Weekly Nikon related news/links #87

Tokina AT X 16 28 F2.8 PRO FX 300x194 Weekly Nikon related news/links #87

Some DxOMark info after the break:

nikon lenses at dxomark Weekly Nikon related news/links #87

The top rated Nikon lenses are:

Nikon AF-S VR Micro-Nikkor 105mm f/2.8G IF-ED (DxOMark Score=34)
Nikon AF-S Nikkor 24mm f/1.4G ED (DxOMark Score=29)
Nikon AF Nikkor 85mm f/1.4D IF (DxOMark Score=29)
Nikon AF-S Nikkor 24-70mm f/2.8G ED (DxOMark Score=28)
Nikon AF-S Nikkor 50mm f/1.4G (DxOMark Score=28)
Nikon AF-S VR Zoom-Nikkor 70-200mm f/2.8G IF-ED (DxOMark Score=27)

The worst performer is the Nikon AF-S VR Zoom-Nikkor 24-120mm f/3.5-5.6G IF-ED (DxOMark Score=4)

Another interesting comparison from DxOMark - Nikon P7000 vs. Canon G12:

nikon p7000 vs canon g12 Weekly Nikon related news/links #87

Related posts:

  1. Weekly Nikon related news/links #81
  2. Weekly Nikon related news/links
  3. Weekly Nikon related news/links #97 (incl. new DxOMark F-mount Zeiss lens test data)
  4. Weekly Nikon related news/links #90
  5. Weekly Nikon related news/links #79
This entry was posted in Weekly Nikon News Flash. Bookmark the permalink. Both comments and trackbacks are currently closed.

13 Comments

  1. Posted December 5, 2010 at 2:19 pm | Permalink

    Yay the new battery is available for my D7000. Reading other stuff too.

  2. Posted December 5, 2010 at 3:33 pm | Permalink

    nice to know more about lapita, thanks :)

  3. NascarGeoff
    Posted December 5, 2010 at 6:01 pm | Permalink

    The samples for that Tokina look great to me.

  4. Posted December 5, 2010 at 7:06 pm | Permalink

    The Tokina looks wonderful to me. Performed very well in the corners too…this lens will be a nice competitor to the 14-24 perhaps :o

    • Posted December 5, 2010 at 11:28 pm | Permalink

      Does this one accept filters? I love my 11-17 2.8 tokina. Might need to consider this with my d700

      • WoutK89
        Posted December 6, 2010 at 3:41 am | Permalink

        I think it doesnt take filters, as you can see in the picture the front element is sticking out.

  5. Anonymous
    Posted December 6, 2010 at 6:52 am | Permalink

    I’d much like to see “24mp D800 with new compact quality kit lens 28-200mm VR f/3.5-5.6 for $3000″ :)

    • Anonymous
      Posted December 6, 2010 at 7:11 am | Permalink

      A good sample of the old 28-200mm can be very contrasty & sharp to the corners through its range if stopped to f/8. I own one and it stays most of the time in front of my D700. All it needs is VR and some better build.

      A VR version would be a perfect travel lens. The new 28-300mm VR & 24-120mm are too bulky for that purpose. Either 24mm or 300mm extremes are not that important for a general purpose lens. Btw 28mm is enough wide (simple 3-frame stitch is possible in case of necessity for wider) & 200mm is enough tele (and could be cropped if you have a 24mp camera).

  6. The invisible man
    Posted December 6, 2010 at 9:45 am | Permalink

    By the way (the Tokina remembered me), I returned the Nikon AF-s 16-35mm f/4 VR because it does not worth the $1100 with it’s “all plastic” body $800 would be a fair price for that lens.
    I’ll try to be patient and save more money for the Nikon 14-24mm f/2.8 ($1800)

    • Posted December 6, 2010 at 8:43 pm | Permalink

      Def. wait to get the 14-24mm. It is an absolutely wonderful lens.

      • Zoltar
        Posted December 7, 2010 at 4:26 am | Permalink

        and its DX cousin is named 10-24mm. Perfect match for D7000 !

  7. Vandyu
    Posted December 6, 2010 at 6:23 pm | Permalink

    I think the film SLR bodies lent themselves easily to special editions. The digital D60 Gold, however, wasn’t very exciting. Now, on the other hand, here is a gold edition that is beautifully done. I only have a standard silver edition, but the gold version is absolutely gorgeous.

    http://www.mir.com.my/rb/photography/credits/fagold/index2.htm

  8. HD
    Posted December 7, 2010 at 6:02 pm | Permalink

    I don’t see the 28-300mm Nikkor in there, only the 28-200mm…. Am I missing something?