<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Nikon AF-S 35mm f/1.4 (FX)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://nikonrumors.com/2009/03/07/nikon-af-s-35mm-f14-fx.aspx/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/03/07/nikon-af-s-35mm-f14-fx.aspx/</link>
	<description>where there’s smoke there’s fire</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 01:35:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: [NR] admin</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/03/07/nikon-af-s-35mm-f14-fx.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-19803</link>
		<dc:creator>[NR] admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 13:09:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=3665#comment-19803</guid>
		<description>I do get a lot of e mail that I check and filter out the garbage. This 35mm AIS lens, I did not catch - I did check, but not in the manual focus section.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I do get a lot of e mail that I check and filter out the garbage. This 35mm AIS lens, I did not catch &#8211; I did check, but not in the manual focus section.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mathias</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/03/07/nikon-af-s-35mm-f14-fx.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-19798</link>
		<dc:creator>Mathias</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 12:47:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=3665#comment-19798</guid>
		<description>Hi!

I am sorry, but it is very simple. The Answer is AI-S

http://geizhals.at/deutschland/?cat=acamobjo_nik;asuch=35mm&amp;xf=785_Nikon

bw
Mat</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi!</p>
<p>I am sorry, but it is very simple. The Answer is AI-S</p>
<p><a href="http://geizhals.at/deutschland/?cat=acamobjo_nik;asuch=35mm&#038;xf=785_Nikon" rel="nofollow">http://geizhals.at/deutschland/?cat=acamobjo_nik;asuch=35mm&#038;xf=785_Nikon</a></p>
<p>bw<br />
Mat</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/03/07/nikon-af-s-35mm-f14-fx.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-19797</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 12:16:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=3665#comment-19797</guid>
		<description>i smell flames here

&quot;when there&#039;s smoke there&#039;s fire.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i smell flames here</p>
<p>&#8220;when there&#8217;s smoke there&#8217;s fire.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Coolpix</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/03/07/nikon-af-s-35mm-f14-fx.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-19796</link>
		<dc:creator>Coolpix</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 12:07:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=3665#comment-19796</guid>
		<description>If it&#039;s interresting someone i know that one piece of this 35mm f1.4 is for sell as  used  here in France</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If it&#8217;s interresting someone i know that one piece of this 35mm f1.4 is for sell as  used  here in France</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Calvin</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/03/07/nikon-af-s-35mm-f14-fx.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-19792</link>
		<dc:creator>Calvin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 11:48:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=3665#comment-19792</guid>
		<description>Absolutely disappointed.  Admin still did not learn from previous critique and continuously show us that you are ridiculous and know little about Nikon history.

AIS 35 f/1.4 is still producing now.

I had been trusting nikonrumors so far.  But now, I think I have reservation on this site. 

IMO, I think you should study the so-called &quot;rumors&quot; in a logical way, analyze its reliability and, if you don&#039;t know much about it, ask your experienced Nikon friends.  I agree that you need to report every &quot;smoke&quot; but I think it should be in a sensible way.  Like I can one day email you seeing a 50mm f/1.2.  If you do not study it, you may simply post that AF-S 50 1.2 is about to launch.  Study it, and you would know there is AIS 50mm f/1.2 still in production.  If you are brainlessly reporting the &quot;rumors&quot;, I think it would severely decrease the creditability of NR.

You&#039;d better apologize for your carelessness to all respectful NR readers, or delete all the posts including this news immediately.  But if you choose the later, I hope that my voice could come into your mind and you could really learn this time, not just having deleted my post last time but without learned.

Thank you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Absolutely disappointed.  Admin still did not learn from previous critique and continuously show us that you are ridiculous and know little about Nikon history.</p>
<p>AIS 35 f/1.4 is still producing now.</p>
<p>I had been trusting nikonrumors so far.  But now, I think I have reservation on this site. </p>
<p>IMO, I think you should study the so-called &#8220;rumors&#8221; in a logical way, analyze its reliability and, if you don&#8217;t know much about it, ask your experienced Nikon friends.  I agree that you need to report every &#8220;smoke&#8221; but I think it should be in a sensible way.  Like I can one day email you seeing a 50mm f/1.2.  If you do not study it, you may simply post that AF-S 50 1.2 is about to launch.  Study it, and you would know there is AIS 50mm f/1.2 still in production.  If you are brainlessly reporting the &#8220;rumors&#8221;, I think it would severely decrease the creditability of NR.</p>
<p>You&#8217;d better apologize for your carelessness to all respectful NR readers, or delete all the posts including this news immediately.  But if you choose the later, I hope that my voice could come into your mind and you could really learn this time, not just having deleted my post last time but without learned.</p>
<p>Thank you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fried Toast</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/03/07/nikon-af-s-35mm-f14-fx.aspx/comment-page-/#comment-19791</link>
		<dc:creator>Fried Toast</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 11:37:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=3665#comment-19791</guid>
		<description>&gt;&quot;remove this rumor post because it’s not a rumor absolutely at all.&quot;

Not sure what your definitely of &quot;rumor&quot; is, but it seems like a rumor to me. Now, maybe it&#039;s a rumor that will be busted w/ a high degree of certainty... that&#039;s possible. But unless you can point out that there&#039;s *definitely* no 35mm f1.4 in the works, then why bother crying about it? Just kill the tab and move on. Just because you think you&#039;re cool for having looked up information on the 35mm f1.4 AIS on Google doesn&#039;t mean you need to go waving your internet dick around at people. 

