<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Review of the latest Nikon patent applications</title>
	<atom:link href="http://nikonrumors.com/2010/02/18/review-of-the-latest-nikon-patent-applications.aspx/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2010/02/18/review-of-the-latest-nikon-patent-applications.aspx/</link>
	<description>where there’s smoke there’s fire</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 21:22:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Henry Nikon Fan</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2010/02/18/review-of-the-latest-nikon-patent-applications.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-53475</link>
		<dc:creator>Henry Nikon Fan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2010 18:06:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=9923#comment-53475</guid>
		<description>I do not mind the variable aperature that much, but I do not like the wide range.  A tighter range would be more preferred.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I do not mind the variable aperature that much, but I do not like the wide range.  A tighter range would be more preferred.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2010/02/18/review-of-the-latest-nikon-patent-applications.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-53451</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2010 16:23:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=9923#comment-53451</guid>
		<description>Wait. The D90 is pretty old. I&#039;m really waiting the D300s but might wait a few more weeks. If there such a thing as a D90 upgrade it will probably be better than the D300s</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wait. The D90 is pretty old. I&#8217;m really waiting the D300s but might wait a few more weeks. If there such a thing as a D90 upgrade it will probably be better than the D300s</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rsm870</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2010/02/18/review-of-the-latest-nikon-patent-applications.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-53438</link>
		<dc:creator>rsm870</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2010 15:06:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=9923#comment-53438</guid>
		<description>Hey! That must be it... I think :P Perhpas Nikon is trying to make the D90 replacement some kind of CanonT2i killer [just launched, check it out its so affordable]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey! That must be it&#8230; I think <img src='http://nikonrumors.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_razz.gif' alt=':P' class='wp-smiley' />  Perhpas Nikon is trying to make the D90 replacement some kind of CanonT2i killer [just launched, check it out its so affordable]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rsm870</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2010/02/18/review-of-the-latest-nikon-patent-applications.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-53436</link>
		<dc:creator>rsm870</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2010 15:03:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=9923#comment-53436</guid>
		<description>supposedly to illustrate how terrible and non-smiley a photo would look without focus-tracking haha</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>supposedly to illustrate how terrible and non-smiley a photo would look without focus-tracking haha</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rsm870</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2010/02/18/review-of-the-latest-nikon-patent-applications.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-53435</link>
		<dc:creator>rsm870</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2010 15:01:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=9923#comment-53435</guid>
		<description>Haha! Well I think that its just a rough sketch, as [NR]admin has said. The real product will look glossy/rugged, cooler, and with grip for fingers rather than a chunk of plastic. [Or magnesium-alloy LOL]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Haha! Well I think that its just a rough sketch, as [NR]admin has said. The real product will look glossy/rugged, cooler, and with grip for fingers rather than a chunk of plastic. [Or magnesium-alloy LOL]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: burak</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2010/02/18/review-of-the-latest-nikon-patent-applications.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-53434</link>
		<dc:creator>burak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2010 14:28:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=9923#comment-53434</guid>
		<description>very straightforward question:
considering to buy a D90.. yes or wait the update?

thanks a lot!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>very straightforward question:<br />
considering to buy a D90.. yes or wait the update?</p>
<p>thanks a lot!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2010/02/18/review-of-the-latest-nikon-patent-applications.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-53400</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2010 09:36:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=9923#comment-53400</guid>
		<description>When will the D90s be out!! Is this just a rumor?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When will the D90s be out!! Is this just a rumor?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Laurentiu Ilie</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2010/02/18/review-of-the-latest-nikon-patent-applications.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-53395</link>
		<dc:creator>Laurentiu Ilie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2010 08:24:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=9923#comment-53395</guid>
		<description>I agree.

An 18-135 f/3.5-4.5 VR DX is what I am waiting for.
Even an 24-135 f/3.5-4.5 or 35-135 f/3.5-f4.5.

