<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: December 1st it is</title>
	<atom:link href="http://nikonrumors.com/2008/11/20/december-1st-it-is.aspx/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2008/11/20/december-1st-it-is.aspx/</link>
	<description>where there’s smoke there’s fire</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 19:13:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Nikon D3x - what do we have so far &#124; Nikon Rumors</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2008/11/20/december-1st-it-is.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-10282</link>
		<dc:creator>Nikon D3x - what do we have so far &#124; Nikon Rumors</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 20:44:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=1532#comment-10282</guid>
		<description>[...] has scheduled several events world wide for December 1st (see here, here and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] has scheduled several events world wide for December 1st (see here, here and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rumor &#8211; Nikon D3x &#8211; Nikon D400 probably announced on 1 December 2008. &#124; Pixel Multiverse</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2008/11/20/december-1st-it-is.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-10043</link>
		<dc:creator>Rumor &#8211; Nikon D3x &#8211; Nikon D400 probably announced on 1 December 2008. &#124; Pixel Multiverse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 18:06:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=1532#comment-10043</guid>
		<description>[...] ERRATA : SOURCE : http://nikonrumors.com/2008/11/20/december-1st-it-is.aspx [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] ERRATA : SOURCE : <a href="http://nikonrumors.com/2008/11/20/december-1st-it-is.aspx" rel="nofollow">http://nikonrumors.com/2008/11/20/december-1st-it-is.aspx</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Douglas</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2008/11/20/december-1st-it-is.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-9982</link>
		<dc:creator>Douglas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 02:46:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=1532#comment-9982</guid>
		<description>i do agree with you that a D400 will still sell at the same price IF Nikon still purchases its sensor from an outside company (sony)... but if Nikon could produce their own sensor (rather than purchasing them at extra cost) and make a D300 callibur camera at the same cost as an EOS 50D, do you think they wouldn&#039;t do it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i do agree with you that a D400 will still sell at the same price IF Nikon still purchases its sensor from an outside company (sony)&#8230; but if Nikon could produce their own sensor (rather than purchasing them at extra cost) and make a D300 callibur camera at the same cost as an EOS 50D, do you think they wouldn&#8217;t do it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Douglas</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2008/11/20/december-1st-it-is.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-9964</link>
		<dc:creator>Douglas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 23:44:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=1532#comment-9964</guid>
		<description>quite frankly, i think it would really be advantagous for both companies involved. Kodak has taken alot of fire for their EasyShare build quality, design, and somewhat lack of user-friendlieness. and partnering the Kodak image quality with Coolpix design and functionality would give the new models an increadible boost, possibly in line with long favored PowerShot line-up.

and then we have the potential for serious advances in the Larger Format Sensor&#039;s. Kodak has been manufacturing Sensors for Hasiblad for some time now, and we have been seeing rumors of Nikon possibly moving into the Medium Format Digital range with MX format (or at least something a little &quot;big&quot;ger than the current FX Sensor).

and still going. Kodak and Lexar have had a long standing relationship, Throw Nikon into the mix of that? the possibilities truely become endless!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>quite frankly, i think it would really be advantagous for both companies involved. Kodak has taken alot of fire for their EasyShare build quality, design, and somewhat lack of user-friendlieness. and partnering the Kodak image quality with Coolpix design and functionality would give the new models an increadible boost, possibly in line with long favored PowerShot line-up.</p>
<p>and then we have the potential for serious advances in the Larger Format Sensor&#8217;s. Kodak has been manufacturing Sensors for Hasiblad for some time now, and we have been seeing rumors of Nikon possibly moving into the Medium Format Digital range with MX format (or at least something a little &#8220;big&#8221;ger than the current FX Sensor).</p>
<p>and still going. Kodak and Lexar have had a long standing relationship, Throw Nikon into the mix of that? the possibilities truely become endless!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2008/11/20/december-1st-it-is.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-9953</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 22:00:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=1532#comment-9953</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think that Nikon or Canon is ever going to implement really professional video features into any of their digital SLR&#039;s.... For Canon, that would just hurt themselves, because they already sell professional video cameras.... 

http://www.usa.canon.com/consumer/controller?act=ProductCatIndexAct&amp;fcategoryid=172

Wouldn&#039;t they be destroying that market a little bit if they started including those features in their SLRs?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think that Nikon or Canon is ever going to implement really professional video features into any of their digital SLR&#8217;s&#8230;. For Canon, that would just hurt themselves, because they already sell professional video cameras&#8230;. </p>
<p><a href="http://www.usa.canon.com/consumer/controller?act=ProductCatIndexAct&#038;fcategoryid=172" rel="nofollow">http://www.usa.canon.com/consumer/controller?act=ProductCatIndexAct&#038;fcategoryid=172</a></p>
<p>Wouldn&#8217;t they be destroying that market a little bit if they started including those features in their SLRs?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Douglas</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2008/11/20/december-1st-it-is.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-9951</link>
		<dc:creator>Douglas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 21:26:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=1532#comment-9951</guid>
		<description>its something that i think would be a very good move, but no, i havent heard any solid information along those lines. however, i HAVE heard a rumor with some credibility (will remain anonamous for professional reasons) that Sony is considering a buy out offer to Nikon... but i still dont think that will go anywhere personally...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>its something that i think would be a very good move, but no, i havent heard any solid information along those lines. however, i HAVE heard a rumor with some credibility (will remain anonamous for professional reasons) that Sony is considering a buy out offer to Nikon&#8230; but i still dont think that will go anywhere personally&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Excited Now!</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2008/11/20/december-1st-it-is.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-9918</link>
		<dc:creator>Excited Now!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 18:11:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=1532#comment-9918</guid>
		<description>QUICK EVERYONE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!, look what has been put up as an announcement and little slide/mini site on the French AND UK/Ireland Nikon Imaging websites.  Now who was expecting this triple wamy - eh???

