<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Busted!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://nikonrumors.com/2010/01/24/busted-2.aspx/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2010/01/24/busted-2.aspx/</link>
	<description>where there’s smoke there’s fire</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 20:11:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: myself</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2010/01/24/busted-2.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-48373</link>
		<dc:creator>myself</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 15:19:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=9494#comment-48373</guid>
		<description>I know what my next lens is going to be.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know what my next lens is going to be.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: juandiegojr</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2010/01/24/busted-2.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-48188</link>
		<dc:creator>juandiegojr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 02:00:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=9494#comment-48188</guid>
		<description>LOL in the pic looks like the reader is horny because of the new cameras and is going to play 5 against 1 hahaha jk.

PS: hmm 24 mpx... hmmm hahahaha</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LOL in the pic looks like the reader is horny because of the new cameras and is going to play 5 against 1 hahaha jk.</p>
<p>PS: hmm 24 mpx&#8230; hmmm hahahaha</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WoutK89</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2010/01/24/busted-2.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-48132</link>
		<dc:creator>WoutK89</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2010 23:58:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=9494#comment-48132</guid>
		<description>300 f/4 is lower priority, it has already AF-S, the 80-400 is really behind on the other Pro lenses out there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>300 f/4 is lower priority, it has already AF-S, the 80-400 is really behind on the other Pro lenses out there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2010/01/24/busted-2.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-48128</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2010 23:42:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=9494#comment-48128</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m actually more interested in lenses anyway. I think that the current cameras are all we need right now. Lenses like the 80-400 and 300/f4 are more important to be finally updated.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m actually more interested in lenses anyway. I think that the current cameras are all we need right now. Lenses like the 80-400 and 300/f4 are more important to be finally updated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: [NR] admin</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2010/01/24/busted-2.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-48127</link>
		<dc:creator>[NR] admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2010 22:44:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=9494#comment-48127</guid>
		<description>trust me, all the info I have is online already, I don&#039;t hide anything :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>trust me, all the info I have is online already, I don&#8217;t hide anything <img src='http://nikonrumors.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: [NR] admin</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2010/01/24/busted-2.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-48126</link>
		<dc:creator>[NR] admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2010 22:36:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=9494#comment-48126</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t want to kill your dreams, but consider also the possibility that there may not be a new DSLR for PMA. Usually DSLR info is easy to leak in advance, lenses are tough - so we may just see some new lenses, the telelconverters and the p&amp;s cameras. This may explain the lack of information at that point. I don&#039;t even have any clues for the second date (and whether there is one at all) - I doubt that they will introduce other products with the new Coolpix cameras on the same event. Maybe they are saving money and will have one event for all new Nikon products?
Also, when was the last time Nikon announced a DSLR, lenses, teleconverters, Coolpix cameras, all at the same time? I say don&#039;t expect much for PMA and be pleasantly surprised if it happens.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t want to kill your dreams, but consider also the possibility that there may not be a new DSLR for PMA. Usually DSLR info is easy to leak in advance, lenses are tough &#8211; so we may just see some new lenses, the telelconverters and the p&amp;s cameras. This may explain the lack of information at that point. I don&#8217;t even have any clues for the second date (and whether there is one at all) &#8211; I doubt that they will introduce other products with the new Coolpix cameras on the same event. Maybe they are saving money and will have one event for all new Nikon products?<br />
Also, when was the last time Nikon announced a DSLR, lenses, teleconverters, Coolpix cameras, all at the same time? I say don&#8217;t expect much for PMA and be pleasantly surprised if it happens.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: []V[] i k e</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2010/01/24/busted-2.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-48121</link>
		<dc:creator>[]V[] i k e</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2010 21:59:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=9494#comment-48121</guid>
		<description>LOL, I&#039;m bored too. SO I watch this forum once a day, otherwise I would get nuts, 

I bought D90 on sale yesterday ;) Not for me-&gt; For my wife LOL</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LOL, I&#8217;m bored too. SO I watch this forum once a day, otherwise I would get nuts, </p>
<p>I bought D90 on sale yesterday <img src='http://nikonrumors.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' />  Not for me-&gt; For my wife LOL</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2010/01/24/busted-2.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-48120</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2010 21:48:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=9494#comment-48120</guid>
		<description>Bugger, just a few weeks until PMA and i&#039;m getting bored because there are not enough rumors.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bugger, just a few weeks until PMA and i&#8217;m getting bored because there are not enough rumors.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken Hogan</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2010/01/24/busted-2.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-48117</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken Hogan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2010 19:38:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=9494#comment-48117</guid>
		<description>He now also predicts the Coolpix P100, lol - too funny</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>He now also predicts the Coolpix P100, lol &#8211; too funny</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WoutK89</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2010/01/24/busted-2.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-48116</link>
		<dc:creator>WoutK89</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2010 19:01:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=9494#comment-48116</guid>
		<description>We know... :o</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We know&#8230; <img src='http://nikonrumors.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_surprised.gif' alt=':o' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thedude</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2010/01/24/busted-2.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-48115</link>
		<dc:creator>thedude</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2010 18:44:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=9494#comment-48115</guid>
		<description>this is actually sort of what i wanted to say.
you mostly you have take a compromise.

canon doesn&#039;t offer a decent wide angle lens, which nikon clearly does. on the other hand nikon doesn&#039;t have an affordable high MPx cam (not yet), canon does.

so you gotta choose.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>this is actually sort of what i wanted to say.<br />
you mostly you have take a compromise.</p>
<p>canon doesn&#8217;t offer a decent wide angle lens, which nikon clearly does. on the other hand nikon doesn&#8217;t have an affordable high MPx cam (not yet), canon does.</p>
<p>so you gotta choose.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: low</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2010/01/24/busted-2.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-48114</link>
		<dc:creator>low</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2010 18:27:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=9494#comment-48114</guid>
		<description>yep, TH wasnt even talkin about a d900 till other sites started mentioning it for quite some time now, lol.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yep, TH wasnt even talkin about a d900 till other sites started mentioning it for quite some time now, lol.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken Hogan</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2010/01/24/busted-2.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-48113</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken Hogan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2010 18:18:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=9494#comment-48113</guid>
		<description>According to Thom the D900 was suppose to be released last Spring and the D700 replacement in October 2009, hmmmmm.... Should I mention his glass predictions?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to Thom the D900 was suppose to be released last Spring and the D700 replacement in October 2009, hmmmmm&#8230;. Should I mention his glass predictions?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken Hogan</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2010/01/24/busted-2.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-48112</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken Hogan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2010 18:16:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=9494#comment-48112</guid>
		<description>Agree, just look at his response on the 70-200mm problem, he wrote it a day after Nikon&#039;s official explanation, I guess he did not have a clue before.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agree, just look at his response on the 70-200mm problem, he wrote it a day after Nikon&#8217;s official explanation, I guess he did not have a clue before.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken Hogan</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2010/01/24/busted-2.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-48111</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken Hogan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2010 18:12:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=9494#comment-48111</guid>
		<description>TH repeats what he reads here on NR - just look at his D900 and teleconverter &quot;predictions&quot;, he just adds a two page explanation why this should happen and people with less brain horsepower think that he is god.
Now KR is a different story (kidding...) no, KR and TH are the same to me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>TH repeats what he reads here on NR &#8211; just look at his D900 and teleconverter &#8220;predictions&#8221;, he just adds a two page explanation why this should happen and people with less brain horsepower think that he is god.<br />
Now KR is a different story (kidding&#8230;) no, KR and TH are the same to me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: low</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2010/01/24/busted-2.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-48110</link>
		<dc:creator>low</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2010 18:03:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=9494#comment-48110</guid>
		<description>TH is late with his comments which lead me to believe how he has to gather info just like any of us would.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>TH is late with his comments which lead me to believe how he has to gather info just like any of us would.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Just a guess by mag!</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2010/01/24/busted-2.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-48109</link>
		<dc:creator>Just a guess by mag!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2010 17:56:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=9494#comment-48109</guid>
		<description>It is just a guess from the magazine! 

See the comment made at http://www.flickr.com/photos/nikonrumors/4300848382/ where it says:
---------------
hayuki / Veno    says:
They are written &quot;予報レンズ” (Forecast lens), &quot;予報カメラ&quot; (Forecast camera) in this article. 
They are written the possibility 50% in D95, 55% in D700X. 

It is an article on the forecast of this magazine and it is not true. 
---------------</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is just a guess from the magazine! </p>
<p>See the comment made at <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/nikonrumors/4300848382/" rel="nofollow">http://www.flickr.com/photos/nikonrumors/4300848382/</a> where it says:<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;<br />
hayuki / Veno    says:<br />
They are written &#8220;予報レンズ” (Forecast lens), &#8220;予報カメラ&#8221; (Forecast camera) in this article.<br />
They are written the possibility 50% in D95, 55% in D700X. </p>
<p>It is an article on the forecast of this magazine and it is not true.<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nimda</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2010/01/24/busted-2.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-48108</link>
		<dc:creator>nimda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2010 17:53:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=9494#comment-48108</guid>
		<description>Disagree.  Most of this is just speculation.  Thom is way more accurate in his comments.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Disagree.  Most of this is just speculation.  Thom is way more accurate in his comments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: low</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2010/01/24/busted-2.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-48107</link>
		<dc:creator>low</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2010 17:22:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=9494#comment-48107</guid>
		<description>TH doesnt hold a candle to NR imo.  its easy to say we&#039;ll hear something new in Feb. - well of course, its PMA!  i think TH enjoys writing about how much he &#039;knows&#039; and likes to build himself up on DPR.  ML is the guy with the connections, or at least has been pretty close to bringing more concrete info to us fanatics.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>TH doesnt hold a candle to NR imo.  its easy to say we&#8217;ll hear something new in Feb. &#8211; well of course, its PMA!  i think TH enjoys writing about how much he &#8216;knows&#8217; and likes to build himself up on DPR.  ML is the guy with the connections, or at least has been pretty close to bringing more concrete info to us fanatics.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nimda</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2010/01/24/busted-2.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-48105</link>
		<dc:creator>nimda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2010 16:47:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=9494#comment-48105</guid>
		<description>Seriously.  Once again Thom Hogan is CRUSHING you.  Keep &quot;reporting&quot; without real investigation and you will never make it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seriously.  Once again Thom Hogan is CRUSHING you.  Keep &#8220;reporting&#8221; without real investigation and you will never make it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

