Nikon Rumors Forum » Topic: Sigma 70-200mm vs. Nikon 80-200mm? http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=103 where there’s smoke there’s forum fire en-US Tue, 21 May 2013 17:53:04 +0000 http://bbpress.org/?v=1.1 <![CDATA[Search]]> q http://nikonrumors.com/forum/search.php adamz on "Sigma 70-200mm vs. Nikon 80-200mm?" http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=103#post-2707 Wed, 13 May 2009 07:47:55 +0000 adamz 2707@http://nikonrumors.com/forum/

this topic was already discussed, search the forum

Leon13th on "Sigma 70-200mm vs. Nikon 80-200mm?" http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=103#post-2701 Wed, 13 May 2009 04:47:50 +0000 Leon13th 2701@http://nikonrumors.com/forum/

The problem is that sigma don't catch sharpness,some 6/10 sharpness is somewhere else
Nikkor is 2/10 sharp. Both have good MTF50 but i i were you i would change D60 to D90 and buy nikkor

JMCS on "Sigma 70-200mm vs. Nikon 80-200mm?" http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=103#post-1183 Mon, 13 Apr 2009 20:27:46 +0000 JMCS 1183@http://nikonrumors.com/forum/

Anyone have an opinion on this? I currently own a Nikon d60, and a Nikon F100. I will be using this lens on My F100, for indoor sports, so the fact that the 80-200mm dosn't have a motor isn't imperative. Reviews seem to be excellent for both, but I am questioning the durability of the 70-200mm. But the 70-200 is cheaper...