<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Nikon D400 and online privacy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://nikonrumors.com/2009/02/02/nikon-d400-and-online-privacy.aspx/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/02/02/nikon-d400-and-online-privacy.aspx/</link>
	<description>where there’s smoke there’s fire</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 23:25:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Lucas</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/02/02/nikon-d400-and-online-privacy.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-15630</link>
		<dc:creator>Lucas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 23:22:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=2827#comment-15630</guid>
		<description>This picture is real?
http://blogs.yahoo.co.jp/hide244/23096086.htm</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This picture is real?<br />
<a href="http://blogs.yahoo.co.jp/hide244/23096086.htm" rel="nofollow">http://blogs.yahoo.co.jp/hide244/23096086.htm</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thank you</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/02/02/nikon-d400-and-online-privacy.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-15610</link>
		<dc:creator>Thank you</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 19:37:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=2827#comment-15610</guid>
		<description>LOLings</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LOLings</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/02/02/nikon-d400-and-online-privacy.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-15600</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 18:52:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=2827#comment-15600</guid>
		<description>So, you were complaining about the people complaining about the complainers of which I am one of the complainers?  Whoa, I just blew my mind. :-P</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, you were complaining about the people complaining about the complainers of which I am one of the complainers?  Whoa, I just blew my mind. <img src='http://nikonrumors.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_razz.gif' alt=':-P' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thank you</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/02/02/nikon-d400-and-online-privacy.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-15594</link>
		<dc:creator>Thank you</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 17:59:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=2827#comment-15594</guid>
		<description>I like the postings. I like website. I come here everyday. I was not complaining about website. I was commentering on Jacks post about complainting. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like the postings. I like website. I come here everyday. I was not complaining about website. I was commentering on Jacks post about complainting. <img src='http://nikonrumors.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: [NR] admin</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/02/02/nikon-d400-and-online-privacy.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-15588</link>
		<dc:creator>[NR] admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 16:51:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=2827#comment-15588</guid>
		<description>I will continue posting -trust me. As I mentioned already - it is the same persons complaining all the time under different names.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I will continue posting -trust me. As I mentioned already &#8211; it is the same persons complaining all the time under different names.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/02/02/nikon-d400-and-online-privacy.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-15587</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 16:44:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=2827#comment-15587</guid>
		<description>Oh, I&#039;m not complaining -as I said it&#039;s entertaining. But yes, I am pathetic too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, I&#8217;m not complaining -as I said it&#8217;s entertaining. But yes, I am pathetic too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thank you</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/02/02/nikon-d400-and-online-privacy.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-15581</link>
		<dc:creator>Thank you</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 15:04:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=2827#comment-15581</guid>
		<description>It be almost as bad as complaining about it, no? lolers!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It be almost as bad as complaining about it, no? lolers!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thank you</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/02/02/nikon-d400-and-online-privacy.aspx/comment-page-/#comment-15580</link>
		<dc:creator>Thank you</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 15:03:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=2827#comment-15580</guid>
		<description>waist? I no understand you. anywhos. I like the d300. it makes good.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>waist? I no understand you. anywhos. I like the d300. it makes good.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nikkoryan</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/02/02/nikon-d400-and-online-privacy.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-15574</link>
		<dc:creator>Nikkoryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 14:27:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=2827#comment-15574</guid>
		<description>Crap, I don&#039;t think I can afford that. Back to pinholes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Crap, I don&#8217;t think I can afford that. Back to pinholes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fried Toast</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/02/02/nikon-d400-and-online-privacy.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-15561</link>
		<dc:creator>Fried Toast</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 12:17:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=2827#comment-15561</guid>
		<description>Due to the current economic situation, the Nikon D400 will be a 3mp P&amp;S. 

Nikon: Reinventing the Digital Camera Market.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Due to the current economic situation, the Nikon D400 will be a 3mp P&amp;S. </p>
<p>Nikon: Reinventing the Digital Camera Market.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fried Toast</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/02/02/nikon-d400-and-online-privacy.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-15560</link>
		<dc:creator>Fried Toast</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 12:15:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=2827#comment-15560</guid>
		<description>Modified BS?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Modified BS?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fried Toast</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/02/02/nikon-d400-and-online-privacy.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-15559</link>
		<dc:creator>Fried Toast</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 12:12:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=2827#comment-15559</guid>
		<description>It hasn&#039;t been 2 years. Unless you count 2 months&#039; worth of times as a year.