Some of this is stratospherically groundbreaking stuff... sets Canon back to the Neolithic age at least eh!?!  Whoever would have imagined clean images at ISO 30000!!!  This is spectacular!  No word on price though... call to my investment bankers I think to shed some stock!

No wonder they didn&#039;t want to use the Sony sensor!  I am surprised the D3 is replaced so soon though - still they are firing those sensors into the D700 so will make returns there.

Must say, thought they would hang on to DX sensor for longer though in the D90/D300 area but they will now be the last products.  Glad I kept my quality lenses from the days of film.  Only low end DX&#039;s now and for how much longer???  Marketing eh?  Sell a product to people for years then, tell them they need better (full frame) and they need to buy all over again.  CASH COWS, they are great, if you own one.

Glad I avoided investing too much in DX and will dump it all tomorrow.

WHAT A STRING OF PRODUCTS THOUGH. AWESOME STUFF!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>QUICK EVERYONE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!, look what has been put up as an announcement and little slide/mini site on the French AND UK/Ireland Nikon Imaging websites.  Now who was expecting this triple wamy &#8211; eh???</p>
<p>Some of this is stratospherically groundbreaking stuff&#8230; sets Canon back to the Neolithic age at least eh!?!  Whoever would have imagined clean images at ISO 30000!!!  This is spectacular!  No word on price though&#8230; call to my investment bankers I think to shed some stock!</p>
<p>No wonder they didn&#8217;t want to use the Sony sensor!  I am surprised the D3 is replaced so soon though &#8211; still they are firing those sensors into the D700 so will make returns there.</p>
<p>Must say, thought they would hang on to DX sensor for longer though in the D90/D300 area but they will now be the last products.  Glad I kept my quality lenses from the days of film.  Only low end DX&#8217;s now and for how much longer???  Marketing eh?  Sell a product to people for years then, tell them they need better (full frame) and they need to buy all over again.  CASH COWS, they are great, if you own one.</p>
<p>Glad I avoided investing too much in DX and will dump it all tomorrow.</p>
<p>WHAT A STRING OF PRODUCTS THOUGH. AWESOME STUFF!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: [NR] admin</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2008/11/20/december-1st-it-is.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-9895</link>
		<dc:creator>[NR] admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 16:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=1532#comment-9895</guid>
		<description>Did we just started a new Rumor: Nikon is buying Kodak?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did we just started a new Rumor: Nikon is buying Kodak?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: [NR] admin</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2008/11/20/december-1st-it-is.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-9892</link>
		<dc:creator>[NR] admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 16:36:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=1532#comment-9892</guid>
		<description>Interesting or funny? Anyway, I created a post about it. Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting or funny? Anyway, I created a post about it. Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: New flash? &#124; Nikon Rumors</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2008/11/20/december-1st-it-is.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-9891</link>
		<dc:creator>New flash? &#124; Nikon Rumors</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 16:35:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=1532#comment-9891</guid>
		<description>[...] Australian web site that posted info about the Nikon event on December 1st, has an update in their what&#8217;s new [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Australian web site that posted info about the Nikon event on December 1st, has an update in their what&#8217;s new [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2008/11/20/december-1st-it-is.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-9875</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 15:01:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=1532#comment-9875</guid>
		<description>That would probably work well for Nikon.  Kodak does make a lot of sensors.  For those with hig resolution needs, Kodak makes the Hasselblad sensors.  They have a lot of experience in this market.  I haven&#039;t heard of Nikon looking to purchase Kodak have you?  It would probably work well in at least a number of areas for Nikon.  Long term.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That would probably work well for Nikon.  Kodak does make a lot of sensors.  For those with hig resolution needs, Kodak makes the Hasselblad sensors.  They have a lot of experience in this market.  I haven&#8217;t heard of Nikon looking to purchase Kodak have you?  It would probably work well in at least a number of areas for Nikon.  Long term.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: different needs</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2008/11/20/december-1st-it-is.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-9874</link>
		<dc:creator>different needs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 14:53:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=1532#comment-9874</guid>
		<description>As has been mentioned here before, different people do have different needs.  Just because they are not the same as yours does not mean it is not needed.  Why not word your replies like &quot;I don&#039;t need xxx&quot;?  That would probably work best.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As has been mentioned here before, different people do have different needs.  Just because they are not the same as yours does not mean it is not needed.  Why not word your replies like &#8220;I don&#8217;t need xxx&#8221;?  That would probably work best.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rhlpetrus</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2008/11/20/december-1st-it-is.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-9869</link>
		<dc:creator>rhlpetrus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 14:04:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=1532#comment-9869</guid>
		<description>Thanks, I had missed the originals of those images. So jeff-c seems out-of-the-loop on this one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, I had missed the originals of those images. So jeff-c seems out-of-the-loop on this one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rhlpetrus</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2008/11/20/december-1st-it-is.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-9865</link>
		<dc:creator>rhlpetrus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 13:14:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=1532#comment-9865</guid>
		<description>No one will dump their D3s, they&#039;ll get a D3X for the different applications. Pros don&#039;t dump bodies like amateurs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No one will dump their D3s, they&#8217;ll get a D3X for the different applications. Pros don&#8217;t dump bodies like amateurs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rhlpetrus</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2008/11/20/december-1st-it-is.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-9864</link>
		<dc:creator>rhlpetrus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 13:11:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=1532#comment-9864</guid>
		<description>From what I&#039;ve seen in forums around the internet, not many people are selling their D300/D700s to get the 5DII. There&#039;s still movernt from Canon users to D700, in particular events shooters (weddings etc), because of AF and low-light ability.