Go outside and shoot pictures or something- relax. Or does recommending that sort of thing make *me* an idiot?
:P</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt;&#8221;remove this rumor post because it’s not a rumor absolutely at all.&#8221;</p>
<p>Not sure what your definitely of &#8220;rumor&#8221; is, but it seems like a rumor to me. Now, maybe it&#8217;s a rumor that will be busted w/ a high degree of certainty&#8230; that&#8217;s possible. But unless you can point out that there&#8217;s *definitely* no 35mm f1.4 in the works, then why bother crying about it? Just kill the tab and move on. Just because you think you&#8217;re cool for having looked up information on the 35mm f1.4 AIS on Google doesn&#8217;t mean you need to go waving your internet dick around at people. </p>
<p>Go outside and shoot pictures or something- relax. Or does recommending that sort of thing make *me* an idiot?<br />
 <img src='http://nikonrumors.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_razz.gif' alt=':P' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fried Toast</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/03/07/nikon-af-s-35mm-f14-fx.aspx/comment-page-/#comment-19790</link>
		<dc:creator>Fried Toast</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 11:32:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=3665#comment-19790</guid>
		<description>&gt;&quot;…… Goodbye&quot;

Two whiners in a row gone. Day couldn&#039;t get much better, could it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt;&#8221;…… Goodbye&#8221;</p>
<p>Two whiners in a row gone. Day couldn&#8217;t get much better, could it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fried Toast</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/03/07/nikon-af-s-35mm-f14-fx.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-19789</link>
		<dc:creator>Fried Toast</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 11:30:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=3665#comment-19789</guid>
		<description>&gt;&quot;I’m gonna delete my feed RSS right now, I’m a bit tired about this fakes
bye bye&quot;

Wheat, wave &quot;bye bye&quot; to chaff.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt;&#8221;I’m gonna delete my feed RSS right now, I’m a bit tired about this fakes<br />
bye bye&#8221;</p>
<p>Wheat, wave &#8220;bye bye&#8221; to chaff.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Puppeteer</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/03/07/nikon-af-s-35mm-f14-fx.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-19787</link>
		<dc:creator>Puppeteer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 11:04:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=3665#comment-19787</guid>
		<description>Why ever not?  They still produce them and they are superb manual lenses - better in many ways than any of the AF-S modern lenses.  They are true quality, precision instruments - not toys from the age of the digital photographer.  From the time when you needed skill and talent to be a photographer not just a large wallet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why ever not?  They still produce them and they are superb manual lenses &#8211; better in many ways than any of the AF-S modern lenses.  They are true quality, precision instruments &#8211; not toys from the age of the digital photographer.  From the time when you needed skill and talent to be a photographer not just a large wallet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eugene</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/03/07/nikon-af-s-35mm-f14-fx.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-19786</link>
		<dc:creator>Eugene</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 10:54:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=3665#comment-19786</guid>
		<description>AIS 35mm 1.4 was announced at 1982/02  wow!
unbelievable it is as old as me, 27 ago 
are you sure it is still be produced? 
camera stores should not listed those outdated lens
or the menu will be exploded and caused a lot of  trouble  ha ha ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AIS 35mm 1.4 was announced at 1982/02  wow!<br />
unbelievable it is as old as me, 27 ago<br />
are you sure it is still be produced?<br />
camera stores should not listed those outdated lens<br />
or the menu will be exploded and caused a lot of  trouble  ha ha &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eugene</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/03/07/nikon-af-s-35mm-f14-fx.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-19785</link>
		<dc:creator>Eugene</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 10:35:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=3665#comment-19785</guid>
		<description>here is nikon &quot;rumors&quot;
not nikon announcement    ha ha ...

take easy</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>here is nikon &#8220;rumors&#8221;<br />
not nikon announcement    ha ha &#8230;</p>
<p>take easy</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ivan Feign</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/03/07/nikon-af-s-35mm-f14-fx.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-19784</link>
		<dc:creator>Ivan Feign</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 10:33:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=3665#comment-19784</guid>
		<description>Uh, I don&#039;t see any mention of AF-S in the lenses you&#039;ve mentioned. Nikon&#039;s had a 35mm f/1.4 AI-S for years. AI. Not AF.

