<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: More spy shots (Nikon D5000)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://nikonrumors.com/2009/04/06/more-spy-shots.aspx/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/04/06/more-spy-shots.aspx/</link>
	<description>where there’s smoke there’s fire</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 18:00:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: jsv_foto</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/04/06/more-spy-shots.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-21221</link>
		<dc:creator>jsv_foto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2009 23:34:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=4015#comment-21221</guid>
		<description>Interesting. If you count the icons on the mode dial, there are 13. The D60 has 12, ditto for the D40 and D40x. This could well indicate a &quot;movie mode.&quot; I do hope there&#039;s no aperture tab, as using old MF glass with a movie mode would rock.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting. If you count the icons on the mode dial, there are 13. The D60 has 12, ditto for the D40 and D40x. This could well indicate a &#8220;movie mode.&#8221; I do hope there&#8217;s no aperture tab, as using old MF glass with a movie mode would rock.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stylus</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/04/06/more-spy-shots.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-21217</link>
		<dc:creator>Stylus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2009 23:15:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=4015#comment-21217</guid>
		<description>The part in front of the prism with the Nikon logo is fugly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The part in front of the prism with the Nikon logo is fugly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stylus</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/04/06/more-spy-shots.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-21216</link>
		<dc:creator>Stylus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2009 23:13:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=4015#comment-21216</guid>
		<description>...6:6 is the same as 1:1...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;6:6 is the same as 1:1&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/04/06/more-spy-shots.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-21215</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2009 23:05:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=4015#comment-21215</guid>
		<description>I have a feeling it is Nikon planted. All the shots of the camera front on have the silver model number blacked out, whereas in the photo with the guy&#039;s left index finger over where the model number should be, you can clearly make out that it is in fact there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a feeling it is Nikon planted. All the shots of the camera front on have the silver model number blacked out, whereas in the photo with the guy&#8217;s left index finger over where the model number should be, you can clearly make out that it is in fact there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Micah</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/04/06/more-spy-shots.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-21200</link>
		<dc:creator>Micah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2009 20:41:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=4015#comment-21200</guid>
		<description>Honestly...maybe.

The next shots have exif dates of yesterday.  Whether or not both sets come from the same person, somebody was less patient and more willing to share than I&#039;d be.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Honestly&#8230;maybe.</p>
<p>The next shots have exif dates of yesterday.  Whether or not both sets come from the same person, somebody was less patient and more willing to share than I&#8217;d be.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/04/06/more-spy-shots.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-21190</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2009 19:46:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=4015#comment-21190</guid>
		<description>&quot;We don’t have a real date on these images because the exif data is off. These could be a month old.&quot;

If you took shots like these, would you wait a month to post them? :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;We don’t have a real date on these images because the exif data is off. These could be a month old.&#8221;</p>
<p>If you took shots like these, would you wait a month to post them? <img src='http://nikonrumors.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lupe</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/04/06/more-spy-shots.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-21185</link>
		<dc:creator>Lupe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2009 18:18:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=4015#comment-21185</guid>
		<description>... also look at the EXIF data.
Shot with a Rollei (date wrong though).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230; also look at the EXIF data.<br />
Shot with a Rollei (date wrong though).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Micah</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/04/06/more-spy-shots.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-21176</link>
		<dc:creator>Micah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2009 17:44:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=4015#comment-21176</guid>
		<description>Actually the exif data makes sense if you look at it.  The Rollei it was shot on is a camera from 2004.   Cameras usually revert to their manufacture date when their batteries die completely.  A camera this old very likely has no functioning internal battery at this point (assuming it ever did) and whoever owns it is probably tired of resetting the damn date/time every time they recharge the battery.

The rest of the exif data (from my reading) all points to images that are camera original.  Everything else is guess work.  The person taking the pics may or may not have had a relationship with the subject.  But by my calculations, with that camera at it&#039;s longest focal length, the shooter never got closer than 25 feet.  Far enough to not be noticed?  Depends on if there was a crowd or not.

We don&#039;t have a real date on these images because the exif data is off.  These could be a month old.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually the exif data makes sense if you look at it.  The Rollei it was shot on is a camera from 2004.   Cameras usually revert to their manufacture date when their batteries die completely.  A camera this old very likely has no functioning internal battery at this point (assuming it ever did) and whoever owns it is probably tired of resetting the damn date/time every time they recharge the battery.</p>
<p>The rest of the exif data (from my reading) all points to images that are camera original.  Everything else is guess work.  The person taking the pics may or may not have had a relationship with the subject.  But by my calculations, with that camera at it&#8217;s longest focal length, the shooter never got closer than 25 feet.  Far enough to not be noticed?  Depends on if there was a crowd or not.</p>
<p>We don&#8217;t have a real date on these images because the exif data is off.  These could be a month old.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nikkorian</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/04/06/more-spy-shots.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-21175</link>
		<dc:creator>Nikkorian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2009 17:42:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=4015#comment-21175</guid>
		<description>rumor marketing of course</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>rumor marketing of course</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lupe</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/04/06/more-spy-shots.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-21168</link>
		<dc:creator>Lupe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2009 17:13:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=4015#comment-21168</guid>
		<description>Impressive!
Definitely a new body shape. This smells like Nikon-planted photos though - a bit of hype before the launch... who on earth dresses like that, posing around with a camera!