A D400 will sell exactly at what the D300 started, 1,799USD. The D90 will stay at 999, in Sept it was already the 4rth best selling camera in the US, with less than a month after starting selling (Sept 05).

With the DxO results showing D90 as the best APS-S sensor in the market, you bet its sales will saty high. And I bet Nikon will come soon with a replacement for D40 or D60 with the 12MP sensor, there was a guy who said he had tested such a camera.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From what I&#8217;ve seen in forums around the internet, not many people are selling their D300/D700s to get the 5DII. There&#8217;s still movernt from Canon users to D700, in particular events shooters (weddings etc), because of AF and low-light ability.</p>
<p>A D400 will sell exactly at what the D300 started, 1,799USD. The D90 will stay at 999, in Sept it was already the 4rth best selling camera in the US, with less than a month after starting selling (Sept 05).</p>
<p>With the DxO results showing D90 as the best APS-S sensor in the market, you bet its sales will saty high. And I bet Nikon will come soon with a replacement for D40 or D60 with the 12MP sensor, there was a guy who said he had tested such a camera.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GT</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2008/11/20/december-1st-it-is.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-9861</link>
		<dc:creator>GT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 11:22:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=1532#comment-9861</guid>
		<description>Heh NRAdmin... have a look at the cameras.net.au  site after I sent them an email.... add the new text under the ECS News section.... Its funny.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Heh NRAdmin&#8230; have a look at the cameras.net.au  site after I sent them an email&#8230;. add the new text under the ECS News section&#8230;. Its funny.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fred</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2008/11/20/december-1st-it-is.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-9845</link>
		<dc:creator>Fred</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 06:26:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=1532#comment-9845</guid>
		<description>Awesome!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Awesome!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pablov</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2008/11/20/december-1st-it-is.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-9835</link>
		<dc:creator>Pablov</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 04:41:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=1532#comment-9835</guid>
		<description>guess what ? .... me too  :D

(but HD Video Professionally implemented, otherwise it would be waste of time, cost and unuseful, and also out of sense)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>guess what ? &#8230;. me too  <img src='http://nikonrumors.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>(but HD Video Professionally implemented, otherwise it would be waste of time, cost and unuseful, and also out of sense)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2008/11/20/december-1st-it-is.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-9826</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 02:49:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=1532#comment-9826</guid>
		<description>Really, is the need for a higher MP camera from Nikon really there? With the astounding success for the D3 and D700, seems many pros and advanced people have moved in full force. I really don&#039;t see people complaining much. Myself included, I&#039;m so happy with my D3 I couldn&#039;t see myself really needing more pixels. But my main need is the new 70-200 and maybe a 80-400, and some more primes perhaps.  Will people really dump D3&#039;s and 700 when this higher MP body comes out? Will they become unused relics?  I think not, not is this economy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Really, is the need for a higher MP camera from Nikon really there? With the astounding success for the D3 and D700, seems many pros and advanced people have moved in full force. I really don&#8217;t see people complaining much. Myself included, I&#8217;m so happy with my D3 I couldn&#8217;t see myself really needing more pixels. But my main need is the new 70-200 and maybe a 80-400, and some more primes perhaps.  Will people really dump D3&#8242;s and 700 when this higher MP body comes out? Will they become unused relics?  I think not, not is this economy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: [NR] admin</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2008/11/20/december-1st-it-is.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-9825</link>
		<dc:creator>[NR] admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 02:35:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=1532#comment-9825</guid>
		<description>I have that picture - I labeled it fake: http://nikonrumors.com/2008/11/05/fake-nikon-d400-pictures-body-box.aspx</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have that picture &#8211; I labeled it fake: <a href="http://nikonrumors.com/2008/11/05/fake-nikon-d400-pictures-body-box.aspx" rel="nofollow">http://nikonrumors.com/2008/11/05/fake-nikon-d400-pictures-body-box.aspx</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

