<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is there a secret Nikon L firmware?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://nikonrumors.com/2009/04/09/is-there-a-secret-nikon-l-firmware.aspx/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/04/09/is-there-a-secret-nikon-l-firmware.aspx/</link>
	<description>where there’s smoke there’s fire</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 09:51:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Micah</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/04/09/is-there-a-secret-nikon-l-firmware.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-21377</link>
		<dc:creator>Micah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Apr 2009 02:29:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=4125#comment-21377</guid>
		<description>Bingo!

But I still would not be surprised if there was calibration data there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bingo!</p>
<p>But I still would not be surprised if there was calibration data there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Micah</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/04/09/is-there-a-secret-nikon-l-firmware.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-21376</link>
		<dc:creator>Micah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Apr 2009 02:28:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=4125#comment-21376</guid>
		<description>As far as I know, the 50/1.4D, 60/2.8 macro, 28/1.4D and all those wonderful &quot;D&quot; lenses do not include a flashable chip.  Flash-able memory is old tech, but it used to be reserved for more expensive complex things like desktop computers.  These &quot;cpu&quot; lenses do indeed have a pre-programmed ROM that contains lens data, that is indeed read by the camera and stored in exif.  But this memory is like an old video game cartridge.  It&#039;s ROM.  Like a music cd.

If you can point me to an article that says otherwise I&#039;d love to see it.  Flashable chips in older lenses doesn&#039;t make sense.

Newer G designs are contemporary with cheaper/smaller/higher capacity flash memory and the ubiquity of capable desktop  computers to potentially alter it, so I wouldn&#039;t be surprised if some G and G contemporary lenses have flashable chips.

Keep in mind that your Olympus example is for a system and mount that is younger than most of Nikon&#039;s AF lens line.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As far as I know, the 50/1.4D, 60/2.8 macro, 28/1.4D and all those wonderful &#8220;D&#8221; lenses do not include a flashable chip.  Flash-able memory is old tech, but it used to be reserved for more expensive complex things like desktop computers.  These &#8220;cpu&#8221; lenses do indeed have a pre-programmed ROM that contains lens data, that is indeed read by the camera and stored in exif.  But this memory is like an old video game cartridge.  It&#8217;s ROM.  Like a music cd.</p>
<p>If you can point me to an article that says otherwise I&#8217;d love to see it.  Flashable chips in older lenses doesn&#8217;t make sense.</p>
<p>Newer G designs are contemporary with cheaper/smaller/higher capacity flash memory and the ubiquity of capable desktop  computers to potentially alter it, so I wouldn&#8217;t be surprised if some G and G contemporary lenses have flashable chips.</p>
<p>Keep in mind that your Olympus example is for a system and mount that is younger than most of Nikon&#8217;s AF lens line.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Smoke</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/04/09/is-there-a-secret-nikon-l-firmware.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-21371</link>
		<dc:creator>Smoke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 20:56:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=4125#comment-21371</guid>
		<description>There&#039;s smoke in Texas</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s smoke in Texas</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gary L</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/04/09/is-there-a-secret-nikon-l-firmware.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-21370</link>
		<dc:creator>Gary L</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 19:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=4125#comment-21370</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve been wondering why firmware is not used MUCH more frequently to correct both, camera and lens issues, as well as add features. Yeah, I DO know of firmware upgrades, but still, glitches remain, and each body and lens is known to have certain issues, which, is what I am yapping about, being corrected.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been wondering why firmware is not used MUCH more frequently to correct both, camera and lens issues, as well as add features. Yeah, I DO know of firmware upgrades, but still, glitches remain, and each body and lens is known to have certain issues, which, is what I am yapping about, being corrected.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: K Gauthier</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/04/09/is-there-a-secret-nikon-l-firmware.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-21369</link>
		<dc:creator>K Gauthier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 19:06:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=4125#comment-21369</guid>
		<description>I had the same problem with the center focus point on the D90 I bought, using my 50mm f1.4 G lens. Very frustating to spend $900 on the body and not have a center autofocus point that works. I tried all the same tests that you did and confirmed it was a problem. Rather than exchange it for the new one and risk dealing with the same problem again, I reverted to using my D40, which has a properly functioning center autofocus point. I&#039;m holding out for the D400, hoping that the professional build will prevent the quality control issue I had with the D90.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had the same problem with the center focus point on the D90 I bought, using my 50mm f1.4 G lens. Very frustating to spend $900 on the body and not have a center autofocus point that works. I tried all the same tests that you did and confirmed it was a problem. Rather than exchange it for the new one and risk dealing with the same problem again, I reverted to using my D40, which has a properly functioning center autofocus point. I&#8217;m holding out for the D400, hoping that the professional build will prevent the quality control issue I had with the D90.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/04/09/is-there-a-secret-nikon-l-firmware.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-21366</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 13:25:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=4125#comment-21366</guid>
		<description>http://www.dpreview.com/news/0903/09031101oly9to18mmfirmware.asp</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.dpreview.com/news/0903/09031101oly9to18mmfirmware.asp" rel="nofollow">http://www.dpreview.com/news/0903/09031101oly9to18mmfirmware.asp</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/04/09/is-there-a-secret-nikon-l-firmware.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-21365</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 12:49:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=4125#comment-21365</guid>
		<description>VR requires firmware and Olympus recently issued an updated firmware for one of their zooms and it doesn&#039;t have VR/IS/OS etc - so, yes, lenses have firmware - it&#039;s simple code contained in the onboard chip. Exif info is partly based on this firmware.

