<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Nikon D90s and Nikon D65</title>
	<atom:link href="http://nikonrumors.com/2009/01/06/nikon-d90s-and-nikon-d65.aspx/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/01/06/nikon-d90s-and-nikon-d65.aspx/</link>
	<description>where there’s smoke there’s fire</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 00:25:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: JC</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/01/06/nikon-d90s-and-nikon-d65.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-14064</link>
		<dc:creator>JC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 11:43:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=2421#comment-14064</guid>
		<description>Yeah, you talk a lot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, you talk a lot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: F-mount size</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/01/06/nikon-d90s-and-nikon-d65.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-14057</link>
		<dc:creator>F-mount size</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 05:50:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=2421#comment-14057</guid>
		<description>Film and Digital sensor are two different thing, needless to say the digital sensor&#039;s much higher density.  It&#039;s obvious when you see their latest high-end zooms, the size of the lens get&#039;s bigger and bigger.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Film and Digital sensor are two different thing, needless to say the digital sensor&#8217;s much higher density.  It&#8217;s obvious when you see their latest high-end zooms, the size of the lens get&#8217;s bigger and bigger.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Later Than Sooner</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/01/06/nikon-d90s-and-nikon-d65.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-14003</link>
		<dc:creator>Later Than Sooner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 16:07:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=2421#comment-14003</guid>
		<description>Yes, yes i did. The same type of BLEEPING trolls that hang out at sites like DPreview et al.

Just annoying and pointless to argue with.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, yes i did. The same type of BLEEPING trolls that hang out at sites like DPreview et al.</p>
<p>Just annoying and pointless to argue with.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ChrisL</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/01/06/nikon-d90s-and-nikon-d65.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-13989</link>
		<dc:creator>ChrisL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 14:09:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=2421#comment-13989</guid>
		<description>I think elementary arithmetic should be within the grasp of most people. Its merely a case of computing the sensor cell size for, say, a D3, a D300, and then a D40. Notice anything?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think elementary arithmetic should be within the grasp of most people. Its merely a case of computing the sensor cell size for, say, a D3, a D300, and then a D40. Notice anything?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/01/06/nikon-d90s-and-nikon-d65.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-13987</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 13:53:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=2421#comment-13987</guid>
		<description>This happens all too often.  I work with children at church, they are not as childish as many adults here can get at times.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This happens all too often.  I work with children at church, they are not as childish as many adults here can get at times.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sooner than later</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/01/06/nikon-d90s-and-nikon-d65.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-13986</link>
		<dc:creator>Sooner than later</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 13:24:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=2421#comment-13986</guid>
		<description>What&#039;s an SRL?  Is this a new camera design?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What&#8217;s an SRL?  Is this a new camera design?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sooner than later</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/01/06/nikon-d90s-and-nikon-d65.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-13985</link>
		<dc:creator>Sooner than later</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 13:21:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=2421#comment-13985</guid>
		<description>Don&#039;t know what a Saturn is?  Except for my classic Jag, I only buy German cars - why would anyone buy anything else?

Is it an American car?  Americans can&#039;t design or build cars that do anything but go in straight lines and do that so badly.  Have you ever tried turning a corner in an American car?  You are ludicrous.  I think UPS are delivery service but don&#039;t know of their depot near me - I do use TNT though and they are brilliant - never lost anything or had delays with them - not sure if you have them in US but they are good.

Are you jealous that I am successful and know what I am talking about?

&quot;So real man use abacuses and not calculators? haha you’re hysterical.&quot;  

YOU ARE MAKING MY ARGUMENT FOR ME NOW - A REAL MAN CAN USE BOTH! - AN IDIOT HAS TO USE THE CALCULATOR - THINK OF MY OWN CAR ANALOGY - KEEP UP, I KNOW YOU ARE STRUGGLING, I WILL GO SLOWER AND KEEP WRITING IN CAPITALS FOR YOU IF THAT HELPS.  

SERIOUSLY IF THAT IS THE BEST YOU CAN DEBATE, YOU SHOULD MAYBE STOP. EEK!

I DOUBT THERE ARE SEVERAL THOUSAND PHOTOGRAPHERS MORE ACCOMPLISHED THAN ME - THERE ARE SOME THAT I ADMIT ARE BETTER AND THAT I HAVE SO MUCH RESPECT FOR. INTERESTINGLY THOUGH THEY ARE ALL ARTISTS (PROPER ARTISTS, THAT IS!!) FIRST - THEY VERY OFTEN HAVE A BACKGROUND IN PAINTING BEFORE THEY EVER PICKED UP A CAMERA.

