<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Nikon D3s and 85mm f/3.5 DX lens available for pre-order</title>
	<atom:link href="http://nikonrumors.com/2009/10/14/nikon-d3s-and-85mm-f3-5-dx-lens-available-for-pre-order.aspx/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/10/14/nikon-d3s-and-85mm-f3-5-dx-lens-available-for-pre-order.aspx/</link>
	<description>where there’s smoke there’s fire</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 02:31:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Jabari</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/10/14/nikon-d3s-and-85mm-f3-5-dx-lens-available-for-pre-order.aspx/comment-page-2/#comment-39189</link>
		<dc:creator>Jabari</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 05:39:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=7812#comment-39189</guid>
		<description>Did anyone else find it odd that they launched a DX lens along side a FX camera???</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did anyone else find it odd that they launched a DX lens along side a FX camera???</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ganry72</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/10/14/nikon-d3s-and-85mm-f3-5-dx-lens-available-for-pre-order.aspx/comment-page-2/#comment-39152</link>
		<dc:creator>Ganry72</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 21:13:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=7812#comment-39152</guid>
		<description>Could the country be so lucky? ,</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Could the country be so lucky? ,</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: [NR] admin</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/10/14/nikon-d3s-and-85mm-f3-5-dx-lens-available-for-pre-order.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-38651</link>
		<dc:creator>[NR] admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 14:55:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=7812#comment-38651</guid>
		<description>late November, 2009</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>late November, 2009</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MoonDoggie</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/10/14/nikon-d3s-and-85mm-f3-5-dx-lens-available-for-pre-order.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-38609</link>
		<dc:creator>MoonDoggie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 03:38:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=7812#comment-38609</guid>
		<description>So when is the D3s going to be available?  What are the rumors?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So when is the D3s going to be available?  What are the rumors?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zen-tao</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/10/14/nikon-d3s-and-85mm-f3-5-dx-lens-available-for-pre-order.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-38571</link>
		<dc:creator>zen-tao</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 11:17:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=7812#comment-38571</guid>
		<description>I made a mistake, I wanted to say: &quot;D3s Is an issue that Nikon Company has been forced to launch..&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I made a mistake, I wanted to say: &#8220;D3s Is an issue that Nikon Company has been forced to launch..&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zen-tao</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/10/14/nikon-d3s-and-85mm-f3-5-dx-lens-available-for-pre-order.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-38569</link>
		<dc:creator>zen-tao</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 07:58:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=7812#comment-38569</guid>
		<description>Good quality, professional standards , accurate color and gray reproduction, reliability , resolution,  low noise, etc etc All the things the photographers demand.  already are in the D3x . Nikon is not going to lower nor his standards or prices. The new D3x is an issue that the were forced to issue reluctantly only to relaunch the image of the company. The are not willing to improve on quality-price ratio.
 Lenses are pretty good, cameras as well. Why they have to spend resources and money on research?  It&#039;s likely they have that technology in the drawer. Who knows...For the time being 12 mpx   and a very expensive 24 mpx. If were a new photographer, starting from scratch I wouldn&#039;t doubt it my choice would be Canon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good quality, professional standards , accurate color and gray reproduction, reliability , resolution,  low noise, etc etc All the things the photographers demand.  already are in the D3x . Nikon is not going to lower nor his standards or prices. The new D3x is an issue that the were forced to issue reluctantly only to relaunch the image of the company. The are not willing to improve on quality-price ratio.<br />
 Lenses are pretty good, cameras as well. Why they have to spend resources and money on research?  It&#8217;s likely they have that technology in the drawer. Who knows&#8230;For the time being 12 mpx   and a very expensive 24 mpx. If were a new photographer, starting from scratch I wouldn&#8217;t doubt it my choice would be Canon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/10/14/nikon-d3s-and-85mm-f3-5-dx-lens-available-for-pre-order.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-38520</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2009 04:54:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=7812#comment-38520</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s &quot;lens&quot;, not &quot;lense&quot;.  That little red line under words is your friend.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s &#8220;lens&#8221;, not &#8220;lense&#8221;.  That little red line under words is your friend.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PHB</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/10/14/nikon-d3s-and-85mm-f3-5-dx-lens-available-for-pre-order.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-38478</link>
		<dc:creator>PHB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Oct 2009 01:37:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=7812#comment-38478</guid>
		<description>You can do that to the output of a D300s using photoshop.