http://www.nikonusa.com/Find-Your-Nikon/Product/Camera-Lenses/1429/NIKKOR-35mm-f%252F1.4.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Uh, I don&#8217;t see any mention of AF-S in the lenses you&#8217;ve mentioned. Nikon&#8217;s had a 35mm f/1.4 AI-S for years. AI. Not AF.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.nikonusa.com/Find-Your-Nikon/Product/Camera-Lenses/1429/NIKKOR-35mm-f%252F1.4.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.nikonusa.com/Find-Your-Nikon/Product/Camera-Lenses/1429/NIKKOR-35mm-f%252F1.4.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stageshadow</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/03/07/nikon-af-s-35mm-f14-fx.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-19783</link>
		<dc:creator>stageshadow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 10:21:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=3665#comment-19783</guid>
		<description>come down, this site is called NIKON RUMORS, not NIKON ANNOUNCEMENTS...
About the lens rumor, checked it today by myself, at a store called Hartlauer in Austria and found exactly the same three 35mm lenses. 
There were no hint about  Af-s,  D or  Ais , just the &quot;DX&quot; showed up in the system, so if the 35 1.4 Ais is still in production, it could be this lens.
One last thing about the 35 1.8 DX, looks like nikon needs more of them that they can deliver at the moment (here in austria), 3-4 weeks waiting time for the lens. WOW!

Greetz Stageshadow</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>come down, this site is called NIKON RUMORS, not NIKON ANNOUNCEMENTS&#8230;<br />
About the lens rumor, checked it today by myself, at a store called Hartlauer in Austria and found exactly the same three 35mm lenses.<br />
There were no hint about  Af-s,  D or  Ais , just the &#8220;DX&#8221; showed up in the system, so if the 35 1.4 Ais is still in production, it could be this lens.<br />
One last thing about the 35 1.8 DX, looks like nikon needs more of them that they can deliver at the moment (here in austria), 3-4 weeks waiting time for the lens. WOW!</p>
<p>Greetz Stageshadow</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sam27</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/03/07/nikon-af-s-35mm-f14-fx.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-19782</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam27</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 10:20:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=3665#comment-19782</guid>
		<description>Guys... It is the Manual One.... 10000%</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Guys&#8230; It is the Manual One&#8230;. 10000%</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: crampo al culo</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/03/07/nikon-af-s-35mm-f14-fx.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-19777</link>
		<dc:creator>crampo al culo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 09:24:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=3665#comment-19777</guid>
		<description>and in the email text where is it written af-s?
as many others have stated, nikon make already a 35/1.4

writing AF-S in the title of the news is a good way to increase traffic the site owners (and the advertisers) but doesn&#039;t add anything for us

I&#039;m gonna delete my feed RSS right now, I&#039;m a bit tired about this fakes
bye bye</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>and in the email text where is it written af-s?<br />
as many others have stated, nikon make already a 35/1.4</p>
<p>writing AF-S in the title of the news is a good way to increase traffic the site owners (and the advertisers) but doesn&#8217;t add anything for us</p>
<p>I&#8217;m gonna delete my feed RSS right now, I&#8217;m a bit tired about this fakes<br />
bye bye</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anon</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/03/07/nikon-af-s-35mm-f14-fx.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-19775</link>
		<dc:creator>anon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 09:10:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=3665#comment-19775</guid>
		<description>yawnnnn...admin..did you not learn anything from New Nikon lens AF-S 17-35 f/1.8D IF ED busted rumor?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yawnnnn&#8230;admin..did you not learn anything from New Nikon lens AF-S 17-35 f/1.8D IF ED busted rumor?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/03/07/nikon-af-s-35mm-f14-fx.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-19773</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 08:18:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=3665#comment-19773</guid>
		<description>My bet is that Nikon will keep video out of FX for now, to keep prices up for FX bodies. This way they&#039;re separating pros from the rest.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My bet is that Nikon will keep video out of FX for now, to keep prices up for FX bodies. This way they&#8217;re separating pros from the rest.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/03/07/nikon-af-s-35mm-f14-fx.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-19770</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 08:04:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=3665#comment-19770</guid>
		<description>+1 no rumor here. Shame.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>+1 no rumor here. Shame.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/03/07/nikon-af-s-35mm-f14-fx.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-19771</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 08:04:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=3665#comment-19771</guid>
		<description>+1 no rumor here. Shame.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>+1 no rumor here. Shame.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: StillWaiting4D800</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/03/07/nikon-af-s-35mm-f14-fx.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-19768</link>
		<dc:creator>StillWaiting4D800</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 07:06:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=3665#comment-19768</guid>
		<description>Same here but I got a feeling it won&#039;t be any time soon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Same here but I got a feeling it won&#8217;t be any time soon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