MOST PHOTOGRAPHERS HAVE MERELY MASTERED THE EASIEST ART OF ALL (AND IT IS THAT - THAT IS FACT, AGREE OR DISAGREE WITH ANY OF WHAT I SAY BUT PHOTOGRAPHY IS THE EASIEST OF THE ARTS TO MASTER) AND THE BLOOD HAS RUSHED TO THEIR HEAD AS A RESULT - THAT&#039;S ONE OF THE REASONS THEY HAVE ENDLESS DISCUSSIONS ON THEIR EQUIPMENT - RATHER LIKE THE POORLY ENDOWED MAN WHO HAS TO BUY A FERRARI TO COMPENSATE.

THERE IS A VERY FAMOUS QUOTE, ONE OF MY FAVORITES IN FACT... &quot;WHAT IS THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN TWO ARTISTS AND TWO PHOTOGRAPHERS?......... TWO ARTISTS CAN GET TOGETHER WITHOUT DISCUSSING BRUSHES.

SO IN SHORT, YES A TRUE ARTIST USES MANUAL AND THE IDIOT/AMATEUR DOES NOT OR CANNOT GET THEIR BRAIN TO UNDERSTAND THIS. OF COURSE THE TRUE ARTIST CAN - AND KNOWS HE CAN - SWITCH TO AUTOFOCUS ANYTIME BUT CHOOSES NOT TO, THUS MAKING HIMSELF EVEN MORE GREAT - LIKE ME AND MY FRIENDS.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t know what a Saturn is?  Except for my classic Jag, I only buy German cars &#8211; why would anyone buy anything else?</p>
<p>Is it an American car?  Americans can&#8217;t design or build cars that do anything but go in straight lines and do that so badly.  Have you ever tried turning a corner in an American car?  You are ludicrous.  I think UPS are delivery service but don&#8217;t know of their depot near me &#8211; I do use TNT though and they are brilliant &#8211; never lost anything or had delays with them &#8211; not sure if you have them in US but they are good.</p>
<p>Are you jealous that I am successful and know what I am talking about?</p>
<p>&#8220;So real man use abacuses and not calculators? haha you’re hysterical.&#8221;  </p>
<p>YOU ARE MAKING MY ARGUMENT FOR ME NOW &#8211; A REAL MAN CAN USE BOTH! &#8211; AN IDIOT HAS TO USE THE CALCULATOR &#8211; THINK OF MY OWN CAR ANALOGY &#8211; KEEP UP, I KNOW YOU ARE STRUGGLING, I WILL GO SLOWER AND KEEP WRITING IN CAPITALS FOR YOU IF THAT HELPS.  </p>
<p>SERIOUSLY IF THAT IS THE BEST YOU CAN DEBATE, YOU SHOULD MAYBE STOP. EEK!</p>
<p>I DOUBT THERE ARE SEVERAL THOUSAND PHOTOGRAPHERS MORE ACCOMPLISHED THAN ME &#8211; THERE ARE SOME THAT I ADMIT ARE BETTER AND THAT I HAVE SO MUCH RESPECT FOR. INTERESTINGLY THOUGH THEY ARE ALL ARTISTS (PROPER ARTISTS, THAT IS!!) FIRST &#8211; THEY VERY OFTEN HAVE A BACKGROUND IN PAINTING BEFORE THEY EVER PICKED UP A CAMERA.</p>
<p>MOST PHOTOGRAPHERS HAVE MERELY MASTERED THE EASIEST ART OF ALL (AND IT IS THAT &#8211; THAT IS FACT, AGREE OR DISAGREE WITH ANY OF WHAT I SAY BUT PHOTOGRAPHY IS THE EASIEST OF THE ARTS TO MASTER) AND THE BLOOD HAS RUSHED TO THEIR HEAD AS A RESULT &#8211; THAT&#8217;S ONE OF THE REASONS THEY HAVE ENDLESS DISCUSSIONS ON THEIR EQUIPMENT &#8211; RATHER LIKE THE POORLY ENDOWED MAN WHO HAS TO BUY A FERRARI TO COMPENSATE.</p>
<p>THERE IS A VERY FAMOUS QUOTE, ONE OF MY FAVORITES IN FACT&#8230; &#8220;WHAT IS THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN TWO ARTISTS AND TWO PHOTOGRAPHERS?&#8230;&#8230;&#8230; TWO ARTISTS CAN GET TOGETHER WITHOUT DISCUSSING BRUSHES.</p>
<p>SO IN SHORT, YES A TRUE ARTIST USES MANUAL AND THE IDIOT/AMATEUR DOES NOT OR CANNOT GET THEIR BRAIN TO UNDERSTAND THIS. OF COURSE THE TRUE ARTIST CAN &#8211; AND KNOWS HE CAN &#8211; SWITCH TO AUTOFOCUS ANYTIME BUT CHOOSES NOT TO, THUS MAKING HIMSELF EVEN MORE GREAT &#8211; LIKE ME AND MY FRIENDS.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paulo</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/01/06/nikon-d90s-and-nikon-d65.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-13984</link>
		<dc:creator>Paulo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 12:59:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=2421#comment-13984</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re right about AF on DSLRs though Sooner than Later is right about the DX v FX debate above.  No future for DX and lots of people now feel cheated that they invested in DX glass - the expensive stuff - and now take a hit on that.

