<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Nikon D3000/D5000 image comparison</title>
	<atom:link href="http://nikonrumors.com/2009/06/30/nikon-d3000d5000-comparison.aspx/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/06/30/nikon-d3000d5000-comparison.aspx</link>
	<description>where there’s smoke there’s fire</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 14:30:14 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Stylus</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/06/30/nikon-d3000d5000-comparison.aspx/comment-page-1#comment-27679</link>
		<dc:creator>Stylus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 04:21:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=5664#comment-27679</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ll have to say that this looks significantly more sensible than the D5000.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll have to say that this looks significantly more sensible than the D5000.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Soap</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/06/30/nikon-d3000d5000-comparison.aspx/comment-page-1#comment-27626</link>
		<dc:creator>Soap</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 10:39:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=5664#comment-27626</guid>
		<description>another person who has a broken sarcasm detector.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>another person who has a broken sarcasm detector.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Soap</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/06/30/nikon-d3000d5000-comparison.aspx/comment-page-1#comment-27625</link>
		<dc:creator>Soap</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 10:36:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=5664#comment-27625</guid>
		<description>Your sarcasm detector is broken if you think he is serious about that Leica line.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your sarcasm detector is broken if you think he is serious about that Leica line.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Padders</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/06/30/nikon-d3000d5000-comparison.aspx/comment-page-1#comment-27618</link>
		<dc:creator>Padders</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 09:03:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=5664#comment-27618</guid>
		<description>I think that this is genuine. If you look at the mode dials, there are things in a different order and the auto-no-flash is seemingly missing on the D3000. If it were faked I would imagine they wouldn&#039;t have gone to the trouble on the dial.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that this is genuine. If you look at the mode dials, there are things in a different order and the auto-no-flash is seemingly missing on the D3000. If it were faked I would imagine they wouldn&#8217;t have gone to the trouble on the dial.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anon</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/06/30/nikon-d3000d5000-comparison.aspx/comment-page-1#comment-27603</link>
		<dc:creator>anon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 05:02:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=5664#comment-27603</guid>
		<description>Honestly - anyone heard anything about the specs for the D3000?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Honestly &#8211; anyone heard anything about the specs for the D3000?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EB</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/06/30/nikon-d3000d5000-comparison.aspx/comment-page-1#comment-27596</link>
		<dc:creator>EB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 01:46:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=5664#comment-27596</guid>
		<description>&quot;Poop, Fart, Wuss.

Tripods are for losers.

Camera backpacks are for sissies.

Digital is for dummies.

Leica is for real men.

I worked in TV for 10 years while working in Hollywood for 15 years while being a circuit engineer at tektronix for 23 years and I helped make the first digital camera while being an inventor for 50 years while shooting 90 rolls of film a day for 62 years.  

D40!!!! &quot;

I wish my job was that easy. At least I&#039;m doing something remotely useful.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Poop, Fart, Wuss.</p>
<p>Tripods are for losers.</p>
<p>Camera backpacks are for sissies.</p>
<p>Digital is for dummies.</p>
<p>Leica is for real men.</p>
<p>I worked in TV for 10 years while working in Hollywood for 15 years while being a circuit engineer at tektronix for 23 years and I helped make the first digital camera while being an inventor for 50 years while shooting 90 rolls of film a day for 62 years.  </p>
<p>D40!!!! &#8221;</p>
<p>I wish my job was that easy. At least I&#8217;m doing something remotely useful.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Egocentrism</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/06/30/nikon-d3000d5000-comparison.aspx/comment-page-1#comment-27528</link>
		<dc:creator>Egocentrism</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 15:45:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=5664#comment-27528</guid>
		<description>TH just recapped his 2009 predictions - basically what I have been reading here for a month. Of course he added the important &quot;I predict&quot;, &quot;I know&quot;, &quot;I am the greatest&quot;...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>TH just recapped his 2009 predictions &#8211; basically what I have been reading here for a month. Of course he added the important &#8220;I predict&#8221;, &#8220;I know&#8221;, &#8220;I am the greatest&#8221;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ennan</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/06/30/nikon-d3000d5000-comparison.aspx/comment-page-1#comment-27510</link>
		<dc:creator>Ennan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 11:32:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=5664#comment-27510</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s a sign of the coming apocalyse you know.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s a sign of the coming apocalyse you know.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: D40-Owner</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/06/30/nikon-d3000d5000-comparison.aspx/comment-page-1#comment-27508</link>
		<dc:creator>D40-Owner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 08:48:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=5664#comment-27508</guid>
		<description>OMG, KR lingo made it to mainstream!! :P</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OMG, KR lingo made it to mainstream!! <img src='http://nikonrumors.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_razz.gif' alt=':P' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rwpl</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/06/30/nikon-d3000d5000-comparison.aspx/comment-page-1#comment-27507</link>
		<dc:creator>rwpl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 08:03:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=5664#comment-27507</guid>
		<description>associated hmm ... they take lenses for testing from many on-line shops ( pstryk, fotozakupy, foto-tip).

