<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: FX format Q660?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://nikonrumors.com/2009/10/15/fx-format-q660.aspx/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/10/15/fx-format-q660.aspx/</link>
	<description>where there’s smoke there’s fire</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 18:00:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Fried Toast</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/10/15/fx-format-q660.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-38620</link>
		<dc:creator>Fried Toast</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 05:06:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=7854#comment-38620</guid>
		<description>I have my MD-D10 grip leftover from my D300 days and I think the only time I ever stuck it on was to verify that it worked when I first bought the D700. I spied an opportunity to pick up a D3 used once for US$2500. Was highly tempted to jump on it. Instead, I waited and picked up a used D700 several months later. Couldn&#039;t be happier.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have my MD-D10 grip leftover from my D300 days and I think the only time I ever stuck it on was to verify that it worked when I first bought the D700. I spied an opportunity to pick up a D3 used once for US$2500. Was highly tempted to jump on it. Instead, I waited and picked up a used D700 several months later. Couldn&#8217;t be happier.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fried Toast</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/10/15/fx-format-q660.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-38619</link>
		<dc:creator>Fried Toast</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 05:02:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=7854#comment-38619</guid>
		<description>Assume nothing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Assume nothing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fried Toast</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/10/15/fx-format-q660.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-38618</link>
		<dc:creator>Fried Toast</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 04:40:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=7854#comment-38618</guid>
		<description>Looks like a poor choice in grammar. I&#039;d hazard a guess that he meant the D3 is being discontinued upon the release of the D3s.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks like a poor choice in grammar. I&#8217;d hazard a guess that he meant the D3 is being discontinued upon the release of the D3s.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Sewell</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/10/15/fx-format-q660.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-38574</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Sewell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 16:13:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=7854#comment-38574</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m assuming you may be NPU registered, rather than NPS</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m assuming you may be NPU registered, rather than NPS</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dreen</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/10/15/fx-format-q660.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-38515</link>
		<dc:creator>Dreen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Oct 2009 23:45:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=7854#comment-38515</guid>
		<description>Yeah I did. Maybe it&#039;s the updated version for the D3Ps?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah I did. Maybe it&#8217;s the updated version for the D3Ps?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kensai</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/10/15/fx-format-q660.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-38467</link>
		<dc:creator>Kensai</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 19:42:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=7854#comment-38467</guid>
		<description>Hey, if you want to read all comments you will still be able to do it. I would like to read comments that have much positive feedback. It&#039;s really a waste of time reading all that uncalled for whining I&#039;m seeing lately.

And I CAN&#039;T avoid it if there is no comment rating mechanism.

Last but not least, not every whining is bad. Perhaps some whining with arguments might get positive feedback and have many +++ ratings.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, if you want to read all comments you will still be able to do it. I would like to read comments that have much positive feedback. It&#8217;s really a waste of time reading all that uncalled for whining I&#8217;m seeing lately.</p>
<p>And I CAN&#8217;T avoid it if there is no comment rating mechanism.</p>
<p>Last but not least, not every whining is bad. Perhaps some whining with arguments might get positive feedback and have many +++ ratings.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zzddrr</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/10/15/fx-format-q660.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-38459</link>
		<dc:creator>zzddrr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 18:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=7854#comment-38459</guid>
		<description>My only guess is that they are stoned. Nikon will suffer for big time next Tuesday. If the gossip is true (why not, it&#039;s a big day for) Canon will come out something really good camera. 