Those that say it has a future are just fooling themselves - when was the last SERIOUS DX lens introduced?  Not cheapo kit lenses that they can throw together (and usually do) but quality optics?

Personally I wish I had stayed 35mm film until they introduced the D700 as I would have saved tens of thousands!

I know I feel a bit cheated and though I now love the big viewfinder again, I could have lived with DX, but feel they took everyone for a ride.  But hey, that&#039;s marketing isn&#039;t it and we do live in this throw away society which we will come to regret eventually.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re right about AF on DSLRs though Sooner than Later is right about the DX v FX debate above.  No future for DX and lots of people now feel cheated that they invested in DX glass &#8211; the expensive stuff &#8211; and now take a hit on that.</p>
<p>Those that say it has a future are just fooling themselves &#8211; when was the last SERIOUS DX lens introduced?  Not cheapo kit lenses that they can throw together (and usually do) but quality optics?</p>
<p>Personally I wish I had stayed 35mm film until they introduced the D700 as I would have saved tens of thousands!</p>
<p>I know I feel a bit cheated and though I now love the big viewfinder again, I could have lived with DX, but feel they took everyone for a ride.  But hey, that&#8217;s marketing isn&#8217;t it and we do live in this throw away society which we will come to regret eventually.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/01/06/nikon-d90s-and-nikon-d65.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-13977</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 08:46:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=2421#comment-13977</guid>
		<description>Nikon&#039;s F-mount is too tight for FX sensors? I bet that really cramped their style when they briefly experimented with 35mm film . . .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nikon&#8217;s F-mount is too tight for FX sensors? I bet that really cramped their style when they briefly experimented with 35mm film . . .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pablov</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/01/06/nikon-d90s-and-nikon-d65.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-13976</link>
		<dc:creator>Pablov</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 07:50:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=2421#comment-13976</guid>
		<description>Right, clips. Although a Movie is made by &quot;clips&quot; of just few seconds or minutes (sequences)

But nobody thinks about making Hollywood class movies with a D90 or 5D MK II, that is obvious, but maybe a short.

Besides the final production one can make with this kind of Movie/Video tools, I want to say something about AF &amp; MF in Video/Movie mode:

Manual AND Auto Focus has their OWN place and time.

Sometimes MF is necessary, other AF can do a better and faster job (also in still photography). It&#039;s that simple.

Manual Focusing on small 3&quot; or even 4&quot; LCD screen can NOT deliver perfect focusing because of the size of the image your are viewing. 
So far the image being recorded in Video mode in a DSLR is displayed only in the LCD screen.

THAT IS another reason why AF or &quot;Focusing Assistance&quot; is (could be) SO usefull and important in Video mode.

Focus tracking indicators on a subject or point will help a lot.

And of course there is the marketing reason, like channeljockey said, consumers also want AF on video, and they can have good reasons for that.

BUT AF in Video must NOT override or eliminate the Manual Focus because it would limitate the creative possibilities, making it just like a home-like camcorder, useless for Professional use.

