<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="bbPress/1.1" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>Nikon Rumors Forum &#187; Tag: +1 - Recent Posts</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/tags.php?tag=1</link>
		<description>where there’s smoke there’s forum fire</description>
		<language>en-US</language>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 07:16:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<generator>http://bbpress.org/?v=1.1</generator>
		<textInput>
			<title><![CDATA[Search]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[Search all topics from these forums.]]></description>
			<name>q</name>
			<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/search.php</link>
		</textInput>
		<atom:link href="http://nikonrumors.com/forum/rss.php?tag=1" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />

		<item>
			<title>Wataru on "24-70 F2.8 vr soon ?"</title>
			<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=2567&amp;page=2#post-78332</link>
			<pubDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 20:52:18 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Wataru</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">78332@http://nikonrumors.com/forum/</guid>
			<description><p>I just pulled the trigger on a 24-70.  I don't think a VR will come out at the time of the D800 announcement, but if it does I'll return it, I suppose.<br />
My only regret is that unlike my 17-35, it cannot be used with my F2s.
</p></description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Marc NY on "Nikon 900 Flash not syncing up properly with 18-200 mm lens"</title>
			<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=4543#post-74697</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 27 Dec 2011 23:47:34 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Marc NY</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">74697@http://nikonrumors.com/forum/</guid>
			<description><p>FYI: I don't use a clip on diffuser, the batteries are fresh and the flash is auto TTL mode.  Strange that it will not work at times and then rare times it does.  ????  </p>
<p>Thanks everyone for your input.  BTW: I just turned on my SB900 and it was syncing up with my 18-200 mm lens again tomorrow it might not.   johnnyapple I will need to look up the focal length information to see if that info is being stored in the exif data.
</p></description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>kyoshinikon on "Nikon 900 Flash not syncing up properly with 18-200 mm lens"</title>
			<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=4543#post-74509</link>
			<pubDate>Sat, 24 Dec 2011 16:14:42 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>kyoshinikon</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">74509@http://nikonrumors.com/forum/</guid>
			<description><p>Check your batteries...  The Sb900 will have a slightly off response when it is near death...  Also make sure the contacts are clean.
</p></description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>CaryTheLabelGuy on "Nikon 900 Flash not syncing up properly with 18-200 mm lens"</title>
			<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=4543#post-74500</link>
			<pubDate>Sat, 24 Dec 2011 13:34:53 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>CaryTheLabelGuy</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">74500@http://nikonrumors.com/forum/</guid>
			<description><p>Are you using the on-board diffuser or the clip-on diffuser dome? Either of those will lock the SB-900 zoom head to 14mm.
</p></description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>satellites on "Nikon 900 Flash not syncing up properly with 18-200 mm lens"</title>
			<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=4543#post-74497</link>
			<pubDate>Sat, 24 Dec 2011 12:11:21 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>satellites</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">74497@http://nikonrumors.com/forum/</guid>
			<description><p>is there a chance your flash is set to manual zoom?
</p></description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>jonnyapple on "Nikon 900 Flash not syncing up properly with 18-200 mm lens"</title>
			<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=4543#post-74496</link>
			<pubDate>Sat, 24 Dec 2011 10:52:10 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>jonnyapple</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">74496@http://nikonrumors.com/forum/</guid>
			<description><p>I don't know what would cause that, Marc, but could you let us know whether the focal length information is being stored in the exif data of the pictures you take with the 18-200? That way you would know if the lens isn't communicating it to the camera. I'd think that's the first place to look. Welcome to the forum.
</p></description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Marc NY on "Nikon 900 Flash not syncing up properly with 18-200 mm lens"</title>
			<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=4543#post-74415</link>
			<pubDate>Fri, 23 Dec 2011 12:59:51 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Marc NY</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">74415@http://nikonrumors.com/forum/</guid>
			<description><p>HI all, I was hoping that someone might be able to help me figure out why my flash is not syncing up properly with my 18-200 mm Nikkor lens.  I have a SB 900 Nikon flash and sometimes it will sync up with my D7000 and my 18-200 mm Nikkor lens but most of the time it will not.  I have always tried to make sure my D7000 is off (sometimes forget to turn off) when I attach my SB 900 flash.  I also try to make sure the flash is off when I disconnect or connect it to the camera body.  I will then start up my D7000 and then switch on my flash.   First thing I will do is move the 18-200 mm lens in and out to see if the flash has connected or synced up to the lens.  When the flash syncs properly the flash's internal lens will automatically adjust the focusing of the light (in or out) with the lens zoom range. </p>
<p>Is there anything I can do to correct this problem?   I recently updated my D7000 firmware but that didn’t seem to help correct that issue… HELP
</p></description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>golf007sd on "24-70 F2.8 vr soon ?"</title>
			<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=2567&amp;page=2#post-72176</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 24 Nov 2011 04:12:37 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>golf007sd</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">72176@http://nikonrumors.com/forum/</guid>
			<description><blockquote><p><cite>sevencrossing <a href="http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=2567&#38;page=2#post-72172">said</a>:</cite><br />
Assuming the subject is not moving, @24mm  I can shoot at 1/15 or slower very useful  in a dim church, unless this  is the event
</p></blockquote>
<p>Great video :D
</p></description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>sevencrossing on "24-70 F2.8 vr soon ?"</title>
			<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=2567&amp;page=2#post-72172</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 24 Nov 2011 03:33:14 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>sevencrossing</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">72172@http://nikonrumors.com/forum/</guid>
			<description><blockquote><p><cite>Godless <a href="http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=2567#post-71984">said</a>:</cite><br />
Who REALLY needs VR with focal lengths below 100mm?