And we Nikon users can wait another 6 months to get some plastic crap and perhaps an &quot;s&quot; version. I start considering to look into other makers offerings because I refuse to pay 8k for the D3x.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My only guess is that they are stoned. Nikon will suffer for big time next Tuesday. If the gossip is true (why not, it&#8217;s a big day for) Canon will come out something really good camera. </p>
<p>And we Nikon users can wait another 6 months to get some plastic crap and perhaps an &#8220;s&#8221; version. I start considering to look into other makers offerings because I refuse to pay 8k for the D3x.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris B.</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/10/15/fx-format-q660.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-38448</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris B.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 16:19:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=7854#comment-38448</guid>
		<description>Thank you. All of your answers were very informative.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you. All of your answers were very informative.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: john</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/10/15/fx-format-q660.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-38433</link>
		<dc:creator>john</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 14:49:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=7854#comment-38433</guid>
		<description>the d700 is more of an &quot;on the go camera&quot; not some brick used for special occasions...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the d700 is more of an &#8220;on the go camera&#8221; not some brick used for special occasions&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Segura</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/10/15/fx-format-q660.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-38432</link>
		<dc:creator>Segura</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 14:22:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=7854#comment-38432</guid>
		<description>I shoot a D700 and can answer about the grip.  When I use my 50mm 1.4G lens, I shoot with the body only.  When I drop on a heavy lens, like my 14-24, 24-70, or 70-200, the grip balances the weight better, and makes it easier to hold.  So better &quot;grip&quot; with the grip.  Shooting vertical is much better as well.
As for the D3, I had the option to upgrade (trade) my D700 for a D3 recently, but did not because I like the sensor cleaning and the built in flash.  Granted the built in flash would only give coverage with my 50mm 1.4G lens, but I use it mainly as a CLS trigger for my SB-900.  Without the built in, I would need to pony up another $450.
Finally to keep it more compact.  On a recent photo trip to El Salvador, I had to pack light, so I left the MB-10 at home, and just took my body, 14-24, anad 24-70.  I brought an SB-400 as well and left my SB-900 at home.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I shoot a D700 and can answer about the grip.  When I use my 50mm 1.4G lens, I shoot with the body only.  When I drop on a heavy lens, like my 14-24, 24-70, or 70-200, the grip balances the weight better, and makes it easier to hold.  So better &#8220;grip&#8221; with the grip.  Shooting vertical is much better as well.<br />
As for the D3, I had the option to upgrade (trade) my D700 for a D3 recently, but did not because I like the sensor cleaning and the built in flash.  Granted the built in flash would only give coverage with my 50mm 1.4G lens, but I use it mainly as a CLS trigger for my SB-900.  Without the built in, I would need to pony up another $450.<br />
Finally to keep it more compact.  On a recent photo trip to El Salvador, I had to pack light, so I left the MB-10 at home, and just took my body, 14-24, anad 24-70.  I brought an SB-400 as well and left my SB-900 at home.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: getanalogue</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/10/15/fx-format-q660.aspx/comment-page-2/#comment-38431</link>
		<dc:creator>getanalogue</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 14:15:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=7854#comment-38431</guid>
		<description>and could make a Jesus video 2000 years ago</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>and could make a Jesus video 2000 years ago</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/10/15/fx-format-q660.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-38428</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 13:42:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=7854#comment-38428</guid>
		<description>Nikon is not saying you should buy this lens with the camera. To assume that&#039;s why the released them on the same day means something is ludicrous. The 70-200 2.8VR II was released with a DX body. What Nikon telling us something then too?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nikon is not saying you should buy this lens with the camera. To assume that&#8217;s why the released them on the same day means something is ludicrous. The 70-200 2.8VR II was released with a DX body. What Nikon telling us something then too?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/10/15/fx-format-q660.aspx/comment-page-2/#comment-38427</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 13:39:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=7854#comment-38427</guid>
		<description>To bad we can&#039;t go back in time 10 years ago !
We could sell bunch of D3000 for $10.000 each !</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To bad we can&#8217;t go back in time 10 years ago !<br />
We could sell bunch of D3000 for $10.000 each !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: getanalogue</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/10/15/fx-format-q660.aspx/comment-page-2/#comment-38426</link>
		<dc:creator>getanalogue</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 12:59:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=7854#comment-38426</guid>
		<description>never had a canon in my hand.... I am pacifist - and taking pictures, my D90, Bentley F4, and Contax 645 - just waiting for a multi-shot D400 - will come next year.
honestly, I think 1.) Q660 is a new FX camera to be launched this year, 2.) I do not think that it will be a D700s/x, and 3.) maybe a rangefinder cam, or D4 with new high res IQ and sensor (maybe 48 MP?) using multi-shot on basis of Exmor-R sensor. The only people whining will be Canon guys and poor guys like myself who cannot afford to spend 10,000.- USD for a camera</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>never had a canon in my hand&#8230;. I am pacifist &#8211; and taking pictures, my D90, Bentley F4, and Contax 645 &#8211; just waiting for a multi-shot D400 &#8211; will come next year.<br />
honestly, I think 1.) Q660 is a new FX camera to be launched this year, 2.) I do not think that it will be a D700s/x, and 3.) maybe a rangefinder cam, or D4 with new high res IQ and sensor (maybe 48 MP?) using multi-shot on basis of Exmor-R sensor. The only people whining will be Canon guys and poor guys like myself who cannot afford to spend 10,000.- USD for a camera</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/10/15/fx-format-q660.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-38425</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 12:26:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=7854#comment-38425</guid>
		<description>D700xs</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>D700xs</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: another anonymous</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/10/15/fx-format-q660.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-38423</link>
		<dc:creator>another anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 12:06:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=7854#comment-38423</guid>
		<description>+1 ;) but very surprised and very happy</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>+1 <img src='http://nikonrumors.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' />  but very surprised and very happy</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nimda</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/10/15/fx-format-q660.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-38422</link>
		<dc:creator>nimda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 11:24:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=7854#comment-38422</guid>
		<description>Yeah I think everyones opinion should matter on everything.  Lets not leave anyone out.  And everyones wishlist should get a chance to be heard.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah I think everyones opinion should matter on everything.  Lets not leave anyone out.  And everyones wishlist should get a chance to be heard.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kensai</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/10/15/fx-format-q660.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-38421</link>
		<dc:creator>Kensai</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 10:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=7854#comment-38421</guid>
		<description>Admin,

