<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: AF-S DX NIKKOR 10-24MM F/3.5-4.5G ED</title>
	<atom:link href="http://nikonrumors.com/2009/04/13/af-s-dx-nikkor-10-24mm-f35-45g-ed.aspx/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/04/13/af-s-dx-nikkor-10-24mm-f35-45g-ed.aspx/</link>
	<description>where there’s smoke there’s fire</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 09:51:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Anon</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/04/13/af-s-dx-nikkor-10-24mm-f35-45g-ed.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-22110</link>
		<dc:creator>Anon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 18:28:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=4292#comment-22110</guid>
		<description>The variable aperture doesn&#039;t really bother me, but it&#039;s almost twice the price of the Tokina 11-16. And that&#039;s a 2.8!

I&#039;d buy it if it was close in price to the Tokina - a 10-20% premium for Nikon over Tokina is fair. But RRP in the UK is £800 versus the Tokina around £500. No contest.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The variable aperture doesn&#8217;t really bother me, but it&#8217;s almost twice the price of the Tokina 11-16. And that&#8217;s a 2.8!</p>
<p>I&#8217;d buy it if it was close in price to the Tokina &#8211; a 10-20% premium for Nikon over Tokina is fair. But RRP in the UK is £800 versus the Tokina around £500. No contest.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: schung</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/04/13/af-s-dx-nikkor-10-24mm-f35-45g-ed.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-22077</link>
		<dc:creator>schung</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 16:31:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=4292#comment-22077</guid>
		<description>About God damned time they come out with a 12-24 DX replacement. The 12-24 was WEAK at the corners on the 12mm end and started to look dated compared to its competition (Tokina 11-16, Sigma 10-20, Tamron 10-24). 

I am sick and tired of these whiners who complain about the 10-24 not being &quot;Pro&quot; because it&#039;s variable aperture. LOOK AT THE MTF CHARTS!!! Beats up on the 12-24 esp. at the wide end.   This lens is a BARGAIN for the optical performance it will have. 

My 12-24 will be put on SALE when this comes out. 

Congrats, Nikon! 

Simon</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>About God damned time they come out with a 12-24 DX replacement. The 12-24 was WEAK at the corners on the 12mm end and started to look dated compared to its competition (Tokina 11-16, Sigma 10-20, Tamron 10-24). </p>
<p>I am sick and tired of these whiners who complain about the 10-24 not being &#8220;Pro&#8221; because it&#8217;s variable aperture. LOOK AT THE MTF CHARTS!!! Beats up on the 12-24 esp. at the wide end.   This lens is a BARGAIN for the optical performance it will have. </p>
<p>My 12-24 will be put on SALE when this comes out. </p>
<p>Congrats, Nikon! </p>
<p>Simon</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian Dudley</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/04/13/af-s-dx-nikkor-10-24mm-f35-45g-ed.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-22014</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian Dudley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 08:05:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=4292#comment-22014</guid>
		<description>Nikon have had their money&#039;s-worth out of the HB23 lenshood design! Now yet another use for it! I hope it fits more securely than on the 12-24. It is ok on the 18-35, and when I had a 17-35, I don&#039;t recall it being loose, but the 12-24 fit is lousy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nikon have had their money&#8217;s-worth out of the HB23 lenshood design! Now yet another use for it! I hope it fits more securely than on the 12-24. It is ok on the 18-35, and when I had a 17-35, I don&#8217;t recall it being loose, but the 12-24 fit is lousy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Svend</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/04/13/af-s-dx-nikkor-10-24mm-f35-45g-ed.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-22009</link>
		<dc:creator>Svend</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 07:48:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=4292#comment-22009</guid>
		<description>MSRP in Norway is 8990 Norwegian kroner = 1 362.08389 U.S. dollars. Got the price from here: http://www.akam.no/artikler/ultravidvinkelzoom_fra_nikon/69101</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MSRP in Norway is 8990 Norwegian kroner = 1 362.08389 U.S. dollars. Got the price from here: <a href="http://www.akam.no/artikler/ultravidvinkelzoom_fra_nikon/69101" rel="nofollow">http://www.akam.no/artikler/ultravidvinkelzoom_fra_nikon/69101</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Segura</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/04/13/af-s-dx-nikkor-10-24mm-f35-45g-ed.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-21977</link>
		<dc:creator>Segura</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 05:23:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=4292#comment-21977</guid>
		<description>Looks like Nikon filled in what lens part #2181 is . . .
nikonrumors.com/2009/02/15/missing-nikon-lens-model-numbers.aspx</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks like Nikon filled in what lens part #2181 is . . .<br />
nikonrumors.com/2009/02/15/missing-nikon-lens-model-numbers.aspx</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: happyDXshooter</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/04/13/af-s-dx-nikkor-10-24mm-f35-45g-ed.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-21974</link>
		<dc:creator>happyDXshooter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 05:21:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=4292#comment-21974</guid>
		<description>You mean, except the 24-70, the 14-24, and the AF-S 50 1.4? You thought Nikon would design a budget kit lens for its professional camera series?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You mean, except the 24-70, the 14-24, and the AF-S 50 1.4? You thought Nikon would design a budget kit lens for its professional camera series?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/04/13/af-s-dx-nikkor-10-24mm-f35-45g-ed.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-21922</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 03:37:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=4292#comment-21922</guid>
		<description>I fear it&#039;s just the kind of lens they&#039;ll make in Japan first and have thailand make it later...like the 18-200/24-120VR</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I fear it&#8217;s just the kind of lens they&#8217;ll make in Japan first and have thailand make it later&#8230;like the 18-200/24-120VR</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: connor</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/04/13/af-s-dx-nikkor-10-24mm-f35-45g-ed.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-21913</link>
		<dc:creator>connor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 03:28:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=4292#comment-21913</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s up on the Nikon UK site, so is the D5000.


