<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Another new DX lens? AF-S Nikkor 10-24mm</title>
	<atom:link href="http://nikonrumors.com/2009/03/26/another-new-dx-lens-af-s-nikkor-10-24mm.aspx/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/03/26/another-new-dx-lens-af-s-nikkor-10-24mm.aspx/</link>
	<description>where there’s smoke there’s fire</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 00:04:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: DarthDuster</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/03/26/another-new-dx-lens-af-s-nikkor-10-24mm.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-20566</link>
		<dc:creator>DarthDuster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 05:03:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=3843#comment-20566</guid>
		<description>I mean if it didn&#039;t have weather sealing then there is no reason to buy this over the tokina. It does seem to have weather sealing though. Now I have to decide weather sealing VS 2.8</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I mean if it didn&#8217;t have weather sealing then there is no reason to buy this over the tokina. It does seem to have weather sealing though. Now I have to decide weather sealing VS 2.8</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/03/26/another-new-dx-lens-af-s-nikkor-10-24mm.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-20480</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 19:17:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=3843#comment-20480</guid>
		<description>Can you provide us some proof that it was added to the computer system at Warehouseexpress.com
A screen shot maybe?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can you provide us some proof that it was added to the computer system at Warehouseexpress.com<br />
A screen shot maybe?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DNHJR</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/03/26/another-new-dx-lens-af-s-nikkor-10-24mm.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-20425</link>
		<dc:creator>DNHJR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 16:26:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=3843#comment-20425</guid>
		<description>Tokina lenses don&#039;t have weather seals. So what you said really does not make any sense.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tokina lenses don&#8217;t have weather seals. So what you said really does not make any sense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe S</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/03/26/another-new-dx-lens-af-s-nikkor-10-24mm.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-20424</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe S</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 16:21:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=3843#comment-20424</guid>
		<description>Well, I ran this thing through the translator: http://translate.google.com/translate?prev=hp&amp;hl=en&amp;u=http%3A%2F%2Fforum.xitek.com%2Fshowthread.php%3Fthreadid%3D612837&amp;sl=auto&amp;tl=en

I STILL can&#039;t tell just judging by the photographs weather it is fake, or not. It does bear a striking resemblance to the 12-24, though...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I ran this thing through the translator: <a href="http://translate.google.com/translate?prev=hp&#038;hl=en&#038;u=http%3A%2F%2Fforum.xitek.com%2Fshowthread.php%3Fthreadid%3D612837&#038;sl=auto&#038;tl=en" rel="nofollow">http://translate.google.com/translate?prev=hp&#038;hl=en&#038;u=http%3A%2F%2Fforum.xitek.com%2Fshowthread.php%3Fthreadid%3D612837&#038;sl=auto&#038;tl=en</a></p>
<p>I STILL can&#8217;t tell just judging by the photographs weather it is fake, or not. It does bear a striking resemblance to the 12-24, though&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shivas</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/03/26/another-new-dx-lens-af-s-nikkor-10-24mm.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-20423</link>
		<dc:creator>shivas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 15:47:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=3843#comment-20423</guid>
		<description>agreed - just got a Tokina 11-16 on backorder, f/2.8 or bust, 3.5 is just too slow. . .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>agreed &#8211; just got a Tokina 11-16 on backorder, f/2.8 or bust, 3.5 is just too slow. . .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: North75</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/03/26/another-new-dx-lens-af-s-nikkor-10-24mm.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-20422</link>
		<dc:creator>North75</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 15:47:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=3843#comment-20422</guid>
		<description>Although not so much from the rear shot of the lens mount.   It is metal mount with a gasket.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Although not so much from the rear shot of the lens mount.   It is metal mount with a gasket.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: North75</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/03/26/another-new-dx-lens-af-s-nikkor-10-24mm.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-20421</link>
		<dc:creator>North75</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 15:44:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=3843#comment-20421</guid>
		<description>It seems that source has a number of other photos as well.  I&#039;m assuming of the same lens.  Looks pretty big around in the shot from the front.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems that source has a number of other photos as well.  I&#8217;m assuming of the same lens.  Looks pretty big around in the shot from the front.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dino</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/03/26/another-new-dx-lens-af-s-nikkor-10-24mm.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-20420</link>
		<dc:creator>dino</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 15:30:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=3843#comment-20420</guid>
		<description>I agree
if consumers are the target of this lens it means they are collecting money to finance bolder and more expensive (FX) projects. The larger is the number of people going to get that lens, the faster we&#039;ll see a FX prime soon. Augh !</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree<br />
if consumers are the target of this lens it means they are collecting money to finance bolder and more expensive (FX) projects. The larger is the number of people going to get that lens, the faster we&#8217;ll see a FX prime soon. Augh !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: [NR] admin</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/03/26/another-new-dx-lens-af-s-nikkor-10-24mm.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-20419</link>
		<dc:creator>[NR] admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 15:24:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=3843#comment-20419</guid>
		<description>Wow! So it is real... can you send us a screenshot please?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow! So it is real&#8230; can you send us a screenshot please?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/03/26/another-new-dx-lens-af-s-nikkor-10-24mm.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-20418</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 15:11:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=3843#comment-20418</guid>
		<description>Look at the link provided above as the source of the photo. The photo above has just been compressed and as such is making the zero look wierd. 

T</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Look at the link provided above as the source of the photo. The photo above has just been compressed and as such is making the zero look wierd. </p>
<p>T</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sven</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/03/26/another-new-dx-lens-af-s-nikkor-10-24mm.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-20417</link>
		<dc:creator>Sven</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 15:10:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=3843#comment-20417</guid>
		<description>Other than what I have said above, if you go to the link provided as the source of this image, you will see that the zero on the 10mm looks normal. The image above has been compressed somewhat and as such looks a little odd. 