Both modes has their own place and should be implemented.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Right, clips. Although a Movie is made by &#8220;clips&#8221; of just few seconds or minutes (sequences)</p>
<p>But nobody thinks about making Hollywood class movies with a D90 or 5D MK II, that is obvious, but maybe a short.</p>
<p>Besides the final production one can make with this kind of Movie/Video tools, I want to say something about AF &amp; MF in Video/Movie mode:</p>
<p>Manual AND Auto Focus has their OWN place and time.</p>
<p>Sometimes MF is necessary, other AF can do a better and faster job (also in still photography). It&#8217;s that simple.</p>
<p>Manual Focusing on small 3&#8243; or even 4&#8243; LCD screen can NOT deliver perfect focusing because of the size of the image your are viewing.<br />
So far the image being recorded in Video mode in a DSLR is displayed only in the LCD screen.</p>
<p>THAT IS another reason why AF or &#8220;Focusing Assistance&#8221; is (could be) SO usefull and important in Video mode.</p>
<p>Focus tracking indicators on a subject or point will help a lot.</p>
<p>And of course there is the marketing reason, like channeljockey said, consumers also want AF on video, and they can have good reasons for that.</p>
<p>BUT AF in Video must NOT override or eliminate the Manual Focus because it would limitate the creative possibilities, making it just like a home-like camcorder, useless for Professional use.</p>
<p>Both modes has their own place and should be implemented.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Astrophotographer</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/01/06/nikon-d90s-and-nikon-d65.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-13975</link>
		<dc:creator>Astrophotographer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 07:33:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=2421#comment-13975</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ll reply. Thermal noise is fairly constant unless you do long exposures. It adds up over time. The main causes are a lower signal to noise ratio at high ISO. A more important issue is when less light is captured (high ISO) the fewer photons per pixel. The pixels will have a greater random distribution. A larger pixel means more photons captured and lower  random distribution. 

In short, even if all thermal and read noise were eliminated the small sample of a small pixel means more noise.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll reply. Thermal noise is fairly constant unless you do long exposures. It adds up over time. The main causes are a lower signal to noise ratio at high ISO. A more important issue is when less light is captured (high ISO) the fewer photons per pixel. The pixels will have a greater random distribution. A larger pixel means more photons captured and lower  random distribution. </p>
<p>In short, even if all thermal and read noise were eliminated the small sample of a small pixel means more noise.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pablov</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/01/06/nikon-d90s-and-nikon-d65.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-13974</link>
		<dc:creator>Pablov</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 07:25:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=2421#comment-13974</guid>
		<description>this became like a kids discussion....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>this became like a kids discussion&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pablov</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/01/06/nikon-d90s-and-nikon-d65.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-13973</link>
		<dc:creator>Pablov</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 07:19:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=2421#comment-13973</guid>
		<description>you can sell &quot;EVERYTHING&quot; you have if you want, but it doesn&#039;t necessarily reflect the future of a specific line of design and production.

DX has a limitation, but it&#039;s not &quot;dying&quot;.
If it was dying Nikon wouldn&#039;t release any new DX camera.
And there is still space for DX new models between D300 and D700.

Maybe Nikon already defined that keeping place for a D400, D500, D600. No one can be Really sure if the D500 and D600 will be DX format, but I guess there is a good chance.

A company don&#039;t do business only with the high-end devices. INSTEAD they can produce the high-end thanks to selling mid and low-end products.

One VERY good thing is to watch the list of products the company has sold the most in the past years. They wouldn&#039;t drop something they are selling well.

Of course improvements and developments will change that path, but not drastically cutting the best selling lines because I would hurt their own business.

Olympus does not have the ammount of lenses you can still use with a DX Nikon camera (Full frame lenses in a DX DSLR are perfectly compatible besides the 1.5x factor, and in some cases it is a benefit)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>you can sell &#8220;EVERYTHING&#8221; you have if you want, but it doesn&#8217;t necessarily reflect the future of a specific line of design and production.</p>
<p>DX has a limitation, but it&#8217;s not &#8220;dying&#8221;.<br />
If it was dying Nikon wouldn&#8217;t release any new DX camera.<br />
And there is still space for DX new models between D300 and D700.</p>
<p>Maybe Nikon already defined that keeping place for a D400, D500, D600. No one can be Really sure if the D500 and D600 will be DX format, but I guess there is a good chance.</p>
<p>A company don&#8217;t do business only with the high-end devices. INSTEAD they can produce the high-end thanks to selling mid and low-end products.</p>
<p>One VERY good thing is to watch the list of products the company has sold the most in the past years. They wouldn&#8217;t drop something they are selling well.</p>
<p>Of course improvements and developments will change that path, but not drastically cutting the best selling lines because I would hurt their own business.</p>
<p>Olympus does not have the ammount of lenses you can still use with a DX Nikon camera (Full frame lenses in a DX DSLR are perfectly compatible besides the 1.5x factor, and in some cases it is a benefit)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FX to stay</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/01/06/nikon-d90s-and-nikon-d65.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-13969</link>
		<dc:creator>FX to stay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 03:04:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=2421#comment-13969</guid>
		<description>&lt;&gt;

Dumbest &quot;consensus&quot; bunch of crap--if you didn&#039;t know, there&#039;s a &quot;new&quot; Nikon camera, uh, actually, THREE FX sensor cameras--in case you&#039;ve been asleep for the past year plus, they are the D3, D3X and the D700.  Yeah, if you check around, I heard some kinda positive reviews.  Duh!!!!