D300 was released at the end of Nov. 2007. That gives you:
1 month in 2007
12 months in 2008
1 month in 2009

Refresh me on the *almost 2 years* part again. Maybe my English isn&#039;t good enough to understand what &quot;almost&quot; really means.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It hasn&#8217;t been 2 years. Unless you count 2 months&#8217; worth of times as a year.</p>
<p>D300 was released at the end of Nov. 2007. That gives you:<br />
1 month in 2007<br />
12 months in 2008<br />
1 month in 2009</p>
<p>Refresh me on the *almost 2 years* part again. Maybe my English isn&#8217;t good enough to understand what &#8220;almost&#8221; really means.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/02/02/nikon-d400-and-online-privacy.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-15556</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 11:41:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=2827#comment-15556</guid>
		<description>Not only is 7.1mm way out for a dSLR, it&#039;s way in for a P&amp;S - I&#039;ve seen a few that mention precisely this number on the lens somewhere, for example my pocket Fuji</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not only is 7.1mm way out for a dSLR, it&#8217;s way in for a P&amp;S &#8211; I&#8217;ve seen a few that mention precisely this number on the lens somewhere, for example my pocket Fuji</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rhlpetrus</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/02/02/nikon-d400-and-online-privacy.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-15554</link>
		<dc:creator>rhlpetrus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 11:13:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=2827#comment-15554</guid>
		<description>Same opinion here, 7.1mm is out for a dslr, even APS-C.

But a D400 is certainly in the works and likely ready to ship, not sure if Nikon will do it now or wait for the 2year cycle to be completed. 

My guess: it&#039;s coming this semester, together with a new entry-level 12MP camera. D700x (D700 body with D3x&#039;s sensor) later in the year.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Same opinion here, 7.1mm is out for a dslr, even APS-C.</p>
<p>But a D400 is certainly in the works and likely ready to ship, not sure if Nikon will do it now or wait for the 2year cycle to be completed. </p>
<p>My guess: it&#8217;s coming this semester, together with a new entry-level 12MP camera. D700x (D700 body with D3x&#8217;s sensor) later in the year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Jim</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/02/02/nikon-d400-and-online-privacy.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-15547</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 10:15:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=2827#comment-15547</guid>
		<description>CS2 can work wonderfully on any yet unreleased camera until they shoot in JPEG. ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CS2 can work wonderfully on any yet unreleased camera until they shoot in JPEG. <img src='http://nikonrumors.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lars</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/02/02/nikon-d400-and-online-privacy.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-15545</link>
		<dc:creator>Lars</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 09:41:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=2827#comment-15545</guid>
		<description>Focal plane DPI close to 6,000, focal length of 7.1 mm. Sounds like a 3 MPx compact to me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Focal plane DPI close to 6,000, focal length of 7.1 mm. Sounds like a 3 MPx compact to me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daf</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/02/02/nikon-d400-and-online-privacy.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-15543</link>
		<dc:creator>Daf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 09:27:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=2827#comment-15543</guid>
		<description>Have you tried to contact the owner ? (Kushik guy)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have you tried to contact the owner ? (Kushik guy)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/02/02/nikon-d400-and-online-privacy.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-15538</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 08:26:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=2827#comment-15538</guid>
		<description>How do you get a 7.1 mm focal length?

PS modified for BS?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How do you get a 7.1 mm focal length?</p>
<p>PS modified for BS?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Orik13</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/02/02/nikon-d400-and-online-privacy.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-15536</link>
		<dc:creator>Orik13</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 07:05:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=2827#comment-15536</guid>
		<description>Looks like a fake. Or EXIF reading error.
Just look at &quot;taken on&quot; date. It can vary from 2004 to 2008. I don&#039;t think Nikon tests D400 since 2004!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks like a fake. Or EXIF reading error.<br />
Just look at &#8220;taken on&#8221; date. It can vary from 2004 to 2008. I don&#8217;t think Nikon tests D400 since 2004!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/02/02/nikon-d400-and-online-privacy.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-15530</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 05:22:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=2827#comment-15530</guid>
		<description>I find it so funny that people post comments complaining that a post on a rumor site was not legitimate. How dare Nikon Rumors post this! Blah blah. Give me a break. It&#039;s like these people don&#039;t realize how pathetic they are.  Don&#039;t get me started on the Canon/Nikon/Sony fanboys who blasted each other on which system is far superior.

Don&#039;t get me wrong, it is entertaining, but pathetic nonetheless.

I say keep these rumors and posts going, Admin.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I find it so funny that people post comments complaining that a post on a rumor site was not legitimate. How dare Nikon Rumors post this! Blah blah. Give me a break. It&#8217;s like these people don&#8217;t realize how pathetic they are.  Don&#8217;t get me started on the Canon/Nikon/Sony fanboys who blasted each other on which system is far superior.</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t get me wrong, it is entertaining, but pathetic nonetheless.</p>
<p>I say keep these rumors and posts going, Admin.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

