Why is there so much focus on driving readers to these stores??

30 links to B&H and 35 to Adorama! Surely we are bright enough to take one line of the deals they both offer.

Guess who?

In one hand Nikon has too low a resolution?
On the next hand, they don’t listen to their customers?
On the next hand, they don’t have good quality sound?
On the next hand they do not have a camera like the Canon 5DMK2?

Well, here is my response!
1. They don’t have as crappy a body as the MK2 even though I like the picture quality from this camera, the body has many documented problems and defects.
2. Canon does not have an answer to either the OLD D3 nor the new D3s!
3. Canon does NOT have a current response to the older D3X in any camera.
4. Nikon just introduced a Point and Shoot with 1080i and good sound.

Next – I really do not care what you wish for Nikon to make to placate you as you probably would complain even if ANY manufacturer gave you all your wishes for ten bucks.
You do the ‘female doggy thing’ well – sorry for anyone who is around you in real life.
You buy and sell whatever you wish – MAKES no difference to anyone here in particular.
I leave dreamers and complainers alone as most of the time, people like that have unresolved issues in life – LOL!
Some people get a charge out of attempting to bully others who don’t see life or things as they do and then when you tell the person that perhaps they look through ‘rose colored glasses’, they now target you for their hate induced diatribe – LOL!

No more comments to you pal!

2) Video + Sound. Now name one Nikon product that does 1080P with decent sound. None

3) I did not call you names because I respect other human beings but I cannot respect your low class personality that allows you to offend others.

4) I am not your pal! If you would work for me with this style, you would be on the street looking for a job.

5) The D3x has more to do with Sony than you can even imagine. Go back to around 2004-2005 and read how much money sony put into imaging sensor development. Please do the same excercise for Nikon and you will find out that Sony spent about 10-50 times more on research than Nikon. The bottom line is that the D3x is overpriced! If it would be the price of the D3 or D3s I would not bitch about it. But $5,000 (+ – couple of hundreds) is the limit that many are willing to pay for that. Nikon slapped all of us in the face with that! Before that I purchased couple nice lenses to make sure they’ll work nicely but I refuse to pay 8 grand! So I just sold 2 Nikon lenses. Go figure it out what I am up to. I will take a look at the 1DsIV and if it comes with 32MP I might buy it no matter it is going to be 8 grand. You know why? Because it will take Nikon 5 years to reach 32MP.

Maybe you get a computer and perhaps try Linux, as the 64bit versions (Ubuntu Studio -for example) will allow you to go past the 100% scaling limitations of many other Operating Systems.

Maybe your tools are outdated?

When you get a computer that can show you the obvious differences, then tell me!

Perhaps you never heard of Laser surgery or even glasses – LOL!

Sorry pal, but now teasing you for your asinine implication.

GET REAL!

Nikon needs above 12 megapixels per your claims YET when they delivered this in a 24 megapixel D3X, it is now equal to a 12 megapixel D3 or worse, you perhaps do not see any tangible differences or benefits – thus defeating your arguments here.

THANKS!

You make incessant complaints here and then when answered you try and turn the person’s words on them.
RIGHT now, Canon is behind Nikon is resolution -FACT!
The D3X has been a best seller for Nikon and the D3s is doing the very same thing in the PRO markets.
Learn this – a TOOL that can make money for you is NOT a cost to the skilled user, as it PAYS for itself perhaps after the first use.

Your not seemingly grasping that – is what makes you clueless as you rant about YOUR wishes devoid of any semblance of reality.

Sorry pal but not some idealist who shouts at the moon trying to get my way.

I spend my time doing things that benefit myself and not barking at others about some apparent shortcoming in equipment.

Some people are so dense that they expect the whole world to suffer from their apparent malaise.

Rational minds are able to overcome simple obstacles while fools or dreamers pontificate about what they wish for while unable to deal with WHAT is in front of them.

One contributes while the other creates discord to make up for their own lack of ability or skill.

LOOK HERE:
http://www.adorama.com/catalog.tpl?op=rebates&brand=Canon

1) D3
2) D3x

Blow up the images from both and make a judgement call

For instance for the d90 and d300 there is a special offer that states:
“Save $200.00 on Nikon 70-300mm Lens when you purchase 1 or more Qualifying Nikon DSLR offered by Amazon.com. Enter code 7O3OOMAR at checkout.”

The D5000 has a similar offer for the 55-200mm lens

It seems like all you care about is being or having the BEST specs while perhaps not knowing whom or at WHAT market a camera is aimed at?

Perhaps what if I now was to state that Canon is STUCK at 21 megapixels and Nikon has moved from 12 to 24 megapixels? – but I won’t, as not some juvenile.

I don’t care WHAT megapixel Nikon goes to, as long as the camera is BETTER in picture quality and not worse than the previous generations.
You seem clueless pal – grow up!

I deal with WHAT is in front of me and NOT what is promised, hence a happy human being instead of an incessant CLUELESS complainer.

Please jump on the Nikon Rebates ASAP.

Regards,

Segura

And besides that, still none of you was able to explain why the D3x is so expensive if high resolution was so bad.

It does not matter how I try to explain to you all. 12MP is the past!!!! 6 yrs old tech!!!!

I like my Nikons AS they are as beautiful 12 megapixels are better than horrible higher megapixels. Egomaniacs always like the bragging rights of bigger everything EVEN when the results are horrid!
Buy what you like but don’t bash the manufacturer who actually IS listening to their PRO AUDIENCE!
Ever seen the lack of RED response in the new Canons as compared to the old FULL FRAME Canons?
Someone needs to respond to your incessant complaints here.
Go buy a 4/3rd system or whatever you like, as soon Nikon will perhaps address their lack of features BUT if these features come at the cost of picture quality, then I will refuse to buy future Nikons.
Different perspective pal!
I don’t live or die by SPECS, but I look at results – hence PRO and not amateur!

1) I work for Canon
2) They actually pay me to come here and bash Nikon
3) Are you happy?

4) People like you would still live in caves if others who want more wouldn’t exist. So go back and play with your 12MP camera.