<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Possible Nikon D300s appearance</title>
	<atom:link href="http://nikonrumors.com/2009/07/26/possible-nikon-d300s-appearance.aspx/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/07/26/possible-nikon-d300s-appearance.aspx</link>
	<description>where there’s smoke there’s fire</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 05:21:12 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Fake</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/07/26/possible-nikon-d300s-appearance.aspx/comment-page-1#comment-30190</link>
		<dc:creator>Fake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 12:20:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/2009/07/26/possible-nikon-d300s-appearance.aspx#comment-30190</guid>
		<description>Still fake? ;p</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Still fake? ;p</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: blitz</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/07/26/possible-nikon-d300s-appearance.aspx/comment-page-1#comment-30052</link>
		<dc:creator>blitz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 04:28:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/2009/07/26/possible-nikon-d300s-appearance.aspx#comment-30052</guid>
		<description>The image is FAKE! look like its been edited with all the blurred effect so that the D300s logo image wont be notice fake, close-up image is much clear compare to the original photo and to the guy&#039;s who claimed to saw the rumored D300s show us your evidence.....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The image is FAKE! look like its been edited with all the blurred effect so that the D300s logo image wont be notice fake, close-up image is much clear compare to the original photo and to the guy&#8217;s who claimed to saw the rumored D300s show us your evidence&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zzddrr</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/07/26/possible-nikon-d300s-appearance.aspx/comment-page-1#comment-29708</link>
		<dc:creator>zzddrr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 07:38:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/2009/07/26/possible-nikon-d300s-appearance.aspx#comment-29708</guid>
		<description>Please explain and support your comment Anonymous about why Nikon is more professional. That is because what we saw so far is quite disappointing:

(1) D3x annoucement - it is a total failure not to mention the after sale support (this is darn 8K camera and not plastic crap)
(2) D5000 - Not too shabby, approx. 120K cameras (at least recalled) just a week before their new product announcement(s). Oh, please google the story ... indeed it is a good one.
(3) D300s - now this is my favourite, I have 3 words to describe the professionalism behind this one &quot;Star Wars Kids&quot;. (...with all due respect to Mr. Tan) When did you see Apple unannounced products in the hands of the Star War Kids? If we assume that this was intentional then what on earth was Nikon thinking? If it wasn&#039;t intentional then yes they are absoletely professional. 

This list can be continued but I guess it illustrates my point. So, Anonymous please explain and support your thoughts with evidence.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please explain and support your comment Anonymous about why Nikon is more professional. That is because what we saw so far is quite disappointing:</p>
<p>(1) D3x annoucement &#8211; it is a total failure not to mention the after sale support (this is darn 8K camera and not plastic crap)<br />
(2) D5000 &#8211; Not too shabby, approx. 120K cameras (at least recalled) just a week before their new product announcement(s). Oh, please google the story &#8230; indeed it is a good one.<br />
(3) D300s &#8211; now this is my favourite, I have 3 words to describe the professionalism behind this one &#8220;Star Wars Kids&#8221;. (&#8230;with all due respect to Mr. Tan) When did you see Apple unannounced products in the hands of the Star War Kids? If we assume that this was intentional then what on earth was Nikon thinking? If it wasn&#8217;t intentional then yes they are absoletely professional. </p>
<p>This list can be continued but I guess it illustrates my point. So, Anonymous please explain and support your thoughts with evidence.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: boomboompow</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/07/26/possible-nikon-d300s-appearance.aspx/comment-page-1#comment-29705</link>
		<dc:creator>boomboompow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 06:10:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/2009/07/26/possible-nikon-d300s-appearance.aspx#comment-29705</guid>
		<description>Hey you Ben O.... maybe you have the looks but you have no money to invest nikon camera... not even a point and shoot camera... pathetic you

Anonymous, stop posting here if you have no good things to say</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey you Ben O&#8230;. maybe you have the looks but you have no money to invest nikon camera&#8230; not even a point and shoot camera&#8230; pathetic you</p>
<p>Anonymous, stop posting here if you have no good things to say</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/07/26/possible-nikon-d300s-appearance.aspx/comment-page-1#comment-29660</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 01:39:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/2009/07/26/possible-nikon-d300s-appearance.aspx#comment-29660</guid>
		<description>no sense Nikon is 100 times more profesional ;Aple is just a fashion company ,lol!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>no sense Nikon is 100 times more profesional ;Aple is just a fashion company ,lol!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben O.</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/07/26/possible-nikon-d300s-appearance.aspx/comment-page-1#comment-29540</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben O.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 14:04:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/2009/07/26/possible-nikon-d300s-appearance.aspx#comment-29540</guid>
		<description>Why is it always the world&#039;s goofiest lookin&#039; dudes who have the best equipment?

