Comments on: Nikon related news/links http://nikonrumors.com/2009/02/26/nikon-related-newslinks-2.aspx/ where there’s smoke there’s fire Mon, 13 Feb 2012 00:40:02 +0000 hourly 1 By: Anonymous http://nikonrumors.com/2009/02/26/nikon-related-newslinks-2.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-18256 Anonymous Sun, 01 Mar 2009 10:46:01 +0000 http://nikonrumors.com/?p=3353#comment-18256 Hey, you think Gizmodo is dumb ? Watch the Dtown video. Hey, you think Gizmodo is dumb ? Watch the Dtown video.

]]> By: Raymond Ohsnap http://nikonrumors.com/2009/02/26/nikon-related-newslinks-2.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-18136 Raymond Ohsnap Fri, 27 Feb 2009 20:52:33 +0000 http://nikonrumors.com/?p=3353#comment-18136 I really dont mind what the result was.I know what i would have chosen of those two cameras... Would probably go for the Canon if i started out with a Canon camera. But when the reviewer doesnt even figure out that there's a built-in falsh on the camera after "a few months" of testing, i sort of have troubles taking the whole review seriouse... I really dont mind what the result was.I know what i would have chosen of those two cameras… Would probably go for the Canon if i started out with a Canon camera.

But when the reviewer doesnt even figure out that there’s a built-in falsh on the camera after “a few months” of testing, i sort of have troubles taking the whole review seriouse…

]]> By: rwbenjey http://nikonrumors.com/2009/02/26/nikon-related-newslinks-2.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-18106 rwbenjey Fri, 27 Feb 2009 17:52:08 +0000 http://nikonrumors.com/?p=3353#comment-18106 I agree. Until review sites start looking at features that matter, instead of consumer fluff, I won't be taking them seriously. I agree. Until review sites start looking at features that matter, instead of consumer fluff, I won’t be taking them seriously.

]]> By: Adam http://nikonrumors.com/2009/02/26/nikon-related-newslinks-2.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-18097 Adam Fri, 27 Feb 2009 14:48:30 +0000 http://nikonrumors.com/?p=3353#comment-18097 Lol. It's great to see you Nikon shooters are as crazy as those idiots on DPReview's Canon boards. Always jumping up in arms when someone posts a review against "your product". Grow up. Get out and shoot. Lol. It’s great to see you Nikon shooters are as crazy as those idiots on DPReview’s Canon boards. Always jumping up in arms when someone posts a review against “your product”.
Grow up. Get out and shoot.

]]> By: Tom http://nikonrumors.com/2009/02/26/nikon-related-newslinks-2.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-18096 Tom Fri, 27 Feb 2009 14:47:01 +0000 http://nikonrumors.com/?p=3353#comment-18096 No doubt many people here think there'll be a 10-18. I'm just hoping for the 85mm f1.4 AF-S to be announced. Not that I want one, it's just been rumored as the next lens for months so I'm keen for things to keep rolling. No doubt many people here think there’ll be a 10-18. I’m just hoping for the 85mm f1.4 AF-S to be announced. Not that I want one, it’s just been rumored as the next lens for months so I’m keen for things to keep rolling.

]]> By: [NR] admin http://nikonrumors.com/2009/02/26/nikon-related-newslinks-2.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-18089 [NR] admin Fri, 27 Feb 2009 13:12:18 +0000 http://nikonrumors.com/?p=3353#comment-18089 I know - I that point I am concerned too I know – I that point I am concerned too

]]> By: Tom http://nikonrumors.com/2009/02/26/nikon-related-newslinks-2.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-18086 Tom Fri, 27 Feb 2009 12:19:49 +0000 http://nikonrumors.com/?p=3353#comment-18086 ...because, like, how many times have you had your amps at 10 and wanted a bit more ? Their amps go to 11. Custom made. …because, like, how many times have you had your amps at 10 and wanted a bit more ? Their amps go to 11. Custom made.

]]> By: Tom http://nikonrumors.com/2009/02/26/nikon-related-newslinks-2.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-18085 Tom Fri, 27 Feb 2009 12:16:13 +0000 http://nikonrumors.com/?p=3353#comment-18085 Spinal Tap had amplifiers that went to 11. Custom made. Spinal Tap had amplifiers that went to 11. Custom made.

]]> By: Ravell http://nikonrumors.com/2009/02/26/nikon-related-newslinks-2.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-18084 Ravell Fri, 27 Feb 2009 12:04:06 +0000 http://nikonrumors.com/?p=3353#comment-18084 They should eally stick to reviewing point and shoots shouldn't they. They didn't seem all that interrested in picture quality (appart from noise), just features. Completely missed the mark IMO. They should eally stick to reviewing point and shoots shouldn’t they.

They didn’t seem all that interrested in picture quality (appart from noise), just features. Completely missed the mark IMO.

]]> By: markdphotoguy http://nikonrumors.com/2009/02/26/nikon-related-newslinks-2.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-18081 markdphotoguy Fri, 27 Feb 2009 11:40:40 +0000 http://nikonrumors.com/?p=3353#comment-18081 I liked how they ignored the fact that the D700 has more dark tone detail than the 5DMKII. It's amazing how much importance some reviewers put on noise levels instead of actual photographic detail is in the shot. D700 has more detail in the dark simple AND less noise how they call it a draw is beyond me. I liked how they ignored the fact that the D700 has more dark tone detail than the 5DMKII. It’s amazing how much importance some reviewers put on noise levels instead of actual photographic detail is in the shot. D700 has more detail in the dark simple AND less noise how they call it a draw is beyond me.

