<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Nikon related news/links</title>
	<atom:link href="http://nikonrumors.com/2010/02/14/nikon-related-newslinks-30.aspx/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2010/02/14/nikon-related-newslinks-30.aspx/</link>
	<description>where there’s smoke there’s fire</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 21:22:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Micah</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2010/02/14/nikon-related-newslinks-30.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-53515</link>
		<dc:creator>Micah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Feb 2010 01:15:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=9653#comment-53515</guid>
		<description>On some level I understand why they don&#039;t do interchangeable backs.  It would open the door to way more warranty repairs, and stats like that do drive many decision at corporations.  It&#039;s amazing we get stuff as good as we do with all the corporate bullshit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On some level I understand why they don&#8217;t do interchangeable backs.  It would open the door to way more warranty repairs, and stats like that do drive many decision at corporations.  It&#8217;s amazing we get stuff as good as we do with all the corporate bullshit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Micah</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2010/02/14/nikon-related-newslinks-30.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-53514</link>
		<dc:creator>Micah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Feb 2010 01:10:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=9653#comment-53514</guid>
		<description>They may not have the critical focus you think they did.

I wonder if the F6 has a whole table for calibrating individual lenses like the digital bodies have...?  The F6 only focuses as well as my d2x, which was pretty good, but not anything like my d300/d700.  The newer cams are MUCH better in low light.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They may not have the critical focus you think they did.</p>
<p>I wonder if the F6 has a whole table for calibrating individual lenses like the digital bodies have&#8230;?  The F6 only focuses as well as my d2x, which was pretty good, but not anything like my d300/d700.  The newer cams are MUCH better in low light.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: [NR] admin</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2010/02/14/nikon-related-newslinks-30.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-53473</link>
		<dc:creator>[NR] admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2010 18:01:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=9653#comment-53473</guid>
		<description>Bred, the software I use gets the prices automatically, once a day. If Amazon changes the price after that, it will not be updated in the price watch section till the next day. Also, very often retailers do the &quot;add to cart to see price&quot; trick - the software I use cannot do that, it just captures the price from the main product page and it does not take in consideration any discounts, rebates, etc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bred, the software I use gets the prices automatically, once a day. If Amazon changes the price after that, it will not be updated in the price watch section till the next day. Also, very often retailers do the &#8220;add to cart to see price&#8221; trick &#8211; the software I use cannot do that, it just captures the price from the main product page and it does not take in consideration any discounts, rebates, etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anders</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2010/02/14/nikon-related-newslinks-30.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-53330</link>
		<dc:creator>Anders</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 22:29:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=9653#comment-53330</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m hoping that they do like canon did with the 500/550D, i.e. announce before the offer expires and have the successor released when it expires. So with my optimistic thinking there might be an announcement soon and the camera to be released in early May :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m hoping that they do like canon did with the 500/550D, i.e. announce before the offer expires and have the successor released when it expires. So with my optimistic thinking there might be an announcement soon and the camera to be released in early May <img src='http://nikonrumors.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bred</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2010/02/14/nikon-related-newslinks-30.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-53298</link>
		<dc:creator>bred</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 13:08:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=9653#comment-53298</guid>
		<description>price watch is STILL broken... d90 for $699 at b&amp;h... more like $780. 