Fast focusing is also very important.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree.</p>
<p>An 18-135 f/3.5-4.5 VR DX is what I am waiting for.<br />
Even an 24-135 f/3.5-4.5 or 35-135 f/3.5-f4.5.</p>
<p>Fast focusing is also very important.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Micah</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2010/02/18/review-of-the-latest-nikon-patent-applications.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-53368</link>
		<dc:creator>Micah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2010 04:16:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=9923#comment-53368</guid>
		<description>I love the dual controls for the metering pattern!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love the dual controls for the metering pattern!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2010/02/18/review-of-the-latest-nikon-patent-applications.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-53358</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2010 03:44:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=9923#comment-53358</guid>
		<description>Subject tracking is already in Coolpix cameras.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Subject tracking is already in Coolpix cameras.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2010/02/18/review-of-the-latest-nikon-patent-applications.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-53348</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2010 02:38:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=9923#comment-53348</guid>
		<description>The D40s will make my D50 a happy great grand daddy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The D40s will make my D50 a happy great grand daddy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fixit</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2010/02/18/review-of-the-latest-nikon-patent-applications.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-53347</link>
		<dc:creator>fixit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2010 02:34:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=9923#comment-53347</guid>
		<description>SUBJECT TRACKING --  there&#039;s the technology Tiger Wood&#039;s wife can use.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SUBJECT TRACKING &#8212;  there&#8217;s the technology Tiger Wood&#8217;s wife can use.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: santela</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2010/02/18/review-of-the-latest-nikon-patent-applications.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-53346</link>
		<dc:creator>santela</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2010 02:15:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=9923#comment-53346</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think you get his humor...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think you get his humor&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Henry Nikon Fan</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2010/02/18/review-of-the-latest-nikon-patent-applications.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-53345</link>
		<dc:creator>Henry Nikon Fan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2010 02:12:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=9923#comment-53345</guid>
		<description>I hope not.  I hope that it is more on the line of the 10-24mm and also with a distance scale.  An AF-S DX 18-135mm f/3.5-4.5G VR would make a nice match with the AF-S DX 10-24mm f/3.5-4.5G and AF-S DX 35mm f/1.8G lenses.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hope not.  I hope that it is more on the line of the 10-24mm and also with a distance scale.  An AF-S DX 18-135mm f/3.5-4.5G VR would make a nice match with the AF-S DX 10-24mm f/3.5-4.5G and AF-S DX 35mm f/1.8G lenses.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ArtTwisted</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2010/02/18/review-of-the-latest-nikon-patent-applications.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-53344</link>
		<dc:creator>ArtTwisted</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2010 02:06:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=9923#comment-53344</guid>
		<description>considering the main market for this kind of lens , ie rich uncles and middle aged men with nothing better to do on there days off, id bet on plastic mount.  The kit lenses are still built pretty well though, the focus is always smooth on the many ive used and the zoom on my 18-105 doesent creep at all so its not all bad.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>considering the main market for this kind of lens , ie rich uncles and middle aged men with nothing better to do on there days off, id bet on plastic mount.  The kit lenses are still built pretty well though, the focus is always smooth on the many ive used and the zoom on my 18-105 doesent creep at all so its not all bad.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Terence</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2010/02/18/review-of-the-latest-nikon-patent-applications.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-53343</link>
		<dc:creator>Terence</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2010 02:03:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=9923#comment-53343</guid>
		<description>I really love the drawing of the running kids</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really love the drawing of the running kids</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2010/02/18/review-of-the-latest-nikon-patent-applications.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-53342</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2010 01:54:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=9923#comment-53342</guid>
		<description>Maybe it is for video continuous AF like the GH1 .......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe it is for video continuous AF like the GH1 &#8230;&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2010/02/18/review-of-the-latest-nikon-patent-applications.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-53341</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2010 01:53:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=9923#comment-53341</guid>
		<description>Maybe it s not for Photography!!!!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe it s not for Photography!!!!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Henry Nikon Fan</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2010/02/18/review-of-the-latest-nikon-patent-applications.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-53340</link>
		<dc:creator>Henry Nikon Fan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2010 01:22:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=9923#comment-53340</guid>
		<description>If this is another plastic mount lens, then I will pass.  If it is a metal mount lens, then I will consider.  

I would also have prefered it to be a little faster; f/3.5-4.5 even if this means more cost.  I like the AF-S 10-24mm f/3.5-4.5.  The f/5.6 is a bit slow.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If this is another plastic mount lens, then I will pass.  If it is a metal mount lens, then I will consider.  </p>
<p>I would also have prefered it to be a little faster; f/3.5-4.5 even if this means more cost.  I like the AF-S 10-24mm f/3.5-4.5.  The f/5.6 is a bit slow.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zorro</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2010/02/18/review-of-the-latest-nikon-patent-applications.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-53339</link>
		<dc:creator>Zorro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2010 01:19:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=9923#comment-53339</guid>
		<description>Nikon closely watches this site for ideas.  When, for example, a 16-35 f/4 VR zoom is rumored, they go ahead and produce that item.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nikon closely watches this site for ideas.  When, for example, a 16-35 f/4 VR zoom is rumored, they go ahead and produce that item.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

