Nikon AF-S Nikkor 500mm f/4G ED VR lens discontinued?

Update: B&H contacted NR and reported that this was a programing error. The lens is not discontinued.

According to B&H - yes:

nikon 500mm lens discontinued Nikon AF S Nikkor 500mm f/4G ED VR lens discontinued?

Related posts:

  1. Nikon AF DC Nikkor 135mm f/2.0D lens discontinued
  2. Nikon AF-S 24-120mm f/3.5-5.6 lens discontinued
  3. Nikkor 17-35mm officially discontinued
  4. Rumor: new Nikkor AF-S 105mm f/2 VRII Nano lens in 2011?
  5. Nikon AF-S DX 18-135mm to be discontinued
This entry was posted in Nikon Lenses. Bookmark the permalink. Both comments and trackbacks are currently closed.

15 Comments

  1. Jack
    Posted February 18, 2009 at 9:16 pm | Permalink

    I doubt that’s accurate. That lens just came out a little while ago.

  2. Posted February 18, 2009 at 9:25 pm | Permalink

    B&H has been really screwy lately. I’m not sure if you guys caught this, but it was down for about an Hour today, and no pictures were showing for a rather long time.

  3. johnny
    Posted February 18, 2009 at 9:28 pm | Permalink

    B&H posting inaccurate availability data. Now that’s something I’ve never heard of :)

  4. steve
    Posted February 18, 2009 at 9:33 pm | Permalink

    Still shows up on Nikon’s site

  5. blake
    Posted February 18, 2009 at 10:05 pm | Permalink

    B&H is wrong, these Long super prime lenses’ release schedule generally line up with an olympic game.

  6. niknik
    Posted February 18, 2009 at 10:56 pm | Permalink

    $8999.99 at calumet, got mine there for $7700.00 during christmas

  7. Jeff
    Posted February 19, 2009 at 12:55 am | Permalink

    $8199.95 at Adorama (USA)
    The only reason they would discontinue would be to upgrade it and that’s doubtful so soon. It’s very popular.

  8. niknik
    Posted February 19, 2009 at 2:11 am | Permalink

    or after march1st. price increas

  9. Steve
    Posted February 19, 2009 at 2:53 am | Permalink

    It is still available on Amazon for $7,899.95: http://www.amazon.com/dp/B00009XV9L/?tag=nikon09-20

  10. jmh
    Posted February 19, 2009 at 6:43 am | Permalink

    B&H must have a new guy doing web site maintenance…..

    More likely it’s “Back-ordered” like the ‘Import’ version. Makes no sense to have the US model alone discontinued – and as noted above – NikonUSA still lists on its web site. Given the relative newness of this lens and unmet demand, I rather doubt it’s been discontinued.

  11. acb
    Posted February 19, 2009 at 6:52 am | Permalink

    may be possible that they’re cutting costs and keeping only the 400 f2.8 and 600 f4 leaving out the middle ground. I’m assuming none of these lenses are easy or cheap to produce especially in an economy where cutting costs is pretty much mandatory to stay afloat.

  12. ace
    Posted February 19, 2009 at 10:40 am | Permalink

    B&H sold Nikon and Canon product below cost last holiday season (BOTH MANUFACTURES DID NOT LIKE IT)now it is payback time,They can not get the lens from Nikon and the call it discontinued ,

  13. Posted February 19, 2009 at 11:17 am | Permalink

    Sorry. This was a programmer’s typo and it’s being corrected. The Nikon 500mm f/4G AF-S ED VR lens is NOT, as far as we know, discontinued.


    Henry Posner
    B&H Photo-Video

    • Posted February 19, 2009 at 8:28 pm | Permalink

      Thanks for clarifying Henry!. So, what are the new models from Nikon for this year? :)
      I will update the post.

  14. Zoetmb
    Posted February 19, 2009 at 9:56 pm | Permalink

    >>>B&H sold Nikon and Canon product below cost last holiday season (BOTH MANUFACTURES DID NOT LIKE IT)now it is payback time,They can not get the lens from Nikon and the call it discontinued ,

    That’s B.S. With sales overall lousy and Circuit City out of the picture (not that Circuit City sold the expensive lenses) and other chains about to go under, Nikon and Canon need stores like B&H more than ever. The fact is that B&H selling at any price does not hurt Nikon since they still pay the same wholesale price. Besides, if Nikon wants to, they can now legally enforce both minimum advertised price and even minimum selling price (Supreme Court ruled as such last year, although Nikon hasn’t enforced it yet.)

    The reality is that Nikon cannot make enough of this lens and they’re probably pushing the lenses in markets where the currencies are strong against the Yen.