<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Official statement from Nikon on second D5000 recall</title>
	<atom:link href="http://nikonrumors.com/2009/08/19/official-statement-from-nikon-on-second-d5000-recall.aspx/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/08/19/official-statement-from-nikon-on-second-d5000-recall.aspx/</link>
	<description>where there’s smoke there’s fire</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 12:57:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: zoe Montgomery</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/08/19/official-statement-from-nikon-on-second-d5000-recall.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-32135</link>
		<dc:creator>zoe Montgomery</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2009 18:39:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=6531#comment-32135</guid>
		<description>Well called jessops this morning gave them a piece of my mind and told them this is the 2nd one they have sold me... they apologised and i am going in to collect a new  camera on friday and different make...

Thank you very much jessops</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well called jessops this morning gave them a piece of my mind and told them this is the 2nd one they have sold me&#8230; they apologised and i am going in to collect a new  camera on friday and different make&#8230;</p>
<p>Thank you very much jessops</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paddysnapper</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/08/19/official-statement-from-nikon-on-second-d5000-recall.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-32097</link>
		<dc:creator>Paddysnapper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2009 11:53:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=6531#comment-32097</guid>
		<description>Nikon are brilliant at looking after their customers....Who else would have replaced the sensor in a 2003 Coolpix  F.O.C.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nikon are brilliant at looking after their customers&#8230;.Who else would have replaced the sensor in a 2003 Coolpix  F.O.C.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zoe Montgomery</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/08/19/official-statement-from-nikon-on-second-d5000-recall.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-32034</link>
		<dc:creator>zoe Montgomery</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 19:53:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=6531#comment-32034</guid>
		<description>This is the 2nd D5000 i now have due to the other having that fault... Just found out about the fault.. Do nikon not contact the likes of jessops to tell them about it before they sell anymore. Jesus christ get them out the shops. now am gonna have to send this one off to be repaired only used it twice....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is the 2nd D5000 i now have due to the other having that fault&#8230; Just found out about the fault.. Do nikon not contact the likes of jessops to tell them about it before they sell anymore. Jesus christ get them out the shops. now am gonna have to send this one off to be repaired only used it twice&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: grumps</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/08/19/official-statement-from-nikon-on-second-d5000-recall.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-31759</link>
		<dc:creator>grumps</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2009 04:19:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=6531#comment-31759</guid>
		<description>Just a quick update:
Sent it off on Monday, got it back today (Wednesday). Everything works really well, in fact I saw some improvement in shutter response which sometimes lagged a bit, not anymore (I know this wasn&#039;t the fix, but it&#039;s all great now!).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just a quick update:<br />
Sent it off on Monday, got it back today (Wednesday). Everything works really well, in fact I saw some improvement in shutter response which sometimes lagged a bit, not anymore (I know this wasn&#8217;t the fix, but it&#8217;s all great now!).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rosco</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/08/19/official-statement-from-nikon-on-second-d5000-recall.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-31738</link>
		<dc:creator>Rosco</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 22:05:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=6531#comment-31738</guid>
		<description>Every business makes mistakes; it&#039;s the way they address the problem that counts. It seems to me that Nikon have been pretty onto it in this case.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Every business makes mistakes; it&#8217;s the way they address the problem that counts. It seems to me that Nikon have been pretty onto it in this case.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/08/19/official-statement-from-nikon-on-second-d5000-recall.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-31734</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 20:23:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=6531#comment-31734</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t know if it&#039;s just me or not, but I noticed that Nikon changed plastics around the time of the D60&#039;s release. The newer Nikon stuff feels cheaper in my opinion. I really hope they take a hard look at QC issues, as it really sets them apart from Canon. 

