http://nikonrumors.com/2009/05/05/a-nikon-rumor-gone-wrong.aspx/ where there’s smoke there’s fire Fri, 25 May 2012 11:40:29 +0000 hourly 1 http://nikonrumors.com/2009/05/05/a-nikon-rumor-gone-wrong.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-23636 Anonymous Tue, 12 May 2009 16:45:16 +0000 http://nikonrumors.com/2009/05/05/a-nikon-rumor-gone-wrong.aspx#comment-23636 You DON'T want to see the D20-based version!!! Rumor has it - it has wheels under it :) You DON’T want to see the D20-based version!!! Rumor has it – it has wheels under it

]]> http://nikonrumors.com/2009/05/05/a-nikon-rumor-gone-wrong.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-23444 flyb0y Wed, 06 May 2009 20:17:26 +0000 http://nikonrumors.com/2009/05/05/a-nikon-rumor-gone-wrong.aspx#comment-23444 Ha Ha! But no, it's not KR- you can tell because these days he'd have a Nikon and a Canon, not two Nikons. Also, the colors in the room look far too normal. I thought that KR lived in a place with super-ultra-saturated colors that only D40's and view cameras were capable of capturing-- What! You mean he turns the saturation up that high on purpose?!! Ha Ha! But no, it’s not KR- you can tell because these days he’d have a Nikon and a Canon, not two Nikons. Also, the colors in the room look far too normal. I thought that KR lived in a place with super-ultra-saturated colors that only D40′s and view cameras were capable of capturing– What! You mean he turns the saturation up that high on purpose?!!

]]> http://nikonrumors.com/2009/05/05/a-nikon-rumor-gone-wrong.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-23438 PJS Wed, 06 May 2009 16:15:12 +0000 http://nikonrumors.com/2009/05/05/a-nikon-rumor-gone-wrong.aspx#comment-23438 Is that KR behind that mess? Is that KR behind that mess?

]]> http://nikonrumors.com/2009/05/05/a-nikon-rumor-gone-wrong.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-23414 bho Wed, 06 May 2009 04:31:58 +0000 http://nikonrumors.com/2009/05/05/a-nikon-rumor-gone-wrong.aspx#comment-23414 a good idea instead of hanging additional cam on the neck...but then its bloody heavy lol... a good idea instead of hanging additional cam on the neck…but then its bloody heavy lol…

]]> http://nikonrumors.com/2009/05/05/a-nikon-rumor-gone-wrong.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-23403 unlikelymoose Wed, 06 May 2009 01:19:05 +0000 http://nikonrumors.com/2009/05/05/a-nikon-rumor-gone-wrong.aspx#comment-23403 how about a D100 + D100 + D100 +D100 = D400? I wanna see some of that. how about a D100 + D100 + D100 +D100 = D400? I wanna see some of that.

]]> http://nikonrumors.com/2009/05/05/a-nikon-rumor-gone-wrong.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-23389 Bonechips Tue, 05 May 2009 22:36:47 +0000 http://nikonrumors.com/2009/05/05/a-nikon-rumor-gone-wrong.aspx#comment-23389 Looks like he has strobes for eyes. Lets him see in the dark. Looks like he has strobes for eyes. Lets him see in the dark.

]]> http://nikonrumors.com/2009/05/05/a-nikon-rumor-gone-wrong.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-23382 GeoVu Tue, 05 May 2009 20:28:51 +0000 http://nikonrumors.com/2009/05/05/a-nikon-rumor-gone-wrong.aspx#comment-23382 LoL LoL

]]> http://nikonrumors.com/2009/05/05/a-nikon-rumor-gone-wrong.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-23374 Willis Tue, 05 May 2009 18:59:33 +0000 http://nikonrumors.com/2009/05/05/a-nikon-rumor-gone-wrong.aspx#comment-23374 That's not the Nikon D3... It's the Nikon 3D!!! That’s not the Nikon D3… It’s the Nikon 3D!!!

]]>