You will see in a few days. 

S</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Other than what I have said above, if you go to the link provided as the source of this image, you will see that the zero on the 10mm looks normal. The image above has been compressed somewhat and as such looks a little odd. </p>
<p>You will see in a few days. </p>
<p>S</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/03/26/another-new-dx-lens-af-s-nikkor-10-24mm.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-20416</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 15:01:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=3843#comment-20416</guid>
		<description>Interesting how it&#039;s similarly spec&#039;d to the Tamron 10-24 F3.5-4.5. The distortion between the 1 and 0, with the zero being bigger lends me to believe this is fake. 

I&#039;d rather see an AF-S 55mm F1.4 DX</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting how it&#8217;s similarly spec&#8217;d to the Tamron 10-24 F3.5-4.5. The distortion between the 1 and 0, with the zero being bigger lends me to believe this is fake. </p>
<p>I&#8217;d rather see an AF-S 55mm F1.4 DX</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/03/26/another-new-dx-lens-af-s-nikkor-10-24mm.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-20414</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 14:49:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=3843#comment-20414</guid>
		<description>The perfect lens for my D40 if it really stays pricewise south of $500. Combined with the AF-S 35/1.8 DX and a AF-S 85/1.8 DX (do you hear me Nikon?) or if that won&#039;t happen the 55-200 DX VR I&#039;d have my dream combo.

Anyone interested in an AF-S 16-85 DX? If the rumour is true I&#039;ll have one for sale April, 2nd ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The perfect lens for my D40 if it really stays pricewise south of $500. Combined with the AF-S 35/1.8 DX and a AF-S 85/1.8 DX (do you hear me Nikon?) or if that won&#8217;t happen the 55-200 DX VR I&#8217;d have my dream combo.</p>
<p>Anyone interested in an AF-S 16-85 DX? If the rumour is true I&#8217;ll have one for sale April, 2nd <img src='http://nikonrumors.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/03/26/another-new-dx-lens-af-s-nikkor-10-24mm.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-20413</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 14:48:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=3843#comment-20413</guid>
		<description>This may be roughly $700 Canadian then?  Seem consistent with the 16-85, 18-70 (when it was new).  If the optics are great, this will make a nice DX/pro kit... 10-24, 24-70, 70-200!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This may be roughly $700 Canadian then?  Seem consistent with the 16-85, 18-70 (when it was new).  If the optics are great, this will make a nice DX/pro kit&#8230; 10-24, 24-70, 70-200!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TRP</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/03/26/another-new-dx-lens-af-s-nikkor-10-24mm.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-20412</link>
		<dc:creator>TRP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 14:46:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=3843#comment-20412</guid>
		<description>Fake, look at the 10 vs the 24, this is photoshop for real :-(</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fake, look at the 10 vs the 24, this is photoshop for real <img src='http://nikonrumors.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':-(' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Desinderlase</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/03/26/another-new-dx-lens-af-s-nikkor-10-24mm.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-20411</link>
		<dc:creator>Desinderlase</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 14:43:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=3843#comment-20411</guid>
		<description>So 12-24 is obsolete?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So 12-24 is obsolete?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sven</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/03/26/another-new-dx-lens-af-s-nikkor-10-24mm.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-20410</link>
		<dc:creator>Sven</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 14:43:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=3843#comment-20410</guid>
		<description>I can confirm that this lens has come onto the computer system at Warehouseexpress.com in the UK. 

Delivery date set to be 02/04/2009
RRP; £329.99
S</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can confirm that this lens has come onto the computer system at Warehouseexpress.com in the UK. </p>
<p>Delivery date set to be 02/04/2009<br />
RRP; £329.99<br />
S</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DarthDuster</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/03/26/another-new-dx-lens-af-s-nikkor-10-24mm.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-20409</link>
		<dc:creator>DarthDuster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 14:33:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=3843#comment-20409</guid>
		<description>This better have wather sealing, I live in the tropics and it rains here a lot, or else im buying the tokina.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This better have wather sealing, I live in the tropics and it rains here a lot, or else im buying the tokina.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ron Scubadiver</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/03/26/another-new-dx-lens-af-s-nikkor-10-24mm.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-20408</link>
		<dc:creator>Ron Scubadiver</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 14:32:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=3843#comment-20408</guid>
		<description>If the 35mm f/1.8 is a hint, I suspect that future DX Nikon lenses will be aimed at the consumer price range.  A faster ultra wide does not seem to fit in that category.  A 20mm faster than f/2.8 would be awesome, or a compact 14mm.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If the 35mm f/1.8 is a hint, I suspect that future DX Nikon lenses will be aimed at the consumer price range.  A faster ultra wide does not seem to fit in that category.  A 20mm faster than f/2.8 would be awesome, or a compact 14mm.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/03/26/another-new-dx-lens-af-s-nikkor-10-24mm.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-20407</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 14:31:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=3843#comment-20407</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m a bit dissapointed that it may be variable aperture.  I&#039;m sure it will be SWM.  They are only releasing SWM equpped lenses now.  Nice range.  I wonder if it&#039;s made by Tamron though?  It&#039;s grainy enough to be a real spy shot though.  I would still love that  rumored 10-18 FX f/4.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m a bit dissapointed that it may be variable aperture.  I&#8217;m sure it will be SWM.  They are only releasing SWM equpped lenses now.  Nice range.  I wonder if it&#8217;s made by Tamron though?  It&#8217;s grainy enough to be a real spy shot though.  I would still love that  rumored 10-18 FX f/4.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

