Comments on: Nikon rumors I didn’t post

By: EB

EB — Fri, 19 Jun 2009 01:49:30 +0000

Seems like an ironic name for a “post”. If you arn’t gona post them, don’t post them…=P

Maybe a better name might be: “Unlikely rumors from the past two weeks”

By: [NR] admin

[NR] admin — Thu, 18 Jun 2009 19:25:29 +0000

he he – I use the force to find you

By: d4n131m3j14

d4n131m3j14 — Thu, 18 Jun 2009 19:06:27 +0000

I saw this post and changed to the list and removed my D800 from it. That list was for messing around with people just wanting to know the gear I use, never thought I would end up in nikonrumors hehehe. I must ask how did you find it?

By: D40-Owner

D40-Owner — Thu, 18 Jun 2009 16:16:26 +0000

The camera in the model’s hand definitely has a built-in flash.
And that’s about all you can see….

By: Martin

Martin — Thu, 18 Jun 2009 13:41:10 +0000

I really like the idea of posting rumors “I didn’t post”. I don’t expect every rumor to be true…and I like to see what BS people come-up with. I tell ya one thing. That SB-700 rumor had my heart skip a beat. I’m waiting until fall to purchase a new flash. I hope by then I have a new option…..SB-700.

By: [NR] admin

[NR] admin — Thu, 18 Jun 2009 13:26:51 +0000

try this link:
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3622/3636466049_18dc7fdb6b_b.jpg

By: [NR] admin

[NR] admin — Thu, 18 Jun 2009 13:25:33 +0000

I removed the entry all together

By: [NR] admin

[NR] admin — Thu, 18 Jun 2009 13:23:22 +0000

LOL – he changed his list – there were a lot of weird lenses there…

By: [NR] admin

[NR] admin — Thu, 18 Jun 2009 13:19:03 +0000

I just checked – the photo is public and is already viewed 1100 times.

By: Tony

Tony — Thu, 18 Jun 2009 13:06:32 +0000

Can’t see the hi-res photo…says it’s private.

By: ak

ak — Thu, 18 Jun 2009 11:43:09 +0000

Odd to include a link in a fake picture…

http://support.nikontech.com/app/answers/detail/a_id/13984

By: jimbo

jimbo — Thu, 18 Jun 2009 09:36:27 +0000

I’m assuming the AF-S 105-300 f/2.8 VR that’s listed on the interesting guy’s flickr is a 70-200mm for DX? Nothing else is suprising

By: rwpl

rwpl — Thu, 18 Jun 2009 08:03:00 +0000

hehe thx for this post!

By: Brintkiks

Brintkiks — Thu, 18 Jun 2009 06:15:54 +0000

The hi-res image on flickr is “private”, so I can’t see it..

By: silverfire

silverfire — Thu, 18 Jun 2009 04:34:21 +0000

The manual “leak” is definitely a fake — all the other text is centered while the D300s is the same as the D300 with an ‘s’ stuck at the end.