<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Nikon D5000 started to come out of the woods</title>
	<atom:link href="http://nikonrumors.com/2009/04/12/nikon-d5000-started-to-come-out-of-the-woods.aspx/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/04/12/nikon-d5000-started-to-come-out-of-the-woods.aspx/</link>
	<description>where there’s smoke there’s fire</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 04:02:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/04/12/nikon-d5000-started-to-come-out-of-the-woods.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-21640</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 17:29:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=4205#comment-21640</guid>
		<description>Seems the d5000 is gone from the picture now, only lists d90 :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seems the d5000 is gone from the picture now, only lists d90 <img src='http://nikonrumors.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephan</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/04/12/nikon-d5000-started-to-come-out-of-the-woods.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-21486</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 00:51:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=4205#comment-21486</guid>
		<description>Because a new 70-200 totally wouldn&#039;t be a &quot;remake&quot;, right?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Because a new 70-200 totally wouldn&#8217;t be a &#8220;remake&#8221;, right?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: madias</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/04/12/nikon-d5000-started-to-come-out-of-the-woods.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-21476</link>
		<dc:creator>madias</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Apr 2009 21:38:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=4205#comment-21476</guid>
		<description>I don´t care about Nikon D5000 but i want that t-shirt !</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don´t care about Nikon D5000 but i want that t-shirt !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: qw</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/04/12/nikon-d5000-started-to-come-out-of-the-woods.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-21473</link>
		<dc:creator>qw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Apr 2009 20:31:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=4205#comment-21473</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s one of the most respected Internet dealers in Sweden, so the site is real.Very real.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s one of the most respected Internet dealers in Sweden, so the site is real.Very real.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Henry Nikon Fan</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/04/12/nikon-d5000-started-to-come-out-of-the-woods.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-21464</link>
		<dc:creator>Henry Nikon Fan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Apr 2009 18:55:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=4205#comment-21464</guid>
		<description>Bodies come and go, but glass last for years and years.  I will not get too excited about any body until it is announced and ultimately available, but a new high quality lens is another story.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bodies come and go, but glass last for years and years.  I will not get too excited about any body until it is announced and ultimately available, but a new high quality lens is another story.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pablov</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/04/12/nikon-d5000-started-to-come-out-of-the-woods.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-21454</link>
		<dc:creator>Pablov</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Apr 2009 16:16:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=4205#comment-21454</guid>
		<description>On tuesday 14th it&#039;s supposed to be the Nikon press announcement :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On tuesday 14th it&#8217;s supposed to be the Nikon press announcement <img src='http://nikonrumors.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Emil</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/04/12/nikon-d5000-started-to-come-out-of-the-woods.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-21452</link>
		<dc:creator>Emil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Apr 2009 15:36:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=4205#comment-21452</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m from sweden, and that&#039;s a rather well-known store here. I believe it, and I&#039;ll call them on Tuesday (after the easter holidays) and ask for more details.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m from sweden, and that&#8217;s a rather well-known store here. I believe it, and I&#8217;ll call them on Tuesday (after the easter holidays) and ask for more details.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pablov</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/04/12/nikon-d5000-started-to-come-out-of-the-woods.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-21451</link>
		<dc:creator>Pablov</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Apr 2009 15:27:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=4205#comment-21451</guid>
		<description>I hope the D400 follows soon...

If there is a lens announcement, I guess it would be some kind of DX kit for the D5000, unless a D400 is announced too (mmm, I doubt it)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hope the D400 follows soon&#8230;</p>
<p>If there is a lens announcement, I guess it would be some kind of DX kit for the D5000, unless a D400 is announced too (mmm, I doubt it)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/04/12/nikon-d5000-started-to-come-out-of-the-woods.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-21450</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Apr 2009 14:54:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=4205#comment-21450</guid>
		<description>Hey, I don&#039;t need viagra, but I like it. It&#039;s fun. 

Imagine they put FX on the sleeve. That&#039;s like saying I&#039;ve got a big sensor because I need an enhancement.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, I don&#8217;t need viagra, but I like it. It&#8217;s fun. </p>
<p>Imagine they put FX on the sleeve. That&#8217;s like saying I&#8217;ve got a big sensor because I need an enhancement.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rad</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/04/12/nikon-d5000-started-to-come-out-of-the-woods.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-21449</link>
		<dc:creator>rad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Apr 2009 14:53:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=4205#comment-21449</guid>
		<description>all of those are newer, (16-85) or remakes (60 and 24-70) whos to say this isn&#039;t suggesting a new 70-200?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>all of those are newer, (16-85) or remakes (60 and 24-70) whos to say this isn&#8217;t suggesting a new 70-200?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/04/12/nikon-d5000-started-to-come-out-of-the-woods.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-21448</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Apr 2009 14:48:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=4205#comment-21448</guid>
		<description>I thought the D5000 was a given after the shots of big foot the adventure pirate.

