<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Nikon D400 again</title>
	<atom:link href="http://nikonrumors.com/2009/02/03/nikon-d400-again.aspx/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/02/03/nikon-d400-again.aspx</link>
	<description>where there’s smoke there’s fire</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 17:22:21 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Stereohans</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/02/03/nikon-d400-again.aspx/comment-page-1#comment-15746</link>
		<dc:creator>Stereohans</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 20:59:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=2853#comment-15746</guid>
		<description>Faked nonsense, amateur made. But there WILL be a real D400 to be introduced in a few weeks. Presumably an upgraded D300 with a marginally modified body, better high ISO abilities (6400 part of the normal ISO range as it is in D700) and improved image quality. But it will be for sure a DX camera and I have serious doubts if we see a body in D700 size with this marvellous 24 mpix sensor before autumn. They would cannibalize D3X sales introducing a D800 just one month after D3X.
More interesting for me are new lenses similar to that stunning AFS 50/1,4. I got mine last week (fine piece of glass!) and hope now that we&#039;ll soon can wait for AF-S 1,8/35, AF-S 1,4/85, 2,0/135...

Greetz, Hans</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Faked nonsense, amateur made. But there WILL be a real D400 to be introduced in a few weeks. Presumably an upgraded D300 with a marginally modified body, better high ISO abilities (6400 part of the normal ISO range as it is in D700) and improved image quality. But it will be for sure a DX camera and I have serious doubts if we see a body in D700 size with this marvellous 24 mpix sensor before autumn. They would cannibalize D3X sales introducing a D800 just one month after D3X.<br />
More interesting for me are new lenses similar to that stunning AFS 50/1,4. I got mine last week (fine piece of glass!) and hope now that we&#8217;ll soon can wait for AF-S 1,8/35, AF-S 1,4/85, 2,0/135&#8230;</p>
<p>Greetz, Hans</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kalle olsson</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/02/03/nikon-d400-again.aspx/comment-page-1#comment-15737</link>
		<dc:creator>kalle olsson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 18:25:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=2853#comment-15737</guid>
		<description>Rear side from a D300, eyepiece fake, and front from a D700</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rear side from a D300, eyepiece fake, and front from a D700</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ron</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/02/03/nikon-d400-again.aspx/comment-page-1#comment-15731</link>
		<dc:creator>Ron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 16:47:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=2853#comment-15731</guid>
		<description>Not only is it fake, it is amazing to me how people doing these obviously staged &quot;spy&quot; shots can&#039;t seem to get a still object in focus...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not only is it fake, it is amazing to me how people doing these obviously staged &#8220;spy&#8221; shots can&#8217;t seem to get a still object in focus&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Photodog</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/02/03/nikon-d400-again.aspx/comment-page-1#comment-15720</link>
		<dc:creator>Photodog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 14:55:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=2853#comment-15720</guid>
		<description>I want THAT camera, now.  (I might be able to afford it, as well).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I want THAT camera, now.  (I might be able to afford it, as well).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DNHJR</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/02/03/nikon-d400-again.aspx/comment-page-1#comment-15709</link>
		<dc:creator>DNHJR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 12:56:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=2853#comment-15709</guid>
		<description>it&#039;s a D300.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>it&#8217;s a D300.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bruno</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/02/03/nikon-d400-again.aspx/comment-page-1#comment-15698</link>
		<dc:creator>Bruno</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 11:17:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=2853#comment-15698</guid>
		<description>i don&#039;t get it.
guys PS a entire camera using a lot of parts, perspectives and stuff, but they always screw up on the Dxxx badge. is it that hard to make?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i don&#8217;t get it.<br />
guys PS a entire camera using a lot of parts, perspectives and stuff, but they always screw up on the Dxxx badge. is it that hard to make?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Magnus</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/02/03/nikon-d400-again.aspx/comment-page-1#comment-15696</link>
		<dc:creator>Magnus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 10:27:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=2853#comment-15696</guid>
		<description>Actually, I´m quite impressed by the PS work. Some parts look very much like a D700 but others look a lot different. 
By the way, is that Pac-Man next to the switch at the bottom right of the LCD? Awesome feature. I bet you can´t beat that Canon!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, I´m quite impressed by the PS work. Some parts look very much like a D700 but others look a lot different.<br />
By the way, is that Pac-Man next to the switch at the bottom right of the LCD? Awesome feature. I bet you can´t beat that Canon!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nikkorian</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/02/03/nikon-d400-again.aspx/comment-page-1#comment-15694</link>
		<dc:creator>Nikkorian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 09:46:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=2853#comment-15694</guid>
		<description>I like the PS job :-)