Lets not make out of this a conspiracy theory.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>associated hmm &#8230; they take lenses for testing from many on-line shops ( pstryk, fotozakupy, foto-tip).</p>
<p>Lets not make out of this a conspiracy theory.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Catchall</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/06/30/nikon-d3000d5000-comparison.aspx/comment-page-1#comment-27505</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Catchall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 06:47:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=5664#comment-27505</guid>
		<description>He is right, because I forgot to say that this new sensor should have at least 12 bit raw files.  If they were only 8 bit, you would quickly exhaust the 256 unique images that could be produced.  And that would be rubbish.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>He is right, because I forgot to say that this new sensor should have at least 12 bit raw files.  If they were only 8 bit, you would quickly exhaust the 256 unique images that could be produced.  And that would be rubbish.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robin Edgar</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/06/30/nikon-d3000d5000-comparison.aspx/comment-page-1#comment-27499</link>
		<dc:creator>Robin Edgar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 00:53:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=5664#comment-27499</guid>
		<description>BTW Ken are you sure that your darkroom is properly ventilated?

Just asking. . . :-)

&quot;If things keep growing like this, and camera makers miss the mark for new models, demand for film gear is going to be so strong in a few years that Pentax K1000s will be selling for about $650 ~ $725, Canon AE-1s will go for about $950 ~ $1,100, and the AE-1 program, which goes for about $50 today (up from $35 last month) will fetch $1,450 ~ $1,575.&quot;

No joke. This is from a very recent post on Ken Rockwell&#039;s site. . .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BTW Ken are you sure that your darkroom is properly ventilated?</p>
<p>Just asking. . . <img src='http://nikonrumors.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>&#8220;If things keep growing like this, and camera makers miss the mark for new models, demand for film gear is going to be so strong in a few years that Pentax K1000s will be selling for about $650 ~ $725, Canon AE-1s will go for about $950 ~ $1,100, and the AE-1 program, which goes for about $50 today (up from $35 last month) will fetch $1,450 ~ $1,575.&#8221;</p>
<p>No joke. This is from a very recent post on Ken Rockwell&#8217;s site. . .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robin Edgar</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/06/30/nikon-d3000d5000-comparison.aspx/comment-page-1#comment-27498</link>
		<dc:creator>Robin Edgar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 00:45:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=5664#comment-27498</guid>
		<description>Up here in Soviet Canuckistan the D5000 kit with 18-55mm VR lens seems to be about $100 or so cheaper than when it was released.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Up here in Soviet Canuckistan the D5000 kit with 18-55mm VR lens seems to be about $100 or so cheaper than when it was released.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robin Edgar</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/06/30/nikon-d3000d5000-comparison.aspx/comment-page-1#comment-27497</link>
		<dc:creator>Robin Edgar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 00:43:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=5664#comment-27497</guid>
		<description>But it&#039;s such hilarious rubbish Ken!

Er. . . I mean Zorro.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But it&#8217;s such hilarious rubbish Ken!</p>
<p>Er. . . I mean Zorro.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robin Edgar</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/06/30/nikon-d3000d5000-comparison.aspx/comment-page-1#comment-27496</link>
		<dc:creator>Robin Edgar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 00:41:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=5664#comment-27496</guid>
		<description>C&#039;mon Ken we *know* it&#039;s you. 

The Zorro &quot;masked man&quot; pseudonym is a dead give away. . .





Please don&#039;t anyone take this *too* seriously. Just having a bit of fun!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>C&#8217;mon Ken we *know* it&#8217;s you. </p>
<p>The Zorro &#8220;masked man&#8221; pseudonym is a dead give away. . .</p>
<p>Please don&#8217;t anyone take this *too* seriously. Just having a bit of fun!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zorro</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/06/30/nikon-d3000d5000-comparison.aspx/comment-page-1#comment-27495</link>
		<dc:creator>Zorro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 23:57:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=5664#comment-27495</guid>
		<description>What rubbish!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What rubbish!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/06/30/nikon-d3000d5000-comparison.aspx/comment-page-1#comment-27494</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 23:50:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=5664#comment-27494</guid>
		<description>Why do people select  &quot;dislike/do not post again&quot;?   I could see if they do that for a totally useless post, but most of the ones I see are actually for helpful posts.  What kind of post would please these people?  Geez.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why do people select  &#8220;dislike/do not post again&#8221;?   I could see if they do that for a totally useless post, but most of the ones I see are actually for helpful posts.  What kind of post would please these people?  Geez.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike O</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/06/30/nikon-d3000d5000-comparison.aspx/comment-page-1#comment-27493</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike O</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 23:34:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=5664#comment-27493</guid>
		<description>thank you sir!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thank you sir!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Catchall</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/06/30/nikon-d3000d5000-comparison.aspx/comment-page-1#comment-27491</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Catchall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 23:25:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=5664#comment-27491</guid>
		<description>I want a 1 pixel sensor. Having just one pixel, Moire effects would be eliminated, so the images would be super-sharp as an anti-alias filter would not be required.  Furthermore, the one pixel would not require a colour or IR filter, so the sensor would be able to record at ISO 51,200 without significant noise.  This sensor could be fitted in the much desired b&amp;w only digital FM3.  What do you think?  Any other potential customers for a camera with such a sensor?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I want a 1 pixel sensor. Having just one pixel, Moire effects would be eliminated, so the images would be super-sharp as an anti-alias filter would not be required.  Furthermore, the one pixel would not require a colour or IR filter, so the sensor would be able to record at ISO 51,200 without significant noise.  This sensor could be fitted in the much desired b&amp;w only digital FM3.  What do you think?  Any other potential customers for a camera with such a sensor?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: [NR] admin</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/06/30/nikon-d3000d5000-comparison.aspx/comment-page-1#comment-27490</link>
		<dc:creator>[NR] admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 22:38:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=5664#comment-27490</guid>
		<description>I will try to contact them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I will try to contact them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