</p></blockquote>
<p>Assuming the subject is not moving, @24mm  I can shoot at 1/15 or slower very useful  in a dim church, unless this  is the event </p>
<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4-94JhLEiN0" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4-94JhLEiN0</a>
</p></description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>golf007sd on "24-70 F2.8 vr soon ?"</title>
			<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=2567&amp;page=2#post-72157</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 24 Nov 2011 01:47:47 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>golf007sd</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">72157@http://nikonrumors.com/forum/</guid>
			<description><blockquote><p><cite>Godless <a href="http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=2567#post-71984">said</a>:</cite><br />
Who REALLY needs VR with focal lengths below 100mm?</p>
</blockquote>
<p>+1 Agreed.
</p></description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>DrMarm on "24-70 F2.8 vr soon ?"</title>
			<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=2567&amp;page=2#post-72120</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 23 Nov 2011 13:30:12 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>DrMarm</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">72120@http://nikonrumors.com/forum/</guid>
			<description><p>The 24-70mm was my last lens purchase in the "trifecta" It is now my "go-to" lens and on my camera pretty much all the time. Use it much more than the 70-200 or the 14-24.  Should have bought it first!
</p></description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>kyoshinikon on "24-70 F2.8 vr soon ?"</title>
			<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=2567#post-71990</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2011 13:07:08 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>kyoshinikon</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">71990@http://nikonrumors.com/forum/</guid>
			<description><blockquote><p><cite>Godless <a href="http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=2567#post-71984">said</a>:</cite><br />
Who REALLY needs VR with focal lengths below 100mm?
</p></blockquote>
<p>Exactly!
</p></description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Godless on "24-70 F2.8 vr soon ?"</title>
			<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=2567#post-71984</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2011 12:15:37 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Godless</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">71984@http://nikonrumors.com/forum/</guid>
			<description><p>Who REALLY needs VR with focal lengths below 100mm?
</p></description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>adamz on "24-70 F2.8 vr soon ?"</title>
			<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=2567#post-71975</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2011 10:40:16 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>adamz</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">71975@http://nikonrumors.com/forum/</guid>
			<description><p>would love to see one, but I doubt it's gonna be released soon - there's a lot of different lenses that needs to be upgraded before this one
</p></description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>kanuck on "24-70 F2.8 vr soon ?"</title>
			<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=2567#post-71972</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2011 10:14:46 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>kanuck</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">71972@http://nikonrumors.com/forum/</guid>
			<description><p>Boy I'd hate to see how much that would cost especially with the 70-200mm VR II going for nearly 3 grand yikes...
</p></description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>vilaro on "24-70 F2.8 vr soon ?"</title>
			<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=2567#post-71958</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2011 07:00:40 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>vilaro</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">71958@http://nikonrumors.com/forum/</guid>
			<description><p>Thanks to everyone for their comments. I know what i'm getting for xmas now.
</p></description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>golf007sd on "24-70 F2.8 vr soon ?"</title>
			<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=2567#post-71935</link>
			<pubDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2011 23:53:38 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>golf007sd</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">71935@http://nikonrumors.com/forum/</guid>
			<description><p>Having the 24-70 2.8 is, in my humble opinion, a no brainer. I use it a lot and each time the result just makes me prrr. In short, it is a must have. IF you are really looking for a lens that has VR that is close to this range, then the 16-35 F/4 would be my recommendation.</p>
<p>Long live the "holly trinity set!!"
