<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="bbPress/1.1" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>Nikon Rumors Forum &#187; Tag: Others - Recent Posts</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/tags.php?tag=others</link>
		<description>where there’s smoke there’s forum fire</description>
		<language>en-US</language>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 06:20:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<generator>http://bbpress.org/?v=1.1</generator>
		<textInput>
			<title><![CDATA[Search]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[Search all topics from these forums.]]></description>
			<name>q</name>
			<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/search.php</link>
		</textInput>
		<atom:link href="http://nikonrumors.com/forum/rss.php?tag=others" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />

		<item>
			<title>gep on "Sigma 35mm f/1.4 review"</title>
			<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=22231#post-149933</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2012 13:07:33 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>gep</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">149933@http://nikonrumors.com/forum/</guid>
			<description><p>Has anyone compared this Sigma to the Nikon 35mm? Here is a comparison to the Canon 35mm and the Sigma blows it away but the Nikon is a much newer lens.<br />
Either way, the Sigma is way sharper than the Canon:<br />
<a href="http://learningcameras.com/reviews/7-lenses/87-sigma-35mm-f14-vs-canon-35mm-f14" rel="nofollow">http://learningcameras.com/reviews/7-lenses/87-sigma-35mm-f14-vs-canon-35mm-f14</a>
</p></description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>gep on "Sigma 35mm f/1.4 review"</title>
			<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=22231#post-139865</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2012 13:47:11 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>gep</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">139865@http://nikonrumors.com/forum/</guid>
			<description><p>The test was outside so it could just be an exposure jump. I don't think they are reversed because depth of field appears to increase continuously.<br />
Seems to be an awesome lens though for almost half the price of the Nikon 35mm f/1.4
</p></description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Geoff_K on "Sigma 35mm f/1.4 review"</title>
			<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=22231#post-138766</link>
			<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2012 16:00:17 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Geoff_K</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">138766@http://nikonrumors.com/forum/</guid>
			<description><p>Thanks for the link.  I wonder one thing though.  When he shows F1.4 then F1.8 shot it gets brighter at F1.8, then continues to get darker as he hits F2.8 and F4</p>
<p>Did he reverse them on the video ?
</p></description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>gep on "Sigma 35mm f/1.4 review"</title>
			<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=22231#post-138759</link>
			<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2012 15:31:17 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>gep</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">138759@http://nikonrumors.com/forum/</guid>
			<description><p>There is a pretty good review of the new Sigma 35mm f/1.4 and it looks like the lens is awesome: </p>
<p><a href="http://learningcameras.com/reviews/7-lenses/86-sigma-35mm-f14-review" rel="nofollow">http://learningcameras.com/reviews/7-lenses/86-sigma-35mm-f14-review</a>
</p></description>
		</item>

	</channel>
</rss>
