<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="bbPress/1.1" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>Nikon Rumors Forum &#187; Topic: 85/2.8 PC-E on DX</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=1102</link>
		<description>where there’s smoke there’s forum fire</description>
		<language>en-US</language>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 05:01:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<generator>http://bbpress.org/?v=1.1</generator>
		<textInput>
			<title><![CDATA[Search]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[Search all topics from these forums.]]></description>
			<name>q</name>
			<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/search.php</link>
		</textInput>
		<atom:link href="http://nikonrumors.com/forum/rss.php?topic=1102" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />

		<item>
			<title>ted2001 on "85/2.8 PC-E on DX"</title>
			<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=1102#post-18322</link>
			<pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 08:51:54 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>ted2001</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">18322@http://nikonrumors.com/forum/</guid>
			<description><p>Thanks very much.  I have the macro lenses that I bought in order 60 - 105 - 200.  This time I thought I go 85-45-24 as needed since I like the extra "reach" in macro.  While I shoot some landscapes, I shoot much more macro.
</p></description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>QuadraPixel on "85/2.8 PC-E on DX"</title>
			<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=1102#post-18312</link>
			<pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 05:30:33 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>QuadraPixel</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">18312@http://nikonrumors.com/forum/</guid>
			<description><p>85mm is pretty telephoto for DX.  You may want to consider the 45mm PC-E.  I have used the 24mm PC-E on both FX and DX and it's the perfect tilt-shift for me (I'm a DX shooter).  </p>
<p>Looks like the 45 and 85 both focus down to a 1:2 macro ratio.
</p></description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>optimaforever on "85/2.8 PC-E on DX"</title>
			<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=1102#post-18308</link>
			<pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 04:11:55 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>optimaforever</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">18308@http://nikonrumors.com/forum/</guid>
			<description><p>It's a superb lens on both dx and fx.<br />
I have a friend who even used it for street photography on his d300 (not exactly what it was meant for).<br />
manual focus on the field is always a pleasure and the tilt shift feature is very fun to play with.<br />
if you shoot landscapes you can use the tilt to get the very trendy small miniature model look to a city (when shot from a tower).<br />
the lens is very sharp wide open until f/16 on a d300 (really), the focus ring is big and comfortable, and the macro capabilities of the 85 f/2.8 are useful when shooting close (even for portraits). if I had to replace my 105 f/2.8 vr, I'd get the 85 PC :-)
</p></description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>ted2001 on "85/2.8 PC-E on DX"</title>
			<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=1102#post-18293</link>
			<pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 01:28:09 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>ted2001</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">18293@http://nikonrumors.com/forum/</guid>
			<description><p>When I can afford a D300s (now have D90), I was planning on getting the 85/2.8 PCE.  Does anyone here have experience with this combination for macro? I'm certain it's terrific on FX, but I'm now happily committed to DX.
</p></description>
		</item>

	</channel>
</rss>
