Comments on: Nikon D8000 could be the name of the D90 replacement

By: David Johnson

David Johnson — Tue, 08 Jun 2010 00:48:35 +0000

My judgement is that the D90 is worth every penny of the price. It should run about $1,100 with the 18-105VR kit lens (which in that range is excellent). I own some considerably more expensive glass in that 18-105 VR range and am amazed at the results with that modest lens. I use a 18-200VR on it now most of the time. But with a 60 Micro and a 70-300VR it is awesome. I believe there is a sweet spot there somewhere and I’d rather have a good body (newer usually IS BETTER) matched with great lens if you have them but the kit lens are very good. I have used the D5000 and feel it is NOT what I want, BUT less money.

By: Kevin Rounds

Kevin Rounds — Mon, 07 Jun 2010 14:04:35 +0000

I’m getting ready to buy a either a d5000 or d90 very soon, I like the feel the the d90 in my hand bettter (big hands) but its a little out of my price range. Do you think if the d90 is replaced that the price will come down a little? Thanks.

By: David Johnson

David Johnson — Sun, 06 Jun 2010 14:09:18 +0000

To Anonymous. The D90 is still in stock at B&H Photo where I got mine. Their service in great. I am also sure Amazon has the D90. Despite having some serious pro gear I use the D90 most. I would like a better video on it. I also think the D700 is one of the best cameras ever made. But a D90 replacement and a D700 replacement with HD 1080p video on both would be awesome. I keep looking at Canons like the Mark II D5 but with both DX and FX great Nikon glass I am staying with Nikon. Even if Nikon comes out soon (and I HOPE they do!) with D90 and D700 replacements with high def video, the two existing cameras will still be out there taking great shots.

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Sun, 06 Jun 2010 06:56:09 +0000

i think d90 has been discontinued for few month, i have been checking for d90 stock at 5 camera store they are all out of stock

By: Marc

Marc — Sat, 05 Jun 2010 19:56:52 +0000

Will these new cameras not have the inbody autofocus motor like the 3000 and 5000, cuz that would be a real turn off for me.

By: Johan Krüger-Haglert

Johan Krüger-Haglert — Sat, 05 Jun 2010 17:44:46 +0000

Atleast this guy seem to have prefered 10-12 mpx over 18 in the 7D.

I think I to would had.

http://www.canonrumors.com/reviews/canon-eos-7d-mini-review/

By: neocles

neocles — Fri, 04 Jun 2010 19:51:09 +0000

Thanks for the vote of confidence. The rumor-specs below (assuming they are even ball-park accurate) sure make this D7000 look pretty damn good for what is gonna be significantly less than the $1500 the D300s cost me.

On the other hand, the reality is that i need a camera now, not whenever this D90 replacement comes out. And the way my D40x just quit working, the ruggedness of the 300s was a real consideration.

By: b3rt619

b3rt619 — Fri, 04 Jun 2010 17:38:21 +0000

the D90 does have everything i need and i think i did get a good deal so i am going to keep it for a while until i really want to upgrade from a D90. Broxibear thanks for the tip i did save all the boxes ill keep them safe for when i want to resell it. but i am still very interested in seeing what new specs these new cameras will have.

By: The Raze

The Raze — Fri, 04 Jun 2010 15:39:53 +0000

I think (hope) the reason Nikon has been taking such a long time implementing better video capabilities, is that they want to release a product that will not only be better than Canons current video, but also be on par with canons next update of video!

Much like the D90 is better for stills than the 550D, even tough the D90 is 2 years older than the 550D!

Nikon don’t rush it, they take their time, and make it GREAT!

By: David Johnson

David Johnson — Fri, 04 Jun 2010 14:53:31 +0000

The NR admin comment about Nikon never emailing a dealer is almost obvious. I believe most NR readers know Nikon plays very close to the vest. We also find it hard to accept that Nikon has indeed fallen way behind on video capability. I think the Nikon D90 video is important and despite owning video gear I find it easier to be in the field and be able to use great stills and video. For what is it is worth I think my D90 images are at least as good as the D300 images I get. The magnesium body is not as attractive to pro use in the field as some might think. A 100% viewfinder is important but not vital. Nikon just does not have the video expertise that Canon or Sony has. Yet Nikon can hardly afford to wait much longer to get improved video in a D90 replacement. As to sales from D3s and D3x and even D300s, the D90 market is more critical to Nikon sales and stockholders. I do think the three released camera rumors for this year are credible and think the entry level and D90 replacement is key. I also am waiting for personal purchase a D700 update with HD video.

