Comments on: New Nikon 80-200mm F2.8? http://nikonrumors.com/2009/02/24/new-nikon-80-200mm-f28.aspx where there’s smoke there’s fire Tue, 16 Mar 2010 17:52:06 -0400 hourly 1 By: jk http://nikonrumors.com/2009/02/24/new-nikon-80-200mm-f28.aspx/comment-page-1#comment-18045 jk Thu, 26 Feb 2009 18:05:14 +0000 http://nikonrumors.com/?p=3371#comment-18045 I can't believe how some of you react.. if you are so superior why not start your own site called "nikonfacts.com" cause that seems more up your alley. I can’t believe how some of you react.. if you are so superior why not start your own site called “nikonfacts.com” cause that seems more up your alley.

]]> By: rwbenjey http://nikonrumors.com/2009/02/24/new-nikon-80-200mm-f28.aspx/comment-page-1#comment-18018 rwbenjey Thu, 26 Feb 2009 03:41:27 +0000 http://nikonrumors.com/?p=3371#comment-18018 New is referring to either the AF-S D model, following the push/pull version, or it's the AF-S D IF model, following the AF-S D model. New is referring to either the AF-S D model, following the push/pull version, or it’s the AF-S D IF model, following the AF-S D model.

]]> By: Jim Coarse http://nikonrumors.com/2009/02/24/new-nikon-80-200mm-f28.aspx/comment-page-1#comment-17985 Jim Coarse Wed, 25 Feb 2009 20:41:34 +0000 http://nikonrumors.com/?p=3371#comment-17985 I believe its saying the item is new and not used. Not a new model. I believe its saying the item is new and not used. Not a new model.

]]> By: Anonymous http://nikonrumors.com/2009/02/24/new-nikon-80-200mm-f28.aspx/comment-page-#comment-17978 Anonymous Wed, 25 Feb 2009 19:34:54 +0000 http://nikonrumors.com/?p=3371#comment-17978 I'll second that this is a well run website with the admin doing his (or her for all I know) best, not even an 'expert' on camera equipment knows the names/designations of every lens/body/accessory. I'm personally aware of the different designations just because I've purchased this lens myself. Don't rag on the admin for a little mistake. I’ll second that this is a well run website with the admin doing his (or her for all I know) best, not even an ‘expert’ on camera equipment knows the names/designations of every lens/body/accessory. I’m personally aware of the different designations just because I’ve purchased this lens myself. Don’t rag on the admin for a little mistake.

]]> By: PJS http://nikonrumors.com/2009/02/24/new-nikon-80-200mm-f28.aspx/comment-page-1#comment-17970 PJS Wed, 25 Feb 2009 18:22:51 +0000 http://nikonrumors.com/?p=3371#comment-17970 NEW as opposed to USED NEW as opposed to USED

]]> By: HDZ http://nikonrumors.com/2009/02/24/new-nikon-80-200mm-f28.aspx/comment-page-1#comment-17960 HDZ Wed, 25 Feb 2009 16:26:43 +0000 http://nikonrumors.com/?p=3371#comment-17960 Dealer in my country but I still not believe that propaganda and will not try 'new' version. Dealer in my country but I still not believe that propaganda and will not try ‘new’ version.

]]> By: BrettA http://nikonrumors.com/2009/02/24/new-nikon-80-200mm-f28.aspx/comment-page-#comment-17958 BrettA Wed, 25 Feb 2009 16:13:27 +0000 http://nikonrumors.com/?p=3371#comment-17958 Or they can always - LOL - ask for their money back. And leave. Or they can always – LOL – ask for their money back. And leave.

]]> By: Lance http://nikonrumors.com/2009/02/24/new-nikon-80-200mm-f28.aspx/comment-page-#comment-17955 Lance Wed, 25 Feb 2009 15:56:40 +0000 http://nikonrumors.com/?p=3371#comment-17955 Don't worry about it... I think you do a pretty good job overall. It IS a rumor site! Don’t worry about it… I think you do a pretty good job overall. It IS a rumor site!