Nikon, if you are looking for someone to test out your newest camera . . . I&#039;m available.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why is it always the world&#8217;s goofiest lookin&#8217; dudes who have the best equipment?</p>
<p>Nikon, if you are looking for someone to test out your newest camera . . . I&#8217;m available.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wild</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/07/26/possible-nikon-d300s-appearance.aspx/comment-page-1#comment-29474</link>
		<dc:creator>wild</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 01:00:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/2009/07/26/possible-nikon-d300s-appearance.aspx#comment-29474</guid>
		<description>Forget the camera...who is that hot girl?????</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Forget the camera&#8230;who is that hot girl?????</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tester</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/07/26/possible-nikon-d300s-appearance.aspx/comment-page-1#comment-29438</link>
		<dc:creator>Tester</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 20:39:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/2009/07/26/possible-nikon-d300s-appearance.aspx#comment-29438</guid>
		<description>This Look so cheesy of these guys in picture , look like trying to promote them self</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This Look so cheesy of these guys in picture , look like trying to promote them self</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NikoDoby</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/07/26/possible-nikon-d300s-appearance.aspx/comment-page-1#comment-29402</link>
		<dc:creator>NikoDoby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 17:53:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/2009/07/26/possible-nikon-d300s-appearance.aspx#comment-29402</guid>
		<description>Wow, I would&#039;ve like to have crashed that party too Altkin.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, I would&#8217;ve like to have crashed that party too Altkin.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/07/26/possible-nikon-d300s-appearance.aspx/comment-page-1#comment-29338</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 15:12:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/2009/07/26/possible-nikon-d300s-appearance.aspx#comment-29338</guid>
		<description>&lt;&gt;

The event was held in a zoo, I&#039;d be a lot more concerned if it were a dead giraffe.

&lt;&gt;

In all likelihood, Nikon probably sent him the camera. The guy is the president/owner of the local Nikon distribution company in the Philippines.  He&#039;s the same idiot that announced a huge lens sale in one of the other local forums and never delivered.   From the looks of it, a little too young and inexperienced to be running the show.  More (family) money than brains, it seems...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&lt;&gt;</p>
<p>The event was held in a zoo, I&#8217;d be a lot more concerned if it were a dead giraffe.</p>
<p>&lt;&gt;</p>
<p>In all likelihood, Nikon probably sent him the camera. The guy is the president/owner of the local Nikon distribution company in the Philippines.  He&#8217;s the same idiot that announced a huge lens sale in one of the other local forums and never delivered.   From the looks of it, a little too young and inexperienced to be running the show.  More (family) money than brains, it seems&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/07/26/possible-nikon-d300s-appearance.aspx/comment-page-1#comment-29331</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 14:12:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/2009/07/26/possible-nikon-d300s-appearance.aspx#comment-29331</guid>
		<description>bo yeah!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>bo yeah!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zzddrr</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/07/26/possible-nikon-d300s-appearance.aspx/comment-page-1#comment-29324</link>
		<dc:creator>zzddrr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 12:30:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/2009/07/26/possible-nikon-d300s-appearance.aspx#comment-29324</guid>
		<description>Well, there is a reason why Apple and others put lid on their leaks. There is a big difference between what Nikon and Apple do.

Apple has a professional marketing team. They both have great products and that is the main driver behind the &quot;hype&quot; and rumors. Don&#039;t let the crowd fool you, it is not marketing and or professional management. If they properly did their homework then they would have released long time ago many products that would have yielded better returns for them. In addition, quite few consumers wouldn&#039;t feel that they are locked up to Nikon (since they have an arsenal of expensive glasses.)

My points are that (1) if Nikon has to rely on this hype that much then it is in big trouble. (2) Nikon is extremely predicatable in terms of what and when they deliver. (3) It is not the champion of consumer centric innovation. And I repeat, consumer centric innovation.

I hope you get it right now what I was talking about.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, there is a reason why Apple and others put lid on their leaks. There is a big difference between what Nikon and Apple do.</p>
<p>Apple has a professional marketing team. They both have great products and that is the main driver behind the &#8220;hype&#8221; and rumors. Don&#8217;t let the crowd fool you, it is not marketing and or professional management. If they properly did their homework then they would have released long time ago many products that would have yielded better returns for them. In addition, quite few consumers wouldn&#8217;t feel that they are locked up to Nikon (since they have an arsenal of expensive glasses.)</p>
<p>My points are that (1) if Nikon has to rely on this hype that much then it is in big trouble. (2) Nikon is extremely predicatable in terms of what and when they deliver. (3) It is not the champion of consumer centric innovation. And I repeat, consumer centric innovation.</p>
<p>I hope you get it right now what I was talking about.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JJS</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/07/26/possible-nikon-d300s-appearance.aspx/comment-page-1#comment-29280</link>
		<dc:creator>JJS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 03:25:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/2009/07/26/possible-nikon-d300s-appearance.aspx#comment-29280</guid>
		<description>No, I am not kidding!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, I am not kidding!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/07/26/possible-nikon-d300s-appearance.aspx/comment-page-1#comment-29260</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 02:15:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/2009/07/26/possible-nikon-d300s-appearance.aspx#comment-29260</guid>
		<description>sorry to break it to you people but that nikon d300s is a real deal. it came from a photography forum and the one holding the camera is the president of the official distro of nikon. 

so instead of arguing start breaking that piggy bank of yours.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>sorry to break it to you people but that nikon d300s is a real deal. it came from a photography forum and the one holding the camera is the president of the official distro of nikon. </p>
<p>so instead of arguing start breaking that piggy bank of yours.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Altkin</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/07/26/possible-nikon-d300s-appearance.aspx/comment-page-1#comment-29257</link>
		<dc:creator>Altkin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 02:08:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/2009/07/26/possible-nikon-d300s-appearance.aspx#comment-29257</guid>
		<description>Not part of the club but was at the same venue during the event.  Saw someone testing the camera.  If you want a clear picture, here it is.

http://i598.photobucket.com/albums/tt65/Altkin/2009-07-25D300s.jpg</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not part of the club but was at the same venue during the event.  Saw someone testing the camera.  If you want a clear picture, here it is.</p>
<p><a href="http://i598.photobucket.com/albums/tt65/Altkin/2009-07-25D300s.jpg" rel="nofollow">http://i598.photobucket.com/albums/tt65/Altkin/2009-07-25D300s.jpg</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zoetmb</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/07/26/possible-nikon-d300s-appearance.aspx/comment-page-1#comment-29253</link>
		<dc:creator>Zoetmb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 01:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/2009/07/26/possible-nikon-d300s-appearance.aspx#comment-29253</guid>
		<description>Looks real to me, but what was that photo taken with and why was it shot so slowly that we have all that motion blur?  Was it taken with a phone?  Was the exposure 1 second?

And is that a live giraffe standing about one foot behind them?  I&#039;d be more concerned about that!!

And yes, I&#039;d love to know whether this was a purposeful leak or whether this guy was being obnoxious.  Distributor or not, how did he get his hands on the camera?  But we&#039;ll probably never find out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks real to me, but what was that photo taken with and why was it shot so slowly that we have all that motion blur?  Was it taken with a phone?  Was the exposure 1 second?</p>
<p>And is that a live giraffe standing about one foot behind them?  I&#8217;d be more concerned about that!!</p>
<p>And yes, I&#8217;d love to know whether this was a purposeful leak or whether this guy was being obnoxious.  Distributor or not, how did he get his hands on the camera?  But we&#8217;ll probably never find out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zenndott</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/07/26/possible-nikon-d300s-appearance.aspx/comment-page-1#comment-29237</link>
		<dc:creator>Zenndott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Jul 2009 22:29:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/2009/07/26/possible-nikon-d300s-appearance.aspx#comment-29237</guid>
		<description>There is a difference between an &quot;upgrade&quot; to the D700 (a &quot;D700s&quot;?) and the purported issue of the D700 body + 24 meg sensor (a &quot;D700x&quot;? &quot;D800&quot;?). I would agree that the former is a while away, but the latter would be a different camera entirely, and thus the announcement time would also differ.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is a difference between an &#8220;upgrade&#8221; to the D700 (a &#8220;D700s&#8221;?) and the purported issue of the D700 body + 24 meg sensor (a &#8220;D700x&#8221;? &#8220;D800&#8243;?). I would agree that the former is a while away, but the latter would be a different camera entirely, and thus the announcement time would also differ.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phil</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/07/26/possible-nikon-d300s-appearance.aspx/comment-page-1#comment-29236</link>
		<dc:creator>Phil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Jul 2009 22:28:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/2009/07/26/possible-nikon-d300s-appearance.aspx#comment-29236</guid>
		<description>The picture is a fake. Nikon closly guard release information on new products.
Funny how the picture is in focus except for the camera. Maybe he was getting excited and made it blur.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The picture is a fake. Nikon closly guard release information on new products.<br />
Funny how the picture is in focus except for the camera. Maybe he was getting excited and made it blur.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zenndott</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/07/26/possible-nikon-d300s-appearance.aspx/comment-page-1#comment-29235</link>
		<dc:creator>Zenndott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Jul 2009 22:24:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/2009/07/26/possible-nikon-d300s-appearance.aspx#comment-29235</guid>
		<description>Then what are the upgraded elements?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Then what are the upgraded elements?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/07/26/possible-nikon-d300s-appearance.aspx/comment-page-1#comment-29233</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Jul 2009 22:07:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/2009/07/26/possible-nikon-d300s-appearance.aspx#comment-29233</guid>
		<description>totally disagree zzddr. I think it has proved nikon well over the past few years. I love the hype and stuff that goes on, makes for an exciting entrance and exit for equipment. Who would think so many people talk about rumors, about a camera company... you don&#039;t see that as often with canon, not from the forums i check... cuz they never know what the hell canon will come out with... i think nikon does it not only for that reason, but to see what people are thinking about their new creations, incase it might be a lemon, or a masterpiece....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>totally disagree zzddr. I think it has proved nikon well over the past few years. I love the hype and stuff that goes on, makes for an exciting entrance and exit for equipment. Who would think so many people talk about rumors, about a camera company&#8230; you don&#8217;t see that as often with canon, not from the forums i check&#8230; cuz they never know what the hell canon will come out with&#8230; i think nikon does it not only for that reason, but to see what people are thinking about their new creations, incase it might be a lemon, or a masterpiece&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