</p></description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>kyoshinikon on "24-70 F2.8 vr soon ?"</title>
			<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=2567#post-71922</link>
			<pubDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2011 19:50:25 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>kyoshinikon</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">71922@http://nikonrumors.com/forum/</guid>
			<description><p>Im guessing the 24-70 replacement will be a f/4 and bigger than the 27-70mm like their wide replacement :P</p>
<p>I assume that the high mpx in the D800 (?) will be addressed in any lenses that are released with it (higher lens resolution?). I going to guess a fast prime.  I would love it if it was the 28-200 f2.8 and the 10mm f/4 they patented
</p></description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>TaoTeJared on "24-70 F2.8 vr soon ?"</title>
			<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=2567#post-71910</link>
			<pubDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2011 18:18:45 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>TaoTeJared</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">71910@http://nikonrumors.com/forum/</guid>
			<description><p>That's what I think every time I hear it.
</p></description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>NSXType-R on "24-70 F2.8 vr soon ?"</title>
			<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=2567#post-71899</link>
			<pubDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2011 16:35:53 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>NSXType-R</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">71899@http://nikonrumors.com/forum/</guid>
			<description><blockquote><p><cite>TaoTeJared <a href="http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=2567#post-71894">said</a>:</cite><br />
I think waiting for this one and a 85mm 1.4 vr is like waiting for the second coming.  I have seen some sub patents filed for years so you know they keep trying designs but something keeps them from building one.  Size?  Cost?  Who knows.</p>
<p>I'm wondering why VR is so hard with this length of zoom.  Canon nor Nikon has done it yet.  I don't want to think about the price - $2,500+?  Probably in that range for sure.
</p></blockquote>
<p>Good luck with the 85mm 1.4 VR, especially when the G is so new.
</p></description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>TaoTeJared on "24-70 F2.8 vr soon ?"</title>
			<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=2567#post-71894</link>
			<pubDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2011 15:50:54 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>TaoTeJared</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">71894@http://nikonrumors.com/forum/</guid>
			<description><p>I think waiting for this one and a 85mm 1.4 vr is like waiting for the second coming.  I have seen some sub patents filed for years so you know they keep trying designs but something keeps them from building one.  Size?  Cost?  Who knows.</p>
<p>I'm wondering why VR is so hard with this length of zoom.  Canon nor Nikon has done it yet.  I don't want to think about the price - $2,500+?  Probably in that range for sure.
</p></description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>PB PM on "24-70 F2.8 vr soon ?"</title>
			<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=2567#post-71893</link>
			<pubDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2011 14:58:23 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>PB PM</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">71893@http://nikonrumors.com/forum/</guid>
			<description><p>I'm with the camp that says, if you need it, get it. If you can afford to wait 6 months, maybe you don't really need the lens at all?</p>
<p>The current 24-70mm F2.8 is a great lens, no need to wait, IMO.
</p></description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Rx4Photo on "24-70 F2.8 vr soon ?"</title>
			<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=2567#post-71889</link>
			<pubDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2011 14:28:19 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Rx4Photo</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">71889@http://nikonrumors.com/forum/</guid>
			<description><p>I shoot a D7000, so DX.  I usually try to keep my shutter speeds at least 1/60 while handholding but I have gotten decent results as slow as 1/15 or 1/30 with some sort of structure to lean against while shooting.  The beauty of that lens is that it's sharp at F2.8 so you can actually shoot fasters shutter speeds to reduce chances of blur.
</p></description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>SkintBrit on "24-70 F2.8 vr soon ?"</title>
			<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=2567#post-71883</link>
			<pubDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2011 13:37:36 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>SkintBrit</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">71883@http://nikonrumors.com/forum/</guid>
			<description><blockquote><p><cite>Ronin.1 <a href="http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=2567#post-71882">said</a>:</cite><br />
Do you use it on an FX or DX body?</p>
<p>One thing about slow shutter speeds is that VR can not compensate for subject movement so there are many situations where an very slow shutter speed simply is not useful.
</p></blockquote>
<p>I only have FX bodies. I mainly use it at it's wide end and so have never missed VR.
</p></description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ronin.1 on "24-70 F2.8 vr soon ?"</title>
			<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=2567#post-71882</link>
			<pubDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2011 12:59:57 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Ronin.1</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">71882@http://nikonrumors.com/forum/</guid>
			<description><blockquote><p><cite>SkintBrit <a href="http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=2567#post-71872">said</a>:</cite><br />
The 24-70 2.8 is my standard lens for weddings and events, buy one now, you won't be disappointed. I agree with iris chrome and Rx4Photo, not sure I've ever wished it had VR.
</p></blockquote>
<p>Do you use it on an FX or DX body?</p>
<p>One thing about slow shutter speeds is that VR can not compensate for subject movement so there are many situations where an very slow shutter speed simply is not useful.
</p></description>
		</item>

	</channel>
</rss>
