Nikon D3s in stock now

UPDATE: all gone - Amazon now says "In stock on May 31, 2010".

Amazon UK still has it in stock.

Amazon has 4 left in stock - this will not last long:

nikon d3s in stock Nikon D3s in stock now

Related posts:

  1. Nikon D3s, 70-200 2.8 in stock now!
  2. Nikon 10-24mm f/3.5-4.5G ED AF-S DX lens in stock
  3. Nikon D3000 in stock @ Amazon, Ritz
  4. Nikon 70-200mm f/2.8G VRII lens now in stock
  5. Nikon D700 back in stock
This entry was posted in Nikon D3s. Bookmark the permalink. Both comments and trackbacks are currently closed.

39 Comments

  1. Johan
    Posted May 28, 2010 at 1:18 pm | Permalink

    first!!!

  2. Posted May 28, 2010 at 1:19 pm | Permalink

    Maybe a shipment got to the US – first the new 200-400 and now the D3s?

    • Anonymous
      Posted May 28, 2010 at 1:40 pm | Permalink

      NR Admin, please report it when it will be out of stock. 1-2 days?

  3. Mr.White
    Posted May 28, 2010 at 1:35 pm | Permalink

    It has begun!

  4. fork()
    Posted May 28, 2010 at 1:42 pm | Permalink

    Nice! Just the easy part left; finding the $5,199.95 :)

    • enesunkie
      Posted May 29, 2010 at 4:14 pm | Permalink

      Finding $5,200 is the easy part!?

  5. I_want_a_D900
    Posted May 28, 2010 at 1:45 pm | Permalink

    Great news. The more often we see D3S in stock the more likely a D700S would show up sooner.

  6. Click
    Posted May 28, 2010 at 2:15 pm | Permalink

    Hurry, better order quick. I just checked on Amazon, there is only one (1) left in stock…

    • GlobalGUy
      Posted May 28, 2010 at 3:31 pm | Permalink

      It is fair.

  7. Broxibear
    Posted May 28, 2010 at 2:17 pm | Permalink

    In stock at Amazon.co.uk too… £1320 more expensive than the brand new D3 I bought 2 weeks ago…for 1 stop and video???

    http://www.amazon.co.uk/exec/obidos/ASIN/B002SG7I8Q/letscook/ref=nosim

    • Posted May 28, 2010 at 4:47 pm | Permalink

      If your making photography for a living then one stop is worth a -lot-. Remember that one stop means “twice as sensitive”.

      • Posted May 28, 2010 at 5:08 pm | Permalink

        Put another way, it’s the difference between 1/125th and 1/250th. At 200mm that’s huge. That said…I think it’s up to your style of shooting whether that’s worth it or not. It’s awful close for still.

      • Me
        Posted May 28, 2010 at 10:43 pm | Permalink

        It’s why F1.4 lenses are around.

        • Lance
          Posted May 29, 2010 at 2:38 am | Permalink

          Do they make an f1.4 200, 300 or 400mm, e.g. for sports? If an f2.8 400mm costs $9,500, what would an f1.4 cost?

          I don’t shoot sports, but with my D3S and an F2 35mm, not even moonlight is required to get the job done.

          • fork()
            Posted May 29, 2010 at 4:46 am | Permalink

            A 400 f/1.4 lens would be too heavy to be be vehicle-mounted, cost would be slightly lower than a Space Shuttle, and the depth of field means you have to choose to focus on the model’s eyelashes or iris.

            400mm 1.4 means a largest lens diameter of around 285mm. The weight and cost of a lens element scales to the third power of the diameter, so you can just guess how this compares to the $5000 200mm f/2 (100mm diameter).

            Nope, nobody makes such lenses. At 200mm, f/2 is pretty fast, f/2.8 is pretty fast for 300-400, f/4 is pretty fast for 500mm and 600mm. :)

      • Broxibear
        Posted May 31, 2010 at 7:30 am | Permalink

        I do make my living from photography but for me the extra stop wasn’t worth the extra cost, depending on the type of images you take it may well be worth it for others.
        The saving I’ve made go towards some Elinchroms.

  8. fzz
    Posted May 28, 2010 at 2:26 pm | Permalink

    sold out already, now the status is “In stock on May 31, 2010.”

  9. Kevin
    Posted May 28, 2010 at 2:28 pm | Permalink

    How do you figure a D700s is more likely? The D3s is in such high demand that Nikon would have to be retarded to put out another camera with the same sensor. IF anything the D700s will be kinda like the D300s. Same sensor with video.

  10. Rudy
    Posted May 28, 2010 at 2:35 pm | Permalink

    I got a 24-70 2.8 from amazon yesterday. I had to really check their website several times per day for availability.

  11. longtimenikonshooter
    Posted May 28, 2010 at 2:52 pm | Permalink

    My mistake was I sold my D700 right after I got my D3s back last November. I missed D700′s low light AF speed so much, and I purchased another one back in March.

