<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="bbPress/1.1" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>Nikon Rumors Forum &#187; Tag: nike free 3.0 - Recent Posts</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/tags.php?tag=nike-free-30</link>
		<description>where there’s smoke there’s forum fire</description>
		<language>en-US</language>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 03:54:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<generator>http://bbpress.org/?v=1.1</generator>
		<textInput>
			<title><![CDATA[Search]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[Search all topics from these forums.]]></description>
			<name>q</name>
			<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/search.php</link>
		</textInput>
		<atom:link href="http://nikonrumors.com/forum/rss.php?tag=nike-free-30" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />

		<item>
			<title>wombat778 on "Clicking sounds coming from my camera...possibly mirror?"</title>
			<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=3990#post-153346</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2012 05:22:23 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>wombat778</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">153346@http://nikonrumors.com/forum/</guid>
			<description><p>Might be the popup flash mechanism. My D800e (along with all others I have seen) make a rattle when the flash is closed, as the flash retention arms are not under pressure. If you pop up the flash, the rattle goes away since the arms come under spring pressure. . Completely normal.
</p></description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>gep on "D800, Oil spots report, make Oct,2012, 1100 cut."</title>
			<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=21409#post-149927</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2012 13:05:46 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>gep</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">149927@http://nikonrumors.com/forum/</guid>
			<description><p>I had dust on my Nikon D600 after less than 1000 shots and before I ever even changed the lens. Something is up with Nikon and dust. Either a shutter design or something else. I even had 2 hot pixels and ended up returning. I'll probably end up re-buying but i'm worried about these issues. Even the reviews are pointing them out:<br />
<a href="http://learningcameras.com/reviews/4-dslrs/75-nikon-d600-full-review" rel="nofollow">http://learningcameras.com/reviews/4-dslrs/75-nikon-d600-full-review</a>
</p></description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>msmoto on "Clicking sounds coming from my camera...possibly mirror?"</title>
			<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=3990#post-149259</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2012 07:12:22 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>msmoto</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">149259@http://nikonrumors.com/forum/</guid>
			<description><p>I just did this with my D90 which has a lot of use.  Sounds like a huge piece is loose inside.  But, the fact is many of these cameras and lenses have parts which move and if jolted will make sounds. If the camera works, I certainly would not send it to Nikon and spend a service charge..maybe $75-$100 to find out nothing is wrong.  I think if one sends in a camera even under warranty and no problem exists, there will be a charge.  But, I cannot say for certain what any one service center will do.  </p>
<p>Shoot images, let us see what you do... post on PAD
</p></description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>spraynpray on "Clicking sounds coming from my camera...possibly mirror?"</title>
			<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=3990#post-149116</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2012 06:44:34 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>spraynpray</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">149116@http://nikonrumors.com/forum/</guid>
			<description><p>Hi jtcaraig, welcome to the NR forum.</p>
<p>I have to ask you - have you noticed anything wrong with the function of the camera or any problems with the images that the camera takes, and do you have any previous experience with DSLR's of the D7000's complexity?  I'm just trying to get a feel for the detail behind Newbie with that last question.
</p></description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>jtcaraig on "Clicking sounds coming from my camera...possibly mirror?"</title>
			<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=3990#post-149007</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2012 05:37:57 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>jtcaraig</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">149007@http://nikonrumors.com/forum/</guid>
			<description><blockquote><p><cite>TaoTeJared <a href="http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=3990#post-67352">said</a>:</cite><br />
That is the mirror flapping.
</p></blockquote>
<p>Hi. I am a newbie. I am also having exactly the same problem. And I also did what he did actually. My question is: Is the 'mirror flapping' normal? Shall I bring my D7000 to service center?
