on... they aren't even sober, or open right now...

Give them a break ;)

Looks like they fixed it already anyways...

-- Dave

greenlight on "I think Adorama screwed up"

greenlight — Fri, 17 Apr 2009 21:57:54 +0000

Or maybe they just "averaged" it. 3.5 - 4.5.... ah heck, let's just say 4...

:-P

[NR] admin on "I think Adorama screwed up"

[NR] admin — Fri, 17 Apr 2009 21:21:54 +0000

yes, they messed up

NSXType-R on "I think Adorama screwed up"

NSXType-R — Fri, 17 Apr 2009 14:16:36 +0000

Sure, typos exist. :D

Gentoo on "I think Adorama screwed up"

Gentoo — Fri, 17 Apr 2009 14:08:20 +0000

They're saying that the new 10-24mm lens is an F/4
http://www.adorama.com/NK1024AFSU.html?kbid=63773

Isn't it a 3.5-4.5?
http://www.nikon.com/about/news/2009/0414_nikkor_02.htm