kolja said:
Might also consider a converter for the 75-300mm lens or that Sigma lens spray spray posted about. Will keep you posted....

I do know which 75 -300 you have, but it is unlikely to usable with a teleconverter

http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=12381

I have used the sigma 150-500mm lens, it has had a few good reviews but I was not impressed with it at all

I will be heading down to my local store on Tuesday with my old lenses and make sure I am happy the way I look through that D7000 ;-) Looks like this is the way to go for me as I will end up with 2 bodies and 2 lenses. I can then look towards some new lenses down the line....10-24mm to substitute my prime 20mm from my X700? Might also consider a convertor for the 75-300mm lens or that Sigma lens spraynpray posted about. Will keep you posted....

The only focus issues I have with mine are with lenses that are in poor condition... The viewfinder on the D7000 is not that much brighter but that little bit makes a huge difference. also usind fast lenses will brighten the viewfinder too. I don't know what the viewfinder is optimized for but I think it is for f/2.8 so it will appear brighter on a f/2.8 lens then a f/5.6...

"All in all I still really like my D50. I wish it had more MP's for cropping but it's held up pretty well."

D50?... D50!

seriously the D7000 is miles better than the D50 bmschrad. Even a d70 is better than a D50. Ive used several D7000's (I own one and use it everyday) and have no focus issues with the body. Ive compared it to the D50 before and it focuses much faster and more accurate than the D50 is capable of. It has a toolset that blows the D50 out of the water. Just the ability to use ISO 2500 is a luxury with the D7000.

Take my word. Get a D7000... You will not be disappointed. If none of the options jive with you a used D700 will be lightyears away from what you have...

bmschrad said:Am I being too picky, are these stories way out of wack? I know the internet amplifies problems sometimes but it seems like Nikon's new cameras quality controls are sub par.

Thing is, when people have issues they are on the forums screaming about it. I would bet for every 10 people complaining there are hundreds that are too busy making images to tap away at a keyboard. Seriously. You don't hear much from the people who are happy with the purchase. They have no reason to go online and say anything.

I've owned two D7000's (first was stolen) and both have been fantastic. For the price they are at now, upgrading from a D50 would leave you zero complaints. (other than kicking yourself for not doing it sooner). Some might have had focus issues but I never experienced this. (I thought the second one might have, but it was more from a particular lens or just user error)

I'm in the same boat, I've been holding off with my D50 forever.

Here are my considerations and what is holding me back.

D7000 great camera at a pretty good price right now. The only thing that scares me is all the back focus issues and soft focus pictures people get from it. I'm not sure if this was an issue with older models and has since been fixed. Does anyone have more info?

D600: would buy in a minute, but after all the crazy dust and oil spot stories I've really been turned off. I don't want to practice cleaning a sensor on my new $2000.00 camera. I've yet to have to clean my D50 after 4 years.

D800: A little out of my price range but may just keep saving for the next six months. At least with this camera it seems they have worked out most of the major bugs. Plus if I shoot with crop mode I get the same FPS as the D7000 with the same MP count.

All in all I still really like my D50. I wish it had more MP's for cropping but it's held up pretty well.

Am I being too picky, are these stories way out of wack? I know the internet amplifies problems sometimes but it seems like Nikon's new cameras quality controls are sub par.

I went from the D70s to the D7000. The D7000 has an ever so slightly brighter/larger viewfinder, but not by much. Other than that, it blows the D70s out of the water in every regard. The only advantage the D70s had over any other body is the "unlimited" x-sync.

As far as full frame bodies, I checked out the D600 and the viewfinder is nice but not much bigger/better than that on the D7000. The other full frame bodies with a round eyepiece are much more pleasant to look through.

However, the D600 will use DX lenses in crop and it has an excellent sensor. It has enough resolution that even in DX mode the files will look great. When you step up to full frame glass, all the better.

BTW - I still have and use the 18-70mm. It's still excellent glass. Probably one of the better kit lenses ever made. Hang on to it.

Either way you go, any of the current Nikon lineup will make the D70 seem like a stone age tool in comparison.

kolja said:
Thanks for all the responses so far - your insights have already given me more ideas. I am new to this forum and will have to spend some in-depth time as most of you suggest. I will take my lenses to my local dealer and mount them on a D7000 to see how different the world looks through this camera. I have to confess, I also still shoot slide film through my Minolta X700 as I just get more rewarding shots this way than my D70 but I am ready to make the complete move to digital ;-) I have obviously stumbled onto the right site to do my research! I will still find it hard to part from my 20mm prime though....