  12. Posted May 28, 2010 at 3:11 pm | Permalink

    Yes available but they are charging $6299 or a $1000 premium! Sold through 47th street photo: here is cut/paste from Amazon site when added to cart!!!
    Nikon D3S 12.1 MP CMOS Digital SLR Camera with 3-Inch LCD and 24fps 720p HD Video Capability (Body Only)
    Other products by Nikon
    4.8 out of 5 stars See all reviews (15 customer reviews)
    15 Reviews
    5 star:
    (13)
    4 star:
    (1)
    3 star:
    (1)
    2 star: (0)
    1 star: (0)

    › See all 15 customer reviews…
    | More about this product
    Price: $6,299.00
    o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o
    In Stock.
    Ships from and sold by 17th Street Photo.
    Only 1 left in stock–order soon.

  13. GlobalGUy
    Posted May 28, 2010 at 3:28 pm | Permalink

    The price just sky-rocketed to $6,300~!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    It was $5,200 when Admin posted!

  14. Posted May 28, 2010 at 3:52 pm | Permalink

    I do NOT think this is fair. 47th Street is notorious for upcharging above list price and i don’t think that Nikon would be very happy about it. You can pre-order from Amazon and wait a month or get it now for a premium. This is price gouging and is not a good business practice. Shame on them.

    • Zoetmb
      Posted May 29, 2010 at 11:09 am | Permalink

      Note that 47th Street Photo has NOTHING TO DO with the giant camera store of the same name that used to actually exist on 47th street east of 6th avenue and was the B&H of their day.

      This 47th Street Photo is one of those notorious Brooklyn dealers. I’m surprised Amazon lets them sell through their site.

  15. Posted May 28, 2010 at 3:56 pm | Permalink

    supply and demand. Everyone says capitalism is so great well this is it at its finest!

  16. Anonymous
    Posted May 28, 2010 at 5:04 pm | Permalink

    it is 5200 in canada

  17. Posted May 28, 2010 at 5:22 pm | Permalink

    nowinstock.net is a good place to check the stock of an item at some stores on these hard to find items

  18. David
    Posted May 28, 2010 at 7:16 pm | Permalink

    I’m not paying $5,200 for a bulky 12MP camera, no matter what other options it has. I’m just not going to.

    • GlobalGuy
      Posted May 28, 2010 at 8:07 pm | Permalink

      Not options — low light performance. That is practically unparalleled.

      If D700 or D300s does it for you though, get those.

  19. Kevin
    Posted May 28, 2010 at 7:31 pm | Permalink

    The camera is worth it’s weight in gold. Only a fool would say it’s not worth $5,200.

    • Greenwood_Geoff
      Posted May 30, 2010 at 9:49 am | Permalink

      Worth is relative ;- )

  20. Click
    Posted May 28, 2010 at 8:35 pm | Permalink

    Kevin, I sure hope you’re right. I found a small town “tweener” dealer that had (2) D3s bodies in stock this week. I just ordered the last one he had a few minutes ago. I was going to wait and see what was going to happened but when I saw the rebates had been extended I couldn’t take it any longer. I wanted a new FX body with video but I didn’t want to spend 5200. Hopefully the D3s will be all the camera that I will ever need at my age (52). I shoot for fun only, I would have liked to have had more of a mature video feature (like Canon’s 1080 and more of a choice on FPS like 29.97 etc.) but I am sure the D3s will keep me busy honing my skills for quite some time. Everyone is screaming about video but I know their will ton’s too learn for someone like me that has no post processing experience with editing (software).

    Anyone have any recommendations as too what would suit a beginners need for editing software for Nikon’s video? I am mostly going to be doing short clips of like my grandson’s graduation’s starting in a few days and family stuff like that. I don’t want a complex pro editing software program that’s super complex to learn. Maybe someone will tell me IMovie09 will be fine, just anything that won’t take a rocket scientist too learn how to edit video as I will be new to this video side of the camera.

    • ArtTwisted
      Posted May 28, 2010 at 11:13 pm | Permalink

      If you like the adobe products then I can strongly recomend Adobe Premier although its not a novice application it is one of the industry standards and would give you room to grow. For more basic stuff simple windows movie editor / imovie is all you really need but I advice against getting a mid range program only to upgrade later to the pricy pro option. Also Premier (and other pro solutions) have tons of support and tutorials, books, etc on them to help new learners.

      • Click
        Posted May 28, 2010 at 11:44 pm | Permalink

        Thank you so much for your recommendation and advice. I greatly appreciate it. Jeff

  21. Jay A
    Posted May 28, 2010 at 10:34 pm | Permalink

    Mike local camera store has D3s…pictureline.com

  22. ashley dudd
    Posted May 29, 2010 at 2:27 am | Permalink

    anyone actually buy this old 12 meg junk?

  23. SKC
    Posted May 29, 2010 at 4:13 am | Permalink

    I love how people concede that the D3s’s low light performance in unrivaled but trash the 12mp without realizing that there is a direct relationship between the two.

    Ignorance.

    • ashley dudd
      Posted May 31, 2010 at 3:41 am | Permalink

      like your d40, right?

  24. GD
    Posted May 29, 2010 at 4:01 pm | Permalink

    Lots of the better local shops have them in stock.

    http://kenmorecamera.com/p-7214-nikon-d3s-dgtl-body.aspx