<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: D400 &#8211; the most anticipated Nikon camera at the moment</title>
	<atom:link href="http://nikonrumors.com/2009/05/25/d400-the-most-anticipated-nikon-camera-at-the-moment.aspx/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/05/25/d400-the-most-anticipated-nikon-camera-at-the-moment.aspx/</link>
	<description>where there’s smoke there’s fire</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 12:29:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: zen-tao</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/05/25/d400-the-most-anticipated-nikon-camera-at-the-moment.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-24847</link>
		<dc:creator>zen-tao</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 07:29:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=4958#comment-24847</guid>
		<description>If we keep replaying each other our spot will be downsized to  minimal surface and we need more pixels to render our art. The larger, the better...

Yours Javier</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If we keep replaying each other our spot will be downsized to  minimal surface and we need more pixels to render our art. The larger, the better&#8230;</p>
<p>Yours Javier</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Remington</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/05/25/d400-the-most-anticipated-nikon-camera-at-the-moment.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-24661</link>
		<dc:creator>Remington</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 14:29:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=4958#comment-24661</guid>
		<description>I guess my question is do you need 24 MP to be a PRO? Does the current D300 not produce excellent IQ with its current 12MP? What&#039;s the downside of using FX glass on a DX body? Even Canon has done well with the 50D and the pixel density debate is still ongoing with both sides digging in their heels to defend their position... almost like the global warming debate.

Besides, if you want FX but without the high price tag buy a D700.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess my question is do you need 24 MP to be a PRO? Does the current D300 not produce excellent IQ with its current 12MP? What&#8217;s the downside of using FX glass on a DX body? Even Canon has done well with the 50D and the pixel density debate is still ongoing with both sides digging in their heels to defend their position&#8230; almost like the global warming debate.</p>
<p>Besides, if you want FX but without the high price tag buy a D700.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mhood</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/05/25/d400-the-most-anticipated-nikon-camera-at-the-moment.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-24659</link>
		<dc:creator>mhood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 13:00:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=4958#comment-24659</guid>
		<description>I wonder how much of the interest in a D400 is related to improvements in the HD video function?  The D90 was a great start but there are many problems with HD video that need resolving.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder how much of the interest in a D400 is related to improvements in the HD video function?  The D90 was a great start but there are many problems with HD video that need resolving.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zen-tao</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/05/25/d400-the-most-anticipated-nikon-camera-at-the-moment.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-24655</link>
		<dc:creator>zen-tao</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 08:09:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=4958#comment-24655</guid>
		<description>Hmm.... ¿ Do you think if they jam more mpx in a D400 we&#039;ll have more resolution than in a D300?  The Dx lenses can&#039;t deliver more resolution than they actually do, have a look in photozone.com. DXs are cheap and their capabilities don&#039;t exceed  D300&#039;s pixel density.  High quality lenses are built for Fx system who is able to level pixel density and resolution. Don&#039;t say me: well buy one D3x. Yes, I know, but it&#039;s very expensive and, I think, overvaluated. To be a professional doesn&#039;t mean to pay whatever Nikon asks to you. That what I meant fatal mistake.... and Canon watching in his branch.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm&#8230;. ¿ Do you think if they jam more mpx in a D400 we&#8217;ll have more resolution than in a D300?  The Dx lenses can&#8217;t deliver more resolution than they actually do, have a look in photozone.com. DXs are cheap and their capabilities don&#8217;t exceed  D300&#8242;s pixel density.  High quality lenses are built for Fx system who is able to level pixel density and resolution. Don&#8217;t say me: well buy one D3x. Yes, I know, but it&#8217;s very expensive and, I think, overvaluated. To be a professional doesn&#8217;t mean to pay whatever Nikon asks to you. That what I meant fatal mistake&#8230;. and Canon watching in his branch.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Remington</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/05/25/d400-the-most-anticipated-nikon-camera-at-the-moment.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-24640</link>
		<dc:creator>Remington</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 15:21:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=4958#comment-24640</guid>
		<description>Completely disagree with you on this. Nikon recently released a new FX body in the D3x and I&#039;m not sure the market for Pro/FX bodies is as large as the market for the mid-range semi-pro market. A D400 is the next logical step for Nikon to drive D60/70/80/90 users to upgrade and for D200 users who did not get into a D300 at the time of it&#039;s release.

A D400 would be attractive to many entry level buyers as a solid body that will last for years. And, that entry level market is still quite large. I think Nikon knows their quite well their market segments and how to deliver what folks are asking for.

