<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Live chat session</title>
	<atom:link href="http://nikonrumors.com/2009/07/29/live-chat-session.aspx/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/07/29/live-chat-session.aspx/</link>
	<description>where there’s smoke there’s fire</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 19:13:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Robin Edgar</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/07/29/live-chat-session.aspx/comment-page-3/#comment-30301</link>
		<dc:creator>Robin Edgar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2009 01:39:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=6010#comment-30301</guid>
		<description>On that point I notice that the new and improved 70-200mm lens is listed at about $2400. It seems to me that those people who primarily use APS-C format Nikon DSLRs might have a chance toi buy the older version significantly cheaper as it is cleared out. The lens was just fine on APS-C DX format Nikons from what I hear.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On that point I notice that the new and improved 70-200mm lens is listed at about $2400. It seems to me that those people who primarily use APS-C format Nikon DSLRs might have a chance toi buy the older version significantly cheaper as it is cleared out. The lens was just fine on APS-C DX format Nikons from what I hear.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dweeb</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/07/29/live-chat-session.aspx/comment-page-3/#comment-30195</link>
		<dc:creator>Dweeb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 12:46:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=6010#comment-30195</guid>
		<description>The only reason to bring out a 300s is to extend the production life of the 300 another year and whip up some Christmas buying. 

And the 70-200 is now &quot;professional&quot; once again, like the last one was a DX or something. 

Both new products also counteract the price erosion by getting prices back up to MSRP AKA the new product never sell below price.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The only reason to bring out a 300s is to extend the production life of the 300 another year and whip up some Christmas buying. </p>
<p>And the 70-200 is now &#8220;professional&#8221; once again, like the last one was a DX or something. </p>
<p>Both new products also counteract the price erosion by getting prices back up to MSRP AKA the new product never sell below price.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: STJ</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/07/29/live-chat-session.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-30147</link>
		<dc:creator>STJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 08:17:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=6010#comment-30147</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m still laughing... :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m still laughing&#8230; <img src='http://nikonrumors.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zzddrr</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/07/29/live-chat-session.aspx/comment-page-3/#comment-30117</link>
		<dc:creator>zzddrr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 06:31:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=6010#comment-30117</guid>
		<description>First, great job NR! 

Second, congratulation for Nikon and the Star Wars Kids.  

I mean, I just cannot believe that after 2 years, all Nikon can do is to add the video that does not even match the 5DII. Are these people insane? For crying out loud, at least match that one. I understand that there are quite few who is interested in playing with video on a DSLR but on a &quot;pro&quot; style camera for many is not priority. 

No question about it, I guess I am not the only one who is very disappointed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First, great job NR! </p>
<p>Second, congratulation for Nikon and the Star Wars Kids.  </p>
<p>I mean, I just cannot believe that after 2 years, all Nikon can do is to add the video that does not even match the 5DII. Are these people insane? For crying out loud, at least match that one. I understand that there are quite few who is interested in playing with video on a DSLR but on a &#8220;pro&#8221; style camera for many is not priority. </p>
<p>No question about it, I guess I am not the only one who is very disappointed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robin Edgar</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/07/29/live-chat-session.aspx/comment-page-3/#comment-30114</link>
		<dc:creator>Robin Edgar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 06:24:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=6010#comment-30114</guid>
		<description>It has ENDED!




Well for now anyway. . . :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It has ENDED!</p>
<p>Well for now anyway. . . <img src='http://nikonrumors.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MikeO</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/07/29/live-chat-session.aspx/comment-page-3/#comment-30103</link>
		<dc:creator>MikeO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 05:49:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=6010#comment-30103</guid>
		<description>wtf. 600?? really? i bought my d60 for 480.. wtf? Is this thing really gonna go for 600? Well, I hope its low light performance is on par w/ the d5000 rather than the d60.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>wtf. 600?? really? i bought my d60 for 480.. wtf? Is this thing really gonna go for 600? Well, I hope its low light performance is on par w/ the d5000 rather than the d60.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steven</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/07/29/live-chat-session.aspx/comment-page-2/#comment-30080</link>
		<dc:creator>Steven</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 05:02:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=6010#comment-30080</guid>
		<description>There&#039;s 2 mistakes I found on the dpreview pages:
The d3000 is said to have a CCD says the text but the chart says it has a CMOS.
The D300 is said to shoot 7fps in the text but spec chart says 6.

I am really disappointed about the 720p only...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s 2 mistakes I found on the dpreview pages:<br />
The d3000 is said to have a CCD says the text but the chart says it has a CMOS.<br />
The D300 is said to shoot 7fps in the text but spec chart says 6.</p>
<p>I am really disappointed about the 720p only&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gra</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/07/29/live-chat-session.aspx/comment-page-2/#comment-30079</link>
		<dc:creator>Gra</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 04:59:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=6010#comment-30079</guid>
		<description>Looks like new collar on the 70 - 200 also...