It is not clear to me how much more Nikon can do to the microlenses to improve ISO performance. They are certainly doing a heroic job of it.

I think that their next priority is very clearly going to be to get a 24MP body to deliver ISO 6400 at full resolution and offer ISO 12800 at half resolution.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You can do that to the output of a D300s using photoshop.</p>
<p>It is not clear to me how much more Nikon can do to the microlenses to improve ISO performance. They are certainly doing a heroic job of it.</p>
<p>I think that their next priority is very clearly going to be to get a 24MP body to deliver ISO 6400 at full resolution and offer ISO 12800 at half resolution.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PHB</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/10/14/nikon-d3s-and-85mm-f3-5-dx-lens-available-for-pre-order.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-38477</link>
		<dc:creator>PHB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Oct 2009 01:34:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=7812#comment-38477</guid>
		<description>Nope, there is a hard limit set by the wavelength of light at about 320 MP. At that point the sensor pitch is two wavelengths of light. You can go smaller, but you won&#039;t get better results due to the quantum nature of light.

From a technical standpoint, it is entirely possible to make a 320MP sensor today. There are actually sensors that fine in low end cameras. The ISO response at max resolution would be shitty and it would take maybe one frame every two seconds. And you would need to shoot using an f/2.8 lens wide open all the time to get the max resolution or you would get diffraction effects.

At this point there are no lenses for such a camera. I suspect that the reason Nikon is now interested in bringing out primes is that they would like to capture the 50MP market and it is going to be easier to make primes that can do justice to a 50MP sensor than zooms.

But making any sort of glass that could perform above 100MP would seem pretty tough. The only reason it is practical at all is CAD/CAM.

The current zooms are easily good for 25MP though. I think we will see the D4/D400 roll out as 24MP bodies, followed in due course by a D800. The D3s may stay in the catalog and even continue to be manufactured for quite a while as an ultra high ISO camera, but eventually it will be dropped.

I think it is pretty clear that you will be able to buy 12MP cameras from Nikon for years. But it is also pretty clear that the next flagship number will be for a 24MP body.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nope, there is a hard limit set by the wavelength of light at about 320 MP. At that point the sensor pitch is two wavelengths of light. You can go smaller, but you won&#8217;t get better results due to the quantum nature of light.</p>
<p>From a technical standpoint, it is entirely possible to make a 320MP sensor today. There are actually sensors that fine in low end cameras. The ISO response at max resolution would be shitty and it would take maybe one frame every two seconds. And you would need to shoot using an f/2.8 lens wide open all the time to get the max resolution or you would get diffraction effects.</p>
<p>At this point there are no lenses for such a camera. I suspect that the reason Nikon is now interested in bringing out primes is that they would like to capture the 50MP market and it is going to be easier to make primes that can do justice to a 50MP sensor than zooms.</p>
<p>But making any sort of glass that could perform above 100MP would seem pretty tough. The only reason it is practical at all is CAD/CAM.</p>
<p>The current zooms are easily good for 25MP though. I think we will see the D4/D400 roll out as 24MP bodies, followed in due course by a D800. The D3s may stay in the catalog and even continue to be manufactured for quite a while as an ultra high ISO camera, but eventually it will be dropped.</p>
<p>I think it is pretty clear that you will be able to buy 12MP cameras from Nikon for years. But it is also pretty clear that the next flagship number will be for a 24MP body.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BillyBobJohnson</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/10/14/nikon-d3s-and-85mm-f3-5-dx-lens-available-for-pre-order.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-38429</link>
		<dc:creator>BillyBobJohnson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 13:57:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=7812#comment-38429</guid>
		<description>Built like a tank and weighing in at 485g. Errrm, no. Straight from the photozone review, &#039;the outer body is made of plastic&#039;.