The interesting news now is about any lenses. I notice no new lens in this ad.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought the D5000 was a given after the shots of big foot the adventure pirate.</p>
<p>The interesting news now is about any lenses. I notice no new lens in this ad.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anton</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/04/12/nikon-d5000-started-to-come-out-of-the-woods.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-21447</link>
		<dc:creator>Anton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Apr 2009 14:27:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=4205#comment-21447</guid>
		<description>You&#039;ll have to wait for more details, the store is closed  until tuesday (due to easter). :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;ll have to wait for more details, the store is closed  until tuesday (due to easter). <img src='http://nikonrumors.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eli</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/04/12/nikon-d5000-started-to-come-out-of-the-woods.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-21446</link>
		<dc:creator>Eli</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Apr 2009 14:26:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=4205#comment-21446</guid>
		<description>Oh and, if it goes to a real site, what makes you think it&#039;s fake? This image is still up on their page. The last &quot;0&quot; may be *slightly* off but it&#039;s not like, somebody photoshopped this, that&#039;s their fault.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh and, if it goes to a real site, what makes you think it&#8217;s fake? This image is still up on their page. The last &#8220;0&#8243; may be *slightly* off but it&#8217;s not like, somebody photoshopped this, that&#8217;s their fault.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eli</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/04/12/nikon-d5000-started-to-come-out-of-the-woods.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-21445</link>
		<dc:creator>Eli</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Apr 2009 14:24:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=4205#comment-21445</guid>
		<description>&quot;why do it have to be D90 and D5000 only? what about D40 and D60?&quot;

Because the D5000 is supposed to be replacing the D40 and D60.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;why do it have to be D90 and D5000 only? what about D40 and D60?&#8221;</p>
<p>Because the D5000 is supposed to be replacing the D40 and D60.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/04/12/nikon-d5000-started-to-come-out-of-the-woods.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-21444</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Apr 2009 14:21:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=4205#comment-21444</guid>
		<description>ladies and gentlemen, nothing to get excited – this image is a fake. look at the first 0&#039;s in the D5000 then look at the last 0... the last 0 is thinner in width compared to first two 0&#039;s. 

why do it have to be D90 and D5000 only? what about D40 and D60?

the lens selection is ver-r-r-ry awkward... a 24-70mm, 70-200mm, 60mm... and friggin&#039; 16-85mm and 18-200mm? sounds pretty old, what about PC-E lenses? what about 18-105mm VR? why include an expensive nikkor lens when &quot;D5000&quot; is supposedly to be cheap?

nikon was selling this same shirt for years and years ((in the merchandise section)).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ladies and gentlemen, nothing to get excited – this image is a fake. look at the first 0&#8242;s in the D5000 then look at the last 0&#8230; the last 0 is thinner in width compared to first two 0&#8242;s. </p>
<p>why do it have to be D90 and D5000 only? what about D40 and D60?</p>
<p>the lens selection is ver-r-r-ry awkward&#8230; a 24-70mm, 70-200mm, 60mm&#8230; and friggin&#8217; 16-85mm and 18-200mm? sounds pretty old, what about PC-E lenses? what about 18-105mm VR? why include an expensive nikkor lens when &#8220;D5000&#8243; is supposedly to be cheap?</p>
<p>nikon was selling this same shirt for years and years ((in the merchandise section)).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeroenw</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/04/12/nikon-d5000-started-to-come-out-of-the-woods.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-21443</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeroenw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Apr 2009 14:21:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=4205#comment-21443</guid>
		<description>Yep, that&#039;s an easy target for the FX fanboys such as  ^^^</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yep, that&#8217;s an easy target for the FX fanboys such as  ^^^</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/04/12/nikon-d5000-started-to-come-out-of-the-woods.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-21442</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Apr 2009 14:19:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=4205#comment-21442</guid>
		<description>is that DX on the sleve? isn&#039;t that like wearing a shirt that says &quot;hey, I need viagra!&quot; jk :) 

I&#039;d like one of those w/o the sleve logos though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>is that DX on the sleve? isn&#8217;t that like wearing a shirt that says &#8220;hey, I need viagra!&#8221; jk <img src='http://nikonrumors.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  </p>
<p>I&#8217;d like one of those w/o the sleve logos though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