DX is dying, and will be dead within 5 years, IMHO.  DX was and is marketing crap from the time when Nikon (and Sony and others) could not make a FX sensor (either affordably or at all) and could not compete with Canon head on--it was to sell a weakness as a sales asset.  If DX was so good, Olympus would rule the photo world with its 4/3 Standard--but that&#039;s not the case, is it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&lt;&gt;</p>
<p>Dumbest &#8220;consensus&#8221; bunch of crap&#8211;if you didn&#8217;t know, there&#8217;s a &#8220;new&#8221; Nikon camera, uh, actually, THREE FX sensor cameras&#8211;in case you&#8217;ve been asleep for the past year plus, they are the D3, D3X and the D700.  Yeah, if you check around, I heard some kinda positive reviews.  Duh!!!!</p>
<p>DX is dying, and will be dead within 5 years, IMHO.  DX was and is marketing crap from the time when Nikon (and Sony and others) could not make a FX sensor (either affordably or at all) and could not compete with Canon head on&#8211;it was to sell a weakness as a sales asset.  If DX was so good, Olympus would rule the photo world with its 4/3 Standard&#8211;but that&#8217;s not the case, is it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: channeljockey</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/01/06/nikon-d90s-and-nikon-d65.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-13963</link>
		<dc:creator>channeljockey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 01:43:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=2421#comment-13963</guid>
		<description>I think there&#039;s a terminology problem in this argument over AF. I don&#039;t think most people who buy a D90 for the movie mode, or the 5D MKII for the movie mode are actually going to make movies; I think they&#039;re going to make clips. Think kids&#039; birthday parties, reunions, picnics - events like that. Short 30s clips that will be strung together with software package X or Y, music added and the final masterpiece either burned to a DVD to give to grandma, or posted on &#039;Tube or flickr or what have you. Flickr, as an aside, only currently allows 90s clips so forget about posting movies.  Back to the point at hand: while professionals could probably make some awesome movies with these cameras, remember that the demos posted by the manufacturers are actually clips. not movies. Will they all go AF? If you&#039;re making clips and not movies, I think that&#039;s what consumers want. Consumers want things easier, not harder. AF is easier than MF just as an automatic transmission is easier than an stick-shift. 
Just my 2c (not $1.6M ;-) )</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think there&#8217;s a terminology problem in this argument over AF. I don&#8217;t think most people who buy a D90 for the movie mode, or the 5D MKII for the movie mode are actually going to make movies; I think they&#8217;re going to make clips. Think kids&#8217; birthday parties, reunions, picnics &#8211; events like that. Short 30s clips that will be strung together with software package X or Y, music added and the final masterpiece either burned to a DVD to give to grandma, or posted on &#8216;Tube or flickr or what have you. Flickr, as an aside, only currently allows 90s clips so forget about posting movies.  Back to the point at hand: while professionals could probably make some awesome movies with these cameras, remember that the demos posted by the manufacturers are actually clips. not movies. Will they all go AF? If you&#8217;re making clips and not movies, I think that&#8217;s what consumers want. Consumers want things easier, not harder. AF is easier than MF just as an automatic transmission is easier than an stick-shift.<br />
Just my 2c (not $1.6M <img src='http://nikonrumors.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' />  )</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shill</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/01/06/nikon-d90s-and-nikon-d65.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-13953</link>
		<dc:creator>Shill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 00:07:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=2421#comment-13953</guid>
		<description>Why do I get the feeling Sooner than Later is messing with you all... playing the role of a Sock Puppet while there are no rumors to divert us.  Looks like he (or she) went fishing and you all made straight for the hook!  Not taking the comments seriously - and I don&#039;t think they are supposed to be taken so - I think they are hilarious.  Made me laugh anyway - almost, dare I say it a parody on the great man himself - Ken Rockwell.