All firmware can be modified if you can copy it out of the chip, read, write, flash it back into the chip. Big IF !

NX2 has automatic lens correction using a database. The D90 has it too. I expect higher-end dslrs do too, but don&#039;t have it written into their firmware as a separate L category.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>VR requires firmware and Olympus recently issued an updated firmware for one of their zooms and it doesn&#8217;t have VR/IS/OS etc &#8211; so, yes, lenses have firmware &#8211; it&#8217;s simple code contained in the onboard chip. Exif info is partly based on this firmware.</p>
<p>All firmware can be modified if you can copy it out of the chip, read, write, flash it back into the chip. Big IF !</p>
<p>NX2 has automatic lens correction using a database. The D90 has it too. I expect higher-end dslrs do too, but don&#8217;t have it written into their firmware as a separate L category.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/04/09/is-there-a-secret-nikon-l-firmware.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-21364</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 12:32:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=4125#comment-21364</guid>
		<description>The L firmware in the D90 is information about lenses that the camera can use, NOT firmware in the lenses.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The L firmware in the D90 is information about lenses that the camera can use, NOT firmware in the lenses.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Micah</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/04/09/is-there-a-secret-nikon-l-firmware.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-21363</link>
		<dc:creator>Micah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 11:38:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=4125#comment-21363</guid>
		<description>Most lenses that I&#039;m aware of don&#039;t have flashable firmware.  The Sigmas that had their firmware upgraded received a new chip/board as far as I know.

The d90 is the first cam I&#039;ve seen that lists a separate L firmware in the camera menu.  I&#039;m curious if it modifyable.  (The d300/d700/d3/d3x don&#039;t need this function, since you can calibrate their lens setting in camera)

I&#039;d love to be able to fix my crooked camera myself with firmware.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Most lenses that I&#8217;m aware of don&#8217;t have flashable firmware.  The Sigmas that had their firmware upgraded received a new chip/board as far as I know.</p>
<p>The d90 is the first cam I&#8217;ve seen that lists a separate L firmware in the camera menu.  I&#8217;m curious if it modifyable.  (The d300/d700/d3/d3x don&#8217;t need this function, since you can calibrate their lens setting in camera)</p>
<p>I&#8217;d love to be able to fix my crooked camera myself with firmware.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Micah</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/04/09/is-there-a-secret-nikon-l-firmware.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-21362</link>
		<dc:creator>Micah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 11:33:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=4125#comment-21362</guid>
		<description>I used single point center point on the d90 in af-s and af-c, non-dynamic, on a tripod.  The other 10 points actually focus properly.  Just not the middle one.  High contrast, non repeating target used.  For comparison I used a zoomed in live view to focus.  This is proper testing procedure as far as I&#039;m concerned.  All points on my d300 are spot on straight out of the box, with all my lenses.

In general I try to ensure I don&#039;t have faulty lenses.  ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I used single point center point on the d90 in af-s and af-c, non-dynamic, on a tripod.  The other 10 points actually focus properly.  Just not the middle one.  High contrast, non repeating target used.  For comparison I used a zoomed in live view to focus.  This is proper testing procedure as far as I&#8217;m concerned.  All points on my d300 are spot on straight out of the box, with all my lenses.</p>
<p>In general I try to ensure I don&#8217;t have faulty lenses.  <img src='http://nikonrumors.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/04/09/is-there-a-secret-nikon-l-firmware.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-21353</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 08:46:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=4125#comment-21353</guid>
		<description>I am surprised NR didn&#039;t know lenses have firmware; why write secret in this blog title ? Make firmware sexy ?