Still, it looks great. Fingers crossed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Impressive!<br />
Definitely a new body shape. This smells like Nikon-planted photos though &#8211; a bit of hype before the launch&#8230; who on earth dresses like that, posing around with a camera!</p>
<p>Still, it looks great. Fingers crossed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rob</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/04/06/more-spy-shots.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-21166</link>
		<dc:creator>rob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2009 17:05:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=4015#comment-21166</guid>
		<description>I would put money on this being shot in Dubrovnik, Croatia. There is a high wall which go around the city from which the photo&#039;s could have been taken. 

Its a very popular advertising town.

I would put money on it. 

R</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would put money on this being shot in Dubrovnik, Croatia. There is a high wall which go around the city from which the photo&#8217;s could have been taken. </p>
<p>Its a very popular advertising town.</p>
<p>I would put money on it. </p>
<p>R</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/04/06/more-spy-shots.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-21163</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2009 16:55:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=4015#comment-21163</guid>
		<description>You are entirely correct.  Plus, if you pull up the camera model used it appears to be a very consumer model.

http://www.dpreview.com/news/0411/04112303rollei_dk4010.asp

These would be terrible marketing shots, anyway.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are entirely correct.  Plus, if you pull up the camera model used it appears to be a very consumer model.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.dpreview.com/news/0411/04112303rollei_dk4010.asp" rel="nofollow">http://www.dpreview.com/news/0411/04112303rollei_dk4010.asp</a></p>
<p>These would be terrible marketing shots, anyway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hum@no.id</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/04/06/more-spy-shots.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-21160</link>
		<dc:creator>hum@no.id</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2009 16:47:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=4015#comment-21160</guid>
		<description>This is a cunning tangled direction... since most easy to read EXIF</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a cunning tangled direction&#8230; since most easy to read EXIF</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/04/06/more-spy-shots.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-21159</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2009 16:47:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=4015#comment-21159</guid>
		<description>Did you look at the image quality?  Terrible.  Maybe frame grabs from film, but not marketing stills, definitely not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did you look at the image quality?  Terrible.  Maybe frame grabs from film, but not marketing stills, definitely not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/04/06/more-spy-shots.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-21158</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2009 16:45:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=4015#comment-21158</guid>
		<description>logic fail</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>logic fail</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CRANSOM</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/04/06/more-spy-shots.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-21157</link>
		<dc:creator>CRANSOM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2009 16:36:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=4015#comment-21157</guid>
		<description>I doubt Nikon would leak a shot taken with a Rollei (check the EXIF).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I doubt Nikon would leak a shot taken with a Rollei (check the EXIF).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marc E</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/04/06/more-spy-shots.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-21156</link>
		<dc:creator>Marc E</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2009 16:18:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=4015#comment-21156</guid>
		<description>How many of you would actually use the LCD in that bright of a sun? Totally looks like a staged photo by Nikon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How many of you would actually use the LCD in that bright of a sun? Totally looks like a staged photo by Nikon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris_M</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/04/06/more-spy-shots.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-21155</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris_M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2009 16:13:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=4015#comment-21155</guid>
		<description>The pop-up flash has a different profile, but I guess it&#039;s the same size as the D40/60&#039;s. I wonder what the “SCENE” could be. I also hope they added some different aspect ratios, like the Oly 620/30 has. I&#039;d love to shoot in 6:6 with Nikkor AF-D primes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The pop-up flash has a different profile, but I guess it&#8217;s the same size as the D40/60&#8242;s. I wonder what the “SCENE” could be. I also hope they added some different aspect ratios, like the Oly 620/30 has. I&#8217;d love to shoot in 6:6 with Nikkor AF-D primes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dweeb</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/04/06/more-spy-shots.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-21154</link>
		<dc:creator>Dweeb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2009 15:59:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=4015#comment-21154</guid>
		<description>Even I&#039;d rather see Avril Lavigne hawking Canon Rebels that the Pirate of Romania. Sure he&#039;s not just a Gypsy that robbed a tourist?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Even I&#8217;d rather see Avril Lavigne hawking Canon Rebels that the Pirate of Romania. Sure he&#8217;s not just a Gypsy that robbed a tourist?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/04/06/more-spy-shots.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-21153</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2009 15:56:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=4015#comment-21153</guid>
		<description>The Mode Dial has different graphics than the D40/40x/60 and it now includes &quot;SCENE&quot;.  The Dial also has different &quot;knurling&quot; around its perimiter than the D40/40x/60.  The pop-up flash has a different profile.  If you look at the seam around the flash it resembles the D300 &amp; D700 not the D40/40x/60.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Mode Dial has different graphics than the D40/40x/60 and it now includes &#8220;SCENE&#8221;.  The Dial also has different &#8220;knurling&#8221; around its perimiter than the D40/40x/60.  The pop-up flash has a different profile.  If you look at the seam around the flash it resembles the D300 &amp; D700 not the D40/40x/60.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