]]> By: Fried Toast http://nikonrumors.com/2009/02/26/nikon-related-newslinks-2.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-18080 Fried Toast Fri, 27 Feb 2009 11:29:24 +0000 http://nikonrumors.com/?p=3353#comment-18080 Well, Gizmodo's a tech/toy site, not a photography site, so it makes sense in a way (even if my D700 & I are a bit taken aback by the result). ;) Well, Gizmodo’s a tech/toy site, not a photography site, so it makes sense in a way (even if my D700 & I are a bit taken aback by the result).

;)

]]> By: Fried Toast http://nikonrumors.com/2009/02/26/nikon-related-newslinks-2.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-18079 Fried Toast Fri, 27 Feb 2009 11:28:14 +0000 http://nikonrumors.com/?p=3353#comment-18079 Not yet. Not yet.

]]> By: Web-fotografen.dk http://nikonrumors.com/2009/02/26/nikon-related-newslinks-2.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-18077 Web-fotografen.dk Fri, 27 Feb 2009 10:14:29 +0000 http://nikonrumors.com/?p=3353#comment-18077 - Me too :) - Me too :)

]]> By: alex http://nikonrumors.com/2009/02/26/nikon-related-newslinks-2.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-18074 alex Fri, 27 Feb 2009 08:05:30 +0000 http://nikonrumors.com/?p=3353#comment-18074 gizmondo review is so idiotic that comments made by readers helped the writers learn that nikon has a commander flash feature :)))))))))))) why do you post such crap reviews on this site? you think that people come to nikonrumors to read gadget reviews? gizmondo review is so idiotic that comments made by readers helped the writers learn that nikon has a commander flash feature

:) )))))))))))

why do you post such crap reviews on this site? you think that people come to nikonrumors to read gadget reviews?

]]> By: Raymond Ohsnap http://nikonrumors.com/2009/02/26/nikon-related-newslinks-2.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-18073 Raymond Ohsnap Fri, 27 Feb 2009 08:05:03 +0000 http://nikonrumors.com/?p=3353#comment-18073 Hahaha! loved the comment on the D700 vs 5D mark II review: "The Nikon wins 3 out of the 4 categories (high ISO shooting is a win in the Nikon - come on - just look at it), and you call it for the Canon? WTF? " And even better, in the article: "Canon priced the 5D $300 lower(!!!!!) than the D700 ($2700 vs $3000 for body-only). The D700's been on the market a few months longer, though, and the prices are starting to come down—you can get the body for $2450(!!!!!) at B&H right now." First saying that the Canon is $300 cheaper then the Nikon, and in the next sentence pointing out that the D700 is actually $250 cheaper than the Canon... Ridiculus... Laughed my ass of there... Hahaha! loved the comment on the D700 vs 5D mark II review:

“The Nikon wins 3 out of the 4 categories (high ISO shooting is a win in the Nikon – come on – just look at it), and you call it for the Canon?

WTF? ”

And even better, in the article:
“Canon priced the 5D $300 lower(!!!!!) than the D700 ($2700 vs $3000 for body-only). The D700′s been on the market a few months longer, though, and the prices are starting to come down—you can get the body for $2450(!!!!!) at B&H right now.”
First saying that the Canon is $300 cheaper then the Nikon, and in the next sentence pointing out that the D700 is actually $250 cheaper than the Canon… Ridiculus…

Laughed my ass of there…

]]> By: Wim http://nikonrumors.com/2009/02/26/nikon-related-newslinks-2.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-18071 Wim Fri, 27 Feb 2009 07:47:45 +0000 http://nikonrumors.com/?p=3353#comment-18071 .. and they're really black. It's like, how much more black could this be? and the answer is none. None more black. .. and they’re really black. It’s like, how much more black could this be? and the answer is none. None more black.

]]> By: Ryan M Long http://nikonrumors.com/2009/02/26/nikon-related-newslinks-2.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-18070 Ryan M Long Fri, 27 Feb 2009 07:38:23 +0000 http://nikonrumors.com/?p=3353#comment-18070 But...these ones go to 11. (I really hope someone gets this) But…these ones go to 11.

(I really hope someone gets this)

]]> By: Zabbu http://nikonrumors.com/2009/02/26/nikon-related-newslinks-2.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-18069 Zabbu Fri, 27 Feb 2009 07:29:45 +0000 http://nikonrumors.com/?p=3353#comment-18069 Maybe not this PMA... Maybe not this PMA…

]]> By: Anonymous http://nikonrumors.com/2009/02/26/nikon-related-newslinks-2.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-18068 Anonymous Fri, 27 Feb 2009 06:42:30 +0000 http://nikonrumors.com/?p=3353#comment-18068 umm, guys... those are lenses they use for the camcorders on movie sets. if you want to use an adapter to attach it to the camera, you will get really bad and far unacceptable results at all apertures and even if focused properly. i've used the 85mm ƒ/1 on a super 8 camcorder before and they're okay, nothing compared to leica lenses for super 8's. umm, guys… those are lenses they use for the camcorders on movie sets. if you want to use an adapter to attach it to the camera, you will get really bad and far unacceptable results at all apertures and even if focused properly.

i’ve used the 85mm ƒ/1 on a super 8 camcorder before and they’re okay, nothing compared to leica lenses for super 8′s.

]]> By: ryan http://nikonrumors.com/2009/02/26/nikon-related-newslinks-2.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-18067 ryan Fri, 27 Feb 2009 06:38:34 +0000 http://nikonrumors.com/?p=3353#comment-18067 That d700 and 5d mark 2 review is rediculous... i love obth nikon and canon, but i would never base a decision on an added feature that has nothing to do with photography.. video is videography.. not photography... love this site though great stuff! thanks for the great news updates! That d700 and 5d mark 2 review is rediculous… i love obth nikon and canon, but i would never base a decision on an added feature that has nothing to do with photography.. video is videography.. not photography… love this site though great stuff! thanks for the great news updates!

]]>