We could also consider that all attention on a D400 could provide some distraction from a D700x or D800 successor that could be just around the corner. Launching a D400 and D700x would certainly not be fatal to Nikon... perhaps to Canon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Completely disagree with you on this. Nikon recently released a new FX body in the D3x and I&#8217;m not sure the market for Pro/FX bodies is as large as the market for the mid-range semi-pro market. A D400 is the next logical step for Nikon to drive D60/70/80/90 users to upgrade and for D200 users who did not get into a D300 at the time of it&#8217;s release.</p>
<p>A D400 would be attractive to many entry level buyers as a solid body that will last for years. And, that entry level market is still quite large. I think Nikon knows their quite well their market segments and how to deliver what folks are asking for.</p>
<p>We could also consider that all attention on a D400 could provide some distraction from a D700x or D800 successor that could be just around the corner. Launching a D400 and D700x would certainly not be fatal to Nikon&#8230; perhaps to Canon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zen-tao</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/05/25/d400-the-most-anticipated-nikon-camera-at-the-moment.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-24636</link>
		<dc:creator>zen-tao</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 12:50:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=4958#comment-24636</guid>
		<description>To release an D400 would be the last Nikon mistake, probably fatal. The professional segment demands another Fx , cheaper than  D3x  and with a lot of Mpx. Otherwise Nikon is going to failure again. If your prices are double than Canon, the quality and features should be , at least, the third part. Niikon already  have enought tecnology to do that. The marketing maneuvers are good for Coolpix segment. But the ones who are expecting to change our old D200 dont need drop by drop changes; tomorrow I change my camera and the day past tomorrow I change it again because a new pretty feature.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To release an D400 would be the last Nikon mistake, probably fatal. The professional segment demands another Fx , cheaper than  D3x  and with a lot of Mpx. Otherwise Nikon is going to failure again. If your prices are double than Canon, the quality and features should be , at least, the third part. Niikon already  have enought tecnology to do that. The marketing maneuvers are good for Coolpix segment. But the ones who are expecting to change our old D200 dont need drop by drop changes; tomorrow I change my camera and the day past tomorrow I change it again because a new pretty feature.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian Dudley</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/05/25/d400-the-most-anticipated-nikon-camera-at-the-moment.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-24631</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian Dudley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 09:24:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=4958#comment-24631</guid>
		<description>Delighted to find the world is full of people as sad as me! Power on NR - you are fulfilling a world-wide need!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Delighted to find the world is full of people as sad as me! Power on NR &#8211; you are fulfilling a world-wide need!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GE FTW</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/05/25/d400-the-most-anticipated-nikon-camera-at-the-moment.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-24617</link>
		<dc:creator>GE FTW</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 02:22:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=4958#comment-24617</guid>
		<description>http://www.gepower.com/prod_serv/products/substation_automation/en/sdm.htm</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.gepower.com/prod_serv/products/substation_automation/en/sdm.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.gepower.com/prod_serv/products/substation_automation/en/sdm.htm</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/05/25/d400-the-most-anticipated-nikon-camera-at-the-moment.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-24604</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 18:15:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=4958#comment-24604</guid>
		<description>Interesting observation at a recent trade show in Toronto... No D300 or D60 brochures available at the Nikon booth. I asked with a exagerated expression and I received a wry smile in return and some excuse that some were on the way. Big co-incidence that Nikon Canada had no D300 or D60 literature at a consumer trade show!  Something is afoot me thinks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting observation at a recent trade show in Toronto&#8230; No D300 or D60 brochures available at the Nikon booth. I asked with a exagerated expression and I received a wry smile in return and some excuse that some were on the way. Big co-incidence that Nikon Canada had no D300 or D60 literature at a consumer trade show!  Something is afoot me thinks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dave</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/05/25/d400-the-most-anticipated-nikon-camera-at-the-moment.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-24598</link>
		<dc:creator>dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 16:14:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=4958#comment-24598</guid>
		<description>Actually I find it interesting from a market research perspective.  One could interpret the results to say that a D400, or follow-on to a D300 is what the public wants most at the moment.  Unfortunately, it doesn&#039;t say what features the public is looking for, so I wouldn&#039;t put it past the folks in marketing to change the body color to silver and change the label to D400, to give the public what they want.

