Comments on: Correction http://nikonrumors.com/2010/02/01/correction.aspx/ where there’s smoke there’s fire Fri, 25 May 2012 20:37:10 +0000 hourly 1 By: [NR] admin http://nikonrumors.com/2010/02/01/correction.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-49264 [NR] admin Tue, 02 Feb 2010 02:52:10 +0000 http://nikonrumors.com/2010/02/01/correction.aspx#comment-49264 I know, I know - I wrote about this in another post. Got too excited... again. I know, I know – I wrote about this in another post. Got too excited… again.

]]> By: 100% http://nikonrumors.com/2010/02/01/correction.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-49262 100% Tue, 02 Feb 2010 02:34:55 +0000 http://nikonrumors.com/2010/02/01/correction.aspx#comment-49262 There is no such thing as 100% rumor There is no such thing as 100% rumor

]]> By: enesunkie http://nikonrumors.com/2010/02/01/correction.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-49237 enesunkie Mon, 01 Feb 2010 22:48:56 +0000 http://nikonrumors.com/2010/02/01/correction.aspx#comment-49237 Youv'e been studying photography for ten years and don't have a camera? The replacement for the D90 will be a great featured camera but please get a cheap used P&S in the mean time. It's a beautiful world out there and some things come around only once in a lifetime, if that. Youv’e been studying photography for ten years and don’t have a camera? The replacement for the D90 will be a great featured camera but please get a cheap used P&S in the mean time. It’s a beautiful world out there and some things come around only once in a lifetime, if that.

]]> By: Jeffrey Friedl http://nikonrumors.com/2010/02/01/correction.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-49228 Jeffrey Friedl Mon, 01 Feb 2010 22:32:24 +0000 http://nikonrumors.com/2010/02/01/correction.aspx#comment-49228 Google Translation sucks a lot less than having nothing (keep your priorities straight :-) ), but that being said, I've had better luck with http://babelfish.yahoo.com/, which has been around for 10 years or so. Google Translation sucks a lot less than having nothing (keep your priorities straight :-) ), but that being said, I’ve had better luck with http://babelfish.yahoo.com/, which has been around for 10 years or so.

]]> By: GlobalGuy http://nikonrumors.com/2010/02/01/correction.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-49174 GlobalGuy Mon, 01 Feb 2010 18:47:43 +0000 http://nikonrumors.com/2010/02/01/correction.aspx#comment-49174 Yup -- and I heard that D3s & D3x guys are waiting for D3sx now too. Hell, even Nikon is so eager for the next generation they are skipping D800 and going straight to D900... :-} Yup — and I heard that D3s & D3x guys are waiting for D3sx now too.

Hell, even Nikon is so eager for the next generation they are skipping D800 and going straight to D900… :-}

]]> By: Kerni http://nikonrumors.com/2010/02/01/correction.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-49160 Kerni Mon, 01 Feb 2010 17:25:54 +0000 http://nikonrumors.com/2010/02/01/correction.aspx#comment-49160 yep, it really is and it's also time for 35mm f1.4, 85mmm f1.4, 135mm f2 and 80-400 VRII... if this wide zoom lens would cost almost the same as the 14-24 it's even more ridiculous... yep, it really is
and it’s also time for 35mm f1.4, 85mmm f1.4, 135mm f2 and 80-400 VRII…
if this wide zoom lens would cost almost the same as the 14-24 it’s even more ridiculous…

]]> By: nobody http://nikonrumors.com/2010/02/01/correction.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-49144 nobody Mon, 01 Feb 2010 16:44:17 +0000 http://nikonrumors.com/2010/02/01/correction.aspx#comment-49144 Agreed! Having VR in a 16-35 zoom, but not in the 300mm f4, that's ridiculous! Agreed! Having VR in a 16-35 zoom, but not in the 300mm f4, that’s ridiculous!

]]> By: Killa http://nikonrumors.com/2010/02/01/correction.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-49142 Killa Mon, 01 Feb 2010 16:39:39 +0000 http://nikonrumors.com/2010/02/01/correction.aspx#comment-49142 photography (mistake) photography (mistake)

]]> By: Killa http://nikonrumors.com/2010/02/01/correction.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-49140 Killa Mon, 01 Feb 2010 16:38:18 +0000 http://nikonrumors.com/2010/02/01/correction.aspx#comment-49140 May be. But for today I don't have any camera (and didn't have before (exept in mobile phone). :) It's true. I'm good in theory, but I don't have practice. Any way I'm sure I'm ready for D90's class. I read about photographi about 10 years. May be. But for today I don’t have any camera (and didn’t have before (exept in mobile phone). :) It’s true. I’m good in theory, but I don’t have practice. Any way I’m sure I’m ready for D90′s class. I read about photographi about 10 years.

]]> By: WoutK89 http://nikonrumors.com/2010/02/01/correction.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-49100 WoutK89 Mon, 01 Feb 2010 15:24:20 +0000 http://nikonrumors.com/2010/02/01/correction.aspx#comment-49100 How many people are going to be pissed, no new 80-400, but they do get a 16-35/4.0VR. Lets wait and see what else they have up their sleeves. How many people are going to be pissed, no new 80-400, but they do get a 16-35/4.0VR. Lets wait and see what else they have up their sleeves.

]]> By: Mi.le http://nikonrumors.com/2010/02/01/correction.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-49090 Mi.le Mon, 01 Feb 2010 15:07:37 +0000 http://nikonrumors.com/2010/02/01/correction.aspx#comment-49090 Well, everyone of us is waiting for our current model's +1 class up successor, eh? Well, everyone of us is waiting for our current model’s +1 class up successor, eh?

]]> By: Killa http://nikonrumors.com/2010/02/01/correction.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-49086 Killa Mon, 01 Feb 2010 15:02:22 +0000 http://nikonrumors.com/2010/02/01/correction.aspx#comment-49086 So, tomorrow Coolpix day, and day after tomorrow – Nikon DSLR day. :) Personally me waiting for D90's successor. So, tomorrow Coolpix day, and day after tomorrow – Nikon DSLR day. :) Personally me waiting for D90′s successor.

]]>