</p></description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>FrankieB on "D4 Wireless Alternatives"</title>
			<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=5431#post-148355</link>
			<pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2012 22:49:32 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>FrankieB</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">148355@http://nikonrumors.com/forum/</guid>
			<description><p>Welcome to Nikon Rumors, and thanks for the tip. I can't believe Nikon has the gall to charge $900 USD for a wireless adaptor. I hope you don't mind if I post this on another Nikon site.</p>
<p>Thank You
</p></description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>sevencrossing on "Thoughts on 200-400mm f4 vs 400mm f2.8 vs 600mm f4"</title>
			<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=24568&amp;page=2#post-148003</link>
			<pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2012 17:38:02 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>sevencrossing</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">148003@http://nikonrumors.com/forum/</guid>
			<description><blockquote><p><cite>Meleagris <a href="http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=24568&#38;page=2#post-147962">said</a>:</cite></p>
<p>One last consideration, if you buy the 600mm or 400mm, renting the 200-400mm is way cheaper.</p>
<p>JB
</p></blockquote>
<p>will they give you a discount if you own one of the other two :)
</p></description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>scoobysmak on "Thoughts on 200-400mm f4 vs 400mm f2.8 vs 600mm f4"</title>
			<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=24568&amp;page=2#post-147999</link>
			<pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2012 17:31:04 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>scoobysmak</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">147999@http://nikonrumors.com/forum/</guid>
			<description><p>I would say I am wondering about the 800mm F5.6 that was announced a while back, but not sure if it will happen though.  Hearing about it is one thing but being able to purchase it is another.
</p></description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>sary on "D800, Oil spots report, make Oct,2012, 1100 cut."</title>
			<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=21409#post-147975</link>
			<pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2012 17:12:09 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>sary</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">147975@http://nikonrumors.com/forum/</guid>
			<description><p>i tried the '' clean sensor of the menu'' and i had more black spots ! i contacted nikon and they confirmed that the sensor needs to be cleaned, so i took the camera today to the service centre kingston ,london .the service was just great and they have done it while i was waiting .<br />
the whole process done within 4o min.<br />
thank ou msmoto for your reply .
</p></description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Meleagris on "Thoughts on 200-400mm f4 vs 400mm f2.8 vs 600mm f4"</title>
			<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=24568&amp;page=2#post-147962</link>
			<pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2012 16:55:46 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Meleagris</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">147962@http://nikonrumors.com/forum/</guid>
			<description><p>I own the 600mm f/4 and would not trade it for anything the world.  It is RAZOR sharp (sorry but I disagree with Thom Hogan) and the AF is amazing.  Is shoot everything from birds to Thoroughbred racing with it.  I have used the 200-400 extensively and love the lens but as others have said it is a totally different lens.  It is very nice for shooting large animals where you can get close...but I usually wish for more lens, not less.  I am considering getting one to compliment the 600 as others have done.</p>
<p>I find a way to make my 600mm work for most of the things I do.  For me, the reach is appreciated over the 400mm and I just do not believe the extender gives you the quality of the lens only.  Since most of what I need is long...the 600 is a no brainer for me.</p>
<p>As others have stated, you might consider the 500mm if you are considering the 200-400.  The weight savings is substantial.  The 600mm (and 400) is a beast and requires some extra planning when traveling.</p>
<p>One last consideration, if you buy the 600mm or 400mm, renting the 200-400mm is way cheaper.</p>
<p>JB
</p></description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Jerry Burnell on "Thoughts on 200-400mm f4 vs 400mm f2.8 vs 600mm f4"</title>
			<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=24568&amp;page=2#post-147705</link>
			<pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2012 13:25:10 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Jerry Burnell</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">147705@http://nikonrumors.com/forum/</guid>
			<description><p>I own both the 200-400 and 600mmm vr lenses and they are quite different. If i am going out to shoot birds I take the 600 and it is most often too short. When I am traveling by airplane I only take the 200-400mm and do not shoot birds because it fits into a checked bag and still leaves room for clothing. The 600mm even in its own smalller bag will not fit in a carry on anything. I shoot a D3X and print many 24X36 images and I try to not use any tela-converters because of the degrading of the image. The 200-400 is too short for morst birding situations but works on larger animals and long senics very nicely. I had the 500mm F4 and bought the 200-400 and I found that i was not using the 500mm because there was not enough differance. Then I traded fort the 600mm F4 VR and I now use both. If you can only get one The 500mm VR would be my choice and I have owned all three. The VR does make a difference.
</p></description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>crizman on "18-200 lens hood problem"</title>
			<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=6185#post-147683</link>
			<pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2012 13:11:22 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>crizman</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">147683@http://nikonrumors.com/forum/</guid>
			<description><p>my hood was damaged-got a new one all is good!
