<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: More Nikon AIS lenses discontinued at B&amp;H</title>
	<atom:link href="http://nikonrumors.com/2009/06/15/more-nikon-ais-lenses-discontinued-at-bh.aspx/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/06/15/more-nikon-ais-lenses-discontinued-at-bh.aspx/</link>
	<description>where there’s smoke there’s fire</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 03:14:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: [NR] admin</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/06/15/more-nikon-ais-lenses-discontinued-at-bh.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-26441</link>
		<dc:creator>[NR] admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 22:31:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=5439#comment-26441</guid>
		<description>You got the whole idea of this blog, some others will never get it...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You got the whole idea of this blog, some others will never get it&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: STJ</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/06/15/more-nikon-ais-lenses-discontinued-at-bh.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-26427</link>
		<dc:creator>STJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 21:38:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=5439#comment-26427</guid>
		<description>Ha ha ha!
Admin - yo umake ma laugh :-)
And by the way - don&#039;t let any emails get you in a &quot;down mood&quot; - rumors are rumors - just post all the stuff you want, readers must then filter for themselves. We all want you to get the exact date and specifications for the next lenses and cameras but you do as best as you can. Those that cannot do the filtering are lost on the web anyways.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ha ha ha!<br />
Admin &#8211; yo umake ma laugh <img src='http://nikonrumors.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
And by the way &#8211; don&#8217;t let any emails get you in a &#8220;down mood&#8221; &#8211; rumors are rumors &#8211; just post all the stuff you want, readers must then filter for themselves. We all want you to get the exact date and specifications for the next lenses and cameras but you do as best as you can. Those that cannot do the filtering are lost on the web anyways.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/06/15/more-nikon-ais-lenses-discontinued-at-bh.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-26403</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 18:26:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=5439#comment-26403</guid>
		<description>good!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>good!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DrB</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/06/15/more-nikon-ais-lenses-discontinued-at-bh.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-26402</link>
		<dc:creator>DrB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 18:00:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=5439#comment-26402</guid>
		<description>I dont care either, but not because of zooms. Instead, I dont care because you&#039;d be mad these days to buy an ais lens new, when ebay is swimming with mint 2nd hand bargains. 

Aside from the 14-24, 24-70 and 17-35, the old ais primes still hold their own (and in some cases clearly outperform) against anything Nikon has to offer (as long as one can be bothered to raise ones hand to the focusing ring). It would be a shame if Nikon didn&#039;t replace at least some of them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I dont care either, but not because of zooms. Instead, I dont care because you&#8217;d be mad these days to buy an ais lens new, when ebay is swimming with mint 2nd hand bargains. </p>
<p>Aside from the 14-24, 24-70 and 17-35, the old ais primes still hold their own (and in some cases clearly outperform) against anything Nikon has to offer (as long as one can be bothered to raise ones hand to the focusing ring). It would be a shame if Nikon didn&#8217;t replace at least some of them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DrB</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/06/15/more-nikon-ais-lenses-discontinued-at-bh.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-26401</link>
		<dc:creator>DrB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 17:52:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=5439#comment-26401</guid>
		<description>Yeah, they do make the eyes water. I dont expect that any FX primes released by Nikon now will be substantially cheaper though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, they do make the eyes water. I dont expect that any FX primes released by Nikon now will be substantially cheaper though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: M</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/06/15/more-nikon-ais-lenses-discontinued-at-bh.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-26400</link>
		<dc:creator>M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 17:02:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=5439#comment-26400</guid>
		<description>Taxes are going up, the markets are falling. The rest is baseless speculation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Taxes are going up, the markets are falling. The rest is baseless speculation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: [NR] admin</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/06/15/more-nikon-ais-lenses-discontinued-at-bh.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-26399</link>
		<dc:creator>[NR] admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 16:51:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=5439#comment-26399</guid>
		<description>I have some really good rumors and I was not going to post them, but now after you asked for it.. I will be all over them ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have some really good rumors and I was not going to post them, but now after you asked for it.. I will be all over them &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/06/15/more-nikon-ais-lenses-discontinued-at-bh.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-26397</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 16:35:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=5439#comment-26397</guid>
		<description>Agreed!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agreed!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/06/15/more-nikon-ais-lenses-discontinued-at-bh.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-26396</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 16:34:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=5439#comment-26396</guid>
		<description>So...how about some REAL RUMORS instead of the usual circle jerk?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So&#8230;how about some REAL RUMORS instead of the usual circle jerk?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/06/15/more-nikon-ais-lenses-discontinued-at-bh.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-26395</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 16:33:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=5439#comment-26395</guid>
		<description>&quot;being outperformed by the zooms&quot;