]]> By: shayzorblade http://nikonrumors.com/2009/02/24/new-nikon-80-200mm-f28.aspx/comment-page-#comment-17954 shayzorblade Wed, 25 Feb 2009 15:55:30 +0000 http://nikonrumors.com/?p=3371#comment-17954 Agreed, quit your whining guys. Jeez, if there had been some truth to this, you all would look like idiots now wouldn't you. I see nothing wrong with posting ANY potential info, because it might turn out to be true. And hell, I just like the possibility of new nikon gear ;-) Agreed, quit your whining guys. Jeez, if there had been some truth to this, you all would look like idiots now wouldn’t you.

I see nothing wrong with posting ANY potential info, because it might turn out to be true.

And hell, I just like the possibility of new nikon gear ;-)

]]> By: [NR] admin http://nikonrumors.com/2009/02/24/new-nikon-80-200mm-f28.aspx/comment-page-#comment-17952 [NR] admin Wed, 25 Feb 2009 15:50:14 +0000 http://nikonrumors.com/?p=3371#comment-17952 I never said I know everything - different than many other people here. Is it really a requirement to have 20 years of Nikon expirience in order to run a rumor site - this is not the NHS - now do you know what that is? I never said I know everything – different than many other people here. Is it really a requirement to have 20 years of Nikon expirience in order to run a rumor site – this is not the NHS – now do you know what that is?

]]> By: [NR] admin http://nikonrumors.com/2009/02/24/new-nikon-80-200mm-f28.aspx/comment-page-1#comment-17949 [NR] admin Wed, 25 Feb 2009 15:37:37 +0000 http://nikonrumors.com/?p=3371#comment-17949 I didn't even make a mistake - I just reported what I saw on Nikon's webpage. I guess my mistake was that I did not know about the old and new version of this lens. I didn’t even make a mistake – I just reported what I saw on Nikon’s webpage. I guess my mistake was that I did not know about the old and new version of this lens.

]]> By: Will http://nikonrumors.com/2009/02/24/new-nikon-80-200mm-f28.aspx/comment-page-1#comment-17944 Will Wed, 25 Feb 2009 15:11:14 +0000 http://nikonrumors.com/?p=3371#comment-17944 New means not used New means not used

]]> By: Nikkoryan http://nikonrumors.com/2009/02/24/new-nikon-80-200mm-f28.aspx/comment-page-1#comment-17943 Nikkoryan Wed, 25 Feb 2009 15:10:45 +0000 http://nikonrumors.com/?p=3371#comment-17943 A new lens would not be D type. It would be a G type. A new lens would not be D type. It would be a G type.

]]> By: Marc W http://nikonrumors.com/2009/02/24/new-nikon-80-200mm-f28.aspx/comment-page-1#comment-17931 Marc W Wed, 25 Feb 2009 14:29:00 +0000 http://nikonrumors.com/?p=3371#comment-17931 I find it comical that people don't even read the previous comments and just say the same thing over and over. I understand that a lot of people are typing comments at the same time, but not everyone did. I find it comical that people don’t even read the previous comments and just say the same thing over and over. I understand that a lot of people are typing comments at the same time, but not everyone did.

]]> By: Marc W http://nikonrumors.com/2009/02/24/new-nikon-80-200mm-f28.aspx/comment-page-1#comment-17930 Marc W Wed, 25 Feb 2009 14:26:46 +0000 http://nikonrumors.com/?p=3371#comment-17930 i thought it was suppose to read "18-400mm 2.8 AF-S" i thought it was suppose to read “18-400mm 2.8 AF-S”

]]> By: Marc W http://nikonrumors.com/2009/02/24/new-nikon-80-200mm-f28.aspx/comment-page-1#comment-17929 Marc W Wed, 25 Feb 2009 14:24:59 +0000 http://nikonrumors.com/?p=3371#comment-17929 Could you get busted for having one? Could you get busted for having one?

]]> By: Anonymous http://nikonrumors.com/2009/02/24/new-nikon-80-200mm-f28.aspx/comment-page-1#comment-17922 Anonymous Wed, 25 Feb 2009 13:53:35 +0000 http://nikonrumors.com/?p=3371#comment-17922 f/56???? f/56????