</p></description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>phototop on "D4 Wireless Alternatives"</title>
			<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=5431#post-147670</link>
			<pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2012 12:49:27 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>phototop</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">147670@http://nikonrumors.com/forum/</guid>
			<description><p>Time has past, since the last comment in this threat, but perhaps someone is still interested in finding a cheap working wifi-connection for the D4, that doens't need an internet connection. </p>
<p>Well, I have an easy-working one I paid about 50$ for. It looks complicate in the beginning, but once you've set it up, it works very stable and easily.</p>
<p>I use an asus WL-330N N150 WLAN AP, REPEATER,GATEWAY,BRIDGE (about 40$, it's tiny and looks professional and has an easy selfexplaining setup-programm) and an external battery (to power up the modem). I configured the WL-330N as an access point. </p>
<p>What you have to do first: </p>
<p>Download the software "Wireless Transmitter Utility" from Nikon <a href="https://nikoneurope-en.custhelp.com/app/answers/detail/a_id/51367" rel="nofollow">https://nikoneurope-en.custhelp.com/app/answers/detail/a_id/51367</a></p>
<p>Have the USB-cable for the camera ready. </p>
<p>Connect the camera with an ethernet cable to the pc. </p>
<p>Configure the camera D4:<br />
In the D4 go to network menue, choose hardware, wired lan (go back), enalbe network connection, go to network settings, Create a profile, connection wizzard, choose Camera control if you want to use the software camera control Pro 2, name it, after that select "enter manually" to choose how the IP address ist optained. (you can choose for example 192.168.101.101). The subnet mask you don't have to change.  </p>
<p>Now the pairing starts:<br />
Connect the camera to the pc using the USB cable, then start the wireless transmitter utility. The software configures the IP-Address for the camera. You are almost done.</p>
<p>Connect the ethernet-cable from the camera to the asus-WL330N. Give the system a minute. </p>
<p>Go to the pc:<br />
No go to thewireless-network of your computer an choose connect to the asus access point. Now its getting interesting. On windows-pc go to control Panel &#62; Network and internet &#62; Manage network connections. Select internet protocol version 4 (TCP/IPv4) choose properties &#62; choose optain an IP adress manually and set the IP-number according to my example to 192.168.101.102. (it must be a number nearby the one from the camera IP-address).</p>
<p>Now we can start the connection:</p>
<p>Go back to the camera: network, network settings, the camera starts to connect, if it takes to long reconnect the wifi conection pc to asus. Now everything should be fine.</p>
<p>Next time you want to connect the camera to the pc you just have to do the last two steps. Enable Network connection on the camera. Start the wifi-connection pc to asus and don't forget to optain an IP number manually in the internet protocol version 4 (TCP/IPv4)properties. You can control the camera wireless without an internet connection.</p>
<p>Hope this gives you an idea, how to do it.</p>
<p>phototop
</p></description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>samchn07 on "Short Movie Creator"</title>
			<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=17166#post-147666</link>
			<pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2012 12:37:35 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>samchn07</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">147666@http://nikonrumors.com/forum/</guid>
			<description><p>I have not seen such kind of device before this is really amazing. I would like to use it.
</p></description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>shawnino on "Best photography presents"</title>
			<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=1899#post-147630</link>
			<pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2012 12:11:22 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>shawnino</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">147630@http://nikonrumors.com/forum/</guid>
			<description><p>Glad you'll accept the 400 f/2.8, if pushed. </p>
<p>I was going away on a trip early November and couldn't wait any longer for the Zeiss 15mm 2.8--plan A was to buy that and add the 24mm 1.4 someday down the track. Bought the Nikkor 14-24 2.8 as Plan B. Great lens, and now I'm not sure I can justify either lens in Plan A. </p>
<p>But if my wife is reading this thread and she wants to buy me a present...
</p></description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Rx4Photo on "50mm 1.8G vs 1.4G"</title>
			<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=20066&amp;page=3#post-147548</link>
			<pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2012 10:59:43 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Rx4Photo</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">147548@http://nikonrumors.com/forum/</guid>
			<description><p>TaoTeJared, that example of the lights in the Sigma's bokeh is the one thing that I dislake about the lens... and from what I thought I saw on a review of the new Sigma 35mm f/1.4 lens it does the same thing.
</p></description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Paperman on "50mm 1.8G vs 1.4G"</title>
			<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=20066&amp;page=3#post-147515</link>
			<pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2012 10:19:11 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Paperman</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">147515@http://nikonrumors.com/forum/</guid>
			<description><p>Dxo resolution test for Sigma on D7000 below. Same story.</p>
<p><img src="http://img255.imageshack.us/img255/4372/sigma2.jpg" /></p>
<p>and the Bokeh link given from Mansurov's Sigma 50mm f1.4 test also mentions how bad the sharpness is at apertures wider than f2.8.</p>
<p>I don't know how and why we started talking about lenses being "sharpest" wide open. What happened to our general knowledge on best results coming on around 1.5 to 2 stops above ?</p>
<p>Most wide aperture pro lenses are "very sharp" wide open but that doesn't mean they are "sharpest" wide open.