you don&#039;t shoot much do ya kid?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;being outperformed by the zooms&#8221;</p>
<p>you don&#8217;t shoot much do ya kid?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: M</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/06/15/more-nikon-ais-lenses-discontinued-at-bh.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-26394</link>
		<dc:creator>M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 15:36:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=5439#comment-26394</guid>
		<description>Amen to all those points. I recently bought (new) the 50/1.2 from Vistek in Canada for US$550. Agree with its sharpness @ f/2. Also love the jewel-like precision of the AI-s lenses, as opposed to the new, Chinese made plastic normal AF-S &#039;normal&#039; lenses (35/1.8 &amp; 50/1.4). I got tired of waiting for the mythical 85/1.4 AFS and popped for a new AFD. Have had issues with it right off the bat. QC hasn&#039;t been what it used to be; my brand new  24-70, barely used, went back for replacement of the AF mechanism. My 14-24 is heading back next.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amen to all those points. I recently bought (new) the 50/1.2 from Vistek in Canada for US$550. Agree with its sharpness @ f/2. Also love the jewel-like precision of the AI-s lenses, as opposed to the new, Chinese made plastic normal AF-S &#8216;normal&#8217; lenses (35/1.8 &amp; 50/1.4). I got tired of waiting for the mythical 85/1.4 AFS and popped for a new AFD. Have had issues with it right off the bat. QC hasn&#8217;t been what it used to be; my brand new  24-70, barely used, went back for replacement of the AF mechanism. My 14-24 is heading back next.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bruno</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/06/15/more-nikon-ais-lenses-discontinued-at-bh.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-26392</link>
		<dc:creator>Bruno</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 15:09:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=5439#comment-26392</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s about time....
Nothing extraordinary about this news !</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s about time&#8230;.<br />
Nothing extraordinary about this news !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: grumps</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/06/15/more-nikon-ais-lenses-discontinued-at-bh.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-26378</link>
		<dc:creator>grumps</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 10:25:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=5439#comment-26378</guid>
		<description>Not exactly, at least Apple has good predictable releases every year and not every decade (lenses)! :p</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not exactly, at least Apple has good predictable releases every year and not every decade (lenses)! :p</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rad</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/06/15/more-nikon-ais-lenses-discontinued-at-bh.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-26368</link>
		<dc:creator>rad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 06:28:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=5439#comment-26368</guid>
		<description>I thought that title was already taken by Apple? ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought that title was already taken by Apple? <img src='http://nikonrumors.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ubiquitous</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/06/15/more-nikon-ais-lenses-discontinued-at-bh.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-26366</link>
		<dc:creator>Ubiquitous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 04:59:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=5439#comment-26366</guid>
		<description>Maybe Nikon should announce what lenses are discontinued. What a revolutionary idea, but we are talking about “Ninja Nikon,” the “Cloak and Dagger” Corporation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe Nikon should announce what lenses are discontinued. What a revolutionary idea, but we are talking about “Ninja Nikon,” the “Cloak and Dagger” Corporation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PHB</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/06/15/more-nikon-ais-lenses-discontinued-at-bh.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-26362</link>
		<dc:creator>PHB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 04:02:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=5439#comment-26362</guid>
		<description>Nah, no new manual lenses.

But with the current range of AF primes not working on the D40 bodies and being outperformed by the zooms, sometimes for less money, it is clear Nikon needs to sort out its prime range.

I suspect that we will see all the AF primes superceded by fast, more expensive AFS versions. These will probably be quite expensive and not quite replace the AF versions that will hang around for  while.

Nikon would probably prefer not to have two sets of obsolete primes to confuse matters.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nah, no new manual lenses.</p>
<p>But with the current range of AF primes not working on the D40 bodies and being outperformed by the zooms, sometimes for less money, it is clear Nikon needs to sort out its prime range.</p>
<p>I suspect that we will see all the AF primes superceded by fast, more expensive AFS versions. These will probably be quite expensive and not quite replace the AF versions that will hang around for  while.</p>
<p>Nikon would probably prefer not to have two sets of obsolete primes to confuse matters.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zorro</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/06/15/more-nikon-ais-lenses-discontinued-at-bh.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-26360</link>
		<dc:creator>Zorro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 02:42:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=5439#comment-26360</guid>
		<description>Does anyone really care?  All these lenses were well past their use-by date.  Modern AF-S zooms are the money-makers for Nikon now because they&#039;re what most users want.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does anyone really care?  All these lenses were well past their use-by date.  Modern AF-S zooms are the money-makers for Nikon now because they&#8217;re what most users want.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/06/15/more-nikon-ais-lenses-discontinued-at-bh.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-26350</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 22:41:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=5439#comment-26350</guid>
		<description>Ya if you can afford the ZF! super expensive</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ya if you can afford the ZF! super expensive</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DrB</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/06/15/more-nikon-ais-lenses-discontinued-at-bh.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-26347</link>
		<dc:creator>DrB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 21:59:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=5439#comment-26347</guid>
		<description>Ah well never mind. Who needs ais when there is zf... ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah well never mind. Who needs ais when there is zf&#8230; ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: William</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/06/15/more-nikon-ais-lenses-discontinued-at-bh.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-26342</link>
		<dc:creator>William</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 19:35:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=5439#comment-26342</guid>
		<description>Maybe the updated versions will be released alongside the D300s</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe the updated versions will be released alongside the D300s</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