Either you don&#039;t have it or you&#039;re talking out of your arse. I suspect the latter. Link included for anyone who gives a toss. http://www.photozone.de/nikon--nikkor-aps-c-lens-tests/377-nikkor_1685_3556vr

Notable also you don&#039;t comment on the shit-to-mediocre Bokeh. It&#039;s typical middle of the road junk and quite funny how you feel offended by criticism of it. As for the other lenses, I&#039;m quite happy with the current 70-200mm and couldn&#039;t care less about the new one. No need to change as I&#039;m using a D300. As for the primes. Well they aren&#039;t the best. There is certainly room for a decent spec 50/1.2 with substantial build quality and a faster motor as most people around here. would agree..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Built like a tank and weighing in at 485g. Errrm, no. Straight from the photozone review, &#8216;the outer body is made of plastic&#8217;.</p>
<p>Either you don&#8217;t have it or you&#8217;re talking out of your arse. I suspect the latter. Link included for anyone who gives a toss. <a href="http://www.photozone.de/nikon--nikkor-aps-c-lens-tests/377-nikkor_1685_3556vr" rel="nofollow">http://www.photozone.de/nikon&#8211;nikkor-aps-c-lens-tests/377-nikkor_1685_3556vr</a></p>
<p>Notable also you don&#8217;t comment on the shit-to-mediocre Bokeh. It&#8217;s typical middle of the road junk and quite funny how you feel offended by criticism of it. As for the other lenses, I&#8217;m quite happy with the current 70-200mm and couldn&#8217;t care less about the new one. No need to change as I&#8217;m using a D300. As for the primes. Well they aren&#8217;t the best. There is certainly room for a decent spec 50/1.2 with substantial build quality and a faster motor as most people around here. would agree..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: camera reviewer</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/10/14/nikon-d3s-and-85mm-f3-5-dx-lens-available-for-pre-order.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-38424</link>
		<dc:creator>camera reviewer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 12:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=7812#comment-38424</guid>
		<description>The Nikon DS3 certainly looks to be a great camera. I will be keeping my D300 and I won’t be rushing out to upgrade yet. A number of good cameras from Nikon have come out since my D300 was introduced but it still does everything I need. The only thing that would make me upgrade earlier than needed is the lure of HD video in the camera. If I was looking for a new camera then the The Nikon DS3 would be on top of my list as it sure has the features any pro will drool over.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Nikon DS3 certainly looks to be a great camera. I will be keeping my D300 and I won’t be rushing out to upgrade yet. A number of good cameras from Nikon have come out since my D300 was introduced but it still does everything I need. The only thing that would make me upgrade earlier than needed is the lure of HD video in the camera. If I was looking for a new camera then the The Nikon DS3 would be on top of my list as it sure has the features any pro will drool over.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: setecientos</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/10/14/nikon-d3s-and-85mm-f3-5-dx-lens-available-for-pre-order.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-38416</link>
		<dc:creator>setecientos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 08:32:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=7812#comment-38416</guid>
		<description>I was kinda disappointed, I hoped for a 85mm 1.4 with VR and would pay $1500 or more if it comes true.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was kinda disappointed, I hoped for a 85mm 1.4 with VR and would pay $1500 or more if it comes true.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EG</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/10/14/nikon-d3s-and-85mm-f3-5-dx-lens-available-for-pre-order.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-38413</link>
		<dc:creator>EG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 06:45:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=7812#comment-38413</guid>
		<description>Reduce the pixels to 6Mp and let Hi3 be iso102400 then it could be a modern version of the FM (or EM for that matter).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Reduce the pixels to 6Mp and let Hi3 be iso102400 then it could be a modern version of the FM (or EM for that matter).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Meon</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/10/14/nikon-d3s-and-85mm-f3-5-dx-lens-available-for-pre-order.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-38409</link>
		<dc:creator>Meon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 05:59:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=7812#comment-38409</guid>
		<description>Imagine 100mp, diffraction effects at f5?
file size larger than an HD movie?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Imagine 100mp, diffraction effects at f5?<br />
file size larger than an HD movie?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Meon</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/10/14/nikon-d3s-and-85mm-f3-5-dx-lens-available-for-pre-order.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-38408</link>
		<dc:creator>Meon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 05:58:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=7812#comment-38408</guid>
		<description>Built like a tank. Mine&#039;s metal, fool.
Now go complain why the 70-200 f2.8 doesn&#039;t do f1.8
and then go complain why the 50 f1.8 doesn&#039;t do f1.4</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Built like a tank. Mine&#8217;s metal, fool.<br />
Now go complain why the 70-200 f2.8 doesn&#8217;t do f1.8<br />
and then go complain why the 50 f1.8 doesn&#8217;t do f1.4</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Geonr</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/10/14/nikon-d3s-and-85mm-f3-5-dx-lens-available-for-pre-order.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-38407</link>
		<dc:creator>Geonr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 05:55:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=7812#comment-38407</guid>
		<description>Yeh, and trees from Malaysia and steel from India, etc.
Poor nikon.  They should also build their own unis for their techs instead of relying on 3rd party institutions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeh, and trees from Malaysia and steel from India, etc.<br />
Poor nikon.  They should also build their own unis for their techs instead of relying on 3rd party institutions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Geonr</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/10/14/nikon-d3s-and-85mm-f3-5-dx-lens-available-for-pre-order.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-38406</link>
		<dc:creator>Geonr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 05:52:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=7812#comment-38406</guid>
		<description>Good luck with that Sony, and trying to find wierd flash adapters for all your gear.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good luck with that Sony, and trying to find wierd flash adapters for all your gear.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gary</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/10/14/nikon-d3s-and-85mm-f3-5-dx-lens-available-for-pre-order.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-38401</link>
		<dc:creator>Gary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 03:05:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=7812#comment-38401</guid>
		<description>Complaining about the new Nikon cameras and lenses would be like complaining about a Ferrari because it lacks a luggage rack on top or a towing hook in the back.