Two dead D90&#039;s? Are the S/N&#039;s close to one another?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know if it&#8217;s just me or not, but I noticed that Nikon changed plastics around the time of the D60&#8242;s release. The newer Nikon stuff feels cheaper in my opinion. I really hope they take a hard look at QC issues, as it really sets them apart from Canon. </p>
<p>Two dead D90&#8242;s? Are the S/N&#8217;s close to one another?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eigil Nybo</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/08/19/official-statement-from-nikon-on-second-d5000-recall.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-31733</link>
		<dc:creator>Eigil Nybo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 19:56:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=6531#comment-31733</guid>
		<description>I think Nikon must take a serious look at their quality control. My three daughters each bought a D90 and now the 2 cameras are in for repair. I&#039;m angry and disappointed. What has happened to a company who give me a Nikkormat,  now 38 years old, and with 2 service check.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Nikon must take a serious look at their quality control. My three daughters each bought a D90 and now the 2 cameras are in for repair. I&#8217;m angry and disappointed. What has happened to a company who give me a Nikkormat,  now 38 years old, and with 2 service check.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NikoDoby</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/08/19/official-statement-from-nikon-on-second-d5000-recall.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-31729</link>
		<dc:creator>NikoDoby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 18:34:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=6531#comment-31729</guid>
		<description>I think this is a good thing Nikon has done. They could of just NOT done anything and who would of known there was a problem with the D5000? Most company&#039;s would of just waited for the defective D5000 to fail and THEN handle the problem !!

Great work Nikon</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think this is a good thing Nikon has done. They could of just NOT done anything and who would of known there was a problem with the D5000? Most company&#8217;s would of just waited for the defective D5000 to fail and THEN handle the problem !!</p>
<p>Great work Nikon</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: steve</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/08/19/official-statement-from-nikon-on-second-d5000-recall.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-31725</link>
		<dc:creator>steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 17:26:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=6531#comment-31725</guid>
		<description>I love google ads. Currently there is an advertisement on the top right hand of this page that is for a personal injury lawyer, regarding a hip replacement recall.

As for the topic at hand, recalls happen. They suck. But better to have it fixed. What would people prefer that Nikon do?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love google ads. Currently there is an advertisement on the top right hand of this page that is for a personal injury lawyer, regarding a hip replacement recall.</p>
<p>As for the topic at hand, recalls happen. They suck. But better to have it fixed. What would people prefer that Nikon do?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/08/19/official-statement-from-nikon-on-second-d5000-recall.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-31724</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 16:39:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=6531#comment-31724</guid>
		<description>it&#039;s because canon isn&#039;t a very honest company.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>it&#8217;s because canon isn&#8217;t a very honest company.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: D40-owner</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/08/19/official-statement-from-nikon-on-second-d5000-recall.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-31721</link>
		<dc:creator>D40-owner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 15:10:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=6531#comment-31721</guid>
		<description>Yep. Remember the Canon EOS 1D Mark III focus problems? It took ages for Canon to even admit the problem.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yep. Remember the Canon EOS 1D Mark III focus problems? It took ages for Canon to even admit the problem.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dave</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/08/19/official-statement-from-nikon-on-second-d5000-recall.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-31720</link>
		<dc:creator>dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 14:55:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=6531#comment-31720</guid>
		<description>A couple ways to take this, but in the end this is good for D5000 owners.  Nikon is trying to make sure they fix the problem correctly.  Yes it is an annoyance for those who have recently purchased the D5000, but overall, it will lead to a better end-user experience.

People make mistakes.  Big companies are made up of people.  Mistakes, even from big companies, are unavoidable.  Would you rather buy a product from a company that admits their mistakes and then tries to correct them, or from a company that denies a problem exists and then quietly fixes the problem for those that complain the loudest.

Kudos to Nikon!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A couple ways to take this, but in the end this is good for D5000 owners.  Nikon is trying to make sure they fix the problem correctly.  Yes it is an annoyance for those who have recently purchased the D5000, but overall, it will lead to a better end-user experience.</p>
<p>People make mistakes.  Big companies are made up of people.  Mistakes, even from big companies, are unavoidable.  Would you rather buy a product from a company that admits their mistakes and then tries to correct them, or from a company that denies a problem exists and then quietly fixes the problem for those that complain the loudest.</p>
<p>Kudos to Nikon!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