is there a chance that you implement some kind of comments rating system? I would really like to see sensible visitors give bonuses to those comments full of information or clarifications and maluses to all those DAMN crypto-Canon-lovers who whine all the time about how Nikon is not keeping up to their hopes.

Jesus Christ, this is a Rumor site, not the Nikon Wishlist channel...

Sorry for the OT, but I wish I could turn off the whining with some kind of semantic web mechanism... :(</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Admin,</p>
<p>is there a chance that you implement some kind of comments rating system? I would really like to see sensible visitors give bonuses to those comments full of information or clarifications and maluses to all those DAMN crypto-Canon-lovers who whine all the time about how Nikon is not keeping up to their hopes.</p>
<p>Jesus Christ, this is a Rumor site, not the Nikon Wishlist channel&#8230;</p>
<p>Sorry for the OT, but I wish I could turn off the whining with some kind of semantic web mechanism&#8230; <img src='http://nikonrumors.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: getanalogue</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/10/15/fx-format-q660.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-38420</link>
		<dc:creator>getanalogue</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 09:54:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=7854#comment-38420</guid>
		<description>Q660 = D95 FX at EUR 998.-</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Q660 = D95 FX at EUR 998.-</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pabs</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/10/15/fx-format-q660.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-38419</link>
		<dc:creator>pabs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 09:50:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=7854#comment-38419</guid>
		<description>That is bullshit, 
No PC botton: amateur+ photoshop added (identical botton as the one bellow slightly modified).
Tripod socket amateur- photoshop removed. looks like crap.
who the hell buys that story on customs and who the hell says D3 users don´t use a tripod! hahaaaa!
cheers</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That is bullshit,<br />
No PC botton: amateur+ photoshop added (identical botton as the one bellow slightly modified).<br />
Tripod socket amateur- photoshop removed. looks like crap.<br />
who the hell buys that story on customs and who the hell says D3 users don´t use a tripod! hahaaaa!<br />
cheers</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