People get real!  Nikon has recently released some incredible products.

As someone else said so well, if you cannot take amazing pictures...not just good...but amazing pictures...with the new D3s then you may be in the wrong profession or hobby.

Unless you are the second coming of Ansel Adams and have reached the human limits of what can be done w/ all this great equipment, then you really have no basis to complain.   Work on perfecting your art, and enjoy the current offerings.   

There will always be some better technology on the horizon...and hence, no device when it is released will ever seem perfect.  It&#039;s fine to dream of something even better, but it&#039;s foolish to not recognize the value in what&#039;s available now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Complaining about the new Nikon cameras and lenses would be like complaining about a Ferrari because it lacks a luggage rack on top or a towing hook in the back.</p>
<p>People get real!  Nikon has recently released some incredible products.</p>
<p>As someone else said so well, if you cannot take amazing pictures&#8230;not just good&#8230;but amazing pictures&#8230;with the new D3s then you may be in the wrong profession or hobby.</p>
<p>Unless you are the second coming of Ansel Adams and have reached the human limits of what can be done w/ all this great equipment, then you really have no basis to complain.   Work on perfecting your art, and enjoy the current offerings.   </p>
<p>There will always be some better technology on the horizon&#8230;and hence, no device when it is released will ever seem perfect.  It&#8217;s fine to dream of something even better, but it&#8217;s foolish to not recognize the value in what&#8217;s available now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bjokerud</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/10/14/nikon-d3s-and-85mm-f3-5-dx-lens-available-for-pre-order.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-38389</link>
		<dc:creator>bjokerud</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 22:43:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=7812#comment-38389</guid>
		<description>An awesome combinaton to. D300 and 17-55, all you&#039;ll ever need XD</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An awesome combinaton to. D300 and 17-55, all you&#8217;ll ever need XD</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/10/14/nikon-d3s-and-85mm-f3-5-dx-lens-available-for-pre-order.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-38380</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 21:17:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=7812#comment-38380</guid>
		<description>you mean... teach him photoshop lol.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>you mean&#8230; teach him photoshop lol.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

