<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Nikon rumors and expectations for next week (recap)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://nikonrumors.com/2009/07/24/nikon-rumors-and-expectations-for-next-week-recap.aspx/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/07/24/nikon-rumors-and-expectations-for-next-week-recap.aspx/</link>
	<description>where there’s smoke there’s fire</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 04:37:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean Carroll</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/07/24/nikon-rumors-and-expectations-for-next-week-recap.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-30454</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean Carroll</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Aug 2009 13:17:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=5909#comment-30454</guid>
		<description>Well, I&#039;m sick of waiting for great expectations from Nikon, If I want a bloody movie camera I&#039;ll buy a movie camera from my local camera store, I will never buy a combination of both as I am a loyal stills guru. I&#039;m just going to mortguage the dog as security and go and buy a bloody D3 and head off and never again worry about another camera, I m so sad that  I have invested all the poor kids future in Nikon equipment. Keep up the good work my friends in camera land and be happy with what you&#039;v got.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I&#8217;m sick of waiting for great expectations from Nikon, If I want a bloody movie camera I&#8217;ll buy a movie camera from my local camera store, I will never buy a combination of both as I am a loyal stills guru. I&#8217;m just going to mortguage the dog as security and go and buy a bloody D3 and head off and never again worry about another camera, I m so sad that  I have invested all the poor kids future in Nikon equipment. Keep up the good work my friends in camera land and be happy with what you&#8217;v got.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: [NR] admin</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/07/24/nikon-rumors-and-expectations-for-next-week-recap.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-29244</link>
		<dc:creator>[NR] admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 00:24:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=5909#comment-29244</guid>
		<description>90% of the posts have a source link - feel free to contact the original source and complain to them. Anyway, we all got your point. I hope you got ours too - no need to carry this discussion further. Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>90% of the posts have a source link &#8211; feel free to contact the original source and complain to them. Anyway, we all got your point. I hope you got ours too &#8211; no need to carry this discussion further. Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: [NR] admin</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/07/24/nikon-rumors-and-expectations-for-next-week-recap.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-29243</link>
		<dc:creator>[NR] admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 00:16:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=5909#comment-29243</guid>
		<description>I do not predict - somebody else does that already - I react on leads, news and tips. BIG difference! Also, I cannot control what other site post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I do not predict &#8211; somebody else does that already &#8211; I react on leads, news and tips. BIG difference! Also, I cannot control what other site post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: C Benson</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/07/24/nikon-rumors-and-expectations-for-next-week-recap.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-29201</link>
		<dc:creator>C Benson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Jul 2009 14:26:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=5909#comment-29201</guid>
		<description>Please read paragraph 2 again. &quot;I understand that Nikon Rumors is providing a service in &quot; “rumors” &quot;.

There is a major problem in assumption when it comes to Nikon Rumors, because people on Dpreview.com, go to Nikon Rumors web site to find out if Nikon is going to release a new camera, in the future. The problem with Nikon Rumors is that they glorified what&#039;s about to happen in the near future, that’s the problem. People takes the information that Nikon Rumors, provides to heart and yes Nikon Rumors provides information as rumors. But they can also provide accurate information to their members. All I ask is that Nikon Rumors act like a news reporter and get the facts before they release the information. That’s all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please read paragraph 2 again. &#8220;I understand that Nikon Rumors is providing a service in &#8221; “rumors” &#8220;.</p>
<p>There is a major problem in assumption when it comes to Nikon Rumors, because people on Dpreview.com, go to Nikon Rumors web site to find out if Nikon is going to release a new camera, in the future. The problem with Nikon Rumors is that they glorified what&#8217;s about to happen in the near future, that’s the problem. People takes the information that Nikon Rumors, provides to heart and yes Nikon Rumors provides information as rumors. But they can also provide accurate information to their members. All I ask is that Nikon Rumors act like a news reporter and get the facts before they release the information. That’s all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: niko58</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/07/24/nikon-rumors-and-expectations-for-next-week-recap.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-29180</link>
		<dc:creator>niko58</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Jul 2009 06:41:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=5909#comment-29180</guid>
		<description>Alan.  I would say that you should quit threatening to switch and switch already.  