</p></description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>sevencrossing on "Best photography presents"</title>
			<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=1899#post-147506</link>
			<pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2012 10:05:07 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>sevencrossing</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">147506@http://nikonrumors.com/forum/</guid>
			<description><p>N 200-400 f4<br />
N 600 f4</p>
<p>but if pushed i will accept N 400 f 2.8 + TCs</p>
<p>A D4 with a 24mm f1.4 would nice </p>
<p> and as this  fantasy. A first class round the world ticket,  with all the trimmings
</p></description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>heartyfisher on "Best photography presents"</title>
			<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=1899#post-147503</link>
			<pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2012 10:03:42 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>heartyfisher</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">147503@http://nikonrumors.com/forum/</guid>
			<description><p>Squamish has a 200 F2??  no wonder he is such an FX snob ;-) D400 FTW !!!<br />
(BTW, Some of the best Bokeh I have seen Squamish ! )</p>
<p>Its better to give than to receive they say.. so I think it will be an AW100 for my son for his trip to Japan. One year at a Japanese Uni(international studies). He broke his last P&#38;S while playing tennis the last time he was over there.
</p></description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>tcole1983 on "Best photography presents"</title>
			<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=1899#post-147502</link>
			<pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2012 10:03:27 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>tcole1983</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">147502@http://nikonrumors.com/forum/</guid>
			<description><p>Well I haven't ever received any expensive lenses for a present, but I have gotten my SB400, tripod, monopod and an extra battery as gifts.  I like all of them :)</p>
<p>What would I really want as a gift...well nothing that is out ATM.  Whatever new body is released...either the D7100 or D400 :)</p>
<p>Lenses...I am content at the moment...still maybe wouldn't mind the 85 F1.8 and eventually another UWA probably the N10-24.
</p></description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Rx4Photo on "Best photography presents"</title>
			<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=1899#post-147490</link>
			<pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2012 09:52:11 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Rx4Photo</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">147490@http://nikonrumors.com/forum/</guid>
			<description><p>Asked for: Manfrotto carbon fiber monopod.</p>
<p>If I landed on Fantasy Island: Nikon 24mm PC-E, Nikon 200-400 AF-S f/4.
</p></description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>adamz on "Best photography presents"</title>
			<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=1899#post-147401</link>
			<pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2012 08:50:44 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>adamz</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">147401@http://nikonrumors.com/forum/</guid>
			<description><p>N600/4, N200-400/f, N200/2, Zeiss 15mm/2.8, N14-24/2.8... but as You wrote, just a fantasy for now :)
</p></description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Godless on "Thoughts on 200-400mm f4 vs 400mm f2.8 vs 600mm f4"</title>
			<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=24568&amp;page=2#post-147361</link>
			<pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2012 08:31:18 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Godless</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">147361@http://nikonrumors.com/forum/</guid>
			<description><blockquote><p><cite>Chrisjhood <a href="http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=24568#post-141484">said</a>:</cite><br />
I am in the market for a new large lens and am having a hard time deciding which is the way to go.  I have done a ton of reading and havent been able to make up my mind yet so I thought I would ask you all.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Forget the 200-400mm, it´s not even near the quality of either the 400mm or the 600mm.</p>
<p>If you want a lighter lens than the 400 or the 600, get the 500mm f/4 instead.
</p></description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>bjrichus on "Best photography presents"</title>
			<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=1899#post-147329</link>
			<pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2012 08:10:49 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>bjrichus</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">147329@http://nikonrumors.com/forum/</guid>
			<description><blockquote><p><cite>msmoto <a href="http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=1899#post-147271">said</a>:</cite><br />
hey, this is a fantasy thread...LOL</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Nikon to announce the D400 before Christmas day for under a grand?</p>
<p>You did say fantasy, didn't you?
</p></description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>DJBee49 on "Shutter Actuations on D700"</title>
			<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=24406#post-147312</link>
			<pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2012 07:58:19 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>DJBee49</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">147312@http://nikonrumors.com/forum/</guid>
			<description><p>You have a lovely camera that is almost brand new! I sold mine to get a D800 and whilst I love the D800, I miss the D700 that was by far the best (digital) camera I ever owned. I wish I could have kept it but.........
</p></description>
		</item>

	</channel>
</rss>