This is a rumors site.  It says so in the URL  You want hard facts, go someplace else.  Admin, keep up the good work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually I find it interesting from a market research perspective.  One could interpret the results to say that a D400, or follow-on to a D300 is what the public wants most at the moment.  Unfortunately, it doesn&#8217;t say what features the public is looking for, so I wouldn&#8217;t put it past the folks in marketing to change the body color to silver and change the label to D400, to give the public what they want.</p>
<p>This is a rumors site.  It says so in the URL  You want hard facts, go someplace else.  Admin, keep up the good work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dave</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/05/25/d400-the-most-anticipated-nikon-camera-at-the-moment.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-24596</link>
		<dc:creator>dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 16:04:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=4958#comment-24596</guid>
		<description>x indicates more pixels and nothing else.  s indicated more features or feature improvements, like the D70s.  I think video would change it enough to warrant the &#039;s&#039;, and more pixels change it enough to warrant an &#039;x&#039;, which makes D350 or D400 more likely.  They would have to make changes to the D300 body to accommodate the microphone, albeit not a big change, so I could see a D300s with same resolution plus video added.  Of course Nikon isn&#039;t above slapping both and x and an s on the end of a product name (D2Xs), so we could see a D300xs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>x indicates more pixels and nothing else.  s indicated more features or feature improvements, like the D70s.  I think video would change it enough to warrant the &#8216;s&#8217;, and more pixels change it enough to warrant an &#8216;x&#8217;, which makes D350 or D400 more likely.  They would have to make changes to the D300 body to accommodate the microphone, albeit not a big change, so I could see a D300s with same resolution plus video added.  Of course Nikon isn&#8217;t above slapping both and x and an s on the end of a product name (D2Xs), so we could see a D300xs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/05/25/d400-the-most-anticipated-nikon-camera-at-the-moment.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-24589</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 15:06:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=4958#comment-24589</guid>
		<description>x indicates high resolution variant.  so unless it is literally just a D300 with more megapixels (maybe video and a few other very small updates) it will not be called the D300x.  D350 is just silly given D100, D200, D300,...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>x indicates high resolution variant.  so unless it is literally just a D300 with more megapixels (maybe video and a few other very small updates) it will not be called the D300x.  D350 is just silly given D100, D200, D300,&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: [NR] admin</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/05/25/d400-the-most-anticipated-nikon-camera-at-the-moment.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-24587</link>
		<dc:creator>[NR] admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 15:01:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=4958#comment-24587</guid>
		<description>Canon is a much bigger company - they are a &quot;printer&quot; company :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Canon is a much bigger company &#8211; they are a &#8220;printer&#8221; company <img src='http://nikonrumors.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anon</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/05/25/d400-the-most-anticipated-nikon-camera-at-the-moment.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-24582</link>
		<dc:creator>anon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 14:04:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=4958#comment-24582</guid>
		<description>Here&#039;s another one waiting for the D4000... :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s another one waiting for the D4000&#8230; <img src='http://nikonrumors.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ed</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/05/25/d400-the-most-anticipated-nikon-camera-at-the-moment.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-24576</link>
		<dc:creator>ed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 12:27:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=4958#comment-24576</guid>
		<description>Yea meng, where the &amp;%$#@ is this camera???!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yea meng, where the &amp;%$#@ is this camera???!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ron Scubadiver</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/05/25/d400-the-most-anticipated-nikon-camera-at-the-moment.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-24575</link>
		<dc:creator>Ron Scubadiver</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 12:23:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=4958#comment-24575</guid>
		<description>What if they call it the D350 or D300x?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What if they call it the D350 or D300x?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: b-man</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/05/25/d400-the-most-anticipated-nikon-camera-at-the-moment.aspx/comment-page-/#comment-24574</link>
		<dc:creator>b-man</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 11:09:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=4958#comment-24574</guid>
		<description>...so what are YOU doing on a rumors-page like this then? and why did you just waste 5 min of your life commenting on something you find stupid? doesen&#039;t that make you just as bad?...and get your facts right by the way. Besides, dreaming is free:)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;so what are YOU doing on a rumors-page like this then? and why did you just waste 5 min of your life commenting on something you find stupid? doesen&#8217;t that make you just as bad?&#8230;and get your facts right by the way. Besides, dreaming is free:)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: justin</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/05/25/d400-the-most-anticipated-nikon-camera-at-the-moment.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-24568</link>
		<dc:creator>justin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 04:41:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=4958#comment-24568</guid>
		<description>i just spend like half an hour on Google Trends.  Thanks NR for my newest past time!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i just spend like half an hour on Google Trends.  Thanks NR for my newest past time!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tomao</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/05/25/d400-the-most-anticipated-nikon-camera-at-the-moment.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-24567</link>
		<dc:creator>Tomao</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 04:32:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=4958#comment-24567</guid>
		<description>Take a look at this search...hmmmm

http://trends.google.com/trends?q=nikon%2C+canon&amp;ctab=0&amp;geo=all&amp;date=all&amp;sort=1</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Take a look at this search&#8230;hmmmm</p>
<p><a href="http://trends.google.com/trends?q=nikon%2C+canon&#038;ctab=0&#038;geo=all&#038;date=all&#038;sort=1" rel="nofollow">http://trends.google.com/trends?q=nikon%2C+canon&#038;ctab=0&#038;geo=all&#038;date=all&#038;sort=1</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MarkAM</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/05/25/d400-the-most-anticipated-nikon-camera-at-the-moment.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-24565</link>
		<dc:creator>MarkAM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 04:19:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=4958#comment-24565</guid>
		<description>Is the Nikon D4000 coming anytime soon?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is the Nikon D4000 coming anytime soon?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