Later than Sooner - excellent. Think you may have realized what Sooner than Later was up to.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why do I get the feeling Sooner than Later is messing with you all&#8230; playing the role of a Sock Puppet while there are no rumors to divert us.  Looks like he (or she) went fishing and you all made straight for the hook!  Not taking the comments seriously &#8211; and I don&#8217;t think they are supposed to be taken so &#8211; I think they are hilarious.  Made me laugh anyway &#8211; almost, dare I say it a parody on the great man himself &#8211; Ken Rockwell.</p>
<p>Later than Sooner &#8211; excellent. Think you may have realized what Sooner than Later was up to.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: F-mount size</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/01/06/nikon-d90s-and-nikon-d65.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-13951</link>
		<dc:creator>F-mount size</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 22:31:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=2421#comment-13951</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve been working in Japan for 2 years, and I&#039;ve read and hard many discussion about whether FullSize sensor will be the next dSLR standard or not,  I visit several Japanese dSLR related news groups frequently and when it comes to this matter (after heated debate) comes to consensus agrement  &quot;FX sensor is too tight for Nikon&#039;s F-mount&quot;.  Also, the many says the Canon&#039;s mount has bit more capacity than Nikon&#039;s, but in order to accommodate both 1.ideal light passege and 2.larger optics(to match the current FFsensor resolution) eventually both mount need to be re-designed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been working in Japan for 2 years, and I&#8217;ve read and hard many discussion about whether FullSize sensor will be the next dSLR standard or not,  I visit several Japanese dSLR related news groups frequently and when it comes to this matter (after heated debate) comes to consensus agrement  &#8220;FX sensor is too tight for Nikon&#8217;s F-mount&#8221;.  Also, the many says the Canon&#8217;s mount has bit more capacity than Nikon&#8217;s, but in order to accommodate both 1.ideal light passege and 2.larger optics(to match the current FFsensor resolution) eventually both mount need to be re-designed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: neon</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/01/06/nikon-d90s-and-nikon-d65.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-13949</link>
		<dc:creator>neon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 18:07:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=2421#comment-13949</guid>
		<description>take a picture of him. I&#039;d love to send him a postcard.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>take a picture of him. I&#8217;d love to send him a postcard.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bang</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/01/06/nikon-d90s-and-nikon-d65.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-13947</link>
		<dc:creator>bang</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 17:55:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=2421#comment-13947</guid>
		<description>&gt;On other hand, if I am on the autobahn, &gt;especially on the no speed limit &gt;sections in Germany, I enjoy the silky &gt;smooth V8 power from my E63 &gt;complete with automatic transmisson.

you mean while you are commuting to your job at the UPS warehouse you appreciate your automatic saturn better? I can see that.

&gt;Real drivers use manual - others don’t.
So real man use abacuses and not calculators? haha you&#039;re hysterical.

&gt;Real artists use manual focus - and, &gt;well, others don’t.

So if you are not using MF you&#039;re not a real artist? I&#039;m sure there are several thousand photographers far more accomplished than you, who make a living shooting AF. Man you gotta start your tv show. you&#039;re goood.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt;On other hand, if I am on the autobahn, &gt;especially on the no speed limit &gt;sections in Germany, I enjoy the silky &gt;smooth V8 power from my E63 &gt;complete with automatic transmisson.</p>
<p>you mean while you are commuting to your job at the UPS warehouse you appreciate your automatic saturn better? I can see that.</p>
<p>&gt;Real drivers use manual &#8211; others don’t.<br />
So real man use abacuses and not calculators? haha you&#8217;re hysterical.</p>
<p>&gt;Real artists use manual focus &#8211; and, &gt;well, others don’t.</p>
<p>So if you are not using MF you&#8217;re not a real artist? I&#8217;m sure there are several thousand photographers far more accomplished than you, who make a living shooting AF. Man you gotta start your tv show. you&#8217;re goood.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Later Than Sooner</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2009/01/06/nikon-d90s-and-nikon-d65.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-13945</link>
		<dc:creator>Later Than Sooner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 17:54:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=2421#comment-13945</guid>
		<description>Sorry guys, Sooner Than Later go out of the lunitic home and back onto computers. I&#039;m sorry, I&#039;m here to take him back to his padded room where he can rant about how right and awesome he is where it won&#039;t annoy other people. Since clearly his opinions are indeed fact. *rolls eyes*

Cmon boy get the bone! good boy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry guys, Sooner Than Later go out of the lunitic home and back onto computers. I&#8217;m sorry, I&#8217;m here to take him back to his padded room where he can rant about how right and awesome he is where it won&#8217;t annoy other people. Since clearly his opinions are indeed fact. *rolls eyes*</p>
<p>Cmon boy get the bone! good boy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