By: PHB

PHB — Fri, 04 Jun 2010 12:06:54 +0000

The FG – Only GBP 30 more than the competition and mine came with a free motordrive.

By: PHB

PHB — Fri, 04 Jun 2010 12:04:16 +0000

D8000 will likely have the D300 AF system plus an AF motor and flash commander capability.

An easy solution to the numbering system would be to start using the lower digit of the non flagship models. So D400 is replaced by D401, D402…

By: PHB

PHB — Fri, 04 Jun 2010 11:59:15 +0000

The price jump in the camera could disappear as production improves.

There will still be a large demand for DX format pro bodies because 90% plus of shots can be taken just as well with lenses are a lot cheaper and a lot lighter.

Its quite astonishing the number of people who bleat on about how Nikon should be producing a 100-500 zoom to replace the 80-400 because 400 is not long enough and then bleat on about how they are FX only. If you need the reach, get a DX body and the 80-400 gives you the equivalent of 120-600.

I think there will be at least another DX pro body, and probably another after that.

By: Broxibear

Broxibear — Fri, 04 Jun 2010 10:35:57 +0000

b3rt619 the D90 is a fantastic camera, I owned a D80 for 4 years before I upgraded to full frame (I already had AF lenses from my film cameras) and it was great.
My advice is to not to worry about the next model until you’ve used it for at least 2 years, by that stage the upgrade won’t cost as much and if you keep all your D90,boxes etc in good order you can make a lot back on ebay ?
I understand everyone wants the newest thing but you don’t need it and spend the cash you save on other things.

By: thefunk

thefunk — Fri, 04 Jun 2010 06:06:58 +0000

yes the magnesium body jumped out to me as the fishy bit, and the 12800. They don’t want to outdo the D300s in all respects ? So technical spec might get bunched whilst they try to compete with better market spec but isn’t it exactly these pro items (body, card slots etc) that mark a real difference ?

By: PHB

PHB — Fri, 04 Jun 2010 04:02:17 +0000

The incentive to upgrade is most likely going to be some form of the D300 autofocus system plus true HD video.

But really who upgrades with every single model? This is for people who are still on the D80 or want to move up from a D40 or a D3000.

By: Fried Toast

Fried Toast — Fri, 04 Jun 2010 03:29:59 +0000

I’m not making excuses for Nikon, but what if they
1) Misjudged the US demand *and*
2) Moved most of their production to the upcoming Dxxx that it set to be announced soon (and which should be available within a month of announcement).

I’m just trying to think of reasons why there’s a shortage (no D3s at Yodobashi Camera in Utsunomiya, either). Perhaps the beancounters at the Sendai Nikon plant are in a tizzy as to what to do now that they’re caught between the proverbial rock and a hard place.

By: Fried Toast

Fried Toast — Fri, 04 Jun 2010 03:25:22 +0000

A 12mp D700s bracketed with an 18~22mp D700x wouldn’t be a major failure, IMO. Just a matter of having cameras for the two camps that seem to exist right now. I’m not sure Nikon can release one cam that would make everyone happy. What’s that saying about not being able to please everyone all the time?

By: [NR] admin

[NR] admin — Fri, 04 Jun 2010 00:57:32 +0000

I seriously doubt Nikon will email a dealer with the specs of an upcoming camera – this has never happen before. In addition, the magnesium body for the D90 replacement sounds fishy. Note also that he did not start a thread with this info – he just replied to an already started thread. Coincidence? Thanks anyway for the rumor.

By: b3rt619

b3rt619 — Fri, 04 Jun 2010 00:50:46 +0000

you are right i love it so far its a great camera. but if something is coming out soon that is going to replace what i just bought, i am just wondering if i should have waited.