Looking through your lens on a D7000 is the same as your D70 in terms of crop factor (any small difference will be down to the viewfinder not the image size). If your dealer has a full frame (D700/D3/D3x/D3s/D800/D600/D4) that you can do the same with, then you will see the difference as there will be 2/3rds of the magnification you get with the D70. As kyoshi said, your lenses will vignette on the full frame (the corners of the picture go black).

I still love my x700 and occasionally take it out for fun... However anything you listed has a better viewfinder than the D70. The lenses you have will work on any nikon digital body but will vignette on fx bodies. In addition Nikon makes a really nice 80-400mm which is much lighter than the canon counterpart and no worse in optical design or function. Many for some odd reason dislike the lens so there are many other options out there including a 70-200mm with a TC as msmoto suggested...

Thanks for all the responses so far - your insights have already given me more ideas. I am new to this forum and will have to spend some in-depth time as most of you suggest. I will take my lenses to my local dealer and mount them on a D7000 to see how different the world looks through this camera. I have to confess, I also still shoot slide film through my Minolta X700 as I just get more rewarding shots this way than my D70 but I am ready to make the complete move to digital ;-) I have obviously stumbled onto the right site to do my research! I will still find it hard to part from my 20mm prime though....

Thanks for all the responses so far - your insights have already given me more ideas. I am new to this forum and will have to spend some in-depth time as most of you suggest. I will take my lenses to my local dealer and mount them on a D7000 to see how different the world looks through this camera. I have to confess, I also still shoot slide film through my Minolta X700 as I just get more rewarding shots this way than my D70 but I am ready to make the complete move to digital ;-) I have obviously stumbled onto the right site to do my research! I will still find it hard to part from my 20mm prime though....

spraynpray said:
Says severn crossing from the safety of his house in England! South African wildlife deserves more respect (in this case subject to camera distance) than English or American wildlife does!

Ok may be he needs the 800mm f 5.5 and (and a D4)

kolja, we love to spend the people's money at NR

@ kolja

Welcome.....my suggestion would be to read some of the comments on the Forum....maybe for a few weeks at least. Then decide if you want to move to full frame, D600 or others, or remain with a crop sensor.

One thought about a cropped sensor is if one is shooting with a long lens, the smaller sensor gives a 1.5 magnification factor. Now, with a full sized sensor like the D600, one can shoot and crop, although I am a believer that shooting and cropping is not as effective as using a crop sensor initially.

Do a forum search and you will gain a lot of information. Many folks do not like Nikon's 80-400mm f/4.5-5.6VR lens, but I do. There are actual comparisons on the forum if one looks.

And, another idea with long lenses is the possibility of a 70-200 and teleconverter...

So, hang around, listen and ask questions, you will find there is a lot of good info here (along with some less valuable small talk :-))

sevencrossing said:

Wildlife is about field craft, rather than lenses

Says sevencrossing from the safety of his house in England! South African wildlife deserves more respect (in this case subject to camera distance) than English or American wildlife does!

Hi kolja, welcome to the NR forum.

When it comes to bangs for your bucks, the D7000 is hard to beat

but if you want a decent sized view finder, the D600 is a clear winner

the D600 has bigger tonal range than the D7000 so it would be much better for landscape

Wildlife is about field craft, rather than lenses

that said the two top lenses for wildlife are

200-400 f4 for mammals

400mm f 2.8 plus one or two converters for birds

both are mega expensive and IHMO would be wasted on a D7000

If you do get the D600 I would start with the 24 -120 f4 Nikon's best, do everything, lens

Hi kolja, welcome to the NR forum.

One thing to consider is (I don't know if you have 'lurked' here for a while or just discovered us) if you look around you will become aware that there is some risk to going straight for a new body like the D600 whereas the D7000 is a well established (possibly next to be replaced) body and so is less likely to give you any problems.

If you look at the PAD (Picture A Day) thread, you will see a guy called coastalconn who shoots birds VERY successfully using a Sigma 100 or 150-500mm lens and because the D7000 is available at a good discount, I would recommend that pairing. Don't forget the crop factor of the D70/D7000 means that 500mm is actually 750mm which is something you lose with the full frame D600.

If that 18-70 is OK for your landscapes etc., stick with that but I would ditch your 70-300 (non-VR I assume) and get the Sigma - it is outstanding 'bang for the buck'.

Hello,
I own a Nikon D70 with 2 lenses: 75-300mm and 18-70mm. I have always been frustrated with the tiny viewfinder and need to upgrade my kit.