It&#039;s official, good job NR.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s up on the Nikon UK site, so is the D5000.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s official, good job NR.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/04/13/af-s-dx-nikkor-10-24mm-f35-45g-ed.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-21892</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 03:01:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=4292#comment-21892</guid>
		<description>Maybe, just, jump, all, over, his, punctuation,,,,,,,,</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe, just, jump, all, over, his, punctuation,,,,,,,,</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/04/13/af-s-dx-nikkor-10-24mm-f35-45g-ed.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-21891</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 03:00:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=4292#comment-21891</guid>
		<description>They are saying that they heard that the Tokina 11-16 is better than the Nikon 12-24.  I have to say that the 11-16 is a very good lens, and it&#039;s cheaper.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They are saying that they heard that the Tokina 11-16 is better than the Nikon 12-24.  I have to say that the 11-16 is a very good lens, and it&#8217;s cheaper.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: charlie</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/04/13/af-s-dx-nikkor-10-24mm-f35-45g-ed.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-21888</link>
		<dc:creator>charlie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 02:54:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=4292#comment-21888</guid>
		<description>I think he meant the Tokina 11-16 is better than the 12-24 Nikkor. No need to jump all over him...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think he meant the Tokina 11-16 is better than the 12-24 Nikkor. No need to jump all over him&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/04/13/af-s-dx-nikkor-10-24mm-f35-45g-ed.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-21887</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 02:53:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=4292#comment-21887</guid>
		<description>&quot;Multiple sources&quot; ??? The lens isn&#039;t even official yet. Please reveal your sources - NR would love to know who has this lens and what tests they have run. Hell, everyone here would. Please back up what you say if you can.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Multiple sources&#8221; ??? The lens isn&#8217;t even official yet. Please reveal your sources &#8211; NR would love to know who has this lens and what tests they have run. Hell, everyone here would. Please back up what you say if you can.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/04/13/af-s-dx-nikkor-10-24mm-f35-45g-ed.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-21885</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 02:47:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=4292#comment-21885</guid>
		<description>I expect the lens will cam out at both ends of it&#039;s range and the number spacing is to do with the cam system.

If this is designed to be an amateur lens (made in china ?) then the glass quality is likely similar to the recent 35mm DX. Very sharp but prominent CA with reasonable flare control. Should be a winner. It might even kill off the 12-24.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I expect the lens will cam out at both ends of it&#8217;s range and the number spacing is to do with the cam system.</p>
<p>If this is designed to be an amateur lens (made in china ?) then the glass quality is likely similar to the recent 35mm DX. Very sharp but prominent CA with reasonable flare control. Should be a winner. It might even kill off the 12-24.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: [NR] admin</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/04/13/af-s-dx-nikkor-10-24mm-f35-45g-ed.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-21883</link>
		<dc:creator>[NR] admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 02:40:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=4292#comment-21883</guid>
		<description>weird - maybe IE6 is too old, they now have IE8 - can you upgrade?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>weird &#8211; maybe IE6 is too old, they now have IE8 &#8211; can you upgrade?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Al</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/04/13/af-s-dx-nikkor-10-24mm-f35-45g-ed.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-21882</link>
		<dc:creator>Al</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 02:39:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=4292#comment-21882</guid>
		<description>The only weird thing about the lens is that 18mm and 20mm is very very close together...?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The only weird thing about the lens is that 18mm and 20mm is very very close together&#8230;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Will</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/04/13/af-s-dx-nikkor-10-24mm-f35-45g-ed.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-21880</link>
		<dc:creator>Will</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 02:34:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=4292#comment-21880</guid>
		<description>How much will this cost?

Any reason to get this over the Tokina 11-16, I heard from multiple sources it&#039;s better than the Nikkor 12-24mm.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How much will this cost?</p>
<p>Any reason to get this over the Tokina 11-16, I heard from multiple sources it&#8217;s better than the Nikkor 12-24mm.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: afterdarkernikon</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/04/13/af-s-dx-nikkor-10-24mm-f35-45g-ed.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-21879</link>
		<dc:creator>afterdarkernikon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 02:29:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=4292#comment-21879</guid>
		<description>I already have the 14-24 for FX and 12-24 for DX and I wont buy this new beast. 

I just love to see Nikon to see doing good on business.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I already have the 14-24 for FX and 12-24 for DX and I wont buy this new beast. </p>
<p>I just love to see Nikon to see doing good on business.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sadd700guy</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/04/13/af-s-dx-nikkor-10-24mm-f35-45g-ed.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-21878</link>
		<dc:creator>sadd700guy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 02:28:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=4292#comment-21878</guid>
		<description>Let me get this straight.  I buy a D700 thinking that FX is the future, and since then, NOT A SINGLE FX LENS is released.  Argh.   Still dealing with my 28-105, which is OK, but sure does have vignetting at 3.5....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let me get this straight.  I buy a D700 thinking that FX is the future, and since then, NOT A SINGLE FX LENS is released.  Argh.   Still dealing with my 28-105, which is OK, but sure does have vignetting at 3.5&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/04/13/af-s-dx-nikkor-10-24mm-f35-45g-ed.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-21876</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 02:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=4292#comment-21876</guid>
		<description>Work computer - XP SP2 and IE6.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Work computer &#8211; XP SP2 and IE6.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: [NR] admin</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/04/13/af-s-dx-nikkor-10-24mm-f35-45g-ed.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-21868</link>
		<dc:creator>[NR] admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 02:09:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=4292#comment-21868</guid>
		<description>looks ok on my mac - what browser and OS are you using?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>looks ok on my mac &#8211; what browser and OS are you using?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