After all, if moving from a Nikon D3 series camera to a Canon 1D series camera, you will probably get everything you want immediately and not miss much.   However, if you are switching from the Nikon D300 or D700 to a Canon 5D Mark II or 50D, then you can spend all your time on Canon forums complaining about all the features you used to have on your Nikon camera that are not on your new Canon camera.

Two truths that you have to deal with if you use Canon cameras.  First, if is not a 1D series camera, then you are just a consumer and your camera will have very few features in common with their 1D series cameras.   You will get megapixels, but not much else.  Secondly, the marketing machine within Canon drives their camera features and I have a great deal of difficulty believing their marketing people are photographers.  Find a Canon site or pro that hasn&#039;t complained for years that they wanted an external switch, like on Nikon, to lock the mirror up.  Instead, they got a button for direct print, because marketing figured it would boost the sales of their printers.

What will you miss.  Oh lets see, pro-level 51 focus points, matrix metering, built-in commander for wireless flash, up to nine-frame bracketing, a huge number of configuration options allowing you to taylor your camera to your various shooting requriements, and even many simple things that Canon just doesn&#039;t feel you need.

Yes, you can switch, but will you really be happy?   Who knows, maybe you might find a camera that isn&#039;t cluttered with all those pesky professional features much more to your liking.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alan.  I would say that you should quit threatening to switch and switch already.  </p>
<p>After all, if moving from a Nikon D3 series camera to a Canon 1D series camera, you will probably get everything you want immediately and not miss much.   However, if you are switching from the Nikon D300 or D700 to a Canon 5D Mark II or 50D, then you can spend all your time on Canon forums complaining about all the features you used to have on your Nikon camera that are not on your new Canon camera.</p>
<p>Two truths that you have to deal with if you use Canon cameras.  First, if is not a 1D series camera, then you are just a consumer and your camera will have very few features in common with their 1D series cameras.   You will get megapixels, but not much else.  Secondly, the marketing machine within Canon drives their camera features and I have a great deal of difficulty believing their marketing people are photographers.  Find a Canon site or pro that hasn&#8217;t complained for years that they wanted an external switch, like on Nikon, to lock the mirror up.  Instead, they got a button for direct print, because marketing figured it would boost the sales of their printers.</p>
<p>What will you miss.  Oh lets see, pro-level 51 focus points, matrix metering, built-in commander for wireless flash, up to nine-frame bracketing, a huge number of configuration options allowing you to taylor your camera to your various shooting requriements, and even many simple things that Canon just doesn&#8217;t feel you need.</p>
<p>Yes, you can switch, but will you really be happy?   Who knows, maybe you might find a camera that isn&#8217;t cluttered with all those pesky professional features much more to your liking.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: niko58</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/07/24/nikon-rumors-and-expectations-for-next-week-recap.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-29177</link>
		<dc:creator>niko58</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Jul 2009 05:59:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=5909#comment-29177</guid>
		<description>C Benson.  I assume that you understand the definition of the word rumor, which is a key word in this sites name, Nikon Rumors.  If not, I have included several definitions here for you to consider regarding your request:

1.  general talk not based on definite knowledge; mere gossip; hearsay
2.  an unconfirmed report, story, or statement in general circulation
3.  talk or opinion widely disseminated with no discernible source
4.  a statement or report current without known authority for its truth

While the Admin may make every attempt to make some assessment as to the validity of the rumors he becomes aware of, even attempting to rank them as to the probability of their truth or actuality, it is not reasonable to expect everything you read on this site to turn out to be true. Since manufacturers do not publish their internal development and production schedules, places like Nikon Rumors are the only places you can go to get a clue of what &quot;might&quot; be in the current pipeline.  Sometimes it will be correct,, sometimes it won&#039;t, but if you come to this site, your expectations should be realistic.