I am considering:
Nikon D7000 (so that I can use my existing lenses)
Nikon D600 (to get a full view finder - this means my lenses need to be replaced as I believe they are not compatible with a D7000)
Canon 7D (only due to a 'cheaper' 100-400mm lens)

I primarily use the camera for daytime shots: Landscapes, wildlife (I live in South Africa), kids. Due to the wildlife trips, I like to invest in a decent long lens such as the 100-400m lens and this is the reason I am considering the Canon switch at all. I think that the D7000 switch would make the most sense as I have 2 existing lenses but the 75-300mm lens is a tad short. But perhaps I should start fresh?

Budget: I prefer the price of the D7000 obviously but if there is a serious case to upgrade and save for the big lens, then I will consider this.

I know it isn't an easy question but appreciate any comments/advice.

freedom7 said:
This is exactly where i am at the moment too.
I have a D70, mainly using 50mm f1.4G shooting portraits
Looking to upgrade to D7000 or 300s (video would be great to have for occasional use)
Any thoughts on the best way forward?

I'm in the same boat than you :)
What was your decision?
--- Ricky Marek

I am looking for free software to shoot my D70 tethered to my Windows 7 computer.

studio460 said:
I would strongly recommend choosing one of Nikon's newest models, either the D3100 or the D7000, over their predecessors. Both are best-in-class in the current Nikon line-up. The D7000 is vastly superior to the D90. The D3100, I'm not as familiar with, but I assume is better in many respects over the D5000, being newer. However, the D5000 does out spec it by a hair (4 fps vs 3 fps). Some features in the D3100 appear the same, and have not been improved in the newer model: both continue to use the same 11-point Multi-CAM 1000 AF, the same 420-color pixel metering, etc. But newer, typically does mean better. Another clear difference is that both the D3100 and D7000 have video quality vastly superior to both the D5000 and D90. Also, both newer models benefit from the faster processor.

But coming from a D70, almost anything in Nikon's current line-up will feel like a very impressive step-up!

Edit: I re-read your thread, and now I realize, the real dilemma may actually be choosing between a used D90 or a new D3100, since they're now about the same price. In that case, the D90 may be the better choice (however, if you think you may want to shoot video in any serious way, the video capability of both the D90 and the D5000 is so horribly flawed, that it's pretty much unuseable). Also, the D90 does have a screw-drive, and will focus any Nikon AF lens--both the D3100 and the D5000 do not--they are only capable of driving AF-S lenses.

agreed!!

Yes the video AF is sluggish but it's still better than what the D300S can offer. But you are right that a dedicated HD camcorder is still a better option if you want no thrills push and record HD video. As for the underexposure if it's the guy I'm thinking of then he was comparing a full frame 5Dmk2 to the DX D7000 in crappy lighting. So to me it proves nothing.

I found the metering to be fantastic on the D7000. The noise from the lens AF during video is nothing new. Just about every AF camera with video picks up the lens auto focusing. You'll want to use an external mic anyway because a boom mic will give you greater sound regardless.

But if you feel the D300S is the better camera for YOU then excellent.

As for upgrading from a D70. I've decided to pass on the D7000...for now. Not because I didn't like using it or because I saw bad pixels (I didn't) but because I know the next gen of FX cameras are going to be unbelievable. I think my DX days are behind me now but I might have to reconsider that decision once the D7000 falls below $999 :^)

B&H currently lists the D300s body at $1459.99. That's $40.00 cheaper than the D7000 w/ Kit lens that so many seem to not want.

Regardless of the newer technology that supposed to be in the D7000 that price for the D300s seems like a gem of a buy to me. I left my D7000 order active at B&H (still Backordered) and was willing to wait but with comments about the D7000 exhibiting slow autofocus in movie mode, the need to buy the extended microphone due to focus motor sounds in video, some dude saying the D7000 underexposes video vs Canon, etc. I think for now it's better to buy a stand alone 1080p video camera from Sony and get that D300s.

I'll only have to add $300 more to what B&H already has from me.

I would think the bigger improvement to the video is the codec and not the resolution, freedom7. I also prefer the ergonomics of the D300s, though. I don't know if you've considered the D90 with grip, but that might save you money that could be spent elsewhere. Enjoy whatever you decide on.

Many thanks for feedback heartyfisher. Ready to make the jump but I realise I need to have a play with the D7000 before i do. but I love the size and ergonomics of the D300s and at the moment the only nag is the 1080p video on the D7000 (which has already stated is an infrequent requirement anyway)
Looking forward to the jump from the D70 to D300s

@ freedom7 : If you are portrait shooter with a 50mm G1.4 then I would say go for the D300S unless you want the extra MP the D7000 has. That pro class of camera is going to be such a joy to use with the 50mm. (What a lens !) on the other hand there is a lot of fun you can have with a shiny new D7000 ! ;-)

I'm with rowbotham (Is that you, Jeff?) in that I often wish I had the 70's 1/500th sync for controlling ambient.