]]> By: Fried Toast http://nikonrumors.com/2009/02/24/new-nikon-80-200mm-f28.aspx/comment-page-1#comment-17909 Fried Toast Wed, 25 Feb 2009 11:21:55 +0000 http://nikonrumors.com/?p=3371#comment-17909 I received the same email (living here in Japan) and had caught that, too. However, I didn't think much of it as the email was regarding the older D versions and their subsequent price increases. Agree w/ the others it's only a differentiation of an updated version of the AF-S lens (I've got a two-ring and it's fantastic- would really like the AF-S version, tho'). I received the same email (living here in Japan) and had caught that, too. However, I didn’t think much of it as the email was regarding the older D versions and their subsequent price increases. Agree w/ the others it’s only a differentiation of an updated version of the AF-S lens (I’ve got a two-ring and it’s fantastic- would really like the AF-S version, tho’).

]]> By: Vyper http://nikonrumors.com/2009/02/24/new-nikon-80-200mm-f28.aspx/comment-page-1#comment-17908 Vyper Wed, 25 Feb 2009 10:06:32 +0000 http://nikonrumors.com/?p=3371#comment-17908 Here is the "old version: http://translate.google.ca/translate?hl=en&sl=ja&u=http://www.nikon-image.com/jpn/products/lens/af/zoom/telephoto/ai_af-s_ed_80-200mmf28d_if.htm&ei=2RelScqeAYGStQPot-SpAg&sa=X&oi=translate&resnum=1&ct=result&prev=/search%3Fq%3Dhttp://www.nikon-image.com/jpn/products/lens/af/zoom/telephoto/ai_af-s_ed_80-200mmf28d_if.htm%26hl%3Den%26safe%3Doff%26rlz%3D1C1GGLS_enCA291CA303%26sa%3DG and here is the "new version http://translate.google.ca/translate?hl=en&sl=ja&u=http://www.nikon-image.com/jpn/products/lens/af/zoom/telephoto/ai_af_ed_80-200mmf28d.htm&ei=8xelSZeYBYmQtQPGu7WgAg&sa=X&oi=translate&resnum=1&ct=result&prev=/search%3Fq%3Dhttp://www.nikon-image.com/jpn/products/lens/af/zoom/telephoto/ai_af_ed_80-200mmf28d.htm%26hl%3Den%26safe%3Doff%26rlz%3D1C1GGLS_enCA291CA303%26sa%3DG Here is the “old version:
http://translate.google.ca/translate?hl=en&sl=ja&u=http://www.nikon-image.com/jpn/products/lens/af/zoom/telephoto/ai_af-s_ed_80-200mmf28d_if.htm&ei=2RelScqeAYGStQPot-SpAg&sa=X&oi=translate&resnum=1&ct=result&prev=/search%3Fq%3Dhttp://www.nikon-image.com/jpn/products/lens/af/zoom/telephoto/ai_af-s_ed_80-200mmf28d_if.htm%26hl%3Den%26safe%3Doff%26rlz%3D1C1GGLS_enCA291CA303%26sa%3DG

and here is the “new version
http://translate.google.ca/translate?hl=en&sl=ja&u=http://www.nikon-image.com/jpn/products/lens/af/zoom/telephoto/ai_af_ed_80-200mmf28d.htm&ei=8xelSZeYBYmQtQPGu7WgAg&sa=X&oi=translate&resnum=1&ct=result&prev=/search%3Fq%3Dhttp://www.nikon-image.com/jpn/products/lens/af/zoom/telephoto/ai_af_ed_80-200mmf28d.htm%26hl%3Den%26safe%3Doff%26rlz%3D1C1GGLS_enCA291CA303%26sa%3DG

]]> By: Vyper http://nikonrumors.com/2009/02/24/new-nikon-80-200mm-f28.aspx/comment-page-1#comment-17907 Vyper Wed, 25 Feb 2009 10:03:29 +0000 http://nikonrumors.com/?p=3371#comment-17907 The reason for the new designation is the fact that the website in question has information still on the previous generation 80-200mm f2.8 lens. The reason for the new designation is the fact that the website in question has information still on the previous generation 80-200mm f2.8 lens.

]]>