If you only want to be made aware of information that is based in  fact, then you should really be visiting the Nikon website and just wait for them to publish the announcement of the next new camera, lens, flash, etc., because obviously you are trying to locate Nikon Facts, not Nikokn Rumors.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>C Benson.  I assume that you understand the definition of the word rumor, which is a key word in this sites name, Nikon Rumors.  If not, I have included several definitions here for you to consider regarding your request:</p>
<p>1.  general talk not based on definite knowledge; mere gossip; hearsay<br />
2.  an unconfirmed report, story, or statement in general circulation<br />
3.  talk or opinion widely disseminated with no discernible source<br />
4.  a statement or report current without known authority for its truth</p>
<p>While the Admin may make every attempt to make some assessment as to the validity of the rumors he becomes aware of, even attempting to rank them as to the probability of their truth or actuality, it is not reasonable to expect everything you read on this site to turn out to be true. Since manufacturers do not publish their internal development and production schedules, places like Nikon Rumors are the only places you can go to get a clue of what &#8220;might&#8221; be in the current pipeline.  Sometimes it will be correct,, sometimes it won&#8217;t, but if you come to this site, your expectations should be realistic.</p>
<p>If you only want to be made aware of information that is based in  fact, then you should really be visiting the Nikon website and just wait for them to publish the announcement of the next new camera, lens, flash, etc., because obviously you are trying to locate Nikon Facts, not Nikokn Rumors.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Johnson</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/07/24/nikon-rumors-and-expectations-for-next-week-recap.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-29171</link>
		<dc:creator>David Johnson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Jul 2009 04:36:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=5909#comment-29171</guid>
		<description>Several Nikon Rumor posts have suggested the need for Nikon to update their 80-400 VR. In my mind that is a lenses that needs fixing. Many expect a 70-200 update. That would be excellent, but many of us are trying to get that 200-500 range and I for one do NOT WANT a wide open 2.8 type glass since handheld shots will beat tripod almost every time for some subjects.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Several Nikon Rumor posts have suggested the need for Nikon to update their 80-400 VR. In my mind that is a lenses that needs fixing. Many expect a 70-200 update. That would be excellent, but many of us are trying to get that 200-500 range and I for one do NOT WANT a wide open 2.8 type glass since handheld shots will beat tripod almost every time for some subjects.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: C Benson</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/07/24/nikon-rumors-and-expectations-for-next-week-recap.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-29169</link>
		<dc:creator>C Benson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Jul 2009 03:35:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=5909#comment-29169</guid>
		<description>Simple. In the past you or Nikon Rumors, have made predictions that Nikon was going to release new cameras for example: D400, D800 or D900 serious cameras at the beginning of the year. But in the end, Nikon did not release those types of cameras. Nikon only release D5000 serious camera. I was upset an other people where upset because Nikon Rumors made false predictions and got people hopes up. Plus other people, on other web sites, where taking the information that Nikon Rumors was providing and running with it. Have you ever heard of a nursery rhyme &quot;Little Girl cried Wolf&quot;? If yes, then you know where I am coming from.

In the past I been trying to get Nikon Rumors, to be more accurate in reporting the information to their members. I understand that Nikon Rumors is providing a service in &quot;rumors&quot;. But they are also providing a service in reporting the correct information to their members. This is what I am trying to get across to you and to your members.

Thank You</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Simple. In the past you or Nikon Rumors, have made predictions that Nikon was going to release new cameras for example: D400, D800 or D900 serious cameras at the beginning of the year. But in the end, Nikon did not release those types of cameras. Nikon only release D5000 serious camera. I was upset an other people where upset because Nikon Rumors made false predictions and got people hopes up. Plus other people, on other web sites, where taking the information that Nikon Rumors was providing and running with it. Have you ever heard of a nursery rhyme &#8220;Little Girl cried Wolf&#8221;? If yes, then you know where I am coming from.</p>
<p>In the past I been trying to get Nikon Rumors, to be more accurate in reporting the information to their members. I understand that Nikon Rumors is providing a service in &#8220;rumors&#8221;. But they are also providing a service in reporting the correct information to their members. This is what I am trying to get across to you and to your members.</p>
<p>Thank You</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Johnson</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/07/24/nikon-rumors-and-expectations-for-next-week-recap.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-29163</link>
		<dc:creator>David Johnson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Jul 2009 01:26:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=5909#comment-29163</guid>
		<description>I also personally agree with Mathias: A CF card is far better than SD, a faster CF card would be better than SD. When you look at the more pro NIKON DSLRs they have CF Cards. Upgrade that equals better, adding SD to a serious camera is a downgrade. The D90 is a GREAT camera. But it sure cuts some corners! I for one do not want that much corner cutting on a D300s or especially a D400 or D700 upgrade.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I also personally agree with Mathias: A CF card is far better than SD, a faster CF card would be better than SD. When you look at the more pro NIKON DSLRs they have CF Cards. Upgrade that equals better, adding SD to a serious camera is a downgrade. The D90 is a GREAT camera. But it sure cuts some corners! I for one do not want that much corner cutting on a D300s or especially a D400 or D700 upgrade.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: [NR] admin</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/07/24/nikon-rumors-and-expectations-for-next-week-recap.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-29161</link>
		<dc:creator>[NR] admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Jul 2009 01:23:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=5909#comment-29161</guid>
		<description>Thanks David, I put a lot of effort in this site and I am glad you guys find it helpful.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks David, I put a lot of effort in this site and I am glad you guys find it helpful.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Johnson</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/07/24/nikon-rumors-and-expectations-for-next-week-recap.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-29159</link>
		<dc:creator>David Johnson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Jul 2009 01:21:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=5909#comment-29159</guid>
		<description>I give Nikon Rumors a lot of credit......saves me time checking on the latest Nikon scoop, a lot better than buying a camera or a lens and finding out a week later that what you really wanted was just being introduced. Not avery serious photographer is totally in tune with manufacturer. I know an engineer who researched cameras for two years but had not really followed the more serious amateurs and pros who would have advised him very differently. He bought a camera which was really not right!  If you are buying from the B&amp;H superstore, you might get the real scoop, buying at a small city Ritz or Best Buy.....so Nikon Rumors is a quick way to get a heads up! Besides it is interesting to hear from photographers who care about quality, marketing, and results!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I give Nikon Rumors a lot of credit&#8230;&#8230;saves me time checking on the latest Nikon scoop, a lot better than buying a camera or a lens and finding out a week later that what you really wanted was just being introduced. Not avery serious photographer is totally in tune with manufacturer. I know an engineer who researched cameras for two years but had not really followed the more serious amateurs and pros who would have advised him very differently. He bought a camera which was really not right!  If you are buying from the B&amp;H superstore, you might get the real scoop, buying at a small city Ritz or Best Buy&#8230;..so Nikon Rumors is a quick way to get a heads up! Besides it is interesting to hear from photographers who care about quality, marketing, and results!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kwartjuh</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/07/24/nikon-rumors-and-expectations-for-next-week-recap.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-29146</link>
		<dc:creator>Kwartjuh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2009 21:37:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=5909#comment-29146</guid>
		<description>1 year ago:

I WANT A GOOD 5D-LIKE CAMERA FROM NIKON OR I&#039;LL SWITCH TO CANON.

nikon didnt make a 5d-like camera, it completely blew the 5D out of the water, and in my opinion also the 5D mark II with the d700.

Like i said earlier: you people are behaving like spoiled little brats. I honestly doubt that people like you care about photography instead of just being total gear-nuts. The 80-400 isnt the fasted of lenses, but performs beautifully on the fullframe AND dx bodies. Sooner or later it will be replaced, but you there is a list of primes that are more out-dated specwise that the 80-400.

And all this admin bashing is just plain silly as well. Yes, admin has made some mistakes, like giving is BS-info about certain retailers going backrupt and stuff that nobody here cares about, but some of you people act like the guy is actually is responsible for what nikons announces when!?

Give the guy some slack, he only tells us what he is being told by mostly anonymous people.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1 year ago:</p>
<p>I WANT A GOOD 5D-LIKE CAMERA FROM NIKON OR I&#8217;LL SWITCH TO CANON.</p>
<p>nikon didnt make a 5d-like camera, it completely blew the 5D out of the water, and in my opinion also the 5D mark II with the d700.</p>
<p>Like i said earlier: you people are behaving like spoiled little brats. I honestly doubt that people like you care about photography instead of just being total gear-nuts. The 80-400 isnt the fasted of lenses, but performs beautifully on the fullframe AND dx bodies. Sooner or later it will be replaced, but you there is a list of primes that are more out-dated specwise that the 80-400.</p>
<p>And all this admin bashing is just plain silly as well. Yes, admin has made some mistakes, like giving is BS-info about certain retailers going backrupt and stuff that nobody here cares about, but some of you people act like the guy is actually is responsible for what nikons announces when!?</p>
<p>Give the guy some slack, he only tells us what he is being told by mostly anonymous people.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: heartyfisher</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/07/24/nikon-rumors-and-expectations-for-next-week-recap.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-29138</link>
		<dc:creator>heartyfisher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2009 20:28:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=5909#comment-29138</guid>
		<description>LOL .. I was just thinking that it may help shut the idiots up a bit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LOL .. I was just thinking that it may help shut the idiots up a bit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: [NR] admin</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/07/24/nikon-rumors-and-expectations-for-next-week-recap.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-29135</link>
		<dc:creator>[NR] admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2009 20:22:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=5909#comment-29135</guid>
		<description>Let me explain - I get a dozen of email every day pointing to other sites that have re-published the information from NikonRumors. When I am the first one to post a rumor, I consider this rumor exclusive to NR - meaning NR was the first to publish it. Please feel free to prove me wrong.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let me explain &#8211; I get a dozen of email every day pointing to other sites that have re-published the information from NikonRumors. When I am the first one to post a rumor, I consider this rumor exclusive to NR &#8211; meaning NR was the first to publish it. Please feel free to prove me wrong.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: [NR] admin</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/07/24/nikon-rumors-and-expectations-for-next-week-recap.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-29134</link>
		<dc:creator>[NR] admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2009 20:19:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=5909#comment-29134</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t know at that point - no matter what I put up there, it will not be perfect. Thanks for the idea.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know at that point &#8211; no matter what I put up there, it will not be perfect. Thanks for the idea.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: [NR] admin</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/07/24/nikon-rumors-and-expectations-for-next-week-recap.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-29133</link>
		<dc:creator>[NR] admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2009 20:18:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=5909#comment-29133</guid>
		<description>C Benson, I try to make sense of your comments and I can&#039;t (and I am not talking only about this one here).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>C Benson, I try to make sense of your comments and I can&#8217;t (and I am not talking only about this one here).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: [NR] admin</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/07/24/nikon-rumors-and-expectations-for-next-week-recap.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-29132</link>
		<dc:creator>[NR] admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2009 20:16:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=5909#comment-29132</guid>
		<description>Mike, this is one of the most intelligent description of what I do here I&#039;ve heard in a while - you  get it :) Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mike, this is one of the most intelligent description of what I do here I&#8217;ve heard in a while &#8211; you  get it <img src='http://nikonrumors.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alan Fischer</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/07/24/nikon-rumors-and-expectations-for-next-week-recap.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-29120</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan Fischer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2009 18:18:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=5909#comment-29120</guid>
		<description>I WANT A FAST SHARP 80-400 VR II  soon or I&#039;ll switch to CANON</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I WANT A FAST SHARP 80-400 VR II  soon or I&#8217;ll switch to CANON</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mathias</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/07/24/nikon-rumors-and-expectations-for-next-week-recap.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-29112</link>
		<dc:creator>Mathias</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2009 17:02:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=5909#comment-29112</guid>
		<description>But who the fuck wants a SD card in a pro camera?! I would absolutly prefer a faster CF card in my PRO D300...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But who the fuck wants a SD card in a pro camera?! I would absolutly prefer a faster CF card in my PRO D300&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eigil Nybo</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/07/24/nikon-rumors-and-expectations-for-next-week-recap.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-29110</link>
		<dc:creator>Eigil Nybo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2009 16:02:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=5909#comment-29110</guid>
		<description>What is happened to the D400. D300s, come on, no real news, look at the spec&#039;s.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What is happened to the D400. D300s, come on, no real news, look at the spec&#8217;s.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