By the way, here&#039;s a real spyshot: 

http://www.fotocommunity.de/pc/pc/pcat/258291/display/7619176</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like the PS job <img src='http://nikonrumors.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>By the way, here&#8217;s a real spyshot: </p>
<p><a href="http://www.fotocommunity.de/pc/pc/pcat/258291/display/7619176" rel="nofollow">http://www.fotocommunity.de/pc/pc/pcat/258291/display/7619176</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: burak</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/02/03/nikon-d400-again.aspx/comment-page-1#comment-15687</link>
		<dc:creator>burak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 08:14:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=2853#comment-15687</guid>
		<description>too ugly to be a D400</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>too ugly to be a D400</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/02/03/nikon-d400-again.aspx/comment-page-1#comment-15683</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 08:07:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=2853#comment-15683</guid>
		<description>Well, if you add a D300 and a D700 and divide by two, I suppose you&#039;d call it a D500

:)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, if you add a D300 and a D700 and divide by two, I suppose you&#8217;d call it a D500</p>
<p> <img src='http://nikonrumors.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: D</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/02/03/nikon-d400-again.aspx/comment-page-1#comment-15681</link>
		<dc:creator>D</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 07:25:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=2853#comment-15681</guid>
		<description>No &quot;FX&quot; square in the first image. Bad !</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No &#8220;FX&#8221; square in the first image. Bad !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kalvinhui</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/02/03/nikon-d400-again.aspx/comment-page-1#comment-15678</link>
		<dc:creator>kalvinhui</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 05:20:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=2853#comment-15678</guid>
		<description>the pop up flash was totally off from the front view and rear view! didnt u see tht?
FAKE FAKE FAKE.....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the pop up flash was totally off from the front view and rear view! didnt u see tht?<br />
FAKE FAKE FAKE&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Johnny Cash</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/02/03/nikon-d400-again.aspx/comment-page-1#comment-15675</link>
		<dc:creator>Johnny Cash</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 05:01:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=2853#comment-15675</guid>
		<description>Definitely a fake. Obviously a terrible photoshop job on first glance.  There are a number of issues with it.  Amateur job.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Definitely a fake. Obviously a terrible photoshop job on first glance.  There are a number of issues with it.  Amateur job.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nikon Fan</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/02/03/nikon-d400-again.aspx/comment-page-1#comment-15663</link>
		<dc:creator>Nikon Fan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 04:01:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=2853#comment-15663</guid>
		<description>I am sure that there will be tons of speculation on a D400 or whatever and if it will be a DX or FX body.  This too will create tons of speculation.

Will this be the end of Semi Pro / Pro Summer DX bodies or will they live on for one (1) more model.  Anyones guess is better than mine.

Let the fun begin!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am sure that there will be tons of speculation on a D400 or whatever and if it will be a DX or FX body.  This too will create tons of speculation.</p>
<p>Will this be the end of Semi Pro / Pro Summer DX bodies or will they live on for one (1) more model.  Anyones guess is better than mine.</p>
<p>Let the fun begin!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Will</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/02/03/nikon-d400-again.aspx/comment-page-1#comment-15661</link>
		<dc:creator>Will</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 03:50:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=2853#comment-15661</guid>
		<description>Look at the 4 in D400, it looks SOOOOOO pasted in there.

Fake</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Look at the 4 in D400, it looks SOOOOOO pasted in there.</p>
<p>Fake</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pretty boi</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/02/03/nikon-d400-again.aspx/comment-page-1#comment-15660</link>
		<dc:creator>pretty boi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 03:22:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=2853#comment-15660</guid>
		<description>fake...very obvious. look at the messy gap line above nikon logo in front...lousy job</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>fake&#8230;very obvious. look at the messy gap line above nikon logo in front&#8230;lousy job</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bo</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/02/03/nikon-d400-again.aspx/comment-page-1#comment-15659</link>
		<dc:creator>bo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 03:11:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=2853#comment-15659</guid>
		<description>viewfinder from d2x series...fake</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>viewfinder from d2x series&#8230;fake</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pablov</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/02/03/nikon-d400-again.aspx/comment-page-1#comment-15658</link>
		<dc:creator>Pablov</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 02:39:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=2853#comment-15658</guid>
		<description>I wonder who are wasting his/her time to make fakes pictures ? just to get attention from people ? Sad, indeed.

Fake to me too, the D400 looks horrible.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder who are wasting his/her time to make fakes pictures ? just to get attention from people ? Sad, indeed.</p>
<p>Fake to me too, the D400 looks horrible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Caprea</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/02/03/nikon-d400-again.aspx/comment-page-1#comment-15657</link>
		<dc:creator>Caprea</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 02:26:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=2853#comment-15657</guid>
		<description>Well, I don&#039;t think it&#039;s real. Butchery photoshopping.

And I sure hope that Nikon put the OK button in the center of the multi selector, on all models from now on. That OK button on left side is just so stupid.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s real. Butchery photoshopping.</p>
<p>And I sure hope that Nikon put the OK button in the center of the multi selector, on all models from now on. That OK button on left side is just so stupid.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DanielCtw</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/02/03/nikon-d400-again.aspx/comment-page-1#comment-15655</link>
		<dc:creator>DanielCtw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 02:12:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=2853#comment-15655</guid>
		<description>Definitely a fake. I see a combination of a D700 and a D300. That&#039;s all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Definitely a fake. I see a combination of a D700 and a D300. That&#8217;s all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
