<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Your next Coolpix may be sending/receiving emails (Nikon patent)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://nikonrumors.com/2009/12/11/your-next-coolpix-may-be-seningreceiving-emails-nikon-patent.aspx/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/12/11/your-next-coolpix-may-be-seningreceiving-emails-nikon-patent.aspx/</link>
	<description>where there’s smoke there’s fire</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 18:34:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: tester</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/12/11/your-next-coolpix-may-be-seningreceiving-emails-nikon-patent.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-43541</link>
		<dc:creator>tester</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 14:20:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=8828#comment-43541</guid>
		<description>this is a double post, sorry, don&#039;t know if you all read all again, but

just have a look to “xphone” at youtube than you know all the future</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>this is a double post, sorry, don&#8217;t know if you all read all again, but</p>
<p>just have a look to “xphone” at youtube than you know all the future</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tester</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/12/11/your-next-coolpix-may-be-seningreceiving-emails-nikon-patent.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-43540</link>
		<dc:creator>tester</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 14:19:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=8828#comment-43540</guid>
		<description>just have a look to &quot;xphone&quot; at youtube than you know all the future</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>just have a look to &#8220;xphone&#8221; at youtube than you know all the future</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lepsik</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/12/11/your-next-coolpix-may-be-seningreceiving-emails-nikon-patent.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-43509</link>
		<dc:creator>Lepsik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2009 17:31:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=8828#comment-43509</guid>
		<description>Actually P6000 already has email client, WAN &amp; WiFI on a board.

This patent just a way to protect existing technology</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually P6000 already has email client, WAN &amp; WiFI on a board.</p>
<p>This patent just a way to protect existing technology</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blackbeard Ben</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/12/11/your-next-coolpix-may-be-seningreceiving-emails-nikon-patent.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-43481</link>
		<dc:creator>Blackbeard Ben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2009 03:44:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=8828#comment-43481</guid>
		<description>Leaving the market would be foolish - however being a market leader and innovator would be extremely smart.

After reading Thom Hogan&#039;s 2010 predictions, I&#039;m convinced: In 15-20 years the standard compact camera market will be very small indeed.  Smart phones will have dominated the segment by then - providing what the majority of consumers want: a compact camera adequate for posed photos of friends, family, and tourist destinations.

I imagine that within 5 years a phone company will team up with a camera/lens manufacturer (or vice-versa) and produce a smart phone with a decent lens and a normal compact camera sized sensor (1/1.8&quot; CCD or similar).  Decent quality HD video would be integrated of course, and probably an SD card slot - although that wouldn&#039;t necessarily be a must because of a big on-board flash drive and broadband wireless.  A decent flash would be included too.

Intuitive controls are a must - but apparently not too much of an issue with touch screen portable devices, since the S70 only has two buttons (power and shutter release).  The only issue I see is battery life - but new technologies like micro-turbines may be a solution to that issue.

Larger compacts would remain - I think EVIL and other larger sensor cameras will be far more popular in the future as the first big step up from the smart phone cameras.  Of course, they&#039;ll start integrating wireless, and other features as well.  The difference is that their focus will be on taking photos above all else - as opposed to the smart phones that will need to do everything well but nothing great (besides making calls).  But the typical compact camera of today will hardly exist except in the hands of stubborn grandparents who don&#039;t want anything to do with a smart phone.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Leaving the market would be foolish &#8211; however being a market leader and innovator would be extremely smart.</p>
<p>After reading Thom Hogan&#8217;s 2010 predictions, I&#8217;m convinced: In 15-20 years the standard compact camera market will be very small indeed.  Smart phones will have dominated the segment by then &#8211; providing what the majority of consumers want: a compact camera adequate for posed photos of friends, family, and tourist destinations.</p>
<p>I imagine that within 5 years a phone company will team up with a camera/lens manufacturer (or vice-versa) and produce a smart phone with a decent lens and a normal compact camera sized sensor (1/1.8&#8243; CCD or similar).  Decent quality HD video would be integrated of course, and probably an SD card slot &#8211; although that wouldn&#8217;t necessarily be a must because of a big on-board flash drive and broadband wireless.  A decent flash would be included too.</p>
<p>Intuitive controls are a must &#8211; but apparently not too much of an issue with touch screen portable devices, since the S70 only has two buttons (power and shutter release).  The only issue I see is battery life &#8211; but new technologies like micro-turbines may be a solution to that issue.</p>
<p>Larger compacts would remain &#8211; I think EVIL and other larger sensor cameras will be far more popular in the future as the first big step up from the smart phone cameras.  Of course, they&#8217;ll start integrating wireless, and other features as well.  The difference is that their focus will be on taking photos above all else &#8211; as opposed to the smart phones that will need to do everything well but nothing great (besides making calls).  But the typical compact camera of today will hardly exist except in the hands of stubborn grandparents who don&#8217;t want anything to do with a smart phone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fugue137</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/12/11/your-next-coolpix-may-be-seningreceiving-emails-nikon-patent.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-43443</link>
		<dc:creator>fugue137</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Dec 2009 19:48:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=8828#comment-43443</guid>
		<description>Great.  A camera that sends emails.  This is patent-worthy how?  It just glues a few pre-existing pieces together in a way that&#039;s not even remotely interesting.  Stupid patent examiners.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great.  A camera that sends emails.  This is patent-worthy how?  It just glues a few pre-existing pieces together in a way that&#8217;s not even remotely interesting.  Stupid patent examiners.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SteveK</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/12/11/your-next-coolpix-may-be-seningreceiving-emails-nikon-patent.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-43343</link>
		<dc:creator>SteveK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Dec 2009 02:01:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=8828#comment-43343</guid>
		<description>I hate to break this news  to Nikon, but I would think the iPhone anticipates this so-called invention.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hate to break this news  to Nikon, but I would think the iPhone anticipates this so-called invention.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rkas</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/12/11/your-next-coolpix-may-be-seningreceiving-emails-nikon-patent.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-43341</link>
		<dc:creator>rkas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Dec 2009 00:06:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=8828#comment-43341</guid>
		<description>Im fully aware of that, ever heard of sarcasm? :P</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Im fully aware of that, ever heard of sarcasm? <img src='http://nikonrumors.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_razz.gif' alt=':P' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/12/11/your-next-coolpix-may-be-seningreceiving-emails-nikon-patent.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-43340</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Dec 2009 23:29:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=8828#comment-43340</guid>
		<description>Exactly. This will be the PJ&#039;s dream once it reaches the D1-series. Before soon, it&#039;ll be faster to produce a new article picture than it&#039;ll be to produce the actual article. 

Besides, you do you guys really think Nikon solely focuses on DSLR-development? And as they probably realize that they can&#039;t match what Canon and Panasonic are producing when it comes to P&amp;S they are trying to find a niche of unique innovative solutions. Personally I&#039;d prefer a larger 6MP sensor and a 35-80mm f/2-2.8 lens.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Exactly. This will be the PJ&#8217;s dream once it reaches the D1-series. Before soon, it&#8217;ll be faster to produce a new article picture than it&#8217;ll be to produce the actual article. </p>
<p>Besides, you do you guys really think Nikon solely focuses on DSLR-development? And as they probably realize that they can&#8217;t match what Canon and Panasonic are producing when it comes to P&amp;S they are trying to find a niche of unique innovative solutions. Personally I&#8217;d prefer a larger 6MP sensor and a 35-80mm f/2-2.8 lens.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: another anonymous</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/12/11/your-next-coolpix-may-be-seningreceiving-emails-nikon-patent.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-43339</link>
		<dc:creator>another anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Dec 2009 23:17:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=8828#comment-43339</guid>
		<description>thanks, nice to hear it</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thanks, nice to hear it</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: another anonymous</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/12/11/your-next-coolpix-may-be-seningreceiving-emails-nikon-patent.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-43338</link>
		<dc:creator>another anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Dec 2009 23:12:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=8828#comment-43338</guid>
		<description>but how to deliver better stuff when it&#039;s costs money to develop it? why cannot it be mainstream pointed business with inovative compact cameras? if it delivers money for development of the best stuff for us then nikon please do it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>but how to deliver better stuff when it&#8217;s costs money to develop it? why cannot it be mainstream pointed business with inovative compact cameras? if it delivers money for development of the best stuff for us then nikon please do it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: another anonymous</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/12/11/your-next-coolpix-may-be-seningreceiving-emails-nikon-patent.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-43337</link>
		<dc:creator>another anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Dec 2009 23:05:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=8828#comment-43337</guid>
		<description>people here used to say  &quot;what would he want more? watches with spout/jet of water?&quot; when someone wanted too much.. do we? i want long focal point lens without any handshake impact ;) but built in tripod doesn&#039;t seem so good</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>people here used to say  &#8220;what would he want more? watches with spout/jet of water?&#8221; when someone wanted too much.. do we? i want long focal point lens without any handshake impact <img src='http://nikonrumors.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' />  but built in tripod doesn&#8217;t seem so good</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: imissmickey</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/12/11/your-next-coolpix-may-be-seningreceiving-emails-nikon-patent.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-43335</link>
		<dc:creator>imissmickey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Dec 2009 22:28:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=8828#comment-43335</guid>
		<description>Oops CR guy - I can&#039;t believe I am the first one to point out the missing &quot;D&quot; in the word sending (instead of sening).

Outside of a typo.  Although, I can see how this ability will set them apart but it makes little sense with the cell phones we have with built in cameras. The improved image quality and zoom would be a plus but not worth the risk of getting viruses that take down the camera.

I am more interested in the D800 or whatever it will be called and P &amp; S without shutter lag.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oops CR guy &#8211; I can&#8217;t believe I am the first one to point out the missing &#8220;D&#8221; in the word sending (instead of sening).</p>
<p>Outside of a typo.  Although, I can see how this ability will set them apart but it makes little sense with the cell phones we have with built in cameras. The improved image quality and zoom would be a plus but not worth the risk of getting viruses that take down the camera.</p>
<p>I am more interested in the D800 or whatever it will be called and P &amp; S without shutter lag.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/12/11/your-next-coolpix-may-be-seningreceiving-emails-nikon-patent.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-43334</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Dec 2009 22:00:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=8828#comment-43334</guid>
		<description>and an attachable bayonet for the lion who wasnt fooled by the birdtent :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>and an attachable bayonet for the lion who wasnt fooled by the birdtent <img src='http://nikonrumors.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jo</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/12/11/your-next-coolpix-may-be-seningreceiving-emails-nikon-patent.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-43333</link>
		<dc:creator>jo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Dec 2009 21:55:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=8828#comment-43333</guid>
		<description>yeah so i can use my slr to jump start my car :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yeah so i can use my slr to jump start my car <img src='http://nikonrumors.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gingerjimmy</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/12/11/your-next-coolpix-may-be-seningreceiving-emails-nikon-patent.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-43332</link>
		<dc:creator>gingerjimmy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Dec 2009 21:47:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=8828#comment-43332</guid>
		<description>don&#039;t want one</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>don&#8217;t want one</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zorro</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/12/11/your-next-coolpix-may-be-seningreceiving-emails-nikon-patent.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-43331</link>
		<dc:creator>Zorro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Dec 2009 21:44:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=8828#comment-43331</guid>
		<description>The gimicks I&#039;d like to see in a Coolpix are: larger sensor, six megapixels, P A S M modes, rapid response, 24-120 equivalent f/2.0-4.0, decent viewfinder (OVF or EVF), and EN-EL1 battery (because of non-rechargeable equivalent).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The gimicks I&#8217;d like to see in a Coolpix are: larger sensor, six megapixels, P A S M modes, rapid response, 24-120 equivalent f/2.0-4.0, decent viewfinder (OVF or EVF), and EN-EL1 battery (because of non-rechargeable equivalent).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Soap</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/12/11/your-next-coolpix-may-be-seningreceiving-emails-nikon-patent.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-43329</link>
		<dc:creator>Soap</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Dec 2009 20:14:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=8828#comment-43329</guid>
		<description>This is the application.  Was it granted?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is the application.  Was it granted?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Soap</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/12/11/your-next-coolpix-may-be-seningreceiving-emails-nikon-patent.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-43328</link>
		<dc:creator>Soap</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Dec 2009 20:12:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=8828#comment-43328</guid>
		<description>WTF do you think funds high-end camera development?  

I&#039;ll give you a hint - it ain&#039;t high-end cameras.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WTF do you think funds high-end camera development?  </p>
<p>I&#8217;ll give you a hint &#8211; it ain&#8217;t high-end cameras.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jesus_sti</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/12/11/your-next-coolpix-may-be-seningreceiving-emails-nikon-patent.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-43325</link>
		<dc:creator>Jesus_sti</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Dec 2009 20:07:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=8828#comment-43325</guid>
		<description>Nikon dslr and nikon coolpix aren&#039;t the same team. The team of coolpix made is job to transform a camera into a gadget technologie. Dslr team made other thing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nikon dslr and nikon coolpix aren&#8217;t the same team. The team of coolpix made is job to transform a camera into a gadget technologie. Dslr team made other thing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jean Sérien</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/12/11/your-next-coolpix-may-be-seningreceiving-emails-nikon-patent.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-43327</link>
		<dc:creator>Jean Sérien</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Dec 2009 19:41:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=8828#comment-43327</guid>
		<description>No, Mr NRAdmin, so stupid thing will NEVER be my next camera.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, Mr NRAdmin, so stupid thing will NEVER be my next camera.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

