<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Flashback from 1998: Navy SEALs training with mysterious Nikon underwater digital camera</title>
	<atom:link href="http://nikonrumors.com/2010/05/05/flashback-from-1998-navy-seals-training-with-nikon-underwater-digital-camera.aspx/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2010/05/05/flashback-from-1998-navy-seals-training-with-nikon-underwater-digital-camera.aspx/</link>
	<description>where there’s smoke there’s fire</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 03:14:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Blackbeard Ben</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2010/05/05/flashback-from-1998-navy-seals-training-with-nikon-underwater-digital-camera.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-64899</link>
		<dc:creator>Blackbeard Ben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 May 2010 06:48:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=11147#comment-64899</guid>
		<description>I think people don&#039;t realize they&#039;re not even in the same class of camera...


D90 vs T2i:

Pentaprism vs dim, tunnel-vision pentamirror viewfinder
Two command dials vs one
Top LCD vs none
Twice the battery life
4.5 fps/100 jpegs vs 3.76 fps/34 jpegs
AF assist light vs annoying AF assist flashes
Better Nikon matrix metering/D-lighting/iTTL, CLS commander
Better/faster AF (despite the specs appearing to be identical)
Sharper kit lens (and better consumer lens options)
Better build quality, and bigger size (that certainly can be either an advantage or disadvantage)


The D90 gives up:

18 Mp vs 12
1080p video vs 720p
Faster phase-detect AF during live view in the T2i
Mic jack in T2i

So the D90 is about two years old and costs ~$35 less on Amazon.  I&#039;ll leave it to you to decide which is the better camera.  I know which one I would rather use, and which one I would trust for serious work for hire.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think people don&#8217;t realize they&#8217;re not even in the same class of camera&#8230;</p>
<p>D90 vs T2i:</p>
<p>Pentaprism vs dim, tunnel-vision pentamirror viewfinder<br />
Two command dials vs one<br />
Top LCD vs none<br />
Twice the battery life<br />
4.5 fps/100 jpegs vs 3.76 fps/34 jpegs<br />
AF assist light vs annoying AF assist flashes<br />
Better Nikon matrix metering/D-lighting/iTTL, CLS commander<br />
Better/faster AF (despite the specs appearing to be identical)<br />
Sharper kit lens (and better consumer lens options)<br />
Better build quality, and bigger size (that certainly can be either an advantage or disadvantage)</p>
<p>The D90 gives up:</p>
<p>18 Mp vs 12<br />
1080p video vs 720p<br />
Faster phase-detect AF during live view in the T2i<br />
Mic jack in T2i</p>
<p>So the D90 is about two years old and costs ~$35 less on Amazon.  I&#8217;ll leave it to you to decide which is the better camera.  I know which one I would rather use, and which one I would trust for serious work for hire.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blackbeard Ben</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2010/05/05/flashback-from-1998-navy-seals-training-with-nikon-underwater-digital-camera.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-64896</link>
		<dc:creator>Blackbeard Ben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 May 2010 06:20:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=11147#comment-64896</guid>
		<description>The caption pretty much says it all...

The weirdest thing is how clean the Nikonos lens and the Canon IS binos objectives are.  Everything is covered in sand - they were probably putting extra effort forth to keep them clean for training (to avoid unnecessary wear).  Keeping them clean for the photos was probably a consideration as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The caption pretty much says it all&#8230;</p>
<p>The weirdest thing is how clean the Nikonos lens and the Canon IS binos objectives are.  Everything is covered in sand &#8211; they were probably putting extra effort forth to keep them clean for training (to avoid unnecessary wear).  Keeping them clean for the photos was probably a consideration as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2010/05/05/flashback-from-1998-navy-seals-training-with-nikon-underwater-digital-camera.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-64748</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 May 2010 03:01:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=11147#comment-64748</guid>
		<description>I just saw one of these at a camera swap meet this last weekend.  Unfortunately the body flooded and they removed the internals but I could have purchased a fully functional shell.  It was an awesomely huge camera!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just saw one of these at a camera swap meet this last weekend.  Unfortunately the body flooded and they removed the internals but I could have purchased a fully functional shell.  It was an awesomely huge camera!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2010/05/05/flashback-from-1998-navy-seals-training-with-nikon-underwater-digital-camera.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-64745</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 May 2010 23:47:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=11147#comment-64745</guid>
		<description>Tink you !</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tink you !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zen-Tao</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2010/05/05/flashback-from-1998-navy-seals-training-with-nikon-underwater-digital-camera.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-64722</link>
		<dc:creator>Zen-Tao</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 May 2010 12:05:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=11147#comment-64722</guid>
		<description>where there&#039;s smoke there are two Indians smoking a peace pipe.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>where there&#8217;s smoke there are two Indians smoking a peace pipe.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LukeLx</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2010/05/05/flashback-from-1998-navy-seals-training-with-nikon-underwater-digital-camera.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-64720</link>
		<dc:creator>LukeLx</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 May 2010 09:07:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=11147#comment-64720</guid>
		<description>And also another unidentified binocular (or what else) on the background :-D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And also another unidentified binocular (or what else) on the background <img src='http://nikonrumors.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':-D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2010/05/05/flashback-from-1998-navy-seals-training-with-nikon-underwater-digital-camera.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-64709</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 May 2010 02:57:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=11147#comment-64709</guid>
		<description>Don&#039;t forget that the 550D is brand new and that the D90 is a year and a half older which is a lot in the actual market.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t forget that the 550D is brand new and that the D90 is a year and a half older which is a lot in the actual market.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: [NR] admin</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2010/05/05/flashback-from-1998-navy-seals-training-with-nikon-underwater-digital-camera.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-64705</link>
		<dc:creator>[NR] admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 May 2010 01:50:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=11147#comment-64705</guid>
		<description>yes, I do delete all comments with offensive language</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yes, I do delete all comments with offensive language</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ronan</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2010/05/05/flashback-from-1998-navy-seals-training-with-nikon-underwater-digital-camera.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-64698</link>
		<dc:creator>Ronan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 May 2010 00:08:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=11147#comment-64698</guid>
		<description>I love that photo... Canon binocular&#039;s... Nikon underwater housing... with Kodak guts... LOL</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love that photo&#8230; Canon binocular&#8217;s&#8230; Nikon underwater housing&#8230; with Kodak guts&#8230; LOL</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2010/05/05/flashback-from-1998-navy-seals-training-with-nikon-underwater-digital-camera.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-64696</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 May 2010 22:21:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=11147#comment-64696</guid>
		<description>NR admin, please throw us a new bone! At this time we need something from the 80s because this one with the Canon binocular is not so good.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NR admin, please throw us a new bone! At this time we need something from the 80s because this one with the Canon binocular is not so good.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: qw</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2010/05/05/flashback-from-1998-navy-seals-training-with-nikon-underwater-digital-camera.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-64693</link>
		<dc:creator>qw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 May 2010 20:20:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=11147#comment-64693</guid>
		<description>in other words, in case you dont understand, what it means is that dpreview changed the rating system BEFORE they rated the 550d as &#039;Gold award&#039;. so its not in the old list u are seeing,. read my reply below</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>in other words, in case you dont understand, what it means is that dpreview changed the rating system BEFORE they rated the 550d as &#8216;Gold award&#8217;. so its not in the old list u are seeing,. read my reply below</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2010/05/05/flashback-from-1998-navy-seals-training-with-nikon-underwater-digital-camera.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-64692</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 May 2010 19:58:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=11147#comment-64692</guid>
		<description>the conversation always goes this way... at least we haven&#039;t started hearing comments about the camera pouring a cup of coffee for you, or cleaning your house etc....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the conversation always goes this way&#8230; at least we haven&#8217;t started hearing comments about the camera pouring a cup of coffee for you, or cleaning your house etc&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2010/05/05/flashback-from-1998-navy-seals-training-with-nikon-underwater-digital-camera.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-64691</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 May 2010 19:56:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=11147#comment-64691</guid>
		<description>If we followed the logic that new technology cannot surpass old technology in &quot;lesser items&quot; then we would still be riding horses...

stuff always get cheaper and easier to make</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If we followed the logic that new technology cannot surpass old technology in &#8220;lesser items&#8221; then we would still be riding horses&#8230;</p>
<p>stuff always get cheaper and easier to make</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2010/05/05/flashback-from-1998-navy-seals-training-with-nikon-underwater-digital-camera.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-64690</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 May 2010 19:53:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=11147#comment-64690</guid>
		<description>HAHA Those two are almost oxymorons

The camera must be the best of the best and always current..but then you stick a walk around lens on it because you aren&#039;t really doing anything that important.

What about a walk around camera? now that is where it should be at.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>HAHA Those two are almost oxymorons</p>
<p>The camera must be the best of the best and always current..but then you stick a walk around lens on it because you aren&#8217;t really doing anything that important.</p>
<p>What about a walk around camera? now that is where it should be at.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2010/05/05/flashback-from-1998-navy-seals-training-with-nikon-underwater-digital-camera.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-64689</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 May 2010 19:51:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=11147#comment-64689</guid>
		<description>yeah I heard the same..apparently that is the only way they can make a low noise sensor higher than 12mp....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yeah I heard the same..apparently that is the only way they can make a low noise sensor higher than 12mp&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2010/05/05/flashback-from-1998-navy-seals-training-with-nikon-underwater-digital-camera.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-64688</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 May 2010 19:49:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=11147#comment-64688</guid>
		<description>It is probably best if you don&#039;t get involved... for starters I disguised it as a Canon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is probably best if you don&#8217;t get involved&#8230; for starters I disguised it as a Canon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ArtTwisted</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2010/05/05/flashback-from-1998-navy-seals-training-with-nikon-underwater-digital-camera.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-64687</link>
		<dc:creator>ArtTwisted</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 May 2010 19:33:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=11147#comment-64687</guid>
		<description>I rather just have a 50mm f.95 for nikon :) but the 1.2 will have to do.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I rather just have a 50mm f.95 for nikon <img src='http://nikonrumors.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  but the 1.2 will have to do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2010/05/05/flashback-from-1998-navy-seals-training-with-nikon-underwater-digital-camera.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-64686</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 May 2010 17:26:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=11147#comment-64686</guid>
		<description>Good one &quot;That Guy&quot;. I want to party with you!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good one &#8220;That Guy&#8221;. I want to party with you!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: That Guy</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2010/05/05/flashback-from-1998-navy-seals-training-with-nikon-underwater-digital-camera.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-64685</link>
		<dc:creator>That Guy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 May 2010 17:12:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=11147#comment-64685</guid>
		<description>Where&#039;s my non-G AF-S 13-600mm f/2.8 VR ED N FX that can fit in my pocket with a retail of $100 ?????</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Where&#8217;s my non-G AF-S 13-600mm f/2.8 VR ED N FX that can fit in my pocket with a retail of $100 ?????</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2010/05/05/flashback-from-1998-navy-seals-training-with-nikon-underwater-digital-camera.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-64684</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 May 2010 17:10:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=11147#comment-64684</guid>
		<description>Where&#039;s my 100-500mm ??!!!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Where&#8217;s my 100-500mm ??!!!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

