Busted

At that point I can call the previous Nikon D400 rumor busted. Such HTML manipulations (not even photoshop) can easily be done and few readers have proved it:

 

nikon busted rumor1 Busted

Nikon D700x

 

nikon busted rumor2 Busted

Nikon D500

Related posts:

  1. Busted!
  2. Nikon Q sign in Cologne? *busted*
  3. Nikon D500
  4. Nikon D700x sooner than expected
  5. Nikon D500 rumor from Russia
This entry was posted in Nikon D400. Bookmark the permalink. Both comments and trackbacks are currently closed.

14 Comments

  1. I am you
    Posted March 21, 2009 at 10:04 am | Permalink

    Finally!!
    And now we wait…

  2. kikkk
    Posted March 21, 2009 at 10:10 am | Permalink

    hm????

  3. C
    Posted March 21, 2009 at 10:20 am | Permalink

    Good to hear as I would be disappointed if D400 is like that. Not much difference vs the D300. Heartless as Canon does on 40D to 50D.

  4. Ed
    Posted March 21, 2009 at 10:23 am | Permalink

    Although I agree that it was likely a fake, the fact that you can easily fake a web page is not proof. Is there proof, as in an analysis of the screen shot?

    • Posted March 21, 2009 at 10:26 am | Permalink

      the reader that sent me the screen shot admitted it… I just got his email… there is not much I could do about it

  5. Pablov
    Posted March 21, 2009 at 11:20 am | Permalink

    Maybe this week we get some good news…

  6. Alex
    Posted March 21, 2009 at 12:16 pm | Permalink

    So now it’s a D500 with 17.3 Megapixels?

    • Marc
      Posted March 21, 2009 at 4:35 pm | Permalink

      Durka, that was just to show how easy it is to manipulate.

  7. Posted March 21, 2009 at 2:16 pm | Permalink

    No shit…

  8. Posted March 21, 2009 at 5:44 pm | Permalink

    [offtop]

    Nikon CoolPix L10 – amateur space adventure..

    http://teslabs.com/meteotek08/
    not fake and rumor:)

    [/offtop]

  9. Pato
    Posted March 21, 2009 at 10:25 pm | Permalink

    I don’t like any of the fake “grabs” around… but if You take a look at the german http://www.nikon.de/family/de_DE/categories/broad/318.html website… You will notice something strange… the Nikon D3 and D300 (Body only) have no text underneath the model number… and You will find the same at http://www.nikon.de/family/de_DE/categories/broad/317.html … D80 and D40 … no text… again… hmm…

    … at http://www.nikon-highlights.de/D3X there is even no mention of D300 and D80… among the links on the left side… at all…

  10. Pablov
    Posted March 21, 2009 at 11:59 pm | Permalink

    It’s something funny or ever curious to see how many post are for discussions or debates if something is real or fake, good or bad, useful or unuseful, but then…. almost silence in other topics

    What weird behaviour have us, the human kind…

  11. googler
    Posted April 15, 2009 at 8:27 pm | Permalink

    I find it interesting if you google d400 on the europe-nikon site, it brings that link as a hit…

    http://www.google.ca/search?hl=en&as_qdr=all&q=d400+site:http://www.europe-nikon.com&btnG=Search&meta=

    • googler
      Posted April 15, 2009 at 8:29 pm | Permalink

      oh i just noticed that it says that it can only find the term d400 on links pointing to this page.. most likely from links on this site..

      disregard this.