What will be interesting is when Nikon release a body that can update the attached lens&#039; firmware as well as the body&#039;s.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am surprised NR didn&#8217;t know lenses have firmware; why write secret in this blog title ? Make firmware sexy ?</p>
<p>What will be interesting is when Nikon release a body that can update the attached lens&#8217; firmware as well as the body&#8217;s.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Placido</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/04/09/is-there-a-secret-nikon-l-firmware.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-21352</link>
		<dc:creator>Placido</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 06:53:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=4125#comment-21352</guid>
		<description>Don&#039;t see any relation between this topic and rangefinder ! Do you want to adapt your SLR lenses on a hypothetic rangefinder?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t see any relation between this topic and rangefinder ! Do you want to adapt your SLR lenses on a hypothetic rangefinder?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lblaod</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/04/09/is-there-a-secret-nikon-l-firmware.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-21349</link>
		<dc:creator>lblaod</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 02:22:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=4125#comment-21349</guid>
		<description>cool</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>cool</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Russell</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/04/09/is-there-a-secret-nikon-l-firmware.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-21346</link>
		<dc:creator>David Russell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 21:26:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=4125#comment-21346</guid>
		<description>I thought all this stuff about the first-party lenses having &quot;hidden features&quot; for future bodies was just conspiracy theorist nonsense. I stand corrected!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought all this stuff about the first-party lenses having &#8220;hidden features&#8221; for future bodies was just conspiracy theorist nonsense. I stand corrected!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/04/09/is-there-a-secret-nikon-l-firmware.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-21344</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 21:07:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=4125#comment-21344</guid>
		<description>have you tried proper AF settings to ensure you have faulty lenses?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>have you tried proper AF settings to ensure you have faulty lenses?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/04/09/is-there-a-secret-nikon-l-firmware.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-21343</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 21:04:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=4125#comment-21343</guid>
		<description>oh, dang. 

i thought nikon is going to let users use canon L lenses on nikon bodies :P</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>oh, dang. </p>
<p>i thought nikon is going to let users use canon L lenses on nikon bodies <img src='http://nikonrumors.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_razz.gif' alt=':P' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Micah</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/04/09/is-there-a-secret-nikon-l-firmware.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-21340</link>
		<dc:creator>Micah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 19:24:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=4125#comment-21340</guid>
		<description>This is very interesting, because I&#039;ve found that the 50/1.4D will not focus properly on any D90 when using the center focus point.  It would be nice to be able to adjust this like I can on the d300.  The d90 doesn&#039;t front focus this way with other lenses I&#039;ve tried so far, especially the 50/1.4g.  My d300 actually focuses the same D version without issue.

It&#039;s so subtle that I wonder if it&#039;s intentional to get people to prefer the newer lens.  It would be easy for Nikon to have software settings for an older lens incorrectly to make it seem inferior.

I&#039;m not one for conspiracy theories, but after trying several 50/1.4D&#039;s and G&#039;s and d90 bodies, I found the issue to be consistent.  Nikon has offered to take the body back and recalibrate it, but I can&#039;t afford to not have a backup for the summer season.  Too bad I can&#039;t just buy a body off the shelf that works.  What&#039;s up with that NIkon?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is very interesting, because I&#8217;ve found that the 50/1.4D will not focus properly on any D90 when using the center focus point.  It would be nice to be able to adjust this like I can on the d300.  The d90 doesn&#8217;t front focus this way with other lenses I&#8217;ve tried so far, especially the 50/1.4g.  My d300 actually focuses the same D version without issue.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s so subtle that I wonder if it&#8217;s intentional to get people to prefer the newer lens.  It would be easy for Nikon to have software settings for an older lens incorrectly to make it seem inferior.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not one for conspiracy theories, but after trying several 50/1.4D&#8217;s and G&#8217;s and d90 bodies, I found the issue to be consistent.  Nikon has offered to take the body back and recalibrate it, but I can&#8217;t afford to not have a backup for the summer season.  Too bad I can&#8217;t just buy a body off the shelf that works.  What&#8217;s up with that NIkon?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blackwellj</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/04/09/is-there-a-secret-nikon-l-firmware.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-21339</link>
		<dc:creator>Blackwellj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 19:23:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=4125#comment-21339</guid>
		<description>It is true</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is true</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaron</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/04/09/is-there-a-secret-nikon-l-firmware.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-21338</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 19:11:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=4125#comment-21338</guid>
		<description>That is very interesting and a great read.  TTL rangefinder on the way? Doubt it but I am very excited for the next generation of lenses that I can&#039;t afford.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That is very interesting and a great read.  TTL rangefinder on the way? Doubt it but I am very excited for the next generation of lenses that I can&#8217;t afford.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