WTF</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>price watch is STILL broken&#8230; d90 for $699 at b&amp;h&#8230; more like $780. </p>
<p>WTF</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NEEKON</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2010/02/14/nikon-related-newslinks-30.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-53143</link>
		<dc:creator>NEEKON</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 00:31:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=9653#comment-53143</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s it!!!! I&#039;m going back to Contax N!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s it!!!! I&#8217;m going back to Contax N!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The invisible man.</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2010/02/14/nikon-related-newslinks-30.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-53141</link>
		<dc:creator>The invisible man.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 23:48:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=9653#comment-53141</guid>
		<description>F6</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>F6</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ArtTwisted</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2010/02/14/nikon-related-newslinks-30.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-53138</link>
		<dc:creator>ArtTwisted</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 20:06:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=9653#comment-53138</guid>
		<description>or the F4 :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>or the F4 <img src='http://nikonrumors.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hochzeitsfotograf</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2010/02/14/nikon-related-newslinks-30.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-53129</link>
		<dc:creator>Hochzeitsfotograf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 11:23:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=9653#comment-53129</guid>
		<description>sometimes i wonder why they would not just make digital backs for F3 and be done with it :-).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>sometimes i wonder why they would not just make digital backs for F3 and be done with it <img src='http://nikonrumors.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Micah</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2010/02/14/nikon-related-newslinks-30.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-53122</link>
		<dc:creator>Micah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 04:53:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=9653#comment-53122</guid>
		<description>That Eric at Photography Bay is just clueless.  Yet another article to highlight that fact.  I found this site through PB, but other than that, that site has been useless.

A lens with a 1.8 aperture needs a precision AF system calbrated to far tighter tolerances than Nikon&#039;s motor free bodies and much more precise than the majority of the Canon line.  Otherwise manual focus is better than the AF would be with a lens like that.  Except with live view, which is available on some of the bodies now anyway.

The current lack of a replacement for the 50/1.8 in Nikon&#039;s current line up makes sense and will probably not continue to be a priority for these reasons.

The 50/1.8 exists.  If you want that focal length and aperture, buy it.  The difference in size between a d90 and the d40/60/3000/5000 is negligible.  Nikon makes the lens and makes cameras that focus it.  If you want a fast aperture lens on a body without an AF motor, buy the superior 50/1.4.

If you want AF with with a 50/1.8  and the cheapest possible body, but a d50.

Otherwise quit yer whinin and make pictures with what you can today.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That Eric at Photography Bay is just clueless.  Yet another article to highlight that fact.  I found this site through PB, but other than that, that site has been useless.</p>
<p>A lens with a 1.8 aperture needs a precision AF system calbrated to far tighter tolerances than Nikon&#8217;s motor free bodies and much more precise than the majority of the Canon line.  Otherwise manual focus is better than the AF would be with a lens like that.  Except with live view, which is available on some of the bodies now anyway.</p>
<p>The current lack of a replacement for the 50/1.8 in Nikon&#8217;s current line up makes sense and will probably not continue to be a priority for these reasons.</p>
<p>The 50/1.8 exists.  If you want that focal length and aperture, buy it.  The difference in size between a d90 and the d40/60/3000/5000 is negligible.  Nikon makes the lens and makes cameras that focus it.  If you want a fast aperture lens on a body without an AF motor, buy the superior 50/1.4.</p>
<p>If you want AF with with a 50/1.8  and the cheapest possible body, but a d50.</p>
<p>Otherwise quit yer whinin and make pictures with what you can today.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The invisible man.</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2010/02/14/nikon-related-newslinks-30.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-53121</link>
		<dc:creator>The invisible man.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 22:55:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=9653#comment-53121</guid>
		<description>D90</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>D90</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2010/02/14/nikon-related-newslinks-30.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-53118</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 21:02:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=9653#comment-53118</guid>
		<description>In case you guys didn&#039;t notice, they superimposed the image of that dog and the flowers in front of the camera. Its likely a scam; I doubt it actually works.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In case you guys didn&#8217;t notice, they superimposed the image of that dog and the flowers in front of the camera. Its likely a scam; I doubt it actually works.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Landscape Photo</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2010/02/14/nikon-related-newslinks-30.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-53116</link>
		<dc:creator>Landscape Photo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 20:16:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=9653#comment-53116</guid>
		<description>I definitely want / will buy a 24mp D700x, or at least 18mp D900. But not a D700s, another 12mp with video :-[

If you need high-ISO performance, then why not D700? The difference from D3x is minor. If you need video, what&#039;s wrong with D300s? Good enough for that job.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I definitely want / will buy a 24mp D700x, or at least 18mp D900. But not a D700s, another 12mp with video :-[</p>
<p>If you need high-ISO performance, then why not D700? The difference from D3x is minor. If you need video, what&#8217;s wrong with D300s? Good enough for that job.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The invisible man.</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2010/02/14/nikon-related-newslinks-30.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-53115</link>
		<dc:creator>The invisible man.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 20:04:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=9653#comment-53115</guid>
		<description>$1990</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>$1990</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: xcm</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2010/02/14/nikon-related-newslinks-30.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-53113</link>
		<dc:creator>xcm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 19:45:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=9653#comment-53113</guid>
		<description>&quot;■New Nikon UK cashback program for the  D5000 and D90 models from Feb 12th – Apr 30th, 2010&quot;

so that means, will not be any announcement in this clas (D90) until May?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;■New Nikon UK cashback program for the  D5000 and D90 models from Feb 12th – Apr 30th, 2010&#8243;</p>
<p>so that means, will not be any announcement in this clas (D90) until May?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The invisible man.</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2010/02/14/nikon-related-newslinks-30.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-53112</link>
		<dc:creator>The invisible man.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 19:13:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=9653#comment-53112</guid>
		<description>What ?
You&#039;re not visiting this site only to read my comments ?
I&#039;m so disapointed !</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What ?<br />
You&#8217;re not visiting this site only to read my comments ?<br />
I&#8217;m so disapointed !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ZinhaEq</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2010/02/14/nikon-related-newslinks-30.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-53111</link>
		<dc:creator>ZinhaEq</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 18:44:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=9653#comment-53111</guid>
		<description>Can&#039;t wait the falling prices of Nikon D700. Can anyone tell me approximately, how much can it fall to? To 1700$, 1600$?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can&#8217;t wait the falling prices of Nikon D700. Can anyone tell me approximately, how much can it fall to? To 1700$, 1600$?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Where's my..</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2010/02/14/nikon-related-newslinks-30.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-53109</link>
		<dc:creator>Where's my..</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 18:21:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=9653#comment-53109</guid>
		<description>D700s, I need my D700s. In fact I just need a rumor of my D700s. That&#039;s why I keep hitting this site. All it needs to be is a D3s in D700 enclosure, and I want it now. I want it all. I want it all. I want it all, and I need it now. Ain&#039;t much I&#039;m asking - and I need it now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>D700s, I need my D700s. In fact I just need a rumor of my D700s. That&#8217;s why I keep hitting this site. All it needs to be is a D3s in D700 enclosure, and I want it now. I want it all. I want it all. I want it all, and I need it now. Ain&#8217;t much I&#8217;m asking &#8211; and I need it now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hobbit</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2010/02/14/nikon-related-newslinks-30.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-53103</link>
		<dc:creator>Hobbit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 16:26:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=9653#comment-53103</guid>
		<description>Does photo-arsenal ever make a sell? All I&#039;ve ever seen from them are exorbitant prices on equipment that may be rare but no where near $35k rare. But hey, if I could fool some rich person into buying it for that price I&#039;d be a happy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does photo-arsenal ever make a sell? All I&#8217;ve ever seen from them are exorbitant prices on equipment that may be rare but no where near $35k rare. But hey, if I could fool some rich person into buying it for that price I&#8217;d be a happy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TheNEO</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2010/02/14/nikon-related-newslinks-30.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-53078</link>
		<dc:creator>TheNEO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 05:56:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=9653#comment-53078</guid>
		<description>Cashback on D5000/D90? Is this Nikon&#039;s way of appeasing customers who bought a camera just before it was replaced by a new version? D7000 coming soon????? PLEEEEAAASSEEE!!!!!!!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cashback on D5000/D90? Is this Nikon&#8217;s way of appeasing customers who bought a camera just before it was replaced by a new version? D7000 coming soon????? PLEEEEAAASSEEE!!!!!!!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