That little spring clip better not be plastic...I too prefer the look of the old over the new...I might have to glue on my own brass plate...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks like new collar on the 70 &#8211; 200 also&#8230;</p>
<p>That little spring clip better not be plastic&#8230;I too prefer the look of the old over the new&#8230;I might have to glue on my own brass plate&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gra</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/07/29/live-chat-session.aspx/comment-page-2/#comment-30077</link>
		<dc:creator>Gra</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 04:55:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=6010#comment-30077</guid>
		<description>Just this very second hits Nikon Australia&#039;s website, both cams, both lenses, 70 - 200 may be about 30 days away in Aus...(I&#039;ve ordered) and up to about AU$400 more</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just this very second hits Nikon Australia&#8217;s website, both cams, both lenses, 70 &#8211; 200 may be about 30 days away in Aus&#8230;(I&#8217;ve ordered) and up to about AU$400 more</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nilbert</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/07/29/live-chat-session.aspx/comment-page-2/#comment-30066</link>
		<dc:creator>nilbert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 04:42:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=6010#comment-30066</guid>
		<description>wha, the price of the new 70-200 is ... 2430 euros? yow! what gives.

Also not available til november, boourns!!

AND ALSO, the old one looks a lot sexier!!! like 10 times cooler looking. imho</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>wha, the price of the new 70-200 is &#8230; 2430 euros? yow! what gives.</p>
<p>Also not available til november, boourns!!</p>
<p>AND ALSO, the old one looks a lot sexier!!! like 10 times cooler looking. imho</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MW</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/07/29/live-chat-session.aspx/comment-page-2/#comment-30064</link>
		<dc:creator>MW</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 04:38:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=6010#comment-30064</guid>
		<description>THIS IS MADNESS!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>THIS IS MADNESS!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: funny</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/07/29/live-chat-session.aspx/comment-page-2/#comment-30057</link>
		<dc:creator>funny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 04:32:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=6010#comment-30057</guid>
		<description>ha, nice job admin. where are all the doubters gone. &quot;nikon would never update tat lens bla bla bla&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ha, nice job admin. where are all the doubters gone. &#8220;nikon would never update tat lens bla bla bla&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alphanikonrex</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/07/29/live-chat-session.aspx/comment-page-2/#comment-30051</link>
		<dc:creator>alphanikonrex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 04:27:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=6010#comment-30051</guid>
		<description>Gosh, the new 70-200 doesn&#039;t have internal focusing!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gosh, the new 70-200 doesn&#8217;t have internal focusing!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alphanikonrex</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/07/29/live-chat-session.aspx/comment-page-2/#comment-30044</link>
		<dc:creator>alphanikonrex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 04:21:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=6010#comment-30044</guid>
		<description>WOW, the ESP of the D300 and the D300S are the exact same—$1799. How does Nikon expect to pull that off?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WOW, the ESP of the D300 and the D300S are the exact same—$1799. How does Nikon expect to pull that off?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/07/29/live-chat-session.aspx/comment-page-2/#comment-30038</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 04:17:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=6010#comment-30038</guid>
		<description>nikon.com has been updated.

http://nikon.com/about/news/2009/0730_d300s_01.htm</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>nikon.com has been updated.</p>
<p><a href="http://nikon.com/about/news/2009/0730_d300s_01.htm" rel="nofollow">http://nikon.com/about/news/2009/0730_d300s_01.htm</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/07/29/live-chat-session.aspx/comment-page-2/#comment-30036</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 04:16:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=6010#comment-30036</guid>
		<description>www.imaging-resource.com has a preview.
US$1,800 MSRP</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.imaging-resource.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.imaging-resource.com</a> has a preview.<br />
US$1,800 MSRP</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ryan</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/07/29/live-chat-session.aspx/comment-page-2/#comment-30031</link>
		<dc:creator>ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 04:15:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=6010#comment-30031</guid>
		<description>fuckin spot on NR.... great work</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>fuckin spot on NR&#8230;. great work</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alex</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/07/29/live-chat-session.aspx/comment-page-2/#comment-30027</link>
		<dc:creator>alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 04:13:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=6010#comment-30027</guid>
		<description>http://www.dpreview.com/news/0907/Nikon/D300s/D300S_70_200_l.jpg

The new 70-200</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.dpreview.com/news/0907/Nikon/D300s/D300S_70_200_l.jpg" rel="nofollow">http://www.dpreview.com/news/0907/Nikon/D300s/D300S_70_200_l.jpg</a></p>
<p>The new 70-200</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bof</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/07/29/live-chat-session.aspx/comment-page-2/#comment-30025</link>
		<dc:creator>bof</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 04:11:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=6010#comment-30025</guid>
		<description>In addition to compatibility with more than 60 NIKKOR lenses and a broad array of system accessories, the D300S will also perform well with the recently announced AF-S NIKKOR 70-200mm f/2.8 VR and the AF-S DX NIKKOR 18-200mm f/3.5-5.6 VR lens.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In addition to compatibility with more than 60 NIKKOR lenses and a broad array of system accessories, the D300S will also perform well with the recently announced AF-S NIKKOR 70-200mm f/2.8 VR and the AF-S DX NIKKOR 18-200mm f/3.5-5.6 VR lens.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robin Edgar</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/07/29/live-chat-session.aspx/comment-page-2/#comment-30022</link>
		<dc:creator>Robin Edgar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 04:11:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=6010#comment-30022</guid>
		<description>And the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nikon.ca/en/Product.aspx?m=17350&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;D300s&lt;/a&gt; not marked as new though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And the <a href="http://www.nikon.ca/en/Product.aspx?m=17350" rel="nofollow">D300s</a> not